Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Leydesdorff, L.: Theories of citation? (1999) 0.06
    0.05575326 = product of:
      0.16725978 = sum of:
        0.16725978 = weight(_text_:specialist in 5130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16725978 = score(doc=5130,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.51558185 = fieldWeight in 5130, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5130)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Citations support the communication of specialist knowledge by allowing authors and readers to make specific selections in several contexts at the same time. In the interactions between the social network of authors and the network of their reflexive communications, a sub textual code of communication with a distributed character has emerged. Citation analysis reflects on citation practices. Reference lists are aggregated in scientometric analysis using one of the available contexts to reduce the complexity: geometrical representations of dynamic operations are reflected in corresponding theories of citation. The specific contexts represented in the modern citation can be deconstructed from the perspective of the cultural evolution of scientific communication
  2. Leydesdorff, L.: Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations (2008) 0.05
    0.04778851 = product of:
      0.14336552 = sum of:
        0.14336552 = weight(_text_:specialist in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14336552 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.44192728 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Aging of publications, percentage of self-citations, and impact vary from journal to journal within fields of science. The assumption that citation and publication practices are homogenous within specialties and fields of science is invalid. Furthermore, the delineation of fields and among specialties is fuzzy. Institutional units of analysis and persons may move between fields or span different specialties. The match between the citation index and institutional profiles varies among institutional units and nations. The respective matches may heavily affect the representation of the units. Non-Institute of Scientific Information (ISI) journals are increasingly cornered into transdisciplinary Mode-2 functions with the exception of specialist journals publishing in languages other than English. An externally cited impact factor can be calculated for these journals. The citation impact of non-ISI journals will be demonstrated using Science and Public Policy as the example.
  3. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02
    0.01758179 = product of:
      0.052745372 = sum of:
        0.052745372 = product of:
          0.105490744 = sum of:
            0.105490744 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.105490744 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  4. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.02
    0.01758179 = product of:
      0.052745372 = sum of:
        0.052745372 = product of:
          0.105490744 = sum of:
            0.105490744 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.105490744 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  5. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.015540253 = product of:
      0.04662076 = sum of:
        0.04662076 = product of:
          0.09324152 = sum of:
            0.09324152 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09324152 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  6. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.01
    0.010988619 = product of:
      0.032965858 = sum of:
        0.032965858 = product of:
          0.065931715 = sum of:
            0.065931715 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065931715 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  7. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.009324154 = product of:
      0.02797246 = sum of:
        0.02797246 = product of:
          0.05594492 = sum of:
            0.05594492 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05594492 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  8. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01
    0.008790895 = product of:
      0.026372686 = sum of:
        0.026372686 = product of:
          0.052745372 = sum of:
            0.052745372 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052745372 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  9. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.01
    0.0076920334 = product of:
      0.0230761 = sum of:
        0.0230761 = product of:
          0.0461522 = sum of:
            0.0461522 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0461522 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  10. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.01
    0.0076920334 = product of:
      0.0230761 = sum of:
        0.0230761 = product of:
          0.0461522 = sum of:
            0.0461522 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0461522 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  11. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.01
    0.0076920334 = product of:
      0.0230761 = sum of:
        0.0230761 = product of:
          0.0461522 = sum of:
            0.0461522 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0461522 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
  12. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.01
    0.0065931715 = product of:
      0.019779515 = sum of:
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  13. Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998) 0.01
    0.0065931715 = product of:
      0.019779515 = sum of:
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:33:24
  14. wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003) 0.01
    0.0065931715 = product of:
      0.019779515 = sum of:
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
  15. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01
    0.0065931715 = product of:
      0.019779515 = sum of:
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  16. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.01
    0.0065931715 = product of:
      0.019779515 = sum of:
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  17. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.01
    0.0065931715 = product of:
      0.019779515 = sum of:
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  18. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.01
    0.0065931715 = product of:
      0.019779515 = sum of:
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05
  19. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014) 0.01
    0.0065931715 = product of:
      0.019779515 = sum of:
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:52:04
  20. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.01
    0.0054943096 = product of:
      0.016482929 = sum of:
        0.016482929 = product of:
          0.032965858 = sum of:
            0.032965858 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032965858 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12