Search (2865 results, page 1 of 144)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.17
    0.16962564 = product of:
      0.25443846 = sum of:
        0.10266554 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10266554 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051092815 = queryNorm
            0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
        0.15177292 = sum of:
          0.06870447 = weight(_text_:classification in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06870447 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051092815 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
          0.08306845 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08306845 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051092815 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.3, S.45-48
  2. Yi, K.: Automatic text classification using library classification schemes : trends, issues and challenges (2007) 0.15
    0.14780095 = product of:
      0.22170141 = sum of:
        0.059888236 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059888236 = score(doc=2560,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051092815 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 2560, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2560)
        0.16181318 = sum of:
          0.11335658 = weight(_text_:classification in 2560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11335658 = score(doc=2560,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051092815 = queryNorm
              0.69665456 = fieldWeight in 2560, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2560)
          0.048456598 = weight(_text_:22 in 2560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048456598 = score(doc=2560,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051092815 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2560, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2560)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of digital resources and their integration into a traditional library setting has created a pressing need for an automated tool that organizes textual information based on library classification schemes. Automated text classification is a research field of developing tools, methods, and models to automate text classification. This article describes the current popular approach for text classification and major text classification projects and applications that are based on library classification schemes. Related issues and challenges are discussed, and a number of considerations for the challenges are examined.
    Date
    22. 9.2008 18:31:54
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 36(2007) no.4, S.78-82
  3. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.14
    0.13543718 = product of:
      0.20315576 = sum of:
        0.0684437 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0684437 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051092815 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
        0.13471206 = sum of:
          0.07933309 = weight(_text_:classification in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07933309 = score(doc=266,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051092815 = queryNorm
              0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.05537897 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05537897 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051092815 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews the enormous changes in cataloging and classification reflected in the literature of 2003 and 2004, and discusses major themes and issues. Traditional cataloging and classification tools have been re-vamped and new resources have emerged. Most notable themes are: the continuing influence of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Control (FRBR); the struggle to understand the ever-broadening concept of an "information entity"; steady developments in metadata-encoding standards; and the globalization of information systems, including multilinguistic challenges.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.13
    0.12573192 = product of:
      0.18859786 = sum of:
        0.0684437 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0684437 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051092815 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
        0.12015416 = sum of:
          0.06477519 = weight(_text_:classification in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06477519 = score(doc=249,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051092815 = queryNorm
              0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.05537897 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05537897 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051092815 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.12
    0.12145533 = product of:
      0.18218298 = sum of:
        0.08114894 = product of:
          0.2434468 = sum of:
            0.2434468 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2434468 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43316546 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051092815 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.101034045 = sum of:
          0.059499815 = weight(_text_:classification in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.059499815 = score(doc=562,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051092815 = queryNorm
              0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.041534226 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041534226 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051092815 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  6. Satija, M.P.: Sources of investigating the development of bibliographic classification (2000) 0.12
    0.11763652 = product of:
      0.17645477 = sum of:
        0.11977647 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11977647 = score(doc=3153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051092815 = queryNorm
            0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
        0.05667829 = product of:
          0.11335658 = sum of:
            0.11335658 = weight(_text_:classification in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11335658 = score(doc=3153,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051092815 = queryNorm
                0.69665456 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    The future of classification. Ed. R. Marcella u. A. Maltby
  7. Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005) 0.11
    0.113083765 = product of:
      0.16962564 = sum of:
        0.0684437 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0684437 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051092815 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
        0.10118195 = sum of:
          0.045802977 = weight(_text_:classification in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045802977 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051092815 = queryNorm
              0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
          0.05537897 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05537897 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051092815 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.11
    0.11215538 = product of:
      0.16823307 = sum of:
        0.11977647 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11977647 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051092815 = queryNorm
            0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
        0.048456598 = product of:
          0.096913196 = sum of:
            0.096913196 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096913196 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051092815 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  9. Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008) 0.11
    0.110015415 = product of:
      0.16502312 = sum of:
        0.059888236 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059888236 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051092815 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
        0.10513489 = sum of:
          0.05667829 = weight(_text_:classification in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05667829 = score(doc=2550,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051092815 = queryNorm
              0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
          0.048456598 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048456598 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051092815 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The paper takes a retrospective look at the work of Henry Evelyn Bliss, classificationist theorist and author of the Bibliographic Classification. Major features of his writings and philosophy are examined and evaluated for the originality of their contribution to the corpus of knowledge in the discipline. Reactions to Bliss's work are analysed, as is his influence on classification theory of the 20th century. Contemporary work on knowledge organization is seen to continue a number of strands from Bliss's original writings. His standing as a classificationist is compared with that of Ranganathan, with the conclusion that he is not given the credit he deserves.
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  10. Svanberg, M.: Mapping two classification schemes : DDC and SAB (2008) 0.11
    0.10771432 = product of:
      0.16157147 = sum of:
        0.05133277 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05133277 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051092815 = queryNorm
            0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
        0.1102387 = sum of:
          0.06870447 = weight(_text_:classification in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06870447 = score(doc=2151,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051092815 = queryNorm
              0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
          0.041534226 = weight(_text_:22 in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041534226 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051092815 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Most Swedish libraries use a Swedish classification scheme called SAB, but a switch to Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is under consideration. The question of a Swedish switch to DDC was treated as part of a Catalogue Survey, conducted during 2006. Summarising the study, there is a lot to be said for a Swedish switch to DDC. If a switch became reality, mappings between SAB and DDC would play a crucial role as an aid both for librarians and library users. The article describes a project where a DDC arrangement of the Swedish National Bibliography should be achieved through mapping of the captions in the SAB arrangement. The methodology used is described, and problems are discussed. The article includes a comparison of DDC numbers achieved through mapping and manually added DDC numbers in a sample of bibliographic records. Future plans for DDC in Sweden are also discussed.
    Date
    14. 8.2008 11:22:44
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
  11. Attar, K.: ¬The application of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification in Cambridge college libraries (2000) 0.11
    0.106569394 = product of:
      0.15985408 = sum of:
        0.11977647 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11977647 = score(doc=7778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051092815 = queryNorm
            0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 7778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7778)
        0.040077604 = product of:
          0.08015521 = sum of:
            0.08015521 = weight(_text_:classification in 7778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08015521 = score(doc=7778,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051092815 = queryNorm
                0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 7778, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7778)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
  12. Goldberg, J.: Classification of religion in LCC (2000) 0.11
    0.106569394 = product of:
      0.15985408 = sum of:
        0.11977647 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11977647 = score(doc=5402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051092815 = queryNorm
            0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 5402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5402)
        0.040077604 = product of:
          0.08015521 = sum of:
            0.08015521 = weight(_text_:classification in 5402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08015521 = score(doc=5402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051092815 = queryNorm
                0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 5402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Vortrag, IFLA General Conference, Divison IV Bibliographic Control, Jerusalem, 2000
  13. Broughton, V.: ¬A new classification for the literature of religion (2000) 0.11
    0.106569394 = product of:
      0.15985408 = sum of:
        0.11977647 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11977647 = score(doc=353,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051092815 = queryNorm
            0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 353, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=353)
        0.040077604 = product of:
          0.08015521 = sum of:
            0.08015521 = weight(_text_:classification in 353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08015521 = score(doc=353,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051092815 = queryNorm
                0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 353, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=353)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.4, S.59-61
  14. Oyler, P.G.: Teaching classification in the 21st century (2002) 0.11
    0.106569394 = product of:
      0.15985408 = sum of:
        0.11977647 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11977647 = score(doc=3846,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051092815 = queryNorm
            0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
        0.040077604 = product of:
          0.08015521 = sum of:
            0.08015521 = weight(_text_:classification in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08015521 = score(doc=3846,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051092815 = queryNorm
                0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 31(2002) no.1, S.16-17
  15. Antelman, K.: Identifying the serial work as a bibliographic entity (2004) 0.10
    0.10438724 = product of:
      0.15658085 = sum of:
        0.13581374 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13581374 = score(doc=130,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051092815 = queryNorm
            0.6828017 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
        0.020767113 = product of:
          0.041534226 = sum of:
            0.041534226 = weight(_text_:22 in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041534226 = score(doc=130,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051092815 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A solid theoretical foundation has been built over the years exploring the bibliographic work and developing cataloging rules and practices to describe the work in the traditional catalog. With the increasing prevalence of multiple manifestations of serial titles, as well as tools that automate discovery and retrieval, bibliographic control of serials at a higher level of abstraction is more necessary than ever before. At the same time, models such as the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records offer new opportunities to control all bibliographic entities at this higher level and build more useful catalog displays. The bibliographic mechanisms that control the work for monographs - author, title, and uniform title - are weak identifiers for serials. New identifiers being adopted by the content industry are built on models and practices that are fundamentally different from those underlying the new bibliographic models. What is needed is a work identifier for serials that is both congruent with the new models and can enable us to meet the objective of providing work-level access to all resources in our catalogs.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Seminario FRBR : Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: reguisiti funzionali per record bibliografici, Florence, 27-28 January 2000, Proceedings (2000) 0.10
    0.103736244 = product of:
      0.15560436 = sum of:
        0.120992504 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.120992504 = score(doc=3948,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051092815 = queryNorm
            0.6082881 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
        0.034611855 = product of:
          0.06922371 = sum of:
            0.06922371 = weight(_text_:22 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06922371 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051092815 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a.: Grimaldi, T.: The object of cataloguing; Byrum, J.D., O.M.A. Madison: Reflections an the goals, concepts and recommendations of the IFLA study an Functional Requirements of Bibliographic Records;
    Date
    29. 8.2005 12:54:22
  17. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.10
    0.10157788 = product of:
      0.15236682 = sum of:
        0.05133277 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05133277 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051092815 = queryNorm
            0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
        0.101034045 = sum of:
          0.059499815 = weight(_text_:classification in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.059499815 = score(doc=780,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051092815 = queryNorm
              0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.041534226 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041534226 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17891833 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051092815 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Networked orientated standards for vocabulary publishing and exchange and proposals for terminological services and terminology registries will improve sharing and use of all knowledge organization systems in the networked information environment. This means that documentary classifications may also become more applicable for use outside their original domain of application. The paper summarises some characteristics common to documentary classifications and explains some terminological, functional and implementation aspects. The original purpose behind each classification scheme determines the functions that the vocabulary is designed to facilitate. These functions influence the structure, semantics and syntax, scheme coverage and format in which classification data are published and made available. The author suggests that attention should be paid to the differences between documentary classifications as these may determine their suitability for a certain purpose and may impose different requirements with respect to their use online. As we speak, many classifications are being created for knowledge organization and it may be important to promote expertise from the bibliographic domain with respect to building and using classification systems.
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
  18. Joudrey, D.N.: ¬A new look at US graduate courses in bibliographic control (2002) 0.10
    0.100019865 = product of:
      0.1500298 = sum of:
        0.1257391 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1257391 = score(doc=5452,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051092815 = queryNorm
            0.63215154 = fieldWeight in 5452, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5452)
        0.024290698 = product of:
          0.048581395 = sum of:
            0.048581395 = weight(_text_:classification in 5452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048581395 = score(doc=5452,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051092815 = queryNorm
                0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 5452, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5452)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The current state of graduate bibliographic control education in the United States is examined through reviewing the literature, analyzing Web sites for 48 LIS programs, and corresponding with and interviewing bibliographic control educators. In reviewing the recent bibliographic control education literature, six primary themes were identified: background/contextual information, theory versus practice, responsibilities and skills needed by catalogers, relations between educators and practitioners, the universality of cataloging, and curricular issues. Each of these areas is examined in depth. The study conducted examined the number and types of bibliographic control education available in LIS programs in the US. It also collected information on which textbooks were being used in each course. It appears from the study that some courses are increasing in number. The primary areas of bibliographic control education examined include organizing information, technical services, classification theory, indexing, thesaurus construction, cataloging technology, and basic, advanced, descriptive, subject, non-book, Internet resources, and music cataloging courses.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 34(2002) nos.1/2, S.59-101
  19. Bensman, S.J.; Leydesdorff, L.: Definition and identification of journals as bibliographic and subject entities : librarianship versus ISI Journal Citation Reports methods and their effect on citation measures (2009) 0.10
    0.100019865 = product of:
      0.1500298 = sum of:
        0.1257391 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1257391 = score(doc=2840,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051092815 = queryNorm
            0.63215154 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
        0.024290698 = product of:
          0.048581395 = sum of:
            0.048581395 = weight(_text_:classification in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048581395 = score(doc=2840,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051092815 = queryNorm
                0.29856625 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper explores the ISI Journal Citation Reports (JCR) bibliographic and subject structures through Library of Congress (LC) and American research libraries cataloging and classification methodology. The 2006 Science Citation Index JCR Behavioral Sciences subject category journals are used as an example. From the library perspective, the main fault of the JCR bibliographic structure is that the JCR mistakenly identifies journal title segments as journal bibliographic entities, seriously affecting journal rankings by total cites and the impact factor. In respect to JCR subject structure, the title segment, which constitutes the JCR bibliographic basis, is posited as the best bibliographic entity for the citation measurement of journal subject relationships. Through factor analysis and other methods, the JCR subject categorization of journals is tested against their LC subject headings and classification. The finding is that JCR and library journal subject analyses corroborate, clarify, and correct each other.
  20. Zhang, Y.; Salaba, A.: Implementing FRBR in libraries : key issues and future directions (2009) 0.10
    0.09974625 = product of:
      0.14961937 = sum of:
        0.120992504 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.120992504 = score(doc=345,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19890657 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051092815 = queryNorm
            0.6082881 = fieldWeight in 345, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=345)
        0.028626861 = product of:
          0.057253722 = sum of:
            0.057253722 = weight(_text_:classification in 345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057253722 = score(doc=345,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16271563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051092815 = queryNorm
                0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 345, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=345)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, Volume 49(2011) no.1, S.47-49 (William Denton).
    RSWK
    Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (BVB)
    Subject
    Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (BVB)

Languages

Types

  • a 2388
  • m 268
  • el 212
  • s 102
  • b 29
  • p 24
  • x 21
  • i 12
  • r 9
  • n 6
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications