Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Objektdokumentation"
  1. Regimbeau, G.: Acces thématiques aux oeuvres d'art contemporaines dans les banques de données (1998) 0.02
    0.018896578 = product of:
      0.047241446 = sum of:
        0.027468907 = product of:
          0.054937813 = sum of:
            0.054937813 = weight(_text_:problems in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054937813 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.019772539 = product of:
          0.039545078 = sum of:
            0.039545078 = weight(_text_:22 in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039545078 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the possibilities and difficulties encountered when using a thematic index to search contemporary art databanks. Jaconde and Videomuseum, 2 French databanks, are used as examples. the core problems found in the study are the methods and limits of indexing in both systems. A thematic index should be developed that is better adapted to 20th century art, based on the complementary and reciprocal relationship between text and image, and which fully exploits hypertext
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  2. Cataloging cultural objects: . Chicago: American Library Association, 396 p. ISBN 978-0-8389-3564-4 (pbk.) : a guide to describing cultural work and their images (2006) 0.01
    0.008690514 = product of:
      0.04345257 = sum of:
        0.04345257 = product of:
          0.08690514 = sum of:
            0.08690514 = weight(_text_:etc in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08690514 = score(doc=1464,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.43976432 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    LCSH
    Cataloging / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Cataloging of art / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Cataloging of pictures / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Subject
    Cataloging / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Cataloging of art / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Cataloging of pictures / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
  3. Blummer, T.: Objektverwalter : Objektdatenbanken - High Tech Spielzeuge oder Zukunftsmodell? (1997) 0.01
    0.007909016 = product of:
      0.039545078 = sum of:
        0.039545078 = product of:
          0.079090156 = sum of:
            0.079090156 = weight(_text_:22 in 820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079090156 = score(doc=820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=820)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    5. 3.1999 17:40:22
  4. Smiraglia, R.P.: Knowledge sharing and content genealogy : extensing the "works" model as a metaphor for non-documentary artefacts with case studies of Etruscan artefacts (2004) 0.01
    0.0066899606 = product of:
      0.033449803 = sum of:
        0.033449803 = product of:
          0.066899605 = sum of:
            0.066899605 = weight(_text_:etc in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.066899605 = score(doc=2671,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.33853072 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The harmonization and extension of a taxonomy of works from the documentary to the artefactual domain represents an attempt to further knowledge sharing across cultural boundaries. The uses and users of works, both documentary and artefactual, are global-the need for this advance in the organization of knowledge is therefore also global. Works are the formal records of knowledge, the essential records of human accomplishment. Works are a global phenomenon despite potential cultural variations in their creation and instantiation, and the need to organize works for retrieval is likewise a global phenomenon. Artefacts (sculptures, paintings, realia, documents, books, scores, recordings, etc.) are the physical media collected by repositories of culture (libraries, archives, museums, etc.), and are the means by which works are communicated. Works mutate and derive across time and culture in response to their entrance into a canon of cultural meaning. In the present paper, we review the characteristics of documentary works. Then we extend the metaphor from the documentary environment to the artefactual environment. To carry the metaphor from the documentary domain to the artefactual domain we alter the terms of the definition slightly, thus: 1) instantiation is understood as content genealogy. an epistemological architecture of content-genealogy is presented, demonstrating the potential for mutation and derivation of the representations of artefacts. Case studies of Etruscan artefacts from the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology are used to demonstrate the inherence of the work in nondocumentary artefacts. An outline of a meta-theory of "works" is presented that harmonizes the documentary and artefactual domains.
