Search (179 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Hodges, P.R.: Keyword in title indexes : effectiveness of retrieval in computer searches (1983) 0.13
    0.1268906 = product of:
      0.19033588 = sum of:
        0.16725978 = weight(_text_:specialist in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16725978 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.51558185 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
        0.0230761 = product of:
          0.0461522 = sum of:
            0.0461522 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0461522 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A study was done to test the effectiveness of retrieval using title word searching. It was based on actual search profiles used in the Mechanized Information Center at Ohio State University, in order ro replicate as closely as possible actual searching conditions. Fewer than 50% of the relevant titles were retrieved by keywords in titles. The low rate of retrieval can be attributes to three sources: titles themselves, user and information specialist ignorance of the subject vocabulary in use, and to general language problems. Across fields it was found that the social sciences had the best retrieval rate, with science having the next best, and arts and humanities the lowest. Ways to enhance and supplement keyword in title searching on the computer and in printed indexes are discussed.
    Date
    14. 3.1996 13:22:21
  2. Woodhead, P.A.; Martin, J.V.: Subject specialization in British university libraries : a survey (1982) 0.11
    0.10876336 = product of:
      0.16314504 = sum of:
        0.14336552 = weight(_text_:specialist in 468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14336552 = score(doc=468,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.44192728 = fieldWeight in 468, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=468)
        0.019779515 = product of:
          0.03955903 = sum of:
            0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03955903 = score(doc=468,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 468, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=468)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A survey of subject specialisation in UK university libraries was made in Apr 81. Replies were received in the form of letters, from which quotations are made liberally. The evolution of subjetc specialisation is traced and views on the term 'subject specialist' dexcribed. Each library is classified in 1 of 5 categories: functional, dual, hybrid, 3 tier, subject divisional, according to the form of subject specialisation (if any) practised. The range of functions commonly performed on a subject basis is considered. Factors which influence the adoption and implementation of subject specialisation are discussed. These include relations with library users, work satisfaction and promotion prospects, the availability of suitably qualified staff and the relevance of subject qualifications, tensions between subject and functional activities, and the significance of automation and economic considerations. Most of the reservations expressed about subject specialisation were practical rather than ideological
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  3. Hanson, T.A.: Personal bibliographic software and the provision of computer-based information services in academic communities (1989) 0.06
    0.06371801 = product of:
      0.19115403 = sum of:
        0.19115403 = weight(_text_:specialist in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19115403 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.5892364 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes methods whereby the process of retrieving bibliographic information from one electronic source (e.g. on-line data base) and its subsequent insertion into another data base, on a personal computer, can be managed more efficiently using specialist software. Describes how one of the available packages is being used at Portsmouth Polytechnic Library, U.K.
  4. Marder, J.V.: ¬The development of the British Education Thesaurus : a personal account (1989) 0.06
    0.06371801 = product of:
      0.19115403 = sum of:
        0.19115403 = weight(_text_:specialist in 2498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19115403 = score(doc=2498,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.5892364 = fieldWeight in 2498, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2498)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Gives an account of the methods of construction of the British Education Thesaurus, its scope, size and the rationale for its creation. Discusses current usage in the UK context and the relationship of the project to other international indexing services. Concludes with some thoughts on future developments and suggestions for consideration by specialist data bases within the field of education.
  5. Marco, G.A.: Subject bibliography in the twenty-first century (1988) 0.06
    0.06371801 = product of:
      0.19115403 = sum of:
        0.19115403 = weight(_text_:specialist in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19115403 = score(doc=430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.5892364 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes five challenges that will be faced by the compilers of subject bibliographies in the twenty-first century. Because the bibliography of the twenty-first century will need to be selective, the subject bibliographer will need to be a specialist in the discipline as well as bibliographic description. It will be essential for those who write and publish or disseminate subject bibliographies to be most concerned with the precise needs of the end user, rather than the object of the work in itself.
  6. Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988) 0.06
    0.05826698 = product of:
      0.17480093 = sum of:
        0.17480093 = sum of:
          0.12205556 = weight(_text_:librarians in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12205556 = score(doc=2832,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.5599305 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
          0.052745372 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052745372 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reference librarians, who are thoroughly familiar with the purpose, scope and arrangement of abstract periodicals, are uniquely qualified for the task of writing abstracts. The procedures described here offer a relatively simple way for them to write acceptable abstracts from the outset. Although research is being conducted in the area of machine generated abstracts, there wll continue to be a role for human abstractors.
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
  7. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.06
    0.0579382 = product of:
      0.1738146 = sum of:
        0.1738146 = sum of:
          0.10788289 = weight(_text_:librarians in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10788289 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.4949133 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.065931715 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.065931715 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  8. Malrieu, D.: ¬L' information sur les revues scientifiques : premier bilan d'une expérience dans la domaine de la psychologie (1988) 0.05
    0.04778851 = product of:
      0.14336552 = sum of:
        0.14336552 = weight(_text_:specialist in 2522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14336552 = score(doc=2522,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.44192728 = fieldWeight in 2522, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2522)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The social sciences documentation centre (CDSH) of the French National Research Centre initiated the publication in 1988 of a psychology periodicals catalogue, Catalogue thématiques des revues de psychologie. Discusses the problems involved in setting up such a catalogue, with specific reference to deciding how a printed source can best complement its parent on-line data base: in this case, CDSH's PSYSIS. The decision to produce the catalogue has been largely precipitated by low uptake of the data base. Considerable attention has been given to delimiting coverage (French and foreign specialist periodicals, multi-disciplinary periodicals); defining descriptors (involving decisions about who the periodical is aimed at); and what information to include under each entry. The main problems, still to be solved, concern lack of adequate software (only a relational data base would be fully satisfactory); and inadequate information about user requirements from hard copy material as opposed to on-line data bases. The results of this preliminary evaluation, albeit tentative, are of considerable relevance to the delopment of strategies for diffusing information on scientific periodicals in general.
  9. Gödert, W.: Klassifikationssysteme und Online-Katalog (1987) 0.05
    0.04778851 = product of:
      0.14336552 = sum of:
        0.14336552 = weight(_text_:specialist in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14336552 = score(doc=5138,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32440975 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04866305 = queryNorm
            0.44192728 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.666449 = idf(docFreq=152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Free text searching with keywords in a complete data store is not necessarily the best automatic retrieval method. There must be a proper classification of documents and concepts and the use of a proper classification system avoids problems of terminological deficiency. The dialogue search form makes the on-line catalogue a new information medium. A bibliographic unit must be created with as many search access points as possible, using verbal and classificatory search elements. Verbal search categories must include free text elements for individual search access requirements and a controlled vocabulary with syntactic connections. Classified data should consist of a universal classification system with clear structural notation for access and surface searching, together with several specialist subject classifications for differentiated documentation and retrieval. The universal classification needs no detailed subdivision: it serves mainly as a guide and entry to the detailed sub-systems
  10. Mischo, W.H.; Lee, J.: End-user searching in bibliographic databases (1987) 0.05
    0.04635056 = product of:
      0.13905168 = sum of:
        0.13905168 = sum of:
          0.08630631 = weight(_text_:librarians in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08630631 = score(doc=336,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.39593065 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
          0.052745372 = weight(_text_:22 in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052745372 = score(doc=336,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The growing interest in end user or direct patron access to on-line bibliographic databases is reviewed with references to online catalogues, databases, and CD-ROMs. The literature of end user searching is surveyed with notes on: user training, software search aids, end user services in libraries: characterisation of end user searches; the role of librarians; and CD-ROMs as end user media
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.227-263
  11. Miller, E.: Prince of librarians : the life and times of Antonio Panizzi of the British Museum (1988) 0.05
    0.04635056 = product of:
      0.13905168 = sum of:
        0.13905168 = sum of:
          0.08630631 = weight(_text_:librarians in 454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08630631 = score(doc=454,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.39593065 = fieldWeight in 454, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=454)
          0.052745372 = weight(_text_:22 in 454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052745372 = score(doc=454,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 454, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=454)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2007 10:20:05
  12. Hori, I.: ¬The cognitive structure of classification work (1989) 0.04
    0.04055674 = product of:
      0.12167022 = sum of:
        0.12167022 = sum of:
          0.07551802 = weight(_text_:librarians in 3553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07551802 = score(doc=3553,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.3464393 = fieldWeight in 3553, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3553)
          0.0461522 = weight(_text_:22 in 3553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0461522 = score(doc=3553,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3553, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3553)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The classification work of 26 librarians and 9 students was studied by a thinking aloud method. The structure of their work was analysed into 2 parts that corresond with the stages presented in the ISO standard 5963. Documents were analysed by different concepts of "aboutness". Identification of the principal concepts present in the subject has led into a hypothesis about 3 conceptual systems. Expressing the concepts in terms of classification systems was found to be difficult with UDC because of many unclear synonyms in different parts of the schedules.
    Date
    25.12.1995 22:12:09
  13. Nelson, M.G.: Catalogers as librarians (1986) 0.04
    0.035960965 = product of:
      0.10788289 = sum of:
        0.10788289 = product of:
          0.21576577 = sum of:
            0.21576577 = weight(_text_:librarians in 2880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21576577 = score(doc=2880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.9898266 = fieldWeight in 2880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2880)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  14. Lancaster, F.W.: Libraries and librarians in an age of electronics (1982) 0.04
    0.035960965 = product of:
      0.10788289 = sum of:
        0.10788289 = product of:
          0.21576577 = sum of:
            0.21576577 = weight(_text_:librarians in 6184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21576577 = score(doc=6184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.9898266 = fieldWeight in 6184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6184)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  15. Miller, J.: From subject headings for audiovisual media (1988) 0.03
    0.034762923 = product of:
      0.104288764 = sum of:
        0.104288764 = sum of:
          0.064729735 = weight(_text_:librarians in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.064729735 = score(doc=324,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.296948 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
          0.03955903 = weight(_text_:22 in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03955903 = score(doc=324,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17040971 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04866305 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In subject cataloging of audiovisual materials generic terms like 'documentary' or 'absolute film' facilitate the work of users and librarians. On the concrete level the study shows 4 ways to make a list of generic terms for the application in general libraries. The heuristic function of the study is to offer methods towards the solution of problems in the field of subject cataloguing of non-book materials. (1) The formal subject heading in library science corresponds to generic terms; Anglo-American and German rules for subject cataloging, however, provide no list that is directly applicable. (2) The terminology of institutions administering many audiovisual documents has been examined; general libraries have to find a common denominator with medium depth of classification and balanced representation of fiction and nonfiction terms. (3) From encyclopedic definitions of generic terms 8 dimensions have been extracted characterizing the terms in question individually. (4) The contribution of communication science has been discussed explaining a research project
    Source
    Inspel. 22(1988), S.121-145
  16. Molholt, P.: ¬The information machine : a new challenge for librarians (1986) 0.03
    0.02876877 = product of:
      0.08630631 = sum of:
        0.08630631 = product of:
          0.17261262 = sum of:
            0.17261262 = weight(_text_:librarians in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17261262 = score(doc=419,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.7918613 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  17. Recruiting, educating, and training cataloging librarians : solving the problems (1989) 0.03
    0.02876877 = product of:
      0.08630631 = sum of:
        0.08630631 = product of:
          0.17261262 = sum of:
            0.17261262 = weight(_text_:librarians in 1057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17261262 = score(doc=1057,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.7918613 = fieldWeight in 1057, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1057)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  18. Davies, R.: Document, information or knowledge? : choices for librarians (1983) 0.03
    0.02876877 = product of:
      0.08630631 = sum of:
        0.08630631 = product of:
          0.17261262 = sum of:
            0.17261262 = weight(_text_:librarians in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17261262 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.7918613 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  19. Adams, M.S.; Judd, B.: Evaluating reference librarians : using goal analysis as a first step (1984) 0.03
    0.02876877 = product of:
      0.08630631 = sum of:
        0.08630631 = product of:
          0.17261262 = sum of:
            0.17261262 = weight(_text_:librarians in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17261262 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.7918613 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  20. Smith, N.M.; Nelson, V.C.: Burnout: a survey of academic reference librarians (1983) 0.03
    0.02876877 = product of:
      0.08630631 = sum of:
        0.08630631 = product of:
          0.17261262 = sum of:
            0.17261262 = weight(_text_:librarians in 5850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17261262 = score(doc=5850,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21798341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04866305 = queryNorm
                0.7918613 = fieldWeight in 5850, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.479444 = idf(docFreq=1362, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5850)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    

Languages

  • e 130
  • d 45
  • f 2
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 141
  • m 24
  • s 10
  • u 2
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications