Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Leydesdorff, L."
  1. Hellsten, I.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The construction of interdisciplinarity : the development of the knowledge base and programmatic focus of the journal Climatic Change, 1977-2013 (2016) 0.09
    0.09063613 = product of:
      0.13595419 = sum of:
        0.11947126 = weight(_text_:specialist in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11947126 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.36827272 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
        0.016482929 = product of:
          0.032965858 = sum of:
            0.032965858 = weight(_text_:22 in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032965858 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Climate change as a complex physical and social issue has gained increasing attention in the natural as well as the social sciences. Climate change research has become more interdisciplinary and even transdisciplinary as a typical Mode-2 science that is also dependent on an application context for its further development. We propose to approach interdisciplinarity as a co-construction of the knowledge base in the reference patterns and the programmatic focus in the editorials in the core journal of the climate-change sciences-Climatic Change-during the period 1977-2013. First, we analyze the knowledge base of the journal and map journal-journal relations on the basis of the references in the articles. Second, we follow the development of the programmatic focus by analyzing the semantics in the editorials. We argue that interdisciplinarity is a result of the co-construction between different agendas: The selection of publications into the knowledge base of the journal, and the adjustment of the programmatic focus to the political context in the editorials. Our results show a widening of the knowledge base from referencing the multidisciplinary journals Nature and Science to citing journals from specialist fields. The programmatic focus follows policy-oriented issues and incorporates public metaphors.
    Date
    24. 8.2016 17:53:22
  2. Leydesdorff, L.: Theories of citation? (1999) 0.06
    0.05575326 = product of:
      0.16725978 = sum of:
        0.16725978 = weight(_text_:specialist in 5130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16725978 = score(doc=5130,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.51558185 = fieldWeight in 5130, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5130)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Citations support the communication of specialist knowledge by allowing authors and readers to make specific selections in several contexts at the same time. In the interactions between the social network of authors and the network of their reflexive communications, a sub textual code of communication with a distributed character has emerged. Citation analysis reflects on citation practices. Reference lists are aggregated in scientometric analysis using one of the available contexts to reduce the complexity: geometrical representations of dynamic operations are reflected in corresponding theories of citation. The specific contexts represented in the modern citation can be deconstructed from the perspective of the cultural evolution of scientific communication
  3. Leydesdorff, L.: Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations (2008) 0.05
    0.04778851 = product of:
      0.14336552 = sum of:
        0.14336552 = weight(_text_:specialist in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14336552 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.44192728 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Aging of publications, percentage of self-citations, and impact vary from journal to journal within fields of science. The assumption that citation and publication practices are homogenous within specialties and fields of science is invalid. Furthermore, the delineation of fields and among specialties is fuzzy. Institutional units of analysis and persons may move between fields or span different specialties. The match between the citation index and institutional profiles varies among institutional units and nations. The respective matches may heavily affect the representation of the units. Non-Institute of Scientific Information (ISI) journals are increasingly cornered into transdisciplinary Mode-2 functions with the exception of specialist journals publishing in languages other than English. An externally cited impact factor can be calculated for these journals. The citation impact of non-ISI journals will be demonstrated using Science and Public Policy as the example.
  4. Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The construction and globalization of the knowledge base in inter-human communication systems (2003) 0.01
    0.0065931715 = product of:
      0.019779515 = sum of:
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 1621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=1621,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1621, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1621)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2003 19:48:04
  5. Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003) 0.01
    0.0065931715 = product of:
      0.019779515 = sum of:
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    6.11.2005 19:02:22
  6. Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009) 0.01
    0.0065931715 = product of:
      0.019779515 = sum of:
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:07:20
  7. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019) 0.01
    0.0065931715 = product of:
      0.019779515 = sum of:
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2019 18:22:45
  8. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011) 0.01
    0.0054943096 = product of:
      0.016482929 = sum of:
        0.016482929 = product of:
          0.032965858 = sum of:
            0.032965858 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032965858 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:51:07
  9. Leydesdorff, L.; Johnson, M.W.; Ivanova, I.: Toward a calculus of redundancy : signification, codification, and anticipation in cultural evolution (2018) 0.01
    0.0054943096 = product of:
      0.016482929 = sum of:
        0.016482929 = product of:
          0.032965858 = sum of:
            0.032965858 = weight(_text_:22 in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032965858 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2018 11:22:09