Search (115 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. McCue, J.A.: Why should a cataloging department hire a metadata specialist? : and, are there any out there? (1997) 0.10 
    0.09656748 = product of:
  0.28970245 = sum of:
    0.28970245 = weight(_text_:specialist in 2982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28970245 = score(doc=2982,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04866305 = queryNorm
        0.893014 = fieldWeight in 2982, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2982)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Addresses the question of why a technical services department would hire a metadata specialist and whether a metadata specialist is really a cataloguer in disguise. Evidence suggests that cataoguing departments are recruiting and training staff for positions requiring broader computer experience and an awareness of larger metadata issues. Also explores whether students are attracted to these positions and whether library schools are preparing technical services staff for these challenges
  2. Heidorn, P.B.; Wei, Q.: Automatic metadata extraction from museum specimen labels (2008) 0.09 
    0.09063613 = product of:
  0.13595419 = sum of:
    0.11947126 = weight(_text_:specialist in 2624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11947126 = score(doc=2624,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04866305 = queryNorm
        0.36827272 = fieldWeight in 2624, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2624)
    0.016482929 = product of:
      0.032965858 = sum of:
        0.032965858 = weight(_text_:22 in 2624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032965858 = score(doc=2624,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2624, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2624)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This paper describes the information properties of museum specimen labels and machine learning tools to automatically extract Darwin Core (DwC) and other metadata from these labels processed through Optical Character Recognition (OCR). The DwC is a metadata profile describing the core set of access points for search and retrieval of natural history collections and observation databases. Using the HERBIS Learning System (HLS) we extract 74 independent elements from these labels. The automated text extraction tools are provided as a web service so that users can reference digital images of specimens and receive back an extended Darwin Core XML representation of the content of the label. This automated extraction task is made more difficult by the high variability of museum label formats, OCR errors and the open class nature of some elements. In this paper we introduce our overall system architecture, and variability robust solutions including, the application of Hidden Markov and Naïve Bayes machine learning models, data cleaning, use of field element identifiers, and specialist learning models. The techniques developed here could be adapted to any metadata extraction situation with noisy text and weakly ordered elements.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  3. Understanding metadata (2004) 0.05 
    0.04635056 = product of:
  0.13905168 = sum of:
    0.13905168 = sum of:
      0.08630631 = weight(_text_:librarians in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08630631 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04866305 = queryNorm
          0.39593065 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
      0.052745372 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052745372 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04866305 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
    Date
    10. 9.2004 10:22:40
  4. Cundiff, M.V.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) (2004) 0.05 
    0.04635056 = product of:
  0.13905168 = sum of:
    0.13905168 = sum of:
      0.08630631 = weight(_text_:librarians in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08630631 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04866305 = queryNorm
          0.39593065 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
      0.052745372 = weight(_text_:22 in 2834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052745372 = score(doc=2834,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04866305 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2834, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2834)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This article provides an introductory overview of the Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard, better known as METS. It will be of most use to librarians and technical staff who are encountering METS for the first time. The article contains a brief history of the development of METS, a primer covering the basic structure and content of METS documents, and a discussion of several issues relevant to the implementation and continuing development of METS including object models, extension schemata, and application profiles.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.52-64
  5. Fietzer, W.: Technical services librarians and metadata : reigning in the new frontier (1999) 0.03 
    0.025172673 = product of:
  0.07551802 = sum of:
    0.07551802 = product of:
      0.15103604 = sum of:
        0.15103604 = weight(_text_:librarians in 6073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15103604 = score(doc=6073,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.6928786 = fieldWeight in 6073, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6073)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  6. Calhoun, K.: Being a librarian : metadata and metadata specialists in the twenty-first century (2007) 0.02 
    0.020102791 = product of:
  0.060308374 = sum of:
    0.060308374 = product of:
      0.12061675 = sum of:
        0.12061675 = weight(_text_:librarians in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12061675 = score(doc=2593,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.55332994 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to forecast the changing roles of librarians - especially catalogers and metadata specialists - in today's technology-driven research, teaching, and learning environments, in which information seekers behave more and more self-sufficiently and move well beyond library collections in their pursuit of information. Design/methodology/approach - Places the roles of librarians and library collections in the larger context of knowledge management and campus information network processes, which occur in every knowledge community, with or without a library. Explores and provides examples of how knowledge creators can collaborate with information technology experts and librarians to transform how faculty members teach and conduct research; how students learn; and how libraries support these activities. Findings - Librarians need to make their collections and services much more visible through human and technological interconnections and greatly improved delivery of information content. Metadata and metadata specialists are strategic assets for libraries, but the service model for cataloging faces critical challenges. Two tables list these challenges and the implications for metadata specialists. Originality/value - Offers new observations and insights into how librarians can continue to contribute to saving information seekers' time and advancing the state of knowledge in the increasingly interconnected world of the web. Drawing from the larger context of the global infosphere, information-seeking behavior, and changing roles for library collections and information systems, forecasts the role of metadata and metadata specialists in libraries.
  7. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.02 
    0.018648308 = product of:
  0.05594492 = sum of:
    0.05594492 = product of:
      0.11188984 = sum of:
        0.11188984 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11188984 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  8. Tammaro, A.M.: Catalogando, catalogando ... metacatalogando (1997) 0.02 
    0.017799769 = product of:
  0.053399306 = sum of:
    0.053399306 = product of:
      0.10679861 = sum of:
        0.10679861 = weight(_text_:librarians in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10679861 = score(doc=902,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.48993918 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    A crucial question for librarians is whether to catalogue Internet information sources, and electronic sources in general, which may contain metainformation of the texts of articles. Librarians can help researchers with data identification and access in 4 ways: making OPAC available on the Internet; providing a complete selection of Gopher, Ftp, WWW, etc. site lists; maintaining a Web site, coordinateted by the library, that functions as an Internet access point; and organising access to existing search engines that do automatic indexing. Briefly reviews several metadata formats, including USMARC field 856, IAFA templates, SOIP (Harvest), TEI Headers, Capcas Head and URC
  9. Revelli, C.: Integrare o sostituire? : Un dilemma per la norme catalografiche (1997) 0.02 
    0.017799769 = product of:
  0.053399306 = sum of:
    0.053399306 = product of:
      0.10679861 = sum of:
        0.10679861 = weight(_text_:librarians in 1624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10679861 = score(doc=1624,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.48993918 = fieldWeight in 1624, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1624)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Discusses a range of professional librarians' opinions on the urgent need either to adopt or replace the current cataloguing rules, a theme closely linked to the identity crisis facing libraries and librarians in the online electronic era. Topics examined include: Gorman and Oddy's views on restructuring AACR principles; the 13 metadata elements contained in the Dublin Core document (1995); catalogue search by known item; keyword search versus subject search; and the US Library of Congress's Program for cooperation cataloging
  10. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.02 
    0.01758179 = product of:
  0.052745372 = sum of:
    0.052745372 = product of:
      0.105490744 = sum of:
        0.105490744 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.105490744 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  11. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02 
    0.01758179 = product of:
  0.052745372 = sum of:
    0.052745372 = product of:
      0.105490744 = sum of:
        0.105490744 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.105490744 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  12. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.02 
    0.015384067 = product of:
  0.0461522 = sum of:
    0.0461522 = product of:
      0.0923044 = sum of:
        0.0923044 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0923044 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  13. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02 
    0.015384067 = product of:
  0.0461522 = sum of:
    0.0461522 = product of:
      0.0923044 = sum of:
        0.0923044 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0923044 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  14. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02 
    0.015384067 = product of:
  0.0461522 = sum of:
    0.0461522 = product of:
      0.0923044 = sum of:
        0.0923044 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0923044 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  15. Wendler, R.: Branching out : cataloging skills and functions in the digital age (1999) 0.01 
    0.014384385 = product of:
  0.043153156 = sum of:
    0.043153156 = product of:
      0.08630631 = sum of:
        0.08630631 = weight(_text_:librarians in 6100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08630631 = score(doc=6100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.39593065 = fieldWeight in 6100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6100)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Librarians create metadata including cataloging to manage and provide access to collections. Two recent technological developments, the explosion in electronic publishing and the conversion of metadata previously unavailable online into machine-readable form, are providing challenges to cataloging. Disparate types of resources, such as images and museum objects, archives, and library collections in print and electronic form, must be brought together in a coherent information environment. While catalogers exclusively cannot do these tasks, they and their skills are essential to bring order out of the chaos of the many different access systems
  16. Lazinger, S.S.: Digital preservation and metadata : history, theory, practice (2002) 0.01 
    0.014384385 = product of:
  0.043153156 = sum of:
    0.043153156 = product of:
      0.08630631 = sum of:
        0.08630631 = weight(_text_:librarians in 1262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08630631 = score(doc=1262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.39593065 = fieldWeight in 1262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1262)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Long-needed guide for anyone involved in the preservation of digital information and a "must for librarians, archiving professionals, faculty and students of library science, administrators and corporate leaders". Comprehensive literature review. The author has clearly been extremely thorough in tracking down an exhaustive record of the literature. This is then paraphrased and synthesized, but not critically
  17. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.01 
    0.013186343 = product of:
  0.03955903 = sum of:
    0.03955903 = product of:
      0.07911806 = sum of:
        0.07911806 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07911806 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  18. Clemson, P.A.: ¬An inside approach to a networked document cataloging (1997) 0.01 
    0.012586337 = product of:
  0.03775901 = sum of:
    0.03775901 = product of:
      0.07551802 = sum of:
        0.07551802 = weight(_text_:librarians in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07551802 = score(doc=702,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.3464393 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Information professions identified the need for a set of standard metadata almost as soon as the WWW became a reality. Several initiatives have already identified the types of bibliographic information that would be necessary to describe and locate an electronic publication. The descriptors identified in the OCLC/NCSA Dublin Core are combined with those assembled by the Coalition of Networked Information and the Internet Engineering Task force to produce a list of electronic citation elements. Advocates embedding these citation elements within electrinic documents through the use of HTML<META>tags and other markup techniques. There is also a call to cataloguing librarians to contribute their expertise in information resources management to document being prepared for the WWW in order to influence the quality of electronic publication from the insides
  19. Hickey, T.R.: CORC : a system for gateway creation (2000) 0.01 
    0.012586337 = product of:
  0.03775901 = sum of:
    0.03775901 = product of:
      0.07551802 = sum of:
        0.07551802 = weight(_text_:librarians in 4870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07551802 = score(doc=4870,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.3464393 = fieldWeight in 4870, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4870)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    CORC is an OCLC project that id developing tools and systems to enable libraries to provide enhanced access to Internet resources. By adapting and extending library techniques and procedures, we are developing a self-supporting system capable of describing a large and useful subset of the Web. CORC is more a system for hosting and supporting subject gateways than a gateway itself and relies on large-scale cooperation among libraries to maintain a centralized database. By supporting emerging metadata standards such as Dublin Core and other standards such as Unicode and RDF, CORC broadens the range of libraries and librarians able to participate. Current plans are for OCLC as a full service in July 2000
  20. Jul, E.: MARC and mark-up : different metadata containers for different purposes (2003) 0.01 
    0.012586337 = product of:
  0.03775901 = sum of:
    0.03775901 = product of:
      0.07551802 = sum of:
        0.07551802 = weight(_text_:librarians in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07551802 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.3464393 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Discusses the development and implications of electronic resource description systems, including the familiar library standard, the MARC Format, and the newly developing Resource Description Format (RDF), as well as other non-library markup languages such as XML, HTML, SGML, etc. Explains the differences between content and container, and the kinds of rules needed for describing each. Closes by outlining clearly why it is important for librarians to reach out beyond the library community and participate in the development of metadata standards.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 103
  • d 9
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 102
  • el 8
  • s 8
  • m 7
  • b 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications