Main, E.: ¬A survey of online dictionaries (1998)
0.08
0.0783365 = product of:
0.3916825 = sum of:
0.3916825 = weight(_text_:dictionaries in 3301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3916825 = score(doc=3301,freq=10.0), product of:
0.2864761 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
1.3672432 = fieldWeight in 3301, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3301)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Looks at some of the available online dictionaries to see how they measure up against their print counterparts. Outlines the basic requirements of an online dictionary and reviews the following: the Merriam-Webster; the Hypertext Webster; OneLook Dictionaries; the Newbury House Online Dictionary; the Elza Oxford and Elza Webster; and Australia's MacquarieNet Dictionary. concludes that the Merriam-Webster is easily the best of the current crop of online dictionaries, but none yet is as easy to use as a standard desktop paper dictionary
- Object
- OneLook Dictionaries
