Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

Cronin, B.: ¬The citation process : the role and significance in scientific communication (1984) 0.04

0.036986932 = product of:
  0.14794773 = sum of:
    0.14794773 = weight(_text_:communication in 7774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14794773 = score(doc=7774,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.7633004 = fieldWeight in 7774, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7774)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Cronin, B.: Semiotics and evaluative bibliometrics (2000) 0.02

0.023116833 = product of:
  0.09246733 = sum of:
    0.09246733 = weight(_text_:communication in 4542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09246733 = score(doc=4542,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.47706276 = fieldWeight in 4542, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4542)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract: The reciprocal relationship between bibliographic references and citations in the context of the scholarly communication system is examined. Semiotic analysis of referencing behaviours and citation counting reveals the complexity of prevailing sign systems and associated symbolic practices.

Cronin, B.: Hyperauthorship : a postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001) 0.02
```
0.022884497 = product of:
  0.09153799 = sum of:
    0.09153799 = weight(_text_:communication in 5909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09153799 = score(doc=5909,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.47226804 = fieldWeight in 5909, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5909)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Classical assumptions about the nature and ethical entailments of authorship (the standard model) are being challenged by developments in scientific collaboration and multiple authorship. In the biomedical research community, multiple authorship has increased to such an extent that the trustworthiness of the scientific communication system has been called into question. Documented abuses, such as honorific authorship, have serious implications in terms of the acknowledgment of authority, allocation of credit, and assigning of accountability. Within the biomedical world it has been proposed that authors be replaced by lists of contributors (the radical model), whose specific inputs to a given study would be recorded unambiguously. The wider implications of the 'hyperauthorship' phenomenon for scholarly publication are considered

Cronin, B.; Snyder, H.W.; Rosembaum, H.; Martinson, A.; Callahan, E.: Invoked on the Web (1998) 0.02

0.018493466 = product of:
  0.073973864 = sum of:
    0.073973864 = weight(_text_:communication in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073973864 = score(doc=2327,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.3816502 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract: Where, how, and why are scholars invoked on the WWW? An inductively derived typology was used to captue genres of invocation. Comparative data were gathered using five commercial search engines. It is argued that the Web fosters mow modalities of scholarly communication. Different categories of invocation are identified and analyzed in terms of their potential to inform sociometric and bibliometric analyses of academic interaction

Cronin, B.: Metatheorizing citation (1998) 0.02

0.018493466 = product of:
  0.073973864 = sum of:
    0.073973864 = weight(_text_:communication in 5127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073973864 = score(doc=5127,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.3816502 = fieldWeight in 5127, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5127)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract: Reviews a variety of perspectives on citation. Argues that citations have multiple articulations in that they inform our understanding of the sociocultural, cognitive, and textual aspects of scientific communication. Proposes 2 metatheoretical frameworks as a means of negotiating the interpretative differences which characterize the various discourse communities concerned with citation theory and practice

Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.: Banking (on) different forms of symbolic capital (2002) 0.02

0.018493466 = product of:
  0.073973864 = sum of:
    0.073973864 = weight(_text_:communication in 1263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073973864 = score(doc=1263,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.3816502 = fieldWeight in 1263, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1263)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Issue: Brief communication.

Cronin, B.: Bowling alone together : academic writing as distributed cognition (2004) 0.02

0.018493466 = product of:
  0.073973864 = sum of:
    0.073973864 = weight(_text_:communication in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073973864 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.3816502 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series: Brief communication

Cronin, B.: Acknowledgement trends in the research literature of information science (2001) 0.02

0.018493466 = product of:
  0.073973864 = sum of:
    0.073973864 = weight(_text_:communication in 4488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073973864 = score(doc=4488,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.3816502 = fieldWeight in 4488, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4488)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract: Data were gathered on acknowledgements in five leading information science journals for the years 1991-1999. The results were compared with data from two earlier studies of the same journals. Analysis of the aggregate data (1971-1999) confirms the general impression that acknowledgement has become an institutionalised element of the scholarly communication process, reflecting the growing cognitive and structural complexity of contemporary research.

Cronin, B.; Overfelt, K.: ¬The scholar's courtesy : a survey of acknowledgement behaviour (1994) 0.02
```
0.016181784 = product of:
  0.064727135 = sum of:
    0.064727135 = weight(_text_:communication in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064727135 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.33394393 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Scholars in major US research universities were surveyed to explore the normative bases of acknowledgement behaviour. Measures of agreement and divergence were established in respect of five issue sets pertaining to acknowledgement practice: expectations, etiquette, ethics, equity and evaluation. The results confirm the substantive role played by acknowledgements in the primary communication process. Although few formal rules exist, it is clear that many scholars subscribe to the idea of a governing etiquette. The findings also suggest that acknowledgement data could be mined to lay bare the rules of engagement that define the dynamics of collaboration and interdependence among scholars
Lee, C.J.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Zhang, G.; Cronin, B.: Bias in peer review (2013) 0.01
```
0.0138701 = product of:
  0.0554804 = sum of:
    0.0554804 = weight(_text_:communication in 525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0554804 = score(doc=525,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.28623766 = fieldWeight in 525, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=525)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Research on bias in peer review examines scholarly communication and funding processes to assess the epistemic and social legitimacy of the mechanisms by which knowledge communities vet and self-regulate their work. Despite vocal concerns, a closer look at the empirical and methodological limitations of research on bias raises questions about the existence and extent of many hypothesized forms of bias. In addition, the notion of bias is predicated on an implicit ideal that, once articulated, raises questions about the normative implications of research on bias in peer review. This review provides a brief description of the function, history, and scope of peer review; articulates and critiques the conception of bias unifying research on bias in peer review; characterizes and examines the empirical, methodological, and normative claims of bias in peer review research; and assesses possible alternatives to the status quo. We close by identifying ways to expand conceptions and studies of bias to contend with the complexity of social interactions among actors involved directly and indirectly in peer review.

Cronin, B.: Vernacular and vehicular language (2009) 0.01

0.010643278 = product of:
  0.042573113 = sum of:
    0.042573113 = product of:
      0.085146226 = sum of:
        0.085146226 = weight(_text_:22 in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085146226 = score(doc=7192,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 22. 3.2009 11:44:11

Cronin, B.: Thinking about data (2013) 0.01

0.010643278 = product of:
  0.042573113 = sum of:
    0.042573113 = product of:
      0.085146226 = sum of:
        0.085146226 = weight(_text_:22 in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085146226 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 22. 3.2013 16:18:36

Cronin, B.: ¬The writing on the wall (2015) 0.01

0.009122809 = product of:
  0.036491238 = sum of:
    0.036491238 = product of:
      0.072982475 = sum of:
        0.072982475 = weight(_text_:22 in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072982475 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 26. 4.2015 19:27:22

Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000) 0.01

0.007602342 = product of:
  0.030409368 = sum of:
    0.030409368 = product of:
      0.060818736 = sum of:
        0.060818736 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060818736 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 31. 7.2001 20:22:57

Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Types

Themes