Search (31 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004) 0.18
    0.17685798 = product of:
      0.30950144 = sum of:
        0.030457148 = weight(_text_:libraries in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030457148 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
        0.023177713 = weight(_text_:with in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023177713 = score(doc=135,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.22591603 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
        0.09457618 = weight(_text_:faculty in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09457618 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.38374713 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
        0.1612904 = sum of:
          0.12668101 = weight(_text_:curriculum in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12668101 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.28523415 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042574327 = queryNorm
              0.4441299 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
          0.0346094 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0346094 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042574327 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    The reference lists of forty-three education dissertations on curriculum and instruction completed at the University of Minnesota during the calendar years 2000-2002 were analyzed to inform collection development. As one measure of use of the academic library collection, the citation analysis yielded data to guide journal selection, retention, and cancellation decisions. The project aimed to ensure that the most frequently cited journals were retained on subscription. The serial monograph ratio for citation also was evaluated in comparison with other studies and explored in the context of funding ratios. Results of citation studies can provide a basis for liaison conversations with faculty in addition to guiding selection decisions. This research project can serve as a model for similar projects in other libraries that look at literature in education as well as other fields.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Borgman, C.L.; Smart, L.J.; Millwood, K.A.; Finley, J.R.; Champeny, L.; Gilliland, A.J.; Leazer, G.H.: Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research : implications for the design of digital libraries (2005) 0.13
    0.13136502 = product of:
      0.22988877 = sum of:
        0.04060953 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04060953 = score(doc=3231,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
        0.010926079 = weight(_text_:with in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010926079 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.10649783 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
        0.1668167 = weight(_text_:faculty in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1668167 = score(doc=3231,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.6768663 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
        0.011536467 = product of:
          0.023072934 = sum of:
            0.023072934 = weight(_text_:22 in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023072934 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    ADEPT is a 5-year project whose goals are to develop, deploy, and evaluate inquiry learning capabilities for the Alexandria Digital Library, an extant digital library of primary sources in geography. We interviewed nine geography faculty members who teach undergraduate courses about their information seeking for research and teaching and their use of information resources in teaching. These data were supplemented by interviews with four faculty members from another ADEPT study about the nature of knowledge in geography. Among our key findings are that geography faculty are more likely to encounter useful teaching resources while seeking research resources than vice versa, although the influence goes in both directions. Their greatest information needs are for research data, maps, and images. They desire better searching by concept or theme, in addition to searching by location and place name. They make extensive use of their own research resources in their teaching. Among the implications for functionality and architecture of geographic digital libraries for educational use are that personal digital libraries are essential, because individual faculty members have personalized approaches to selecting, collecting, and organizing teaching resources. Digital library services for research and teaching should include the ability to import content from common office software and to store content in standard formats that can be exported to other applications. Digital library services can facilitate sharing among faculty but cannot overcome barriers such as intellectual property rights, access to proprietary research data, or the desire of individuals to maintain control over their own resources. Faculty use of primary and secondary resources needs to be better understood if we are to design successful digital libraries for research and teaching.
