Search (78 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997) 0.05 
    0.04915068 = product of:
  0.09830136 = sum of:
    0.073973864 = weight(_text_:communication in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073973864 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.3816502 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
    0.024327492 = product of:
      0.048654985 = sum of:
        0.048654985 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048654985 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Computers play an important role in the development of bibliographic databases. Exchange formats are needed for the generation and exchange of bibliographic data at different levels: international, national, regional and local. Discusses the formats available at national and international level such as the International Standard Exchange Format (ISO 2709); the various MARC formats and the Common Communication Format (CCF). Work on Indian standards involving the Bureau of Indian Standards, the National Information System for Science and Technology (NISSAT) and other institutions proceeds only slowly
    Source
    DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22
  2. CCF/B: The Common Communication Format for bibliographic information (1992) 0.03 
    0.032363568 = product of:
  0.12945427 = sum of:
    0.12945427 = weight(_text_:communication in 8713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12945427 = score(doc=8713,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.66788787 = fieldWeight in 8713, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8713)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  3. CCF/F: The Common Communication Format for factual information (1992) 0.03 
    0.032363568 = product of:
  0.12945427 = sum of:
    0.12945427 = weight(_text_:communication in 2269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12945427 = score(doc=2269,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.66788787 = fieldWeight in 2269, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2269)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  4. Hopkinson, A. (Bearb.): Implementation notes for users of the Common Communication Format for bibliographic information (CCF/B) (1993) 0.03 
    0.032363568 = product of:
  0.12945427 = sum of:
    0.12945427 = weight(_text_:communication in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12945427 = score(doc=2270,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.66788787 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  5. Hopkinson, A. (Bearb.): Implementation notes for users of the Common Communication Format for factual information (CCF/F) (1993) 0.03 
    0.032363568 = product of:
  0.12945427 = sum of:
    0.12945427 = weight(_text_:communication in 2271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12945427 = score(doc=2271,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.66788787 = fieldWeight in 2271, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2271)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  6. Hopkinson, A.: Traditional communication formats : MARC is far from dead (1999) 0.03 
    0.032363568 = product of:
  0.12945427 = sum of:
    0.12945427 = weight(_text_:communication in 4484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12945427 = score(doc=4484,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.66788787 = fieldWeight in 4484, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4484)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  7. Green, B.: Towards international standards for book sector EDI (1995) 0.03 
    0.026153712 = product of:
  0.10461485 = sum of:
    0.10461485 = weight(_text_:communication in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10461485 = score(doc=3895,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.5397349 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Describes the work of the British and European book industry communication stadards organizations BIC (Book Industry Communication) in the UK, EDItEUR (its pan-European counterpart), and BISAC (Book Industry Systems Advisory Committe). The work of the organisations enables collaboration between the publishing, bookselling, library and manufacturing sectors of the industry worldwide. Discusses Electronic Data Interchange (EDI); TeleOrdering; the international EDIFACT standard, EDI with SGML; and published lists of mandatory and recommended data elements for publishers' bibliographic databases
  8. Beaudiquez, M.: ¬L'¬avenir des formats de communication (1996) 0.02 
    0.024023717 = product of:
  0.09609487 = sum of:
    0.09609487 = weight(_text_:communication in 92) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09609487 = score(doc=92,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.49577817 = fieldWeight in 92, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=92)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Summary of the general report of the International Conference on the Future of Communication Formats held at the National Library of Canada, Oct 1996, attended by 170 participants from 20 countries
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: The future of communication formats
  9. Information transfer and exchange formats (1991) 0.02 
    0.023116833 = product of:
  0.09246733 = sum of:
    0.09246733 = weight(_text_:communication in 7891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09246733 = score(doc=7891,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.47706276 = fieldWeight in 7891, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7891)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Describes international standard exchange formats for bibliographic information transfer. Outlines their common and differing features. Describes: UNIMARC, UNISIST Reference manual and UNECSO Common Communication Format
  10. Hopkinson, A.: International data exchange : a question of formats (1992) 0.02 
    0.018493466 = product of:
  0.073973864 = sum of:
    0.073973864 = weight(_text_:communication in 6951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073973864 = score(doc=6951,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.3816502 = fieldWeight in 6951, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6951)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Paper presented at the International Symposium on Information Technology; Standards for biliographic control, Bangkok, Thailand, 4-8 Sept 89. Reviews the 3 formats for the international exchange of bibliographic data: UNIMARC, UNISIST Reference Manual, and UNESCO's Common Communication Format (CCF) and describes the origins, technical features and typical users for all 3 formats. Selection of the most appropriate format depends upon whether users participate in a library network, are employed by technical institutes, or need to exchange information with both types of organization
  11. Leeves, J.: EDIBIB: harmonising standards for bibliographic data interchange : a report prepared for Book Industry Communication (1993) 0.02 
    0.018493466 = product of:
  0.073973864 = sum of:
    0.073973864 = weight(_text_:communication in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073973864 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.3816502 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  12. Tillett, B.: Cataloguing rules and conceptual models for the electronic environment (1995) 0.02 
    0.018493466 = product of:
  0.073973864 = sum of:
    0.073973864 = weight(_text_:communication in 5754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073973864 = score(doc=5754,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.3816502 = fieldWeight in 5754, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5754)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Offers the conceptual modelling technique as a means of analysing the future of library cataloguing with regard to cataloguing rules and MARC formats. Discusses the evolution of publishing technology and introduces the conceptual model that the IFLA is preparing in its study of the functional requirements of bibliographic records. Considers the purpose of cataloguing rules and how they have evolved in response to changes in technologies. Examines the future of cataloguing with future rules and alternative communication formats
  13. Campos, F.M.: UNIMARC: the virtual format in the virtual age (1998) 0.02 
    0.018493466 = product of:
  0.073973864 = sum of:
    0.073973864 = weight(_text_:communication in 5175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073973864 = score(doc=5175,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.3816502 = fieldWeight in 5175, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5175)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Focuses on the history of the UNIMARC format which was designed as a communication tool among the various national formats used for computerized bibliographic records. Explains the function of UNIMARC and ISBDs in bringing together automated versions of catalogues without greatly compromising individual or local characteristics. Gives examples of European projects which have resulted in products which illustrate the value of UNIMARC and discusses its application to electronic media and future in international networks
  14. Chen, Y.-N.: ¬An FRBR-based approach for transforming MARC records into linked data (2018) 0.02 
    0.018493466 = product of:
  0.073973864 = sum of:
    0.073973864 = weight(_text_:communication in 4799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073973864 = score(doc=4799,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.3816502 = fieldWeight in 4799, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4799)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  15. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification in the USMARC format (1994) 0.02 
    0.016181784 = product of:
  0.064727135 = sum of:
    0.064727135 = weight(_text_:communication in 8864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064727135 = score(doc=8864,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.33394393 = fieldWeight in 8864, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8864)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The paper reviews the development of the USMARC Format for Classification Data, a standard for communication of classification data in machine-readable form. It considers the uses for online classification schedules, both for technical services and reference functions and gives an overview of the format specification details of data elements used and of the structure of the records. The paper describes an experiment conducted at the Library of Congress to test the format as well as the development of the classification database encompassing the LCC schedules. Features of the classification system are given. The LoC will complete its conversion of the LCC in mid-1995
  16. Lauro, A. Di: IDIN manual for the creation and management of a bibliographic database using Micro-ISIS (1988) 0.02 
    0.016181784 = product of:
  0.064727135 = sum of:
    0.064727135 = weight(_text_:communication in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064727135 = score(doc=4292,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.33394393 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Die UNESCO vertreibt kostenfrei die Software Micro-ISIS für PCs. Zur Anwendung in kleinen Dokumentationseinrichtungen unter dem Dach des International Development Information Network (IDIN) wurde ein eigenes IDIN-Format geschaffen, das unter dieser Software eingesetzt werden kann. Besonders berücksichtigt sind dabei unselbständige Werke und die Sacherschließung mit Hilfe des 'OECD Macrothesaurus for Information Processing in the Field of Economic and Social Development'. Das Format ist abgeleitet vom 'Common Communication Format (CCF)', das ebenfalls im Auftrag der Unesco entwickelt wurde. IDIN ist eine vereinfachte Version und hat eine andere Behandlung mehrteiliger Werke
  17. USMARC format for classification data : including guidelines for content designation (1991) 0.02 
    0.016181784 = product of:
  0.064727135 = sum of:
    0.064727135 = weight(_text_:communication in 4372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064727135 = score(doc=4372,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.33394393 = fieldWeight in 4372, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4372)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Format specifications for the communication of MARC classification records, which may be used in online public catalog retrieval systems, in systems to maintain and develop classification schedules, and in online systems for library classifiers. Defines the codes and conventions (tags, indicators, subfield codes, and codes values) that identify the data elements in the records. Developed to support the 2 major US classification schemes: Library of Congress Classification and Dewey Decimal Classification, but also lets you communicate other classification schemes. Includes a glossary of classification terms and full record examples of LCC, DDC, NLM classification and UDC
  18. Duclos-Faure, D.: Format d'echange des donnees locales : ou en sommes-nous? (1997) 0.02 
    0.016181784 = product of:
  0.064727135 = sum of:
    0.064727135 = weight(_text_:communication in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064727135 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.33394393 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Since Sep 1996 a group with representatives from the French National Library (BNF), French Joint Catalogue (CCF), Directorate of Scientific and Technical Information (DISTNB), Directorate of Reading (DL) and the Higher Education Bibliography Agency (ABES) has been working on establishing a format for exchanging local data which will accomodtae the needs of all users; conform to international standards and take account of new technological tools (Z39.50-1995). Using pre-existing formats with UNIMARC as the basis, the new format will allow selection of documents by different location criteria, establish conditions of communication and manage interlibrary loan. To date fields have been defined for data on location and management of copies, and for descriptive data on copies
  19. McCallum, S.H.: MARCXML sampler (2005) 0.02 
    0.016181784 = product of:
  0.064727135 = sum of:
    0.064727135 = weight(_text_:communication in 4361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064727135 = score(doc=4361,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.33394393 = fieldWeight in 4361, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4361)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    At the IFLA conference in Glasgow, three years ago, the Information Technology Section organized a workshop on metadata. At that workshop MARCXML was presented, along with plans and expectations for its use. This paper is an update to that report. It reviews the development of an XML schema for MARC 21 and the MARCXML tool kit of transformations. The close relationship of MARCXML to the recent ISO standards work associated with MARC in XML is described. Sketches of interesting applications follow with uses that range from MARCXML as a switching format to a maintenance tool to a record communication format for new XML-based protocols.
  20. Simmons, P.: Converting UNIMARC records to CCF (1989) 0.01 
    0.0138701 = product of:
  0.0554804 = sum of:
    0.0554804 = weight(_text_:communication in 2515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0554804 = score(doc=2515,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.28623766 = fieldWeight in 2515, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2515)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    One of the primary goals of Unesco's Common Communication Format (CCF) has been to maintain compatibility between two major information communities: libraries; and abstracting and indexing organisations. While abstracting and indexing organisations do not follow any single standard for description or the structure and encoding of machine records, libraries have clearly defined standards and practices. Among CCF-using organisations are some that wish to incorporate records produced by national bibliographic agencies, especially national libraries, into their own data bases. They need the ability to convert UNIMARC records to CCF. To accomplish this they require a source of records, a computer to process them, a computer programm designed for record conversion and a table or instructions laying out the specific way in which each UNIMARC data element is to be processed in the course of conversion to CCF. Examines the factors to be considered in planning a table that would be sufficiently detailed to accomplish record conversion, and outlines problems that might be encountered.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 61
  • d 12
  • f 2
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 65
  • m 7
  • s 5
  • b 2
  • l 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Classifications