Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Lancaster, F.W."
  1. Lancaster, F.W.: Libraries in the year 2001 (1993) 0.15
    0.14710607 = product of:
      0.22065909 = sum of:
        0.16725978 = weight(_text_:specialist in 7599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16725978 = score(doc=7599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.51558185 = fieldWeight in 7599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7599)
        0.053399306 = product of:
          0.10679861 = sum of:
            0.10679861 = weight(_text_:librarians in 7599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10679861 = score(doc=7599,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.48993918 = fieldWeight in 7599, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the trend away from a paper based society and towards an electronic society: with the advent of computers, electronic mail, computer conferencing, electronic invisible colleges, and the application of computers to libraries and information networks, and to publishing, with the production of electronic media. Forecasts the advent of the electronic library and the electronic librarian, the decline in the use of present day libraries, technical and library services, and the enhanced and extended role of librarians in the new situation. Predicts the eventual demise of the traditional library with the exception of non research libraries but the enhanced value of the librarians as an information specialist
  2. Lancaster, F.W.: Libraries and librarians in an age of electronics (1982) 0.04
    0.035960965 = product of:
      0.10788289 = sum of:
        0.10788289 = product of:
          0.21576577 = sum of:
            0.21576577 = weight(_text_:librarians in 6184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21576577 = score(doc=6184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.9898266 = fieldWeight in 6184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6184)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  3. Elzy, C.; Nourie, A.; Lancaster, F.W.; Joseph, K.M.: Evaluating reference service in a large academic library (1991) 0.03
    0.025172673 = product of:
      0.07551802 = sum of:
        0.07551802 = product of:
          0.15103604 = sum of:
            0.15103604 = weight(_text_:librarians in 4015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15103604 = score(doc=4015,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.6928786 = fieldWeight in 4015, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4015)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports an unobtrusive study of the ability of professional librarians to deal with factual questions conducted at the Milner Library, Illinois State University. Standards were recruited to pose questions for which answers were known, to 19 librarians in 5 departments. In all, 190 test incidents (10 questions for each of the 19 librarians) were used. Librarians were evaluated on the accuracy of the responses given and on their responsiveness and helpfulness, as judged by the student proxies. Describes the methods used in the study, including the accuracy and attitude scales developed, presents the major results, and makes suggestions on the follow-up action that seems appropriate after a study of this kind has been performed
  4. Lancaster, F.W.: Librarians, technology and mediocrity (1993) 0.02
    0.020342594 = product of:
      0.06102778 = sum of:
        0.06102778 = product of:
          0.12205556 = sum of:
            0.12205556 = weight(_text_:librarians in 7006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12205556 = score(doc=7006,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.5599305 = fieldWeight in 7006, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7006)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Two years ago the author gave a keynote talk at the Essen Symposium that suggested that technology has lulled librarians into a false sense of security and that there is no real evidence that the increasing use of technology has improved library services at all. This talk carries this theme one stage further, suggesting that technology may actually encourage mediocrity in library and information services
  5. Lancaster, F.W.: Electronic publishing (1989) 0.02
    0.017980482 = product of:
      0.053941444 = sum of:
        0.053941444 = product of:
          0.10788289 = sum of:
            0.10788289 = weight(_text_:librarians in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10788289 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.4949133 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Contribution to an issue on the impact of technological change on libraries and ways in which librarians are applying technology to their collections, services to users and the management of their libraries. Traces the evolution of electronic publishing from the early 60s to the present. Pays particular attention to computer conferencing, and hypermedia.
  6. Lancaster, F.W.; Connell, T.H.; Bishop, N.; McCowan, S.: Identifying barriers to effective subject access in library catalogs (1991) 0.01
    0.012586337 = product of:
      0.03775901 = sum of:
        0.03775901 = product of:
          0.07551802 = sum of:
            0.07551802 = weight(_text_:librarians in 2259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07551802 = score(doc=2259,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.3464393 = fieldWeight in 2259, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2259)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    51 subject searches were performed in an online catalog containing about 4,5 million records. Their success was judges in terms of lists of items, known to be relevant to the various topics, compiled by subject specialists (faculty members or authors of articles in specialized encyclopedias). Many of the items known to be relevant were not retrieved, even in very broad searches that sometimes retrieved several hundred records, and very little could be done to make them retrievable within the constraints of present cataloging practice. Librarians should recognize that library catalogs, as now implemented, offer only the most primitive of subject access and should seek to develop different types of subject access tools. - Vgl auch Letter (B.H. Weinberg) in: LTRS 36(1992) S.123-124.
  7. Lancaster, F.W.: Networked electronic publishing of the results of scholarly research (1995) 0.01
    0.012586337 = product of:
      0.03775901 = sum of:
        0.03775901 = product of:
          0.07551802 = sum of:
            0.07551802 = weight(_text_:librarians in 1675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07551802 = score(doc=1675,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.3464393 = fieldWeight in 1675, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1675)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information superhighway: the role of librarians, information scientists, and intermediaries. Festschrift in honor of Frederick Wilfred Lancaster. 17th International Essen Symposium, 24.-27.10.1994. Ed. A.H. Helal et al
  8. Lancaster, F.W.: Searching databases on CD-ROM : comparison of the results of end-user searching with results from two modes of searching by skilled intermediaries (1994) 0.01
    0.01078829 = product of:
      0.032364868 = sum of:
        0.032364868 = product of:
          0.064729735 = sum of:
            0.064729735 = weight(_text_:librarians in 8372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064729735 = score(doc=8372,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.296948 = fieldWeight in 8372, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8372)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The results of 35 searches performed by users (end users) of an academic library (Illinois Stae University, Milner Library) in the ERIC databases on CD-ROM were compared with the results for the same topics achieved by an experienced education librarian and by a team of librarians. Recall ratios, precision ratios, and novelty ratios were calculated. Results show that the users, all faculty members or graduate students, found only about a third of the really important items. Suggests that library users are frequently misled into thinking that CD-ROM databases are easy to use and that the 'technology' guarantees satisfactory results.
  9. Xu, H.; Lancaster, F.W.: Redundancy and uniqueness of subject access points in online catalogs (1998) 0.01
    0.01078829 = product of:
      0.032364868 = sum of:
        0.032364868 = product of:
          0.064729735 = sum of:
            0.064729735 = weight(_text_:librarians in 1788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064729735 = score(doc=1788,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.296948 = fieldWeight in 1788, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1788)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of an analysis of 205 randomly selected records from the OCLC OLUC, to test the assumption that online catalogues have greatly improved subject searching capabilities, over card catalogues, by making other fields in the records searchable as subject access points (SAPs). Results showed considerable overlap (duplication) among the SAPs provided by the title, subject heading and classification number fields. On average, little more than 4 unique, unduplicated access points were found per record. Where title and classification number fields do add some access points not provided by subject headings, the increase is less than many librarians might be expected. Suggests that OPACs might outperform catalogues more in precision than in recall by allowing greater discrimination in searching; terms from different fields may be combined; titles offer greater specifity; searches can be limited by date, language or other criteria
  10. Su, S.-F.; Lancaster, F.W.: Evaluation of expert systems in reference service applications (1995) 0.01
    0.008990241 = product of:
      0.026970722 = sum of:
        0.026970722 = product of:
          0.053941444 = sum of:
            0.053941444 = weight(_text_:librarians in 4014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053941444 = score(doc=4014,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.24745665 = fieldWeight in 4014, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4014)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of an evaluation of 2 expert systems designed for use in library reference services: ReferenceExpert (RE), developed by Houston University; and SourceFinder (SF), developed by Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign. The test group consisted of 60 graduate students at the initial stage of an intermediate level reference course. The evaluation involved test questions already used in an earlier study (College and research libraries 52(1991) no.5, S.454-465). Results indicated that: there was no significant difference between RE and SF students in the confidence they expressed regarding understanding of their test questions; no significant correlation was found between confidence in understanding the question and success in selecting appropriate sources; only 1/5 of the students agreed that the system they used could be considered 'intelligent'; the majority did not consider the system they used to be 'competent'; almost half agreed that the subject categories provided by the menus were too broad; a little more than half wer not satisfied with the information sources selected by their system; significantly more RE users than SF users agreed that they found the menu interface useful; and a keyword search capability was the feature most often mentioned as a needed system enhancement. Overall results indicated that current expert systems for the selection of reference sources cannot perform as well as experienced subject oriented reference librarians
  11. Lancaster, F.W.: Vocabulary control for information retrieval (1986) 0.01
    0.008790895 = product of:
      0.026372686 = sum of:
        0.026372686 = product of:
          0.052745372 = sum of:
            0.052745372 = weight(_text_:22 in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052745372 = score(doc=217,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2007 10:07:51