Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Folksonomies"
  1. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.01
    0.013186343 = product of:
      0.03955903 = sum of:
        0.03955903 = product of:
          0.07911806 = sum of:
            0.07911806 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07911806 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  2. Macgregor, G.; McCulloch, E.: Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool (2006) 0.01
    0.0127141215 = product of:
      0.038142364 = sum of:
        0.038142364 = product of:
          0.07628473 = sum of:
            0.07628473 = weight(_text_:librarians in 764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07628473 = score(doc=764,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.34995657 = fieldWeight in 764, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=764)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to provide an overview of the collaborative tagging phenomenon and explore some of the reasons for its emergence. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the related literature and discusses some of the problems associated with, and the potential of, collaborative tagging approaches for knowledge organisation and general resource discovery. A definition of controlled vocabularies is proposed and used to assess the efficacy of collaborative tagging. An exposition of the collaborative tagging model is provided and a review of the major contributions to the tagging literature is presented. Findings - There are numerous difficulties with collaborative tagging systems (e.g. low precision, lack of collocation, etc.) that originate from the absence of properties that characterise controlled vocabularies. However, such systems can not be dismissed. Librarians and information professionals have lessons to learn from the interactive and social aspects exemplified by collaborative tagging systems, as well as their success in engaging users with information management. The future co-existence of controlled vocabularies and collaborative tagging is predicted, with each appropriate for use within distinct information contexts: formal and informal. Research limitations/implications - Librarians and information professional researchers should be playing a leading role in research aimed at assessing the efficacy of collaborative tagging in relation to information storage, organisation, and retrieval, and to influence the future development of collaborative tagging systems. Practical implications - The paper indicates clear areas where digital libraries and repositories could innovate in order to better engage users with information. Originality/value - At time of writing there were no literature reviews summarising the main contributions to the collaborative tagging research or debate.
  3. Cope, J.: Librarianship as intellectual craft : the ethics of classification in the realms of leisure and waged labor (2012) 0.01
    0.008990241 = product of:
      0.026970722 = sum of:
        0.026970722 = product of:
          0.053941444 = sum of:
            0.053941444 = weight(_text_:librarians in 421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053941444 = score(doc=421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.24745665 = fieldWeight in 421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper develops an ethical conception of library labor as an intellectual craft that can serve as an alternative to a deterministic discourse of technological transformation. In this paper, the author proposes a model of librarianship as an intellectual craft that can be used as an "ideal type" in comparison to recent transformations in the practice of librarianship. This paper then examines the rise of participatory classification in the realm of leisure in user-generated classification schemes (e.g., folksonomies) as a way of examining some of the difficult ethical questions that this ideal of intellectual craft poses when applied to contemporary conditions. Marx's concept of surplus value is used to examine how donated labor adds to the general knowledge. This paper concludes by advocating for the general expansion of leisure coupled with the promotion public institutions that support the craft of those who organize information in a broadly defined public interest. In an era of dramatic change, such a framework offers a positive ethical account of librarians and information professionals' labor that is not wholly dependent on a discourse of market exchange.
  4. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.01
    0.0077701267 = product of:
      0.02331038 = sum of:
        0.02331038 = product of:
          0.04662076 = sum of:
            0.04662076 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04662076 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  5. Wesch, M.: Information R/evolution (2006) 0.01
    0.0076920334 = product of:
      0.0230761 = sum of:
        0.0230761 = product of:
          0.0461522 = sum of:
            0.0461522 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0461522 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  6. Morrison, P.J.: Tagging and searching : search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web (2008) 0.01
    0.0065931715 = product of:
      0.019779515 = sum of:
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2008 12:39:22
  7. Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008) 0.01
    0.0054943096 = product of:
      0.016482929 = sum of:
        0.016482929 = product of:
          0.032965858 = sum of:
            0.032965858 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032965858 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  8. Braun, M.: Lesezeichen zum Stöbern : "Social bookmark"-Seiten setzen auf die Empfehlungen ihrer Nutzer (2007) 0.00
    0.0043954477 = product of:
      0.013186343 = sum of:
        0.013186343 = product of:
          0.026372686 = sum of:
            0.026372686 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026372686 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22