-
Sauperl, A.; Rozman, D.: Subject cataloguing at the crossroads : with or without subject heading strings? (2007)
0.06
0.0579382 = product of:
0.1738146 = sum of:
0.1738146 = sum of:
0.10788289 = weight(_text_:librarians in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10788289 = score(doc=245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.4949133 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
0.065931715 = weight(_text_:22 in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065931715 = score(doc=245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Knjiznice za prihodnost : napredek in sodelovanje : zbornik referatov [ Libraries for the future : development and collaboration: proceedings / Professional conference of Union of associations of Slovene Librarians], Portoroz, October 22-23, 2007; ed. M. Ambrozic
-
Sauperl, A.: Four views of a novel : characteristics of novels as described by publishers, librarians, literary theorists, and readers (2013)
0.02
0.017799769 = product of:
0.053399306 = sum of:
0.053399306 = product of:
0.10679861 = sum of:
0.10679861 = weight(_text_:librarians in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10679861 = score(doc=1952,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.48993918 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Publishers present novels with summaries, librarians provide subject headings, classification numbers and annotations, literary theorists write reviews. Readers share opinions and tags in social networks. These groups share interest in the same novel and possibly in the same library catalogs. I analyze the descriptions of novels written by these four groups to propose the enhancement of library catalogs. Results show that the story, information about the author, genre, personal experience with reading the novel, and an evaluation (awards, personal evaluation) are consistently presented by all four groups and should become standard elements for the subject description of fiction.
-
Sauperl, A.; Saye, J.D.: Have we made any progress? : catalogues of the future revisited (2009)
0.01
0.0127141215 = product of:
0.038142364 = sum of:
0.038142364 = product of:
0.07628473 = sum of:
0.07628473 = weight(_text_:librarians in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07628473 = score(doc=2843,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.34995657 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Library online public access catalogues (OPACs) are considered to be unattractive in comparison with popular internet sites. In 2000, the authors presented some suggestions on how library catalogues should change. Have librarians actually made their OPACs more user-friendly by adopting techniques and technologies already present in other information resources? This paper aims to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The characteristics of four OPACs, one online bookstore and two internet search engines are analyzed. The paper reviews some of the changes and directions suggested by researchers and adds some of authors own. All this is in the hope that library catalogues will survive "Google attack." Findings - Changes are identified in the information services studied over a seven-year period. Least development is found in library catalogues. Suggestions are made for library catalogues of the future. Research limitations/implications - A library catalogue, a web search engine and an internet bookstore cannot be compared directly because of differences in scope. But features from each could be fruitfully used in others. Practical implications - OPACs must be both attractive and useful. They should be at least as easy to use as their competitors. With the results of research as well as the knowledge librarians have many years, the profession should be able to develop better OPACs than we have today and regain lost ground in the "competition" for those with information needs. Originality/value - A comparison of OPAC features in 2000 and 2007, even if subjective, can provide a panoramic view of the development of the field.
-
Pogorelec, A.; Sauperl, A.: ¬The alternative model of classification of belles-lettres in libraries (2006)
0.01
0.008990241 = product of:
0.026970722 = sum of:
0.026970722 = product of:
0.053941444 = sum of:
0.053941444 = weight(_text_:librarians in 405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053941444 = score(doc=405,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.24745665 = fieldWeight in 405, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=405)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Several systems for the classification of fiction have been proposed to date, but experience shows that such classification partially depends on the culture and literary education in specific countries. Slovenian public libraries have traditionally used UDC as the only subject information on belles-lettres. Research has shown that users would prefer richer subject information. Therefore an attempt was made to enhance UDC by adding subject information, that should be helpful to users and librarians. The newly proposed Alternative Model system contains lists of verbal and alpha-numerical denotations for the basic groups of belles-lettres book material (main-genres: lyrics, drama, epics) and all other categorical criteria (language of the original literary work, literature to which the work belongs, genre, sub-genre) and half-categorical (accessibility of the content of literary works, origin within the periods of literary history, the century in which the literary work was written, the rhythm of the language). All these lists are available, but not included in this paper. The idea of the Alternative Model system is to show the possibilities of making the classification of belles-lettres in libraries more helpful, efficient and exact.
-
Sauperl, A.; Saye, J.D.: Pebbles for the mosais of cataloging expertise : what do problems in expert systems for cataloging reveal about cataloging expertise? (1999)
0.01
0.0065931715 = product of:
0.019779515 = sum of:
0.019779515 = product of:
0.03955903 = sum of:
0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03955903 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Sauperl, A.: Precoordination or not? : a new view of the old question (2009)
0.01
0.0054943096 = product of:
0.016482929 = sum of:
0.016482929 = product of:
0.032965858 = sum of:
0.032965858 = weight(_text_:22 in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032965858 = score(doc=3611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 6.2010 14:22:43
-
Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002)
0.00
0.0032965858 = product of:
0.009889757 = sum of:
0.009889757 = product of:
0.019779515 = sum of:
0.019779515 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019779515 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 27. 9.2005 14:22:19
