-
Goldberg, J.: Classification of religion in LCC (2000)
0.11
0.106569394 = product of:
0.15985408 = sum of:
0.11977647 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11977647 = score(doc=5402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 5402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5402)
0.040077604 = product of:
0.08015521 = sum of:
0.08015521 = weight(_text_:classification in 5402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08015521 = score(doc=5402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 5402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Vortrag, IFLA General Conference, Divison IV Bibliographic Control, Jerusalem, 2000
-
Dini, L.: CACAO : multilingual access to bibliographic records (2007)
0.10
0.09613319 = product of:
0.14419977 = sum of:
0.10266554 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10266554 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.041534226 = product of:
0.08306845 = sum of:
0.08306845 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08306845 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Pro-Cite 2.0 for the IBM and Biblio-Link to USMARC comunications format records (1993)
0.09
0.09134519 = product of:
0.13701779 = sum of:
0.10266554 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10266554 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
0.034352235 = product of:
0.06870447 = sum of:
0.06870447 = weight(_text_:classification in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06870447 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 16(1993) no.2, S.125-127
- Imprint
- Ann Arbor, MI 48106 : Personal Bibliographic Software, P.O. box 4250
-
Broughton, V.: ¬A new classification for the literature for religion (2000)
0.09
0.09134519 = product of:
0.13701779 = sum of:
0.10266554 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10266554 = score(doc=5398,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 5398, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5398)
0.034352235 = product of:
0.06870447 = sum of:
0.06870447 = weight(_text_:classification in 5398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06870447 = score(doc=5398,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 5398, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5398)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Vortrag, IFLA General Conference, Divison IV Bibliographic Control, Jerusalem, 2000
-
Elazar, D.H.: ¬The making of a classification scheme for libraries of Judaica (2000)
0.09
0.09134519 = product of:
0.13701779 = sum of:
0.10266554 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10266554 = score(doc=5400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 5400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5400)
0.034352235 = product of:
0.06870447 = sum of:
0.06870447 = weight(_text_:classification in 5400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06870447 = score(doc=5400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 5400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5400)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Vortrag, IFLA General Conference, Divison IV Bibliographic Control, Jerusalem, 2000
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: Section on Classification and Indexing : review of activities 1999-2000 (2000)
0.09
0.09134519 = product of:
0.13701779 = sum of:
0.10266554 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10266554 = score(doc=5409,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 5409, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5409)
0.034352235 = product of:
0.06870447 = sum of:
0.06870447 = weight(_text_:classification in 5409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06870447 = score(doc=5409,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 5409, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5409)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Vortrag, IFLA General Conference, Divison IV Bibliographic Control, Jerusalem, 2000
-
Campbell, D.G.; Mayhew, A.: ¬A phylogenetic approach to bibliographic families and relationships (2017)
0.08
0.07939734 = product of:
0.11909601 = sum of:
0.10478258 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10478258 = score(doc=3875,freq=12.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.52679294 = fieldWeight in 3875, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3875)
0.0143134305 = product of:
0.028626861 = sum of:
0.028626861 = weight(_text_:classification in 3875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028626861 = score(doc=3875,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 3875, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3875)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This presentation applies the principles of phylogenetic classification to the phenomenon of bibliographic relationships in library catalogues. We argue that while the FRBR paradigm supports hierarchical bibliographic relationships between works and their various expressions and manifestations, we need a different paradigm to support associative bibliographic relationships of the kind detected in previous research. Numerous studies have shown the existence and importance of bibliographic relationships that lie outside that hierarchical FRBR model: particularly the importance of bibliographic families. We would like to suggest phylogenetics as a potential means of gaining access to those more elusive and ephemeral relationships. Phylogenetic analysis does not follow the Platonic conception of an abstract work that gives rise to specific instantiations; rather, it tracks relationships of kinship as they evolve over time. We use two examples to suggest ways in which phylogenetic trees could be represented in future library catalogues. The novels of Jane Austen are used to indicate how phylogenetic trees can represent, with greater accuracy, the line of Jane Austen adaptations, ranging from contemporary efforts to complete her unfinished work, through to the more recent efforts to graft horror memes onto the original text. Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey provides an example of charting relationships both backwards and forwards in time, across different media and genres. We suggest three possible means of applying phylogenetic s in the future: enhancement of the relationship designators in RDA, crowdsourcing user tags, and extracting relationship trees through big data analysis.
