-
Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007)
0.14
0.13543718 = product of:
0.20315576 = sum of:
0.0684437 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0684437 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.13471206 = sum of:
0.07933309 = weight(_text_:classification in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07933309 = score(doc=266,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.05537897 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05537897 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews the enormous changes in cataloging and classification reflected in the literature of 2003 and 2004, and discusses major themes and issues. Traditional cataloging and classification tools have been re-vamped and new resources have emerged. Most notable themes are: the continuing influence of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Control (FRBR); the struggle to understand the ever-broadening concept of an "information entity"; steady developments in metadata-encoding standards; and the globalization of information systems, including multilinguistic challenges.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Clarke, R.I.: Breaking records : the history of bibliographic records and their influence in conceptualizing bibliographic data (2015)
0.13
0.12628555 = product of:
0.18942831 = sum of:
0.16938952 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16938952 = score(doc=1877,freq=16.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.8516034 = fieldWeight in 1877, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1877)
0.020038802 = product of:
0.040077604 = sum of:
0.040077604 = weight(_text_:classification in 1877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040077604 = score(doc=1877,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 1877, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1877)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A bibliographic record is a conceptual whole that includes all bibliographic information about a resource together in one place. With the Semantic Web, individual data statements are linked across the web. This position article argues that the traditional conceptualization of bibliographic records affects the affordances and limitations of that data. A historical analysis of the development of bibliographic records contrasted with the Semantic Web model reveals how the "record" model shaped library cataloging and the implications on library catalogs today. Reification of the record model for bibliographic data hampers possibilities for innovation in cataloging, inspiring a reconceptualization of bibliographic description.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.3/4, S.286-302
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.13
0.12573192 = product of:
0.18859786 = sum of:
0.0684437 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0684437 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.12015416 = sum of:
0.06477519 = weight(_text_:classification in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06477519 = score(doc=249,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.05537897 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05537897 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hillmann, D.I.: 'Parallel universes' or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996)
0.12
0.11548598 = product of:
0.17322896 = sum of:
0.08469476 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08469476 = score(doc=3656,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
0.088534206 = sum of:
0.040077604 = weight(_text_:classification in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040077604 = score(doc=3656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
0.048456598 = weight(_text_:22 in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048456598 = score(doc=3656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Briefly follows the debate concerning: the relationship between traditional library OPACs and the WWW; possible replacement of USMARC format with SGML; and the possible demise of OPACs that do not migrate to the WWW. Discusses the approach taken by the Text encoding Initative (TEI) in their use of a mandatory TEI header in their standard SGML application as the first since CIP to explore attaching bibliographic information to the item itself to assist cataloguing
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
- Source
- Electronic resources: selection and bibliographic control. Ed.: L.-Y.W. Pattie, u. B.J. Cox
-
McMillan, G.: Electronic theses and dissertations : merging perspectives (1996)
0.12
0.11548598 = product of:
0.17322896 = sum of:
0.08469476 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08469476 = score(doc=601,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
0.088534206 = sum of:
0.040077604 = weight(_text_:classification in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040077604 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
0.048456598 = weight(_text_:22 in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048456598 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Theses and dissertations as electronic files transferred from the student author to the Graduate School to the Library may well be the first major source of electronic texts that many libraries encounter. To prepare for this potential influx of electronic texts, an ad hoc task force considered work flow and cataloging guidelines. The author suggests expanding current theses cataloging and taking advantage of online information prepared by authors so that the bibliographic records provide OPACS with much more valuable information than does traditional theses cataloging. This should not require a lot of extra work.
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Electronic Resources: Selection and Bibliographic Control
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.105-125
-
Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996)
0.11
0.113083765 = product of:
0.16962564 = sum of:
0.0684437 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0684437 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.10118195 = sum of:
0.045802977 = weight(_text_:classification in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045802977 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.05537897 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05537897 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Electronic Resources: Selection and Bibliographic Control
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
-
Layne, S.S.: Brian E. Schottlaender : politics and philosophy of bibliographic control, a conversation (1999)
0.11
0.106569394 = product of:
0.15985408 = sum of:
0.11977647 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11977647 = score(doc=5622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
0.040077604 = product of:
0.08015521 = sum of:
0.08015521 = weight(_text_:classification in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08015521 = score(doc=5622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 28(1999) no.4, S.71-89
-
Morgan, E.L.: Possible solutions for incorporating digital information mediums into traditional library cataloging services (1996)
0.10
0.0989483 = product of:
0.14842245 = sum of:
0.059888236 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059888236 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
0.088534206 = sum of:
0.040077604 = weight(_text_:classification in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040077604 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
0.048456598 = weight(_text_:22 in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048456598 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Electronic Resources: Selection and Bibliographic Control
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.143-170
-
Leazer, G.H.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Bibliographic families in the library catalog : a qualitative analysis and grounded theory (1999)
0.09
0.08698937 = product of:
0.13048406 = sum of:
0.11317813 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11317813 = score(doc=107,freq=14.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.56900144 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
0.017305927 = product of:
0.034611855 = sum of:
0.034611855 = weight(_text_:22 in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034611855 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Forty-five years have passed since Lubetzky outlined the primary objectives of the catalog, which should facilitate the identification of specific bibliographic entities, and the explicit recoguition of works and relationships amongthem. Still, our catalogs are better designed to identify specific bibliographic entities than they are to guide users among the network of potential related editions and translations of works. In this paper, we seck to examine qualitatively some interesting examples of families of related works, defined as bibliographic families. Although the cases described here were derived from a random sample, this is a qualitative analysis. We selected these bibliographic families for their ability to reveal the strengths and weaknesses of Leazer's model, which incorporates relationship taxonomies by Tillett and Smiraglia Qualitatice analysis is intended to produce on explanation of a phenomenou, particularly an identification of any palterns observed. Patterns observed in qualitative analysis can be used to affirm external observations of the same phenomena; conclusions can contribute to what is knoton as grounded theory-a unique explanation grounded in the phenomenon under study. We arrive at two statements of grounded theory concerning bibliographic families: cataloger-generated implicit maps among works are inadequate, and qualitative analysis suggests the complexity of even the smallest bibliographic families. We conclude that user behavior study is needed to suggest which alternative maps are preferable.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Stankowski, R.H.: Bibliographic record maintenance and control in a consortium database (1990)
0.08
0.082512185 = product of:
0.12376827 = sum of:
0.103729464 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.103729464 = score(doc=502,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.52149844 = fieldWeight in 502, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=502)
0.020038802 = product of:
0.040077604 = sum of:
0.040077604 = weight(_text_:classification in 502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040077604 = score(doc=502,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 502, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=502)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- When an institution wishes to automate but does not have the financial resources to implement an online integrated system, one solution is to join forces with other libraries who have similar desires and needs. Since the online database is the foundation of all library automation, a shared database will be necessary in this type of cluster environment. This article discusses some of the problems encountered when bibliographic records are shared by a number of libraries, such as difficulties in information retrieval and bibliographic control. Possible methods of dealing with the problems of joint input and database maintenance are then proposed.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 12(1990) no.2, S.47-62
-
Rothstein, S.: ¬The extended library and the dedicated library : a sceptical outsider looks at union catalogues and bibliographic networks (1982)
0.08
0.07612099 = product of:
0.11418148 = sum of:
0.08555462 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08555462 = score(doc=291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=291)
0.028626861 = product of:
0.057253722 = sum of:
0.057253722 = weight(_text_:classification in 291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057253722 = score(doc=291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 2(1982) nos.1/2, S.103-120
-
Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: ¬A turning point for catalogs : Ranganathan's possible point of view (2015)
0.07
0.070724726 = product of:
0.10608709 = sum of:
0.08891097 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08891097 = score(doc=2006,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.44699866 = fieldWeight in 2006, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2006)
0.017176118 = product of:
0.034352235 = sum of:
0.034352235 = weight(_text_:classification in 2006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034352235 = score(doc=2006,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 2006, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2006)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Since the end of the last century, catalogs have been changing more and more quickly. This change is following a recognizable course, beginning with the publication of Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, passing through the reorganization of international cataloging principles, the revision of international standards of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (International Standard for Bibliographic Description), and the foundation of new cataloging codes, such as Resource Description and Access. While principles, models, and rules are well established, bibliographic formats seem to be a bottleneck and users seem far from libraries. This article aims to present an overview of current changes, potential convergences, developments, and weak points from Ranganathan's point of view.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.3/4, S.341-351
