Search (188 results, page 1 of 10)

0.0579382 = product of:
  0.1738146 = sum of:
    0.1738146 = sum of:
      0.10788289 = weight(_text_:librarians in 3023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10788289 = score(doc=3023,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04866305 = queryNorm
          0.4949133 = fieldWeight in 3023, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3023)
      0.065931715 = weight(_text_:22 in 3023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.065931715 = score(doc=3023,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04866305 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3023, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3023)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Discusses the selection, acquisition and collection development of electronic library resources with particular reference to the selection of: CD-ROM databases; laser disk; and Internet and WWW information sources. Includes selected Web sites which provide help to librarians in evaluating electronic resources, e.g. http://www.ala.org/ICONN/overview.html

Date

22. 2.1999 14:08:01

0.04778851 = product of:
  0.14336552 = sum of:
    0.14336552 = weight(_text_:specialist in 790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14336552 = score(doc=790,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04866305 = queryNorm
        0.44192728 = fieldWeight in 790, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=790)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Updated version of an earlier edition which underlines, on the one hand, the growing importance of grey literature as an information source and the need for guidelines for its further exploitation and, on the other hand the many changes which are taking place, not least with respect to electronic publishing and the rise of the Internet and WWW. Individual chapters deal with specific issues, including: the nature and development of grey literature; grey literatur collections and methods of acquisition; bibliographic control; cataloguing and indexing; specialist means of distribution, microforms and the Internet; theses, translations and meetings papers; aerospace; life sciences; the European Community; education; energy; science and technology; keys to reports series codes; trade literature; and a list of useful addresses of organizations and contacts

0.04635056 = product of:
  0.13905168 = sum of:
    0.13905168 = sum of:
      0.08630631 = weight(_text_:librarians in 5440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08630631 = score(doc=5440,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04866305 = queryNorm
          0.39593065 = fieldWeight in 5440, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5440)
      0.052745372 = weight(_text_:22 in 5440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052745372 = score(doc=5440,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04866305 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5440, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5440)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Stresses the need for sites evaluating Internet resources. Lists sites and outlines how they are evaluated. Librarians need to collaborate more, and reviews need to become more consistent and informative for the user. Describes the model followed by the Marr/Kirkwood Official Guide to Business Schools Web. This uses a tabular format and compares business school sites on a set of standard criteria. The format lends itself to multiple reviewers

Source

Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.66-72

0.034762923 = product of:
  0.104288764 = sum of:
    0.104288764 = sum of:
      0.064729735 = weight(_text_:librarians in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.064729735 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04866305 = queryNorm
          0.296948 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
      0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03955903 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04866305 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Hundreds of scholarly studies have investigated various aspects of Wikipedia. Although a number of literature reviews have provided overviews of this vast body of research, none has specifically focused on the readers of Wikipedia and issues concerning its readership. In this systematic literature review, we review 99 studies to synthesize current knowledge regarding the readership of Wikipedia and provide an analysis of research methods employed. The scholarly research has found that Wikipedia is popular not only for lighter topics such as entertainment but also for more serious topics such as health and legal information. Scholars, librarians, and students are common users, and Wikipedia provides a unique opportunity for educating students in digital literacy. We conclude with a summary of key findings, implications for researchers, and implications for the Wikipedia community.

Date

18.11.2014 13:22:03

0.02876877 = product of:
  0.08630631 = sum of:
    0.08630631 = product of:
      0.17261262 = sum of:
        0.17261262 = weight(_text_:librarians in 6371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17261262 = score(doc=6371,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.7918613 = fieldWeight in 6371, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6371)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.02876877 = product of:
  0.08630631 = sum of:
    0.08630631 = product of:
      0.17261262 = sum of:
        0.17261262 = weight(_text_:librarians in 1693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17261262 = score(doc=1693,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.7918613 = fieldWeight in 1693, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1693)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.02876877 = product of:
  0.08630631 = sum of:
    0.08630631 = product of:
      0.17261262 = sum of:
        0.17261262 = weight(_text_:librarians in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17261262 = score(doc=1746,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.7918613 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.025172673 = product of:
  0.07551802 = sum of:
    0.07551802 = product of:
      0.15103604 = sum of:
        0.15103604 = weight(_text_:librarians in 45) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15103604 = score(doc=45,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.6928786 = fieldWeight in 45, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=45)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Librarians on the Internet: impact on reference services. Ed.: R. Kinder

0.024914488 = product of:
  0.074743465 = sum of:
    0.074743465 = product of:
      0.14948693 = sum of:
        0.14948693 = weight(_text_:librarians in 854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14948693 = score(doc=854,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.68577206 = fieldWeight in 854, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=854)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Presents an assessment of Bulletin Board for Libraries (BUBL). This major electronic information resource for librarians operates from the University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. The main Home Page offering is BUBL Link (Librarians for Networked Knowledge), which utilises a WWW/Z39.50 system to access thousands of Internet sources, catalogues by BUBL in exactly the same way that librarians are accustomed to in dealing with bibliographic documents. Other services include BUBL Journals (indexes, abstracts); BUBL search; and BUBL Mail

0.021800179 = product of:
  0.06540053 = sum of:
    0.06540053 = product of:
      0.13080107 = sum of:
        0.13080107 = weight(_text_:librarians in 5167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13080107 = score(doc=5167,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.60005057 = fieldWeight in 5167, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5167)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

A guide to collection development and leisure related Web sites. Highlights more than 2 dozen sites, approximately half of which are devoted to collection development. The same principles used to develop print collections apply to electronic resource collection development. Many review resources are available as a result of efforts by Internet librarians. Good starting points for this category include the Library Web Manager's Reference Center: Current Awareness, and the Librarians' Index to the Internet. Picks of the month for leisure time include KidsHealth.org, Chemical Scorecard, and DigiCams Web Cam Viewer. Also includes a sidebar listing eight books covering topics such as SQL, HTML, DHTML, Web navigation, Windows 98, guides to computers and Palm Pilots, and spamming

0.021756357 = product of:
  0.06526907 = sum of:
    0.06526907 = product of:
      0.13053814 = sum of:
        0.13053814 = weight(_text_:22 in 502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13053814 = score(doc=502,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 502, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=502)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

3. 5.1997 8:44:22
22. 9.2003 10:02:00

0.021469397 = product of:
  0.06440819 = sum of:
    0.06440819 = product of:
      0.19322456 = sum of:
        0.19322456 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19322456 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4125659 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

"Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."