-
Hjoerland, B.: Arguments for 'the bibliographical paradigm' : some thoughts inspired by the new English edition of the UDC (2007)
0.08
0.07546778 = product of:
0.11320166 = sum of:
0.08891097 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08891097 = score(doc=552,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.44699866 = fieldWeight in 552, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=552)
0.024290698 = product of:
0.048581395 = sum of:
0.048581395 = weight(_text_:classification in 552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048581395 = score(doc=552,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 552, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=552)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The term 'the bibliographic paradigm' is used in the literature of library and information science, but is a very seldom term and is almost always negatively described. This paper reconsiders this concept. Method. The method is mainly 'analytical'. Empirical data concerning the current state of the UDC-classification system are also presented in order to illuminate the connection between theory and practice. Analysis. The bibliographic paradigm is understood as a perspective in library and information science focusing on documents and information resources, their description, organization, mediation and use. This perspective is examined as one among other metatheories of library and information science and its philosophical assumptions and implications are outlined. Results. The neglect and misunderstanding of 'the bibliographic paradigm' as well as the quality of the new UDC-classification indicate that both the metatheoretical discourses on library and information science and its concrete practice seem to be in a state of crisis.
-
Zumer, M.: ¬The new "Guidelines for national bibliographies in the digital age" (2007)
0.07
0.06982237 = product of:
0.10473356 = sum of:
0.08469476 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08469476 = score(doc=696,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
0.020038802 = product of:
0.040077604 = sum of:
0.040077604 = weight(_text_:classification in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040077604 = score(doc=696,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The Working group on Guidelines for (electronic) national bibliographies was established in 2004 has started the work with an analysis of users and contexts of use of national bibliographies (NB) in the digital age. National bibliographies are changing dramatically: they include more and more also bibliographic records for digital resources and national bibliographic agencies are increasingly complementing (or even replacing) printed versions of NB with electronic. The guidelines will be soon posted for the world-wide review; this paper gives and overview of the document prepared so far.
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 89 - Bibliography with National Libraries and Classification and Indexing
-
Bourdon, F.; Landry, P.: Best practices for subject access to national bibliographies : interim report by the Working Group on Guidelines for Subject Access by National Bibliographic Agencies (2007)
0.07
0.06982237 = product of:
0.10473356 = sum of:
0.08469476 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08469476 = score(doc=698,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
0.020038802 = product of:
0.040077604 = sum of:
0.040077604 = weight(_text_:classification in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040077604 = score(doc=698,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The working group to establish guidelines for subject access by national bibliographic agencies was set up in 2005 in order to analyse the question of subject access and propose key elements for an indexing policy for national bibliographies. The group's mandate is to put forward recommendations based on best practices for subject access to national bibliographies. The group is presently assessing the elements which should be included in an indexing policy and will present an initial version of its recommendations in 2008.
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 89 - Bibliography with National Libraries and Classification and Indexing
-
Dousa, T.M.: E. Wyndham Hulme's classification of the attributes of books : On an early model of a core bibliographical entity (2017)
0.06
0.06432813 = product of:
0.096492186 = sum of:
0.0684437 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0684437 = score(doc=3859,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 3859, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3859)
0.028048482 = product of:
0.056096964 = sum of:
0.056096964 = weight(_text_:classification in 3859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056096964 = score(doc=3859,freq=12.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.3447546 = fieldWeight in 3859, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3859)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Modelling bibliographical entities is a prominent activity within knowledge organization today. Current models of bibliographic entities, such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographical Records (FRBR) and the Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), take inspiration from data - modelling methods developed by computer scientists from the mid - 1970s on. Thus, it would seem that the modelling of bibliographic entities is an activity of very recent vintage. However, it is possible to find examples of bibliographical models from earlier periods of knowledge organization. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to one such model, outlined by the early 20th - century British classification theorist E. Wyndham Hulme in his essay on "Principles of Book Classification" (1911 - 1912). There, Hulme set forth a classification of various attributes by which books can conceivably be classified. These he first divided into accidental and inseparable attributes. Accidental attributes were subdivided into edition - level and copy - level attributes and inseparable attitudes, into physical and non - physical attributes. Comparison of Hulme's classification of attributes with those of FRBR and BIBFRAME 2.0 reveals that the different classes of attributes in Hulme's classification correspond to groups of attributes associated with different bibliographical entities in those models. These later models assume the existence of different bibliographic entities in an abstraction hierarchy among which attributes are distributed, whereas Hulme posited only a single entity - the book - , whose various aspects he clustered into different classes of attributes. Thus, Hulme's model offers an interesting alternative to current assumptions about how to conceptualize the relationship between attributes and entities in the bibliographical universe.
