Search (55 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Information Gateway"
  1. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.09
    0.09063613 = product of:
      0.13595419 = sum of:
        0.11947126 = weight(_text_:specialist in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11947126 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.36827272 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
        0.016482929 = product of:
          0.032965858 = sum of:
            0.032965858 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032965858 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32
  2. Kilner, K.: ¬The AustLit Gateway and scholarly bibliography : a specialist implementation of the FRBR (2004) 0.05
    0.04778851 = product of:
      0.14336552 = sum of:
        0.14336552 = weight(_text_:specialist in 5851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14336552 = score(doc=5851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.44192728 = fieldWeight in 5851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5851)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  3. Cervone, F.: Library portals and gateways (2009) 0.04
    0.04055674 = product of:
      0.12167022 = sum of:
        0.12167022 = sum of:
          0.07551802 = weight(_text_:librarians in 3839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07551802 = score(doc=3839,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.3464393 = fieldWeight in 3839, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3839)
          0.0461522 = weight(_text_:22 in 3839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0461522 = score(doc=3839,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3839, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3839)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries have had web presences since the introduction of the World Wide Web. Providing access to information provided by the library has been attempted through various means throughout the years but no method has been as popular or pervasive as the uses of library gateways and portals. Development of gateways and portals in libraries has been affected by many factors many of which have been outside the direct control of libraries or librarians. Both the history of library practice in this area and these external factors have had a substantial impact on the state of library portal and gateway development today.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:27
  4. Thaller, M.: From the digitized to the digital library (2001) 0.03
    0.03379158 = product of:
      0.10137474 = sum of:
        0.10137474 = weight(_text_:specialist in 1159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10137474 = score(doc=1159,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.3124898 = fieldWeight in 1159, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1159)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Theses: 1. Who should be addressed by digital libraries? How shall we measure whether we have reached the desired audience? Thesis: The primary audience for a digital library is neither the leading specialist in the respective field, nor the freshman, but the advanced student or young researcher and the "almost specialist". The primary topic of digitization projects should not be the absolute top range of the "treasures" of a collection, but those materials that we always have wanted to promote if they were just marginally more important. Whether we effectively serve them to the appropriate community of serious users can only be measured according to criteria that have yet to be developed. 2. The appropriate size of digital libraries and their access tools Thesis: Digital collections need a critical, minimal size to make their access worthwhile. In the end, users want to access information, not metadata or gimmicks. 3. The quality of digital objects Thesis: If digital library resources are to be integrated into the daily work of the research community, they must appear on the screen of the researcher in a quality that is useful in actual work. 4. The granularity / modularity of digital repositories Thesis: While digital libraries are self-contained bodies of information, they are not the basic unit that most users want to access. Users are, as a rule, more interested in the individual objects in the library and need a straightforward way to access them. 5. Digital collections as integrated reference systems Thesis: Traditional libraries support their collections with reference material. Digital collections need to find appropriate models to replicate this functionality. 6. Library and teaching Thesis: The use of multimedia in teaching is as much of a current buzzword as the creation of digital collections. It is obvious that they should be connected. A clear-cut separation of the two approaches is nevertheless necessary.
  5. Buckland, M.; Lancaster, L.: Combining place, time, and topic : the Electronic Cultural Atlas Initiative (2004) 0.03
    0.031859007 = product of:
      0.09557702 = sum of:
        0.09557702 = weight(_text_:specialist in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09557702 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.2946182 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Electronic Cultural Atlas Initiative was formed to encourage scholarly communication and the sharing of data among researchers who emphasize the relationships between place, time, and topic in the study of culture and history. In an effort to develop better tools and practices, The Electronic Cultural Atlas Initiative has sponsored the collaborative development of software for downloading and editing geo-temporal data to create dynamic maps, a clearinghouse of shared datasets accessible through a map-based interface, projects on format and content standards for gazetteers and time period directories, studies to improve geo-temporal aspects in online catalogs, good practice guidelines for preparing e-publications with dynamic geo-temporal displays, and numerous international conferences. The Electronic Cultural Atlas Initiative (ECAI) grew out of discussions among an international group of scholars interested in religious history and area studies. It was established as a unit under the Dean of International and Area Studies at the University of California, Berkeley in 1997. ECAI's mission is to promote an international collaborative effort to transform humanities scholarship through use of the digital environment to share data and by placing greater emphasis on the notions of place and time. Professor Lewis Lancaster is the Director. Professor Michael Buckland, with a library and information studies background, joined the effort as Co-Director in 2000. Assistance from the Lilly Foundation, the California Digital Library (University of California), and other sources has enabled ECAI to nurture a community; to develop a catalog ("clearinghouse") of Internet-accessible georeferenced resources; to support the development of software for obtaining, editing, manipulating, and dynamically visualizing geo-temporally encoded data; and to undertake research and development projects as needs and resources determine. Several hundred scholars worldwide, from a wide range of disciplines, are informally affiliated with ECAI, all interested in shared use of historical and cultural data. The Academia Sinica (Taiwan), The British Library, and the Arts and Humanities Data Service (UK) are among the well-known affiliates. However, ECAI mainly comprises individual scholars and small teams working on their own small projects on a very wide range of cultural, social, and historical topics. Numerous specialist committees have been fostering standardization and collaboration by area and by themes such as trade-routes, cities, religion, and sacred sites.
