Search (3615 results, page 1 of 181)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.24
    0.23765342 = product of:
      0.47530684 = sum of:
        0.11882671 = product of:
          0.35648012 = sum of:
            0.35648012 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.35648012 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.35648012 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35648012 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.23
    0.22757229 = product of:
      0.30342972 = sum of:
        0.07129603 = product of:
          0.21388808 = sum of:
            0.21388808 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21388808 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21388808 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21388808 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.018245619 = product of:
          0.036491238 = sum of:
            0.036491238 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036491238 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.21
    0.21291532 = product of:
      0.2838871 = sum of:
        0.059413355 = product of:
          0.17824006 = sum of:
            0.17824006 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17824006 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.046233665 = weight(_text_:communication in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046233665 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.23853138 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.17824006 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17824006 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  4. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.19
    0.19012275 = product of:
      0.3802455 = sum of:
        0.09506138 = product of:
          0.28518412 = sum of:
            0.28518412 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28518412 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.28518412 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28518412 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  5. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.19
    0.18688972 = product of:
      0.37377945 = sum of:
        0.07129603 = product of:
          0.21388808 = sum of:
            0.21388808 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21388808 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.3024834 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3024834 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  6. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.17
    0.1663574 = product of:
      0.3327148 = sum of:
        0.0831787 = product of:
          0.2495361 = sum of:
            0.2495361 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2495361 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.2495361 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2495361 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  7. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.14
    0.14259206 = product of:
      0.28518412 = sum of:
        0.07129603 = product of:
          0.21388808 = sum of:
            0.21388808 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21388808 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21388808 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21388808 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  8. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.14
    0.14259206 = product of:
      0.28518412 = sum of:
        0.07129603 = product of:
          0.21388808 = sum of:
            0.21388808 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21388808 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21388808 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21388808 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  9. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.14
    0.14259206 = product of:
      0.28518412 = sum of:
        0.07129603 = product of:
          0.21388808 = sum of:
            0.21388808 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21388808 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21388808 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21388808 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  10. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.12
    0.12459315 = product of:
      0.2491863 = sum of:
        0.04753069 = product of:
          0.14259206 = sum of:
            0.14259206 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14259206 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.20165561 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20165561 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  11. Costas, R.; Zahedi, Z.; Wouters, P.: ¬The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media : large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations (2015) 0.12
    0.122440256 = product of:
      0.24488051 = sum of:
        0.046233665 = weight(_text_:communication in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046233665 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.23853138 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
        0.19864684 = sum of:
          0.16823748 = weight(_text_:blogs in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16823748 = score(doc=2598,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31091204 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04488925 = queryNorm
              0.54110956 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
          0.030409368 = weight(_text_:22 in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030409368 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04488925 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze the disciplinary orientation of scientific publications that were mentioned on different social media platforms, focussing on their differences and similarities with citation counts. Design/methodology/approach - Social media metrics and readership counts, associated with 500,216 publications and their citation data from the Web of Science database, were collected from Altmetric.com and Mendeley. Results are presented through descriptive statistical analyses together with science maps generated with VOSviewer. Findings - The results confirm Mendeley as the most prevalent social media source with similar characteristics to citations in their distribution across fields and their density in average values per publication. The humanities, natural sciences, and engineering disciplines have a much lower presence of social media metrics. Twitter has a stronger focus on general medicine and social sciences. Other sources (blog, Facebook, Google+, and news media mentions) are more prominent in regards to multidisciplinary journals. Originality/value - This paper reinforces the relevance of Mendeley as a social media source for analytical purposes from a disciplinary perspective, being particularly relevant for the social sciences (together with Twitter). Key implications for the use of social media metrics on the evaluation of research performance (e.g. the concentration of some social media metrics, such as blogs, news items, etc., around multidisciplinary journals) are identified.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Footnote
    Teil eines Special Issue: Social Media Metrics in Scholarly Communication: exploring tweets, blogs, likes and other altmetrics.
  12. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.12
    0.11882671 = product of:
      0.23765342 = sum of:
        0.059413355 = product of:
          0.17824006 = sum of:
            0.17824006 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17824006 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.17824006 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17824006 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  13. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.12
    0.11606685 = product of:
      0.2321337 = sum of:
        0.21388808 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21388808 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.018245619 = product of:
          0.036491238 = sum of:
            0.036491238 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036491238 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  14. Electronic publishing and electronic information communication (1996) 0.11
    0.112824544 = product of:
      0.22564909 = sum of:
        0.18307598 = weight(_text_:communication in 6664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18307598 = score(doc=6664,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.9445361 = fieldWeight in 6664, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6664)
        0.042573113 = product of:
          0.085146226 = sum of:
            0.085146226 = weight(_text_:22 in 6664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.085146226 = score(doc=6664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6664)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    A special issue devoted to current developments in electronic publishing and electronic information communication
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.181-247
  15. Fullwood, C.; Melrose, K.; Morris, N.; Floyd, S.: Sex, blogs, and baring your soul : factors influencing UK blogging strategies (2013) 0.11
    0.1057146 = product of:
      0.2114292 = sum of:
        0.09246733 = weight(_text_:communication in 614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09246733 = score(doc=614,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.47706276 = fieldWeight in 614, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=614)
        0.11896186 = product of:
          0.23792373 = sum of:
            0.23792373 = weight(_text_:blogs in 614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23792373 = score(doc=614,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.31091204 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.7652445 = fieldWeight in 614, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=614)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    There is an abundance of evidence to suggest that online behavior differs from behaviors in the offline world, and that there are a number of important factors which may affect the communication strategies of people within an online space. This article examines some of these, namely, whether the sex, age, and identifiability of blog authors, as well as the genre of communication, affect communication strategies. Findings suggest that the level of identifiability of the blog author has a limited effect upon their communication strategies. However, sex appeared to influence online behavior in so far as men were more likely to swear and attack others in their blogs. Genre had an important influence on disclosure with more self-disclosure taking place in the diary genre (i.e., blogs in which people talk about their own lives) comparative to the filter genre (i.e., blogs in which people talk about events external to their lives). Age affected both self-disclosure and language use. For example, younger bloggers tended to use more swearing, express more negative emotions and disclose more personal information about others. These findings suggest that age, sex, genre, and identifiability form a cluster of variables that influence the language style and self-disclosure patterns of bloggers; however, the level of identifiability of the blogger may be less important in this respect. Implications of these findings are discussed.
  16. Farkas, M.G.: Social software in libraries : building collaboration, communication, and community online (2007) 0.10
    0.099117324 = product of:
      0.19823465 = sum of:
        0.0554804 = weight(_text_:communication in 2364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0554804 = score(doc=2364,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.28623766 = fieldWeight in 2364, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2364)
        0.14275424 = product of:
          0.28550848 = sum of:
            0.28550848 = weight(_text_:blogs in 2364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28550848 = score(doc=2364,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.31091204 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.9182934 = fieldWeight in 2364, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2364)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: What is social software? -- Blogs -- Blogs in libraries : practical applications -- RSS -- Wikis -- Online communities -- Social networking -- Social bookmarking and collaborative filtering -- Tools for synchronous online reference -- The mobile revolution -- Podcasting -- Screencasting and vodcasting -- Gaming -- What will work @ your library -- Keeping up : a primer -- Future trends in social software.
    LCSH
    Blogs
    Subject
    Blogs
  17. Haustein, S.; Sugimoto, C.; Larivière, V.: Social media in scholarly communication : Guest editorial (2015) 0.10
    0.09882462 = product of:
      0.19764924 = sum of:
        0.07846113 = weight(_text_:communication in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07846113 = score(doc=3809,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.4048012 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
        0.119188115 = sum of:
          0.10094249 = weight(_text_:blogs in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10094249 = score(doc=3809,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31091204 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04488925 = queryNorm
              0.32466576 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
          0.018245619 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018245619 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04488925 = queryNorm
              0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This year marks 350 years since the inaugural publications of both the Journal des Sçavans and the Philosophical Transactions, first published in 1665 and considered the birth of the peer-reviewed journal article. This form of scholarly communication has not only remained the dominant model for disseminating new knowledge (particularly for science and medicine), but has also increased substantially in volume. Derek de Solla Price - the "father of scientometrics" (Merton and Garfield, 1986, p. vii) - was the first to document the exponential increase in scientific journals and showed that "scientists have always felt themselves to be awash in a sea of the scientific literature" (Price, 1963, p. 15), as, for example, expressed at the 1948 Royal Society's Scientific Information Conference: Not for the first time in history, but more acutely than ever before, there was a fear that scientists would be overwhelmed, that they would be no longer able to control the vast amounts of potentially relevant material that were pouring forth from the world's presses, that science itself was under threat (Bawden and Robinson, 2008, p. 183).
    Furthermore, the rise of the web, and subsequently, the social web, has challenged the quasi-monopolistic status of the journal as the main form of scholarly communication and citation indices as the primary assessment mechanisms. Scientific communication is becoming more open, transparent, and diverse: publications are increasingly open access; manuscripts, presentations, code, and data are shared online; research ideas and results are discussed and criticized openly on blogs; and new peer review experiments, with open post publication assessment by anonymous or non-anonymous referees, are underway. The diversification of scholarly production and assessment, paired with the increasing speed of the communication process, leads to an increased information overload (Bawden and Robinson, 2008), demanding new filters. The concept of altmetrics, short for alternative (to citation) metrics, was created out of an attempt to provide a filter (Priem et al., 2010) and to steer against the oversimplification of the measurement of scientific success solely on the basis of number of journal articles published and citations received, by considering a wider range of research outputs and metrics (Piwowar, 2013). Although the term altmetrics was introduced in a tweet in 2010 (Priem, 2010), the idea of capturing traces - "polymorphous mentioning" (Cronin et al., 1998, p. 1320) - of scholars and their documents on the web to measure "impact" of science in a broader manner than citations was introduced years before, largely in the context of webometrics (Almind and Ingwersen, 1997; Thelwall et al., 2005):
    There will soon be a critical mass of web-based digital objects and usage statistics on which to model scholars' communication behaviors - publishing, posting, blogging, scanning, reading, downloading, glossing, linking, citing, recommending, acknowledging - and with which to track their scholarly influence and impact, broadly conceived and broadly felt (Cronin, 2005, p. 196). A decade after Cronin's prediction and five years after the coining of altmetrics, the time seems ripe to reflect upon the role of social media in scholarly communication. This Special Issue does so by providing an overview of current research on the indicators and metrics grouped under the umbrella term of altmetrics, on their relationships with traditional indicators of scientific activity, and on the uses that are made of the various social media platforms - on which these indicators are based - by scientists of various disciplines.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Footnote
    Teil eines Special Issue: Social Media Metrics in Scholarly Communication: exploring tweets, blogs, likes and other altmetrics. Der Beitrag ist frei verfügbar.
  18. Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.; Cai, D.; Kappas, A.: Sentiment strength detection in short informal text (2010) 0.10
    0.09780245 = product of:
      0.1956049 = sum of:
        0.046233665 = weight(_text_:communication in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046233665 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.23853138 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
        0.14937124 = sum of:
          0.11896186 = weight(_text_:blogs in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11896186 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31091204 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04488925 = queryNorm
              0.38262224 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
          0.030409368 = weight(_text_:22 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030409368 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04488925 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    A huge number of informal messages are posted every day in social network sites, blogs, and discussion forums. Emotions seem to be frequently important in these texts for expressing friendship, showing social support or as part of online arguments. Algorithms to identify sentiment and sentiment strength are needed to help understand the role of emotion in this informal communication and also to identify inappropriate or anomalous affective utterances, potentially associated with threatening behavior to the self or others. Nevertheless, existing sentiment detection algorithms tend to be commercially oriented, designed to identify opinions about products rather than user behaviors. This article partly fills this gap with a new algorithm, SentiStrength, to extract sentiment strength from informal English text, using new methods to exploit the de facto grammars and spelling styles of cyberspace. Applied to MySpace comments and with a lookup table of term sentiment strengths optimized by machine learning, SentiStrength is able to predict positive emotion with 60.6% accuracy and negative emotion with 72.8% accuracy, both based upon strength scales of 1-5. The former, but not the latter, is better than baseline and a wide range of general machine learning approaches.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:29:23
  19. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.10
    0.09506138 = product of:
      0.19012275 = sum of:
        0.04753069 = product of:
          0.14259206 = sum of:
            0.14259206 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14259206 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14259206 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14259206 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  20. Newson, A.; Houghton, D.; Patten, J.: Blogging and other social media : exploiting the technology and protecting the enterprise (2008) 0.09
    0.08910242 = product of:
      0.17820483 = sum of:
        0.052307423 = weight(_text_:communication in 2831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052307423 = score(doc=2831,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.26986745 = fieldWeight in 2831, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2831)
        0.12589741 = product of:
          0.25179482 = sum of:
            0.25179482 = weight(_text_:blogs in 2831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.25179482 = score(doc=2831,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.31091204 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.8098587 = fieldWeight in 2831, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2831)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Introduction to blogs - Creating a blog - Writing a blog - Enhancing the experience - Is blogging worthwhile for a business? - Introduction to social media - Professional networks for businesses - Industry specific professional networks - Wikis - Online office applications - Podcasting - Social bookmarking and online content democracy - Forerunners to social media - Social media aggregators - Social tools inside the enterprise - Elements of enterprise - Examples and conclusion - The law of social media - Online reputation
    LCSH
    Business communication / Blogs
    Blogs
    Business enterprises / Blogs
    Subject
    Business communication / Blogs
    Blogs
    Business enterprises / Blogs

Languages

Types

  • a 3148
  • m 299
  • s 169
  • el 104
  • b 35
  • r 16
  • x 8
  • i 4
  • p 3
  • n 2
  • ? 1
  • h 1
  • l 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications