Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Universale Facettenklassifikationen"
  1. Classification and information control : Papers representing the work of the Classification Research Group during 1960-1968 (1969) 0.03
    0.032706924 = product of:
      0.081767306 = sum of:
        0.02060168 = product of:
          0.04120336 = sum of:
            0.04120336 = weight(_text_:problems in 3402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04120336 = score(doc=3402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.27361554 = fieldWeight in 3402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.061165623 = product of:
          0.12233125 = sum of:
            0.12233125 = weight(_text_:exercises in 3402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12233125 = score(doc=3402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25947425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.47145814 = fieldWeight in 3402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: FAIRTHORNE, R.A.: 'Browsing' schemes and 'specialist' schemes; KYLE, B.R.F.: Lessons learned from experience in drafting the Kyle classification; MILLS, J.: Inadequacies of exing general classification schemes; COATES, E.J.: CRG proposals for a new general classification; TOMLINSON, H.: Notes on initial work for NATO classification; TOMLINSON, H.: Report on work for new general classification scheme; TOMLINSON, H.: Expansion of categories using mining terms; TOMLINSON, H.: Relationship between geology and mining; TOMLINSON, H.: Use of categories for sculpture; TOMLINSON, H.: Expansion of categories using terms from physics; TOMLINSON, H.: The distinction between physical and chemical entities; TOMLINSON, H.: Concepts within politics; TOMLINSON, H.: Problems arising from first GCS papers; AUSTIN, D.: The theory of integrative levels reconsidered as the basis of a general classification; AUSTIN, D.: Demonstration: provisional scheme for naturally occuring entities; AUSTIN, D.: Stages in classing and exercises; AUSTIN, D.: Report to the Library Association Research Committee on the use of the NATO grant
  2. Raju, A.A.N.: Colon Classification: theory and practice : a self instructional manual (2001) 0.01
    0.010194271 = product of:
      0.05097135 = sum of:
        0.05097135 = product of:
          0.1019427 = sum of:
            0.1019427 = weight(_text_:exercises in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1019427 = score(doc=1482,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25947425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.39288178 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Colon Classification (CC) is truly the first freely faceted scheme for library classification devised and propagated by Dr. S.R. Ranganathan. The scheme is being taught in theory and practice to the students in most of the LIS schools in India and abroad also. Many manuals, Guide books and Introductory works have been published on CC in the past. But the present work tread a new path in presenting CC to the student, teaching and professional community. The present work Colon Classification: Theory and Practice; A Self Instructional Manual is the result of author's twenty-five years experience of teaching theory and practice of CC to the students of LIS. For the first ime concerted and systematic attempt has been made to present theory and practice of CC in self-instructional mode, keeping in view the requirements of students learners of Open Universities/ Distance Education Institutions in particular. The other singificant and novel features introduced in this manual are: Presenting the scope of each block consisting certain units bollowed by objectives, introduction, sections, sub-sections, self check exercises, glossary and assignment of each unit. It is hoped that all these features will help the users/readers of this manual to understand and grasp quickly, the intricacies involved in theory and practice of CC(6th Edition). The manual is presented in three blocks and twelve units.
  3. Sukhmaneva, E.G.: Modern development of faceted classification 0.01
    0.009461033 = product of:
      0.047305163 = sum of:
        0.047305163 = product of:
          0.094610326 = sum of:
            0.094610326 = weight(_text_:etc in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094610326 = score(doc=3132,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.47875473 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Brings out the principles of faceted classification and its advantages with regard to multi-aspect indexing. Also considers the contributions of Dr. S.R. Ranganathan, the Classification Research Group (London) and others. The concepts of Fundamental Categories, Rounds and Levels, Integrative Levels, etc. are discussed.
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Why a new universal classification system is needed (2017) 0.01
    0.008278403 = product of:
      0.041392017 = sum of:
        0.041392017 = product of:
          0.082784034 = sum of:
            0.082784034 = weight(_text_:etc in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082784034 = score(doc=3614,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.41891038 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Research history of the last 70 years highlights various systems for contents assessment and retrieval of scientific literature, such as universal classifications, thesauri, ontologies etc., which have followed developments of their own, notwithstanding a general trend towards interoperability, i.e. either to become instruments for cooperation or to widen their scope to encompass neighbouring fields within their framework. In the case of thesauri and ontologies, the endeavour to upgrade them into a universal system was bound to miscarry. This paper purports to indicate ways to gain from past experience and possibly rally material achievements while updating and promoting the ontologically-based faceted Information Coding Classification as a progressive universal system fit for meeting whatever requirements in the fields of information and science at large.
  5. Maltby, A.; Gill, L.: ¬The case for Bliss : modern classification practice and principles in the context of the Bibliographic classification (1979) 0.01
    0.006867227 = product of:
      0.034336135 = sum of:
        0.034336135 = product of:
          0.06867227 = sum of:
            0.06867227 = weight(_text_:problems in 3329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06867227 = score(doc=3329,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.4560259 = fieldWeight in 3329, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3329)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: MALTBY, A.: BC old and new: an appraisal; GILL, L.: Guide to classifying by BC2; GILL, L.: The Tavistock reclassification project; MALTBY, A.: Libraries using BC; numbers', comments and problems
  6. Tennis, J.T.: Never facets alone : the evolving thought and persistent problems in Ranganathan's theories of classification (2017) 0.01
    0.006867227 = product of:
      0.034336135 = sum of:
        0.034336135 = product of:
          0.06867227 = sum of:
            0.06867227 = weight(_text_:problems in 5800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06867227 = score(doc=5800,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.4560259 = fieldWeight in 5800, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5800)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan's theory of classification spans a number of works over a number of decades. And while he was devoted to solving many problems in the practice of librarianship, and is known as the father of library science in India (Garfield, 1984), his work in classification revolves around one central concern. His classification research addressed the problems that arose from introducing new ideas into a scheme for classification, while maintaining a meaningful hierarchical and systematically arranged order of classes. This is because hierarchical and systematically arranged classes are the defining characteristic of useful classification. To lose this order is to through the addition of new classes is to introduce confusion, if not chaos, and to move toward a useless classification - or at least one that requires complete revision. In the following chapter, I outline the stages, and the elements of those stages, in Ranganathan's thought on classification from 1926-1972, as well as posthumous work that continues his agenda. And while facets figure prominently in all of these stages; but for Ranganathan to achieve his goal, he must continually add to this central feature of his theory of classification. I will close this chapter with an outline of persistent problems that represent research fronts for the field. Chief among these are what to do about scheme change and the open question about the rigor of information modeling in light of semantic web developments.
  7. Broughton, V.: Language related problems in the construction of faceted terminologies and their automatic management (2008) 0.01
    0.0059471927 = product of:
      0.029735964 = sum of:
        0.029735964 = product of:
          0.059471928 = sum of:
            0.059471928 = weight(_text_:problems in 2497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059471928 = score(doc=2497,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.39493 = fieldWeight in 2497, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2497)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    The paper describes current work on the generation of a thesaurus format from the schedules of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition (BC2). The practical problems that occur in moving from a concept based approach to a terminological approach cluster around issues of vocabulary control that are not fully addressed in a systematic structure. These difficulties can be exacerbated within domains in the humanities because large numbers of culture specific terms may need to be accommodated in any thesaurus. The ways in which these problems can be resolved within the context of a semi-automated approach to the thesaurus generation have consequences for the management of classification data in the source vocabulary. The way in which the vocabulary is marked up for the purpose of machine manipulation is described, and some of the implications for editorial policy are discussed and examples given. The value of the classification notation as a language independent representation and mapping tool should not be sacrificed in such an exercise.
  8. Dutta, B.: Ranganathan's elucidation of subject in the light of 'Infinity (8)' (2015) 0.01
    0.0059131454 = product of:
      0.029565725 = sum of:
        0.029565725 = product of:
          0.05913145 = sum of:
            0.05913145 = weight(_text_:etc in 2794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05913145 = score(doc=2794,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.2992217 = fieldWeight in 2794, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2794)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews Ranganathan's description of subject from mathematical angle. Ranganathan was highly influenced by Nineteenth Century mathematician George Cantor and he used the concept of infinity in developing an axiomatic interpretation of subject. Majority of library scientists interpreted the concept of subject merely as a term or descriptor or heading to include the same in cataloguing and subject indexing. Some library scientists interpreted subject on the basis of document, i.e. from the angle of the concept of aboutness or epistemological potential of the document etc. Some people explained subject from the viewpoint of social, cultural or socio-cultural process. Attempts were made to describe subject from epistemological viewpoint. But S R Ranganathan was the first to develop an axiomatic concept of subject on its own. He built up an independent idea of subject that is ubiquitously pervasive with human cognition process. To develop the basic foundation of subject, he used the mathematical concepts of infinity and infinitesimal and construed the set of subjects or universe of subjects as continuous infinite universe. The subject may also exist in extremely micro-form, which was termed as spot subject and analogized with point, which is dimensionless having only an existence. The influence of Twentieth Century physicist George Gamow on Ranganathan's thought has also been discussed.
  9. Sukhmaneva, E.G.: ¬The problems of notation and faceted classification 0.01
    0.0054937815 = product of:
      0.027468907 = sum of:
        0.027468907 = product of:
          0.054937813 = sum of:
            0.054937813 = weight(_text_:problems in 3300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054937813 = score(doc=3300,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 3300, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3300)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  10. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.00
    0.004943135 = product of:
      0.024715675 = sum of:
        0.024715675 = product of:
          0.04943135 = sum of:
            0.04943135 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04943135 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
  11. Chatterjee, A.; Choudhury, G.G.: CC7: an evaluation of its development in three planes (1989) 0.00
    0.0048070587 = product of:
      0.024035294 = sum of:
        0.024035294 = product of:
          0.048070587 = sum of:
            0.048070587 = weight(_text_:problems in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048070587 = score(doc=517,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the new edition of CC, which has incorporated most of the developments in the idea plane and notational plane reported in the literature during the previous 20 years, making it a 'freely faceted' scheme. However, some errors have crept in which are bound to create problems for the users. Both these aspects have been critically examined here drawing comparison, where necessary, with the previous edition of the scheme. Reveals the enormously improved capabilities of the scheme in meeting the challenge posed by the ever expanding horizon of the universe of subjects as also the inconsistencies and lack of cohesion in various schedules
  12. Star, S.L.: Grounded classification : grounded theory and faceted classification (1998) 0.00
    0.0048070587 = product of:
      0.024035294 = sum of:
        0.024035294 = product of:
          0.048070587 = sum of:
            0.048070587 = weight(_text_:problems in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048070587 = score(doc=851,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Artikel in einem Themenheft "How Classifications Work: Problems and Challenges in an Electronic Age"
  13. Broughton, V.: Finding Bliss on the Web : some problems of representing faceted terminologies in digital environments 0.00
    0.0041203364 = product of:
      0.02060168 = sum of:
        0.02060168 = product of:
          0.04120336 = sum of:
            0.04120336 = weight(_text_:problems in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04120336 = score(doc=3532,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.27361554 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  14. Johnson, E.H.: S R Ranganathan in the Internet age (2019) 0.00
    0.0041203364 = product of:
      0.02060168 = sum of:
        0.02060168 = product of:
          0.04120336 = sum of:
            0.04120336 = weight(_text_:problems in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04120336 = score(doc=5406,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.27361554 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    S R Ranganathan's ideas have influenced library classification since the inception of his Colon Classification in 1933. His address at Elsinore, "Library Classification Through a Century", was his grand vision of the century of progress in classification from 1876 to 1975, and looked to the future of faceted classification as the means to provide a cohesive system to organize the world's information. Fifty years later, the internet and its achievements, social ecology, and consequences present a far more complicated picture, with the library as he knew it as a very small part and the problems that he confronted now greatly exacerbated. The systematic nature of Ranganathan's canons, principles, postulates, and devices suggest that modern semantic algorithms could guide automatic subject tagging. The vision presented here is one of internet-wide faceted classification and retrieval, implemented as open, distributed facets providing unified faceted searching across all web sites.
  15. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.00
    0.003954508 = product of:
      0.019772539 = sum of:
        0.019772539 = product of:
          0.039545078 = sum of:
            0.039545078 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039545078 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  16. Tennis, J.T.: Facets and fugit tempus : considering time's effect on faceted classification schemes (2012) 0.00
    0.003954508 = product of:
      0.019772539 = sum of:
        0.019772539 = product of:
          0.039545078 = sum of:
            0.039545078 = weight(_text_:22 in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039545078 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    2. 6.2013 18:33:22
  17. Perugini, S.: Supporting multiple paths to objects in information hierarchies : faceted classification, faceted search, and symbolic links (2010) 0.00
    0.0034601947 = product of:
      0.017300973 = sum of:
        0.017300973 = product of:
          0.034601945 = sum of:
            0.034601945 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034601945 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43
  18. Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012) 0.00
    0.0034601947 = product of:
      0.017300973 = sum of:
        0.017300973 = product of:
          0.034601945 = sum of:
            0.034601945 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034601945 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:31:25
  19. Austin, D.: Prospects for a new general classification (1969) 0.00
    0.0034336136 = product of:
      0.017168067 = sum of:
        0.017168067 = product of:
          0.034336135 = sum of:
            0.034336135 = weight(_text_:problems in 1519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034336135 = score(doc=1519,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.22801295 = fieldWeight in 1519, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1519)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    In traditional classification schemes, the universe of knowledge is brokeii down into self- contained disciplines which are further analysed to the point at which a particular concept is located. This leads to problems of: (a) currency: keeping the scheme in line with new discoveries. (b) hospitality: allowing room for insertion of new subjects (c) cross-classification: a concept may be considered in such a way that it fits as logically into one discipline as another. Machine retrieval is also hampered by the fact that any individual concept is notated differently, depending on where in the scheme it appears. The approach now considered is from an organized universe of concepts, every concept being set down only once in an appropriate vocabulary, where it acquires the notation which identifies it wherever it is used. It has been found that all the concepts present in any compound subject can be handled as though they belong to one of two basic concept types, being either Entities or Attributes. In classing, these concepts are identified, and notation is selected from appropriate schedules. Subjects are then built according to formal rules, the final class number incorporating operators which convey the fundamental relationships between concepts. From this viewpoint, the Rules and Operators of the proposed system can be seen as the grammar of an IR language, and the schedules of Entities and Attributes as its vocabulary.
  20. Dimensions of knowledge : facets for knowledge organization (2017) 0.00
    0.0034336136 = product of:
      0.017168067 = sum of:
        0.017168067 = product of:
          0.034336135 = sum of:
            0.034336135 = weight(_text_:problems in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034336135 = score(doc=4154,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.22801295 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Richard P. Smiraglia: A Brief Introduction to Facets in Knowledge Organization / Kathryn La Barre: Interrogating Facet Theory: Decolonizing Knowledge Organization / Joseph T. Tennis: Never Facets Alone: The Evolving Thought and Persistent Problems in Ranganathan's Theories of Classification / M. P. Satija and Dong-Guen Oh: The DDC and the Knowledge Categories: Dewey did Faceting without Knowing It / Claudio Gnoli: Classifying Phenomena Part 3: Facets / Rick Szostak: Facet Analysis Without Facet Indicators / Elizabeth Milonas: An Examination of Facets within Search Engine Result Pages / Richard P. Smiraglia: Facets for Clustering and Disambiguation: The Domain Discourse of Facets in Knowledge Organization