0.020342594 = product of:
  0.06102778 = sum of:
    0.06102778 = product of:
      0.12205556 = sum of:
        0.12205556 = weight(_text_:librarians in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12205556 = score(doc=3694,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.5599305 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Outlines strategies which can be used to help the academics librarian decide on which titles to add to the reference collection to ensure a well-rounded coverage. Discusses information sharing with other librarians, the importance of collection awareness, budget allocation, the role of reviews, and print versus electronic reference sources. Proposes the establishment of a listserve for academic librarians as a solution to the problems of delay and word count limits of print reviews, with facilities for online ordering

0.020102791 = product of:
  0.060308374 = sum of:
    0.060308374 = product of:
      0.12061675 = sum of:
        0.12061675 = weight(_text_:librarians in 5076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12061675 = score(doc=5076,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.55332994 = fieldWeight in 5076, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5076)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The rapid rise of Wikipedia as an information source has placed the traditional role of librarians as information gatekeepers and guardians under scrutiny with much of the professional literature suggesting that librarians are polarized over the issue of whether Wikipedia is a useful reference tool. This qualitative study examines the perceptions and behaviours of National Library Board (NLB) of Singapore librarians with regards to information seeking and usage of Wikipedia. It finds that instead of polarized attitudes, most librarians, although cautious about using Wikipedia in their professional capacity, hold a range of generally positive attitudes towards the online encyclopaedia, believing that it has a valid role to play in the information seeking of patrons today. This is heartening because it suggests the existence within the librarian population of attitudes that can be tapped to engage constructively with Wikipedia. Three of these in particular are briefly discussed at the end of the article: Wikipedia's ability to appeal to the socalled "digital natives," its role as a source of non-Western information, and its potential to enable a revitalization of the role of librarians as public intellectuals contributing to a democratic information commons.

0.017980482 = product of:
  0.053941444 = sum of:
    0.053941444 = product of:
      0.10788289 = sum of:
        0.10788289 = weight(_text_:librarians in 2527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10788289 = score(doc=2527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.4949133 = fieldWeight in 2527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2527)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The CD-ROM data base, Grolier's Electronic Encyclopedia is designed to suit 2 types of user: library patrons (end users); and reference librarians. The 2 user modes are described briefly. Experience with the product at the School of Library and Information Science, Indiana University at Bloomington, is described.

0.017980482 = product of:
  0.053941444 = sum of:
    0.053941444 = product of:
      0.10788289 = sum of:
        0.10788289 = weight(_text_:librarians in 6670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10788289 = score(doc=6670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.4949133 = fieldWeight in 6670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Present practical advice on weeding and maintaining reference collections, covering different types of libraries and problems. In individual papers, librarians describe methods and criteria used by their libraries in weeding their reference materials

0.017980482 = product of:
  0.053941444 = sum of:
    0.053941444 = product of:
      0.10788289 = sum of:
        0.10788289 = weight(_text_:librarians in 436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10788289 = score(doc=436,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.4949133 = fieldWeight in 436, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=436)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.017799769 = product of:
  0.053399306 = sum of:
    0.053399306 = product of:
      0.10679861 = sum of:
        0.10679861 = weight(_text_:librarians in 2201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10679861 = score(doc=2201,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.48993918 = fieldWeight in 2201, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Current trends in library training and practice reflect the inexorable movement toward the electronic environemnt. In this setting, librarians are beginning to pay considerably less attention to the books in their reference collections than to the online sources. This is cause for concern, since materials in the print format are often preferable to the electronic. They can be more accessible, quicker, and easier to use. Their contents are likely to be more comprehensive and are often unique. Urges librarians to continue to become familiar with and use the books in their reference collection

0.017799769 = product of:
  0.053399306 = sum of:
    0.053399306 = product of:
      0.10679861 = sum of:
        0.10679861 = weight(_text_:librarians in 3264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10679861 = score(doc=3264,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.48993918 = fieldWeight in 3264, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3264)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Reports results of a study, undertaken at the J. Otto Lottes Health Sciences Library, Missouri University at Columbia, to derive a set of evaluation criteria to assist librarians in determining the positive and negative aspects of alternative Web sites available for searching MEDLINE via the WWW. A set of searches were used systematically to compare MEDLINE Web sites, including: Avicenna; America Online; HealthGate; PubMed; Medscape; and Physicians' Online. Focuses on the principle features of the search engines used in the sites: default fields and operators; MeSH; subheadings; stopwords protected in MeSH; truncation and stemming. Describes the group processes used to arrive at the evaluation criteria and some general conclusions which will help librarians in directing their users to a particular MEDLINE site

0.01758179 = product of:
  0.052745372 = sum of:
    0.052745372 = product of:
      0.105490744 = sum of:
        0.105490744 = weight(_text_:22 in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.105490744 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

7.11.1999 18:22:39