    Date
    3. 6.2005 20:40:22
  3. Creth, S.D.: ¬The information arcade : playground for the mind (1994) 0.12
    0.12184125 = product of:
      0.42644435 = sum of:
        0.15762697 = weight(_text_:faculty in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15762697 = score(doc=911,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.6395786 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
        0.26881737 = sum of:
          0.21113503 = weight(_text_:curriculum in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21113503 = score(doc=911,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.28523415 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042574327 = queryNorm
              0.7402165 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
          0.057682335 = weight(_text_:22 in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057682335 = score(doc=911,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042574327 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The information arcade at the main library, University of Iowa encourage and facilitates the integration of electronic information resources into the academic curriculum and into research activities. It is the result of a collaboration between librarians, faculty and computing staff. Describes how the service was set up and the services it provides
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 20(1994) no.1, S.22-23
  4. Pinto, M.: Assessing disciplinary differences in faculty perceptions of information literacy competencies (2016) 0.09
    0.08799549 = product of:
      0.20532282 = sum of:
        0.015451809 = weight(_text_:with in 2963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015451809 = score(doc=2963,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.15061069 = fieldWeight in 2963, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2963)
        0.17833455 = weight(_text_:faculty in 2963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17833455 = score(doc=2963,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.7236005 = fieldWeight in 2963, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2963)
        0.011536467 = product of:
          0.023072934 = sum of:
            0.023072934 = weight(_text_:22 in 2963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023072934 = score(doc=2963,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2963, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2963)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Uncovering faculty members' conceptions of Information Literacy (IL), as well as exploring their perceptions with regard to the importance given to a previously defined set of core IL competences grouped into four categories: searching, evaluation, processing and communication and dissemination. Ascertaining the possible differences among the five knowledge branches (arts and humanities, sciences, social and legal sciences, health sciences, and technical disciplines); and understanding the importance granted to a set of learning improvement initiatives by the faculty. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The survey was completed by a set of faculty members from the University of Granada (Spain). Data were collected using the IL-HUMASS survey. The research is based on subjective data, first approached from a descriptive point of view. Later, data correlation, analysis and non-parametric tests were used with the goal of finding significant differences of faculty perceptions among the relevant academic areas. Findings - Results suggest that more than half of the surveyed faculty have what the authors define as an Academic Concept of IL. The IL categories of communica\tion and dissemination and searching were graded in significance by the staff as being "very important," while those of evaluation and processing were assigned a slightly lesser rating of "important." Results suggest that IL awareness falls into two broad groups differentiated by subject discipline: those from health sciences, social and legal sciences and arts and humanities representing the first group, and sciences and technical disciplines the other. Research limitations/implications - This approach address the subjective status of faculty concepts in a single university, but also in all knowledge branches. Future research is needed. Originality/value - This is one of the few papers regarding faculty perceptions of IL.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  5. Tompkins, P.; Perry, S.; Lippincott, J.K.: New learning communities : collaboration, networking, and information literacy (1998) 0.08
    0.080731645 = product of:
      0.18837383 = sum of:
        0.030457148 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030457148 = score(doc=3334,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 3334, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3334)
        0.09457618 = weight(_text_:faculty in 3334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09457618 = score(doc=3334,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.38374713 = fieldWeight in 3334, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3334)
        0.06334051 = product of:
          0.12668101 = sum of:
            0.12668101 = weight(_text_:curriculum in 3334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12668101 = score(doc=3334,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28523415 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.4441299 = fieldWeight in 3334, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3334)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The Coalition for Networked Information's (CNI) New Learning Communities Program was developed to support pioneers in education who use networks and networked information to support student centred teaching and learning. The programme focuses on 3 trends: the increased availability of computer networks in higher education, specifically the Internet; the need for students to develop information literacy skills as part of the curriculum; and the increasing importance of collaboration in both teaching and learning and the technological society. The Coalition for Networked Information brings together pioneer teams from higher education institutions and these teams: which can include faculty, librarians, information technologists, students and instructional designers; have developed new courses that use networking technologies and place emphasis on networked information resources. Through a series of workshops and conferences, a videotape and a Web site; CNI supported the pioneer temas and disseminated the lessons learned from their projects to others in the higher education community
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 17(1998) no.2, S.100-106
  6. Frâncu, V.; Popescu, T.: Twenty years after : scientific research in the field of knowledge organization in Romania (1993-2012) (2014) 0.08
    0.07881703 = product of:
      0.1379298 = sum of:
        0.025380958 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025380958 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.18147534 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
        0.019314762 = weight(_text_:with in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019314762 = score(doc=4692,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.18826336 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
        0.078813486 = weight(_text_:faculty in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078813486 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.3197893 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
        0.014420584 = product of:
          0.028841168 = sum of:
            0.028841168 = weight(_text_:22 in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028841168 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    The main point that we want to state in this study is that research in the field of knowledge organization in Romania over the last twenty years is unequally and unjustly distributed among different professional categories ranging from library and information science faculty members, library professionals, software tools developers and independent researchers. The special condition of library and information science functioning as a university department in Romania with an interruption of 20 years (1970-1990) affected the overall situation of scientific research in the specific fields associated with this discipline. Our study has three stages: data collection, data recording and data interpretation. The primary outcomes of the scientific research activities considered are publications (books, book chapters and journal articles). Given this, our interest will be directed towards analyzing to what extent research and writing for publication have an impact on the evolution of Romanian libraries over this twenty years span.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  7. Chen, K.-n.; Lin, P.-c.: Information literacy in university library user education (2011) 0.08
    0.07624305 = product of:
      0.17790045 = sum of:
        0.013657599 = weight(_text_:with in 4538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013657599 = score(doc=4538,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.1331223 = fieldWeight in 4538, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4538)
        0.11145909 = weight(_text_:faculty in 4538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11145909 = score(doc=4538,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.4522503 = fieldWeight in 4538, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4538)
        0.052783757 = product of:
          0.105567515 = sum of:
            0.105567515 = weight(_text_:curriculum in 4538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.105567515 = score(doc=4538,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28523415 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.37010825 = fieldWeight in 4538, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4538)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The aim of this paper is to determine the essential features of information literacy; what role it should play in university library user education; and how programs can be best implemented. Design/methodology/approach - The researchers systemically surveyed and reviewed publications related to information literacy and library user education. Findings - It was found that a well-designed information literacy program benefits the library and its staff, faculty, and students; librarians should play a leading role in the design and operation of programs, but collaboration with faculty, IT professionals and students is essential; programs should be embedded in the curriculum, be largely cooperative, and be problem-based; evaluation and assessment are essential components; emphasis should be placed on first-year students; and, ideally, the librarians will turn into educators and the library will become a learning center combining learning, research and technology. Research limitations/implications - This paper reflects the opinions of the researchers and the authors of the reviewed literature who have insights into the issues related to information literacy and library user education. These opinions present useful guidelines for both librarian and teacher practitioners. Originality/value - This paper provides a point of view on the relationship between information literacy and library user education in the six themes described above.
  8. Benedetti, S.; Wu, A.; Hayes, S.: Art in a medium-sized university library : acquisition, cataloging, and access issues: challenges and opportunities (2004) 0.08
    0.07558437 = product of:
      0.13227263 = sum of:
        0.025380958 = weight(_text_:libraries in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025380958 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.18147534 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
        0.013657599 = weight(_text_:with in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013657599 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.1331223 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
        0.078813486 = weight(_text_:faculty in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078813486 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.3197893 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
        0.014420584 = product of:
          0.028841168 = sum of:
            0.028841168 = weight(_text_:22 in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028841168 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    In 2001, the William Madison Randall Library at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington found itself with a substantial collection of art, acquired over time through gifts and purchases to augment existing collections of faculty scholarship and regional materials. What had been tracked in a simple administrative database had become a collection deserving improved access. This paper outlines the acquisition, cataloging, and access issues that shaped the evolution of the art works from their status first as decoration on the library walls, then as fully cataloged library materials in the online catalog, then as digitized images available in a searchable Web tour. Explored are the reasons behind the collection development push and the methods of acquisition, how and why the collection outgrew its original inventory database, and why the university librarian turned to catalog librarians for solutions to improve access by utilizing and linking data existing in separate databases. The paper offers implications and lessons learned that could assist other libraries that may face such a challenge, as well as a literature review of the issues faced in art documentation. Randall Library's experience illustrates how a decision to invest in cataloging an unusual medium can go beyond the basics of author and subject access to create an unusually valuable foundation for promotional, curricular and Web-based ventures.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Rankin, K.L.: Video cataloguing : reducing backlogs (1996) 0.07
    0.07116902 = product of:
      0.16606104 = sum of:
        0.035533343 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035533343 = score(doc=6934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 6934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6934)
        0.110338874 = weight(_text_:faculty in 6934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.110338874 = score(doc=6934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.44770497 = fieldWeight in 6934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6934)
        0.020188818 = product of:
          0.040377636 = sum of:
            0.040377636 = weight(_text_:22 in 6934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040377636 = score(doc=6934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6934)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    At the University of Nevada, Las Vergas (UNLV), increases in student population and the creation of new academic programmes resulted in the recruitment of additional teaching faculty. This growth increased acquisitions budgets and collections. Library staff then faced a cataloguing backlog of hundreds of video titles. Describes how the library solved the backlog problem by implementing 'cataloguing shortcuts'. Outlines the previous cataloguing process and the elements which were streamlined by implementing shortcuts. The number of videos catalogued went from 604 in the 1991/2 academic year (prior to the shortcuts) to 804 titles in 1992/3 and 883 titles in 1993/4. The Special Formats Cataloguer now has time to work on formats other than video
    Date
    27.11.1995 17:07:22
    Source
    College and undergraduate libraries. 3(1996) no.1, S.69-78
  10. Loesch, M.F.; Deyrup, M.M.: Cataloging the curriculum library : new procedures for non-traditional formats (2002) 0.07
    0.070153594 = product of:
      0.24553758 = sum of:
        0.12610157 = weight(_text_:faculty in 5472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12610157 = score(doc=5472,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.51166284 = fieldWeight in 5472, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5472)
        0.11943601 = product of:
          0.23887202 = sum of:
            0.23887202 = weight(_text_:curriculum in 5472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23887202 = score(doc=5472,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.28523415 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.8374594 = fieldWeight in 5472, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5472)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    This report examines some of the technical problems of integrating a curriculum resource center into an academic library setting. Procedures for conducting an inventory of existing materials, processing multi-media and other non-print formats, and displaying and retrieving materials within a Web OPAC are discussed. An analysis of how cataloging staff can use the new ACRL standards to reshape how students and faculty access information resources is provided.
  11. Speier, C.; Palmer, J.; Wren, D.; Hahn, S.: Faculty perceptions of electronic journals as scholarly communication : a question of prestige and legitimacy (1999) 0.07
    0.06899636 = product of:
      0.24148726 = sum of:
        0.21841434 = weight(_text_:faculty in 3674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21841434 = score(doc=3674,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.88622606 = fieldWeight in 3674, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3674)
        0.023072934 = product of:
          0.046145868 = sum of:
            0.046145868 = weight(_text_:22 in 3674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046145868 = score(doc=3674,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3674, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3674)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Recent years have seen a proliferation of electronic journals across academic disciplines. Electronic journals offer many advantages to multiple constituencies, however, their acceptance by faculty and university promotion and tenure committees is unclear. This research examines perceptions of faculty and promotion and tenure committee members regarding the perceived prestige and legitimacy of electronic journals as an outlet for scholarly communication
    Date
    22. 5.1999 14:43:47
  12. Boon, S.; Johnston, B.; Webber, S.: ¬A phenomenographic study of English faculty's conceptions of information literacy (2007) 0.06
    0.064676575 = product of:
      0.150912 = sum of:
        0.019314762 = weight(_text_:with in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019314762 = score(doc=829,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.18826336 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
        0.078813486 = weight(_text_:faculty in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078813486 = score(doc=829,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.3197893 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
        0.052783757 = product of:
          0.105567515 = sum of:
            0.105567515 = weight(_text_:curriculum in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.105567515 = score(doc=829,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28523415 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.37010825 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this research is to identify UK English academics' conceptions of information literacy and compare those conceptions with current information literacy standards and frameworks. Design/methodology/approach - Three year AHRB-funded study involving 80 academics interviewed throughout the UK and using the phenomenographic research method to discover variation in experience leading towards identification of qualitatively different conceptions of information literacy. Conceptions are then reviewed in light of previous research and current librarian-generated frameworks and standards. Findings - The findings identify UK English academics' conceptions of information literacy and show them to be both similar to and significantly different from conceptions described in previous research and librarian-generated frameworks and standards. Research limitations/implications - The research focuses on creating a conceptual snapshot-in-time for the 20 English academics taking part. The research implies that disciplinary differences in conception of information literacy are significant and suggests further research to assess disciplinary conceptual differences. Practical implications - Librarians working with English faculty on information literacy need to be aware of differences in conception between themselves and academics to work effectively. The paper also highlights the significance of information literacy in English faculty's teaching and research practices and this relevance suggests that information literacy should be integrated into course and curriculum design. Originality/value - The paper fills a major gap in literature on information literacy by focussing on conceptions of lecturers, thereby counterbalancing the abundance of work produced by librarians. The paper illustrates the complexity of English academics' conceptions of information literacy and informs academics' use and understanding of information literacy.
  13. Albert, E.: Vpliv knjiznicarjevega vedenja na uspesnost referencne sluzbe v Slovenskih splosnoizobrazevalnih knjiznicah (1998) 0.06
    0.061002016 = product of:
      0.14233804 = sum of:
        0.030457148 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030457148 = score(doc=3049,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 3049, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3049)
        0.09457618 = weight(_text_:faculty in 3049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09457618 = score(doc=3049,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.38374713 = fieldWeight in 3049, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3049)
        0.0173047 = product of:
          0.0346094 = sum of:
            0.0346094 = weight(_text_:22 in 3049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0346094 = score(doc=3049,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3049, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3049)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The authors are students of librarianship in the faculty of philosophy at Ljubljana University, Slovenia. Users were asked to describe their library visits and summarise what was most helpful and least helpful about the service received. In the list of best practices, the most frequent feature was that the staff member really listened (58,9%). Other aspects of most helpful behaviour (e.g. using different body language, showing genuine interest, willingness to investigate further) occured in less than 40% of the interviews. 3 features of least helpful behaviour were listed in more than 30% of the cases; not asking the user anything about the question and making no effort to determine the specific need, not telling the user what he/she was doing, making no effort to determine whether the user had found the relevant information
    Date
    22. 2.1999 19:29:43
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: The influence of the librarian's behaviour on the effectiveness of reference services in Slovene public libraries
  14. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.06
    0.061002016 = product of:
      0.14233804 = sum of:
        0.030457148 = weight(_text_:libraries in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030457148 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
        0.09457618 = weight(_text_:faculty in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09457618 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.38374713 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
        0.0173047 = product of:
          0.0346094 = sum of:
            0.0346094 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0346094 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/bates/articles/Searching_Bradford-m020430.html.
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    Imprint
    Greenwood Village, Co. : Libraries Unlimited
  15. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.06
    0.057882257 = product of:
      0.1350586 = sum of:
        0.023177713 = weight(_text_:with in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023177713 = score(doc=994,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.22591603 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
        0.09457618 = weight(_text_:faculty in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09457618 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.38374713 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
        0.0173047 = product of:
          0.0346094 = sum of:
            0.0346094 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0346094 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Citation rates are becoming increasingly important in judging the research quality of journals, institutions and departments, and individual faculty. This paper looks at the pattern of citations across different management science journals and over time. A stochastic model is proposed which views the generating mechanism of citations as a gamma mixture of Poisson processes generating overall a negative binomial distribution. This is tested empirically with a large sample of papers published in 1990 from six management science journals and found to fit well. The model is extended to include obsolescence, i.e., that the citation rate for a paper varies over its cited lifetime. This leads to the additional citations distribution which shows that future citations are a linear function of past citations with a time-dependent and decreasing slope. This is also verified empirically in a way that allows different obsolescence functions to be fitted to the data. Conclusions concerning the predictability of future citations, and future research in this area are discussed.
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  16. Ashoor, M.S.; Kanamugire, A.B.: Responding to researchers' and faculty use patterns and perceptions of CD-ROM services (1996) 0.06
    0.057544995 = product of:
      0.20140748 = sum of:
        0.17833455 = weight(_text_:faculty in 3723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17833455 = score(doc=3723,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.7236005 = fieldWeight in 3723, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3723)
        0.023072934 = product of:
          0.046145868 = sum of:
            0.046145868 = weight(_text_:22 in 3723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046145868 = score(doc=3723,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3723, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3723)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a brief report of a study of the use patterns and perception of faculty and researchers regarding CD-ROM services at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals Library, Saudi Arabia. The main objectives were: to ascertain use patterns and perceptions of CD-ROM services; and to elicit comments which would be used in developing a planning strategy to expand and enhance CD-ROM services
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:10:24
  17. Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008) 0.05
    0.054972857 = product of:
      0.12827 = sum of:
        0.016389119 = weight(_text_:with in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016389119 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.15974675 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
        0.09457618 = weight(_text_:faculty in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09457618 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.38374713 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
        0.0173047 = product of:
          0.0346094 = sum of:
            0.0346094 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0346094 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologies improve IR systems regarding its retrieval and presentation of information, which make the task of finding information more effective, efficient, and interactive. In this paper we argue that ontologies also greatly improve the engineering of such systems. We created a framework that uses ontology to drive the process of engineering an IR system. We developed a prototype that shows how a domain specialist without knowledge in the IR field can build an IR system with interactive components. The resulting system provides support for users not only to find their information needs but also to extend their state of knowledge. This way, our approach to ontology-enabled information retrieval addresses both the engineering aspect described here and also the usability aspect described elsewhere.
    Date
    28.11.2016 12:43:22
    Source
    http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/f/u/fuf1/hermeneus/Hermeneus_architecture.pdf
  18. Saye, J.D.: Where are we and how did we get here? : place of cataloging in the library and information curriculum: causes and consequences (2002) 0.05
    0.0526389 = product of:
      0.18423614 = sum of:
        0.110338874 = weight(_text_:faculty in 5447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.110338874 = score(doc=5447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.44770497 = fieldWeight in 5447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5447)
        0.073897265 = product of:
          0.14779453 = sum of:
            0.14779453 = weight(_text_:curriculum in 5447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14779453 = score(doc=5447,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28523415 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.5181516 = fieldWeight in 5447, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5447)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Explores factors that have influenced library and information science education over the past two decades. Emphasis is placed on cataloging instruction and particularly cataloging as a required course. Identifies the introduction of new areas of study, corresponding curricular changes, and the nature of LIS faculty as influencing the role of cataloging in the professional education of librarians. An analysis is provided of the changing perception of the importance of cataloging in professional library education programs.
  19. Rha, E.Y.; Belkin, N.: Exploring social aspects of task perception using cognitive sociology : a social cognitive perspective (2020) 0.05
    0.04823521 = product of:
      0.11254883 = sum of:
        0.019314762 = weight(_text_:with in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019314762 = score(doc=5973,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.18826336 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
        0.078813486 = weight(_text_:faculty in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078813486 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.3197893 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
        0.014420584 = product of:
          0.028841168 = sum of:
            0.028841168 = weight(_text_:22 in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028841168 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore effects of individuals' social context on their perception of a task, for better understanding of social aspects of task-based information seeking behavior. Design/methodology/approach This study took a qualitative case approach and conducted semi-structured one-on-one interviews with 12 participants. A cross-context comparative approach was chosen to identify effects of the social contexts on individuals. For comparative analysis, the research population was tenured faculty members in two different disciplines, natural sciences and humanities. The interview data were analyzed and coded using NVivo12 through an open coding process. Findings The results demonstrate that the same task type is differently perceived by individuals in different social contexts. Reasons for the different perceptions in the different contexts are associated with social factors of the disciplines, specifically social norms and practices. Originality/value This study uses a novel theoretical framework, cognitive sociology, to examine social aspects of human perception in relation to task-based information seeking behavior, which has been little understood theoretically and empirically in the field of information science.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  20. Hemmig, W.S.: ¬The information-seeking behavior of visual artists : a literature review (2008) 0.05
    0.045810714 = product of:
      0.10689167 = sum of:
        0.013657599 = weight(_text_:with in 1894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013657599 = score(doc=1894,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.1331223 = fieldWeight in 1894, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1894)
        0.078813486 = weight(_text_:faculty in 1894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078813486 = score(doc=1894,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.3197893 = fieldWeight in 1894, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1894)
        0.014420584 = product of:
          0.028841168 = sum of:
            0.028841168 = weight(_text_:22 in 1894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028841168 = score(doc=1894,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1894, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1894)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the literature on the information behavior of practicing visual artists to determine if a consistent model emerges and what further research is necessary. Design/methodology/approach - Works dealing with the information needs and uses relevant to the creative activities of visual artists are discussed in the paper. These works are assessed for their contributions toward understanding of the specific information behaviors of practicing artists. Findings - The results show that a consistent model of artists' information behavior emerges. However, nearly all of the literature focuses on art students, academic art faculty, or librarians, and so any claim that practicing artists fit the model is largely unsupported by research. There have been no published studies of communities of practicing visual artists. The implications of defining artists as communities of practice are discussed. Research limitations/implications - Research is proposed that studies the information behavior of communities of practicing visual artists in order to confirm or amend the existing model. Practical implications - Practitioners will have their attention drawn to an underserved user population whose information needs and behaviors have not been directly targeted for research. They will recognize the need for study of their own artist communities and the development of services for them. Originality/value - This paper directs the discussion of artists' information behavior away from the art-library-specific literature, where it has largely resided, as a means of adjusting the focus of research onto the largely unstudied and underserved communities of practicing artists.
    Date
    7. 6.2008 12:22:23