  6. Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000) 0.03
    0.02913349 = product of:
      0.087400466 = sum of:
        0.087400466 = sum of:
          0.06102778 = weight(_text_:librarians in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06102778 = score(doc=1447,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.27996525 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
          0.026372686 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026372686 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.
    Date
    21. 4.2002 10:22:31
  7. Woldering, B.: 2nd European Library Seminar / 3rd Gabriel Workshop, 4-6 June 2003 at the Biblioteca Nacional in Lisbon (2003) 0.02
    0.020342594 = product of:
      0.06102778 = sum of:
        0.06102778 = product of:
          0.12205556 = sum of:
            0.12205556 = weight(_text_:librarians in 2025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12205556 = score(doc=2025,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.5599305 = fieldWeight in 2025, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2025)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    From 4-6 June 2003 the 2nd European Library Seminar / 3rd Gabriel Workshop was held at the Biblioteca Nacional in Lisbon, Portugal. 62 librarians and webmasters from 20 countries participated in the workshop, mainly Gabriel contacts but also quite a number of librarians from Portugal.
  8. Woldering, B.: 2nd European Library Seminar / 3rd Gabriel Workshop (2003) 0.02
    0.018685868 = product of:
      0.056057602 = sum of:
        0.056057602 = product of:
          0.112115204 = sum of:
            0.112115204 = weight(_text_:librarians in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.112115204 = score(doc=2132,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.5143291 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    From 4 to 6 June 2003 the 2nd European Library Seminar / 3rd Gabriel Workshop was held at the Biblioteca Nacional in Lisbon, Portugal. 62 librarians and webmasters from 20 countries participated in the workshop, mainly Gabriel contacts but also quite a number of librarians from Portugal. Since its foundation in 1995 Gabriel, the world wide web service of the European national libraries, has established itself as the official network service of the Conference of European National Librarians (CENL) and has undergone a continuous development. The Gabriel website has been redesigned and restructured, and it was relaunched in summer 2002. At present, 41 libraries from 39 European countries are represented in Gabriel. Gabriel offers access to varied information sources and numerous online-catalogues and Services of the European national libraries. Gabriel is the only trans-European library service.
  9. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.02
    0.015540253 = product of:
      0.04662076 = sum of:
        0.04662076 = product of:
          0.09324152 = sum of:
            0.09324152 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09324152 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
  10. Subject gateways (2000) 0.02
    0.015384067 = product of:
      0.0461522 = sum of:
        0.0461522 = product of:
          0.0923044 = sum of:
            0.0923044 = weight(_text_:22 in 6483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0923044 = score(doc=6483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:43:01
  11. Franco, A.: Gateways to the Internet : finding quality information on the Internet (2004) 0.02
    0.015256945 = product of:
      0.045770835 = sum of:
        0.045770835 = product of:
          0.09154167 = sum of:
            0.09154167 = weight(_text_:librarians in 30) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09154167 = score(doc=30,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.41994786 = fieldWeight in 30, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=30)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Librarians have long sought to select, evaluate, and organize information on the Internet. Efforts began with individual librarians sharing bookmark files of favorite sites and progressed to increasingly large, collaboratively produced general and subject/discipline-specific gateway Web sites or megasites. Megasites list major resources usually in a particular subject area or discipline. Library portals that review, evaluate, and sometimes rate and rank resources grew from some of these Web sites. Both megasites and portals serve as gateways to the Internet. Many portals have developed from relatively small static files into large, dynamically generated databases providing descriptive annotations of selected resources and are increasingly overseen as global projects with formal policies and procedures. Portals now provide increasingly complex and sophisticated browse and search capabilities with a multitude of access points, often including call numbers and subject headings. These are described and compared. Future trends such as increased collaboration among portals; automated location, selection, and cataloging of resources; integration of multiple resource types; and increased access to full-content and virtual library services are also discussed.
  12. Internet searching and indexing : the subject approach (2000) 0.01
    0.014384385 = product of:
      0.043153156 = sum of:
        0.043153156 = product of:
          0.08630631 = sum of:
            0.08630631 = weight(_text_:librarians in 1468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08630631 = score(doc=1468,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.39593065 = fieldWeight in 1468, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1468)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This comprehensive volume offers usable information for people at all levels of Internet savvy. It can teach librarians, students, and patrons how to search the Internet more systematically. It also helps information professionals design more efficient, effective search engines and Web pages.
  13. Milanesi, C.: Möglichkeiten der Kooperation im Rahmen von Subject Gateways : das Euler-Projekt im Vergleich mit weiteren europäischen Projekten (2001) 0.01
    0.013186343 = product of:
      0.03955903 = sum of:
        0.03955903 = product of:
          0.07911806 = sum of:
            0.07911806 = weight(_text_:22 in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07911806 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:59
  14. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.01
    0.013186343 = product of:
      0.03955903 = sum of:
        0.03955903 = product of:
          0.07911806 = sum of:
            0.07911806 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07911806 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
  15. Hickey, T.R.: CORC : a system for gateway creation (2000) 0.01
    0.012586337 = product of:
      0.03775901 = sum of:
        0.03775901 = product of:
          0.07551802 = sum of:
            0.07551802 = weight(_text_:librarians in 4870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07551802 = score(doc=4870,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.3464393 = fieldWeight in 4870, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4870)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    CORC is an OCLC project that id developing tools and systems to enable libraries to provide enhanced access to Internet resources. By adapting and extending library techniques and procedures, we are developing a self-supporting system capable of describing a large and useful subset of the Web. CORC is more a system for hosting and supporting subject gateways than a gateway itself and relies on large-scale cooperation among libraries to maintain a centralized database. By supporting emerging metadata standards such as Dublin Core and other standards such as Unicode and RDF, CORC broadens the range of libraries and librarians able to participate. Current plans are for OCLC as a full service in July 2000
  16. Woldering, B.: EU-Projekt The European Library (TEL) erfolgreich abgeschlossen (2004) 0.01
    0.012586337 = product of:
      0.03775901 = sum of:
        0.03775901 = product of:
          0.07551802 = sum of:
            0.07551802 = weight(_text_:librarians in 2792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07551802 = score(doc=2792,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.3464393 = fieldWeight in 2792, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2792)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The European Library (TEL) ist ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt von acht europäischen Nationalbibliotheken sowie der zentralen Katalogisierungsinstitution in Italien (ICCU), das unter der Schirmherrschaft der Conference of European national librarians (CENL) initiiert wurde. Mit The European Library wird ein Service entwickelt, der eine integrierte Suche über die Sammlungen und Kataloge mit Verlinkung zu den angeschlossenen Dienstleistungen der beteiligten Nationalbibliotheken bieten wird. Im TEL-Projekt wurde die Machbarkeit dieses Vorhabens untersucht und die Ergebnisse sind vielversprechend: Die Projektpartner haben sich verpflichtet, nach Ende des Projektes im Januar 2004 die Ergebnisse in einen funktionsfähigen Service zu überführen. Die Freischaltung von The European Library ist für Anfang 2005 geplant. Im vorliegenden Text werden die organisatorischen, finanziellen und technischen Ergebnisse des Projektes vorgestellt.
