-
Gödert, W.: Klassifikationssysteme und Online-Katalog (1987)
0.05
0.04778851 = product of:
0.14336552 = sum of:
0.14336552 = weight(_text_:specialist in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14336552 = score(doc=5138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.44192728 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Free text searching with keywords in a complete data store is not necessarily the best automatic retrieval method. There must be a proper classification of documents and concepts and the use of a proper classification system avoids problems of terminological deficiency. The dialogue search form makes the on-line catalogue a new information medium. A bibliographic unit must be created with as many search access points as possible, using verbal and classificatory search elements. Verbal search categories must include free text elements for individual search access requirements and a controlled vocabulary with syntactic connections. Classified data should consist of a universal classification system with clear structural notation for access and surface searching, together with several specialist subject classifications for differentiated documentation and retrieval. The universal classification needs no detailed subdivision: it serves mainly as a guide and entry to the detailed sub-systems
-
Tunkelang, D.: Faceted search (2009)
0.03
0.031859007 = product of:
0.09557702 = sum of:
0.09557702 = weight(_text_:specialist in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09557702 = score(doc=26,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.2946182 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- We live in an information age that requires us, more than ever, to represent, access, and use information. Over the last several decades, we have developed a modern science and technology for information retrieval, relentlessly pursuing the vision of a "memex" that Vannevar Bush proposed in his seminal article, "As We May Think." Faceted search plays a key role in this program. Faceted search addresses weaknesses of conventional search approaches and has emerged as a foundation for interactive information retrieval. User studies demonstrate that faceted search provides more effective information-seeking support to users than best-first search. Indeed, faceted search has become increasingly prevalent in online information access systems, particularly for e-commerce and site search. In this lecture, we explore the history, theory, and practice of faceted search. Although we cannot hope to be exhaustive, our aim is to provide sufficient depth and breadth to offer a useful resource to both researchers and practitioners. Because faceted search is an area of interest to computer scientists, information scientists, interface designers, and usability researchers, we do not assume that the reader is a specialist in any of these fields. Rather, we offer a self-contained treatment of the topic, with an extensive bibliography for those who would like to pursue particular aspects in more depth.
-
Zaytseva, E.: Classification tools for librarians and users : the Russian experience (2008)
0.02
0.020342594 = product of:
0.06102778 = sum of:
0.06102778 = product of:
0.12205556 = sum of:
0.12205556 = weight(_text_:librarians in 2179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12205556 = score(doc=2179,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.5599305 = fieldWeight in 2179, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2179)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The paper considers the history of the development of electronic versions of library classifications in Russia. It describes classification tools specially designed for OPAC users and librarians - classifiers and classification editors.
-
Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984)
0.02
0.01758179 = product of:
0.052745372 = sum of:
0.052745372 = product of:
0.105490744 = sum of:
0.105490744 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.105490744 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
-
Mitchell, J.S.: In this age of WWW is classification redundant? (1998)
0.01
0.014384385 = product of:
0.043153156 = sum of:
0.043153156 = product of:
0.08630631 = sum of:
0.08630631 = weight(_text_:librarians in 5443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08630631 = score(doc=5443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.39593065 = fieldWeight in 5443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Argues that classification systems have an important role to play in knowledge organization in the new world electronic order. The natural language approach is not incompatible with the use of a classification system and classification has untapped potential as a multilingual switching language. Librarians must learn to present classification systems in a language understood by a general audience and promote them as general knowledge organization tools
-
Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000)
0.01
0.013186343 = product of:
0.03955903 = sum of:
0.03955903 = product of:
0.07911806 = sum of:
0.07911806 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07911806 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:42:47
-
High, W.H.: Library of Congress Classification numbers as subject access points in computer-based retrieval (1990)
0.01
0.012586337 = product of:
0.03775901 = sum of:
0.03775901 = product of:
0.07551802 = sum of:
0.07551802 = weight(_text_:librarians in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07551802 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.3464393 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Subject retrieval by Library of Congress (LC) Classification numbers is examined from the perspective of 5 user groups of on-line catalogues. Although, at present, librarians are the user group most likely to benefit from the LC classification advances in the capabilities of on-line catalogues. Research on the use of the LC classification schedules as a component of subject retrieval should continue.
-
Dodd, D.G.: Grass-roots cataloging and classification : food for thought from World Wide Web subject-oriented hierarchical lists (1996)
0.01
0.012586337 = product of:
0.03775901 = sum of:
0.03775901 = product of:
0.07551802 = sum of:
0.07551802 = weight(_text_:librarians in 7270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07551802 = score(doc=7270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.3464393 = fieldWeight in 7270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The explosion of the use of the Internet by the genral public, particularly via the WWW, has given rise to the proliferation of semiprofessional attempts to give some subject based access to Internet resources via hierarchical guides (hotlists) on Web search engines such as Yahoo and Magellan. Examines the structure and principles of various hierachical lists, and compares them, when possible, to broad LCC and DDC schemes, and to LCSH. Explores the approaches taken by non librarians in their efforts to organize and provide access to materials on the Internet. Focuses on the dichotomy between the hierarchical 'browse' and the analytical 'search' approaches to finding materials, as exemplified by these various attempts to organize the Internet
-
Fagan, J.C.: Usability studies of faceted browsing : a literature review (2010)
0.01
0.012586337 = product of:
0.03775901 = sum of:
0.03775901 = product of:
0.07551802 = sum of:
0.07551802 = weight(_text_:librarians in 4396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07551802 = score(doc=4396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.3464393 = fieldWeight in 4396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4396)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Faceted browsing is a common feature of new library catalog interfaces. But to what extent does it improve user performance in searching within today's library catalog systems? This article reviews the literature for user studies involving faceted browsing and user studies of "next-generation" library catalogs that incorporate faceted browsing. Both the results and the methods of these studies are analyzed by asking, What do we currently know about faceted browsing? How can we design better studies of faceted browsing in library catalogs? The article proposes methodological considerations for practicing librarians and provides examples of goals, tasks, and measurements for user studies of faceted browsing in library catalogs.