-
Parent, I.: ¬The importance of national bibliographies in the digital age (2007)
0.06
0.060896795 = product of:
0.09134519 = sum of:
0.0684437 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0684437 = score(doc=687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=687)
0.022901488 = product of:
0.045802977 = sum of:
0.045802977 = weight(_text_:classification in 687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045802977 = score(doc=687,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 687, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=687)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Technological developments are introducing both challenges and opportunities for the future production of national bibliographies. There are new complex issues which must be addressed collectively by national bibliographic agencies. As an international community, we must consider new methods and models for the on-going provision of authoritative data in national bibliographies, which continue to play an essential role in the control of and access to each country's published heritage.
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 89 - Bibliography with National Libraries and Classification and Indexing
-
Gorman, M.: Bibliographic control or chaos : an agenda for national bibliographic services in the 21st century (2001)
0.06
0.056463175 = product of:
0.16938952 = sum of:
0.16938952 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16938952 = score(doc=6899,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.8516034 = fieldWeight in 6899, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6899)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Mitchell, J.S.: DDC 22 : an introduction (2003)
0.06
0.05501018 = product of:
0.16503054 = sum of:
0.16503054 = sum of:
0.05667829 = weight(_text_:classification in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05667829 = score(doc=1936,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
0.10835225 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10835225 = score(doc=1936,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.6055961 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22) will be issued simultaneously in print and web versions in July 2003. The new edition is the first full print update to the Dewey Decimal Classification system in seven years-it includes several significant updates and many new numbers and topics. DDC 22 also features some fundamental structural changes that have been introduced with the goals of promoting classifier efficiency and improving the DDC for use in a variety of applications in the web environment. Most importantly, the content of the new edition has been shaped by the needs and recommendations of Dewey users around the world. The worldwide user community has an important role in shaping the future of the DDC.
- Object
- DDC-22
-
Louie, A.J.; Maddox, E.L.; Washington, W.: Using faceted classification to provide structure for information architecture (2003)
0.05
0.05405512 = product of:
0.08108268 = sum of:
0.05133277 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05133277 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
0.029749908 = product of:
0.059499815 = sum of:
0.059499815 = weight(_text_:classification in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059499815 = score(doc=2471,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This is a short, but very thorough and very interesting, report on how the writers built a faceted classification for some legal information and used it to structure a web site with navigation and searching. There is a good summary of why facets work well and how they fit into bibliographic control in general. The last section is about their implementation of a web site for the Washington State Bar Association's Council for Legal Public Education. Their classification uses three facets: Purpose (the general aim of the document, e.g. Resources for K-12 Teachers), Topic (the subject of the document), and Type (the legal format of the document). See Example Web Sites, below, for a discussion of the site and a problem with its design.
-
Aitchison, C.R.: Cataloging virtual reality artworks: challenges and future prospects (2021)
0.05
0.053284697 = product of:
0.07992704 = sum of:
0.059888236 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059888236 = score(doc=711,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 711, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=711)
0.020038802 = product of:
0.040077604 = sum of:
0.040077604 = weight(_text_:classification in 711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040077604 = score(doc=711,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 711, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=711)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In 2019, Pepperdine Libraries acquired two virtual reality artworks by filmmaker and artist Paisley Smith: Homestay and Unceded Territories. To bring awareness to these pieces, Pepperdine Libraries added these works to the library catalog, creating bibliographic records for both films. There were many challenges and considerations in cataloging virtual reality art, including factors such as the nature of the work, the limits found in Resource Description and Access (RDA) and MARC, and providing access to these works. This paper discusses these topics, as well as provides recommendations for potential future standards for cataloging virtual works.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.5, p.492-509
-
Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) : a conceptual model (2009)
0.05
0.053262964 = product of:
0.079894446 = sum of:
0.0684437 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0684437 = score(doc=3573,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 3573, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3573)
0.011450744 = product of:
0.022901488 = sum of:
0.022901488 = weight(_text_:classification in 3573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022901488 = score(doc=3573,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.14074548 = fieldWeight in 3573, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3573)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Subject access to information has been the predominant approach of users to satisfy their information needs. Research demonstrates that the integration of controlled vocabulary information with an information retrieval system helps users perform more effective subject searches. This integration becomes possible when subject authority data (information about subjects from authority files) are linked to bibliographic files and are made available to users. The purpose of authority control is to ensure consistency in representing a value-a name of a person, a place name, or a subject term-in the elements used as access points in information retrieval. For example, "World War, 1939-1945" has been established as an authorized subject heading in the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). When using LCSH, in cataloging or indexing, all publications about World War II are assigned the established heading regardless of whether a publication refers to the war as the "European War, 1939-1945", "Second World War", "World War 2", "World War II", "WWII", "World War Two", or "2nd World War." The synonymous expressions are referred to by the authorized heading. This ensures that all publications about World War II can be retrieved by and displayed under the same subject heading, either in an individual institution's own catalog or database or in a union catalog that contains bibliographic records from a number of individual libraries or databases. In almost all large bibliographic databases, authority control is achieved manually or semi-automatically by means of an authority file. The file contains records of headings or access points - names, titles, or subjects - that have been authorized for use in bibliographic records. In addition to ensuring consistency in subject representation, a subject authority record also records and maintains semantic relationships among subject terms and/or their labels. Records in a subject authority file are connected through semantic relationships, which may be expressed statically in subject authority records or generated dynamically according to the specific needs (e.g., presenting the broader and narrower terms) of printed or online display of thesauri, subject headings lists, classification schemes, and other knowledge organization systems.
-
Choi, I.: Visualizations of cross-cultural bibliographic classification : comparative studies of the Korean Decimal Classification and the Dewey Decimal Classification (2017)
0.05
0.051891945 = product of:
0.077837914 = sum of:
0.04277731 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04277731 = score(doc=3869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 3869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3869)
0.0350606 = product of:
0.0701212 = sum of:
0.0701212 = weight(_text_:classification in 3869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0701212 = score(doc=3869,freq=12.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.43094325 = fieldWeight in 3869, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The changes in KO systems induced by sociocultural influences may include those in both classificatory principles and cultural features. The proposed study will examine the Korean Decimal Classification (KDC)'s adaptation of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) by comparing the two systems. This case manifests the sociocultural influences on KOSs in a cross-cultural context. Therefore, the study aims at an in-depth investigation of sociocultural influences by situating a KOS in a cross-cultural environment and examining the dynamics between two classification systems designed to organize information resources in two distinct sociocultural contexts. As a preceding stage of the comparison, the analysis was conducted on the changes that result from the meeting of different sociocultural feature in a descriptive method. The analysis aims to identify variations between the two schemes in comparison of the knowledge structures of the two classifications, in terms of the quantity of class numbers that represent concepts and their relationships in each of the individual main classes. The most effective analytic strategy to show the patterns of the comparison was visualizations of similarities and differences between the two systems. Increasing or decreasing tendencies in the class through various editions were analyzed. Comparing the compositions of the main classes and distributions of concepts in the KDC and DDC discloses the differences in their knowledge structures empirically. This phase of quantitative analysis and visualizing techniques generates empirical evidence leading to interpretation.
-
British Library / FAST/Dewey Review Group: Consultation on subject indexing and classification standards applied by the British Library (2015)
0.05
0.050415646 = product of:
0.07562347 = sum of:
0.05133277 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05133277 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
0.024290698 = product of:
0.048581395 = sum of:
0.048581395 = weight(_text_:classification in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048581395 = score(doc=2810,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A broad-based review of the subject and classification schemes used on British Library records began in late 2014. The review was undertaken in response to a number of drivers including: - An increasing demand on available resources due to the rapidly expanding digital publishing arena, and continuing steady state in print publication patterns - Increased demands on metadata to meet changing audience expectations.
- Source
- http://www.bl.uk/bibliographic/pdfs/british-library-consultation-fast-abridged-dewey.pdf
-
Cossham, A.F.: Models of the bibliographic universe (2017)
0.05
0.04889854 = product of:
0.14669561 = sum of:
0.14669561 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14669561 = score(doc=3817,freq=12.0), product of:
0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.051092815 = queryNorm
0.73751014 = fieldWeight in 3817, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3817)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- What kinds of mental models do library catalogue users have of the bibliographic universe in an age of online and electronic information? Using phenomenography and grounded analysis, it identifies participants' understanding, experience, and conceptualisation of the bibliographic universe, and identifies their expectations when using library catalogues. It contrasts participants' mental models with existing LIS models, and explores the nature of the bibliographic universe. The bibliographic universe can be considered to be a social object that exists because it is inscribed in catalogue records, cataloguing codes, bibliographies, and other bibliographic tools. It is a socially constituted phenomenon.