-
Carlyle, A.; Summerlin, J.: Transforming catalog displays : record clustering for works of fiction (2002)
0.07
0.06982237 = product of:
0.10473356 = sum of:
0.08469476 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08469476 = score(doc=5626,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 5626, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5626)
0.020038802 = product of:
0.040077604 = sum of:
0.040077604 = weight(_text_:classification in 5626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040077604 = score(doc=5626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5626)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Displays grouping retrieved bibliographic record sets into categories or clusters may communicate search results more quickly and effectively to users than current catalog displays providing long alphabetical lists of records. Bibliographic records associated with three large fiction works are analyzed to discover the presence of relationship-type indicators. Preliminary results show that 94% of the records in this study contained indicators of cluster type that would allow them to be correctly identified automatically. However, the clusters formed by the relationship types used here are of unequal size. Because of this, it is suggested that alternative strategies be investigated for their potential to create more useful clustered displays.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 33(2002) nos.3/4, S.xx-xx
-
Seikel, M.: General notes in catalog records versus FRBR user tasks (2013)
0.07
0.06982237 = product of:
0.10473356 = sum of:
0.08469476 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08469476 = score(doc=1929,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 1929, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1929)
0.020038802 = product of:
0.040077604 = sum of:
0.040077604 = weight(_text_:classification in 1929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040077604 = score(doc=1929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 1929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1929)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article analyzes the literature concerning uses of notes in bibliographic records and also certain grammatical conventions used by catalogers to communicate information about the resources they are describing. It shows that these types of data do not aid the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) user tasks in the resource discovery process. It also describes how general notes are addressed in Resource Description Access (RDA), and advocates that cataloging practices involving most general notes and such conventions as bracketing and abbreviations should be discontinued with the widespread use of RDA.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 51(2013) no.4, S.420-427
-
Panchyshyn, R.S.; Park, A.L.: Resource Description and Access (RDA) database enrichment : the path to a hybridized catalog (2015)
0.07
0.06982237 = product of:
0.10473356 = sum of:
0.08469476 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08469476 = score(doc=2017,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
0.020038802 = product of:
0.040077604 = sum of:
0.040077604 = weight(_text_:classification in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040077604 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article examines the benefits of a Resource Description and Access (RDA) enrichment project for libraries. Enrichment projects "hybridize", or enrich legacy Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, Second Edition (AACR2) bibliographic records with RDA data. Until a replacement for MARC is developed, bibliographic data will continue to be encoded in MARC 21 in many integrated library systems. Library catalogs contain records coded under both AACR2 and RDA standards. RDA enrichment projects benefit the patron experience because the data is cleaner and more consistent for patron use and display, cataloging staff workflows are simplified, and the consistency of the data is advantageous for system development and data exchange with other communities
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.2, S.214-233
-
Walker, J.M.: Faceted vocabularies in catalog searches : provenance evidence vocabulary as search terms or limiters for a personal library collection (2023)
0.07
0.06982237 = product of:
0.10473356 = sum of:
0.08469476 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08469476 = score(doc=1173,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 1173, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1173)
0.020038802 = product of:
0.040077604 = sum of:
0.040077604 = weight(_text_:classification in 1173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040077604 = score(doc=1173,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 1173, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1173)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Genre/Form headings are an important means by which librarians provide users with contextual or descriptive information. To facilitate the discovery of resources with important provenance characteristics, the Marion E. Wade Center added terms from a controlled vocabulary to bibliographic records representing items in the C. S. Lewis personal library collection. The selected terms focus on features that have historically been of interest to visitors. The addition of these headings in the bibliographic records allows users to use these keywords to conduct a search or narrow their results, resulting in more flexibility to locate and select the resources that best meet their needs.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 61(2023) no.5-6, S.646-660
-
Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004)
0.07
0.0695915 = product of:
0.104387246 = sum of:
0.0905425 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0905425 = score(doc=2647,freq=14.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.45520115 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.013844742 = product of:
0.027689485 = sum of:
0.027689485 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027689485 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Despite the existence of a logical structural model for bibliographic records which integrates any record type, library catalogues persist in offering catalogue records at the level of 'items'. Such records however, do not clearly indicate which works they contain. Hence the search possibilities of the end user are unduly limited. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) present through a conceptual model, independent of any cataloguing code or implementation, a globalized view of the bibliographic universe. This model, a synthesis of the existing cataloguing rules, consists of clearly structured entities and well defined types of relationships among them. From a theoretical viewpoint, the model is likely to be a good knowledge organiser with great potential in identifying the author and the work represented by an item or publication and is able to link different works of the author with different editions, translations or adaptations of those works aiming at better answering the user needs. This paper is presenting an interpretation of the FRBR model opposing it to a traditional bibliographic record of a complex library material.
- Content
- 1. Introduction With the diversification of the material available in library collections such as: music, film, 3D objects, cartographic material and electronic resources like CD-ROMS and Web sites, the existing cataloguing principles and codes are no longer adequate to enable the user to find, identify, select and obtain a particular entity. The problem is not only that material fails to be appropriately represented in the catalogue records but also access to such material, or parts of it, is difficult if possible at all. Consequently, the need emerged to develop new rules and build up a new conceptual model able to cope with all the requirements demanded by the existing library material. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records developed by an IFLA Study Group from 1992 through 1997 present a generalised view of the bibliographic universe and are intended to be independent of any cataloguing code or implementation (Tillett, 2002). Outstanding scholars like Antonio Panizzi, Charles A. Cutter and Seymour Lubetzky formulated the basic cataloguing principles of which some can be retrieved, as Denton (2003) argues as updated versions, between the basic lines of the FRBR model: - the relation work-author groups all the works of an author - all the editions, translations, adaptations of a work are clearly separated (as expressions and manifestations) - all the expressions and manifestations of a work are collocated with their related works in bibliographic families - any document (manifestation and item) can be found if the author, title or subject of that document is known - the author is authorised by the authority control - the title is an intrinsic part of the work + authority control entity
- Date
- 17. 6.2015 14:40:22
-
Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000)
0.07
0.0685737 = product of:
0.10286055 = sum of:
0.08555462 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08555462 = score(doc=190,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.017305927 = product of:
0.034611855 = sum of:
0.034611855 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034611855 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Catalogers have become interdependent in their pursuit to provide bibliographic control and access. This interdependency has brought with it the need for greater agreement in applying common cataloging policies and rules. The expanded application of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is fostering greater uniformity in the provision of bibliographic description and access. The rules have been translated into numerous languages and used in European, Middle Eastern, and Latin American countries. Cataloging committees and individual libraries in Europe and South Africa have expressed strong interest in adopting, adapting, or aligning with AACR2. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) is one of the most successful cooperative cataloging efforts and has a considerable international component, which encourages the use of AACR, LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), and MARC. AACR2 is successful on an international level because it is based in internationally developed standards, including ISBDs and the Paris Principles. ISBDs (International Standard Bibliographic Description) and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records are examples of the contributions that IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) has made to the internationalization of cataloging. IFLA sponsored the international conference that resulted in the Paris Principles as well as subsequent projects to craft international policy in relation to uniform headings for persons, corporate bodies, and titles.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Tillett, B.B.: Bibliographic relationships in library catalogues (1988)
0.06
0.06452934 = product of:
0.193588 = sum of:
0.193588 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.193588 = score(doc=5240,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.973261 = fieldWeight in 5240, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5240)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 17(1988), S.3-6
-
Albrechtsen, H.: ¬The order of catalogues : towards democratic classification and indexing in public libraries (1998)
0.06
0.06306431 = product of:
0.09459646 = sum of:
0.059888236 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059888236 = score(doc=2099,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 2099, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2099)
0.034708228 = product of:
0.069416456 = sum of:
0.069416456 = weight(_text_:classification in 2099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069416456 = score(doc=2099,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.42661208 = fieldWeight in 2099, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2099)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses how classification systems have developed to perform the work of articulation in electronic libraries as exemplified by projects involving cooperative design of classificatory structures and democratic classification and indexing. Delineates the stages in this evolution and focuses on the mutual design activity of libraries and users which took place in the development of an enriched multimedia catalogue on the WWW at Ballerup public library in Denmark and on research in england into the democratic indexing of images and fiction. Although recent projects are promising it is important to avoid a mechanistic concept of knowledge and maintain a social view
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 27(1998) no.2, S.41-43