-
Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990)
0.01
0.010988619 = product of:
0.032965858 = sum of:
0.032965858 = product of:
0.065931715 = sum of:
0.065931715 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065931715 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 8. 1.2007 12:22:40
-
Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009)
0.01
0.010988619 = product of:
0.032965858 = sum of:
0.032965858 = product of:
0.065931715 = sum of:
0.065931715 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065931715 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 8.2009 12:54:24
-
Hill, J.S.: Things are taking a little longer than that : a response to Dewey Decimal Classification in the online environment (1990)
0.01
0.01078829 = product of:
0.032364868 = sum of:
0.032364868 = product of:
0.064729735 = sum of:
0.064729735 = weight(_text_:librarians in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064729735 = score(doc=496,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.296948 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Librarians are often so eager to adopt new technologies and systems that they can lose sight of the realities that must be dealt with. Among factors that may delay use of Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) for on-line catalogues retrieval are: limited use of DDC in libraries with operational on-line catalogues; limitations to the MARC bibliographic formats: lack of an authority structure for classification number for items catalogued. Factors that may delay development of effective classification retrieval mechanisms include unclear terminology and unreasonably high (or low) expectations.
-
Classification theory in the computer age : Conversations across the disciplines. Proceedings from the Conference, Nov. 18.-19, 1988, Albany, New York (1989)
0.01
0.01078829 = product of:
0.032364868 = sum of:
0.032364868 = product of:
0.064729735 = sum of:
0.064729735 = weight(_text_:librarians in 2071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064729735 = score(doc=2071,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.296948 = fieldWeight in 2071, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2071)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: D. BATTY: The future of DDC in the perspective of current classification research; I. DAHLBERG: Concept and definiton theory; I.L. TRAVIS: Application of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification; E. SVENONIUS: An ideal classification for an on-line catalog; K. MARKEY u. A.N. DEMEYER: The concept of common subject headings in subject outline searching; N. WILLIAMSON: The Library of Congress Classification in the Computer age; D.S. SCOTT: Subject classification and natural-language processing for retrieval in large databases; F. MIKSA: Shifting directions in LIS classification; C. MANDEL: A computer age classification: implications for library practice; R.S. HALSEY: Implications of classification theory in the computer age for educators of librarians and information science professionals; J. HOLIDAY: Subject access: new technology and philosophical perspectives
-
Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010)
0.01
0.009324154 = product of:
0.02797246 = sum of:
0.02797246 = product of:
0.05594492 = sum of:
0.05594492 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05594492 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
- Date
- 22. 1.2010 15:06:54
-
Kniesner, D.L.; Willman, C.: But is it an online shelflist? : classification access in eight OPACs (1995)
0.01
0.008990241 = product of:
0.026970722 = sum of:
0.026970722 = product of:
0.053941444 = sum of:
0.053941444 = weight(_text_:librarians in 5555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053941444 = score(doc=5555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.24745665 = fieldWeight in 5555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5555)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- As librarians increasingly try to use their online catalogues to do what used to be done with their card shelflists, they are realizing that some catalogue sedigners and vendors have not paid enough attention to online shelf order classification access. Compares the call number searching abilities of 8 prominent, mature library systems: VTLS, Inlex, Innovative Interfaces, Inc., Data Research Associates (DRA), Geac Advance, Dynix, SIRSI, and NOTIS. Using 5 criteria that are important to cataloguers, each system was tested and rated for its suitability as an online shelflist. *** Special note from the authors: "[We've] become aware of a new version of SIRSI's Unicorn library system-- version 7.0 that changes our rating of SIRSI in a major way. We had rated SIRSI Unicorn a "C" in the paper, but now we would rate version 7.0 an "A". This is indeed a major change. Fortunately, we identified version numbers for each system in the article: we had tested version 6.1 of SIRSI. Thus, version 7.0 of SIRSI Unicorn, available in early 1995, has improved to the point that it meets every criteria used in the article for suitability as an online shelflist. The authors have evaluated version 7.0 with an "A" rating." ***
-
Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003)
0.01
0.008790895 = product of:
0.026372686 = sum of:
0.026372686 = product of:
0.052745372 = sum of:
0.052745372 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052745372 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 30. 7.2004 12:22:52
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.01
0.008790895 = product of:
0.026372686 = sum of:
0.026372686 = product of:
0.052745372 = sum of:
0.052745372 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052745372 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
-
Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003)
0.01
0.008790895 = product of:
0.026372686 = sum of:
0.026372686 = product of:
0.052745372 = sum of:
0.052745372 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052745372 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
-
Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989)
0.01
0.0076920334 = product of:
0.0230761 = sum of:
0.0230761 = product of:
0.0461522 = sum of:
0.0461522 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0461522 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 8.11.1995 11:52:22
-
Vizine-Goetz, D.: OCLC investigates using classification tools to organize Internet data (1998)
0.01
0.0076920334 = product of:
0.0230761 = sum of:
0.0230761 = product of:
0.0461522 = sum of:
0.0461522 = weight(_text_:22 in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0461522 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04866305 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