  5. Meyer, U.: Entwurf und Realisierung eines Hypermediasystems : vernetzte Informationen zu ausgewählten Bauplastiken in Hannover (1993) 0.01
    0.005931762 = product of:
      0.02965881 = sum of:
        0.02965881 = product of:
          0.05931762 = sum of:
            0.05931762 = weight(_text_:22 in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05931762 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Technik und Information: Markt, Medien und Methoden. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1992, Technische Universität Berlin, 22.-25.9.1992. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
  6. Dworman, G.O.; Kimbrough, S.O.; Patch, C.: On pattern-directed search of arcives and collections (2000) 0.01
    0.0059131454 = product of:
      0.029565725 = sum of:
        0.029565725 = product of:
          0.05913145 = sum of:
            0.05913145 = weight(_text_:etc in 4289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05913145 = score(doc=4289,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.2992217 = fieldWeight in 4289, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4289)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article begins by presenting and discussing the distinction between record-oriented and pattern-oriented search. Examples or recordoriented (or item-oriented) questions include: "What (or how many, etc.) glass items made prior to 100 A.D. do we have in our collection?" and "How many paintings featuring dogs do we have that were painted during the 19th century, and who painted them?" Standard database systems are well suited to answering such questions, based on the data in, for example, a collections management system. Examples of pattern-oriented questions include: "How does the (apparent) productoin of glass objects vary over time between 400 B.C. and 100 A.D.?" and "What other animals are present in paintings with dogs (painted during the 19th century and in our collection)?" Standard database systems are not well suited to answering these sorts of questions, even though the basic data is properly stored in them. To answer pattern-oriented questions it is the accepted solution to transform the underlying (relational) data to what is called the data cube or cross tabulation form. We discuss how this can be done for non-numeric data, such as are found in museum collections and archives
  7. Schweibenz, W.: Museumsinformation im Internet am Beispiel der Webseiten zweier Kunstmuseen in den USA (1998) 0.00
    0.004943135 = product of:
      0.024715675 = sum of:
        0.024715675 = product of:
          0.04943135 = sum of:
            0.04943135 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04943135 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  8. Social History and Industrial Classification - SHIC : Sozialgeschichtliche und industrielle Klassifikation - Eine thematische Klassifikation für Museumssammlungen (1999) 0.00
    0.0047305166 = product of:
      0.023652581 = sum of:
        0.023652581 = product of:
          0.047305163 = sum of:
            0.047305163 = weight(_text_:etc in 4016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047305163 = score(doc=4016,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.23937736 = fieldWeight in 4016, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4016)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    SHIC liefert eine breite interdisziplinäre Struktur für die Einteilung von Objekten, Photographien, Archivmaterial Tonbandaufnahmen. lnformationsdateien und aller weiterer Formen musealen Materials auf dem Gebiet der menschlichen Geschichte. Sie kann abstrakte Begriffe sowie Materialien von sehr allgemeiner Natur zusätzlich zu genauer definierten Stücken bewältigen. Die Klassifikation hat eine hierarchische Struktur mit Stufen, die vom Allgemeinen bis zum Spezifischen gehen. In der Regel sind die höheren Stufen begrifflich, während die niedrigeren Stufen direkter auf dem Gebiet begründet sind. Objekte Lind Ideen werden entsprechend der Aktivitätssphäre angeordnet, mit der sie Primär verbunden sind. Das Ziel der Klassifikation ist es. Objekte etc. auf ihre Funktion im Kontext rnit anderen Objekten zu beziehen. Der Hammer eines Zimmermannes könnte mit allen weiteren Schlagwerkzeugen, ohne Rücksicht auf die Gewerke and Industriezweige, in denen sie benutzt wurden, klassifiziert werden, aber dies ist nicht das Ziel von SHIC. 2. Der Aufbau von SHIC Es gibt vier primäre Rubriken (Abschnitte), die alle Aktivitäten des Menschen als eines gesellschaftlichen Wesens umfassen: Abschnitt 1: Gesellschaftliches Leben Abschnitt 2: Häusliches und Familiäres Leben Abschnitt 3: Persönliches Leben Abschnitt 4: Arbeitsleben Diese vier Abschnitte werden als von gleicher Bedeutsamkeit betrachtet, aller schließen sich nicht immer wechselseitig ans. Es müssen gelegentlich eigenmächtige Entscheidungen angewendet werden, um die Zuordnung des Materials zu bestimmen. Der Rest der Klassifikation ist als eine Hierarchie mit einer Dezimalstruktur angeordnet, die die Anwendung einer Zahlenkodierung erleichtert. Die nächsten vier Sturen unter den Abschnitten sind in absteigender Ordnung als Abteilung, Klasse Gruppe und Untergruppe bekannt. Jede Rubrik innerhalb dieser Stufen kann in zehn Untergruppen zwischen 0 und 9 unterteilt werden. Von diesen Untergruppen ist die erste (0) immer für allgemeines oder Material unbekannter Herkunft reserviert. und die letzte (9) wird gewöhnlich benutzt, um unbedeutende vermischte Kategorien zusammenzufassen, die nicht anderweitig in die anderen Rubriken eingefügt werden können. Sie können dann, wenn nötig, auf der nächst unteren Stufe getrennt werden.