  17. Price, A.: Five new Danish subject gateways under development (2000) 0.01
    0.010988619 = product of:
      0.032965858 = sum of:
        0.032965858 = product of:
          0.065931715 = sum of:
            0.065931715 = weight(_text_:22 in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065931715 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:31
  18. Woldering, B.: EU-Projekt The European Library (TEL) erfolgreich abgeschlossen (2004) 0.01
    0.01078829 = product of:
      0.032364868 = sum of:
        0.032364868 = product of:
          0.064729735 = sum of:
            0.064729735 = weight(_text_:librarians in 4949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064729735 = score(doc=4949,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.296948 = fieldWeight in 4949, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4949)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The European Library (TEL) ist ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt von acht europäischen Nationalbibliotheken sowie der zentralen Katalogisierungsinstitution in Italien (ICCU), das unter der Schirmherrschaft der Conference of European national librarians (CENL) initiiert wurde. Mit The European Library wird ein Service entwickelt, der eine integrierte Suche über die Sammlungen und Kataloge mit Verlinkung zu den angeschlossenen Dienstleistungen der beteiligten Nationalbibliotheken bieten wird. Im TEL-Projekt wurde die Machbarkeit dieses Vorhabens untersucht und die Ergebnisse sind vielversprechend: Die Projektpartner haben sich verpflichtet, nach Ende des Projektes im Januar 2004 die Ergebnisse in einen funktionsfähigen Service zu überführen. Die Freischaltung von The European Library ist für Dezember 2004 geplant. Im vorliegenden Text werden die organisatorischen, finanziellen und technischen Ergebnisse des Projektes vorgestellt.
  19. Campbell, J.D.: Access in a networked world : scholars portal in context (2004) 0.01
    0.01078829 = product of:
      0.032364868 = sum of:
        0.032364868 = product of:
          0.064729735 = sum of:
            0.064729735 = weight(_text_:librarians in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064729735 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.296948 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Since the 1960s, librarians have projected a vision of a digital library that offers seamless access to a vast world of scholarly information of all types. Until the 1990s, however, digital technologies lacked the power and capacity to deliver on the vision. During the 1990s, technology platforms, networking technologies, electronic resources, and the evolution of standards matured sufficiently to lay the foundation for the vision to be fulfilled. As this maturation was taking place, the rapid growth of electronic resources was based on numerous proprietary systems making access across such systems impossible. The scholars portal project is an effort to create a search and retrieval tool that will provide an interim solution to this problem until such time as those systems are built on a unified set of standards and data formats.
  20. Park, J.-r.; Li, G.; Burger, A.: Opening and closing rituals of the virtual reference service of the Internet Public Library (2010) 0.01
    0.010171297 = product of:
      0.03051389 = sum of:
        0.03051389 = product of:
          0.06102778 = sum of:
            0.06102778 = weight(_text_:librarians in 4153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06102778 = score(doc=4153,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.27996525 = fieldWeight in 4153, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4153)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the communicative rituals of opening and closing manifested in e-mail-based Internet Public Library's (IPL's) online reference interaction. Design/methodology/approach - A total of 400 transcripts comprising user queries and responses by IPL librarians are examined. The opening and closing elements are identified to examine the way in which IPL librarians and users construct social space; that is, communicate their interpersonal and affective stances during the course of seeking and offering information. Findings - The results of data analysis show regular patterns of verbal and structural politeness indicators of opening and closing e-mail discourse. Linguistic elements such as greetings and acknowledgement are included in all the sampled transcripts; i.e. a 100 percent occurrence. Closing rituals have a 95 percent occurrence of linguistic features such as acknowledgement and invitation for follow-up. In contrast, there is a low occurrence of personalized openings through greeting by user name (26 percent). This lack of personalization also occurs in closings: personalized farewell through use of librarian name appears in only 8 percent of closings. Research limitations/implications - The employment of the various politeness tactics in opening and closing reflects the librarian's attention and concern to user's information needs, interests and wants. Such communicative competence narrows social distance and brings forth close socio-interpersonal space for interaction; this may, in turn, improve the overall quality of reference service. Research findings also indicate that more use of personal names may decrease the social distance between the librarian and user, resulting in increased solidarity and proximity. Originality/value - The study provides new insights into linguistic politeness and the functions of address forms such as personal names with a view toward developing effective opening and closing rituals that contribute to the enhancement of virtual reference services.

Languages

  • e 35
  • d 20

Types

  • a 48
  • el 6
  • s 3
  • m 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…