Search (118 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Electronic publishing and electronic information communication (1996) 0.11 
    0.112824544 = product of:
  0.22564909 = sum of:
    0.18307598 = weight(_text_:communication in 6664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18307598 = score(doc=6664,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.9445361 = fieldWeight in 6664, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6664)
    0.042573113 = product of:
      0.085146226 = sum of:
        0.085146226 = weight(_text_:22 in 6664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085146226 = score(doc=6664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6664)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    A special issue devoted to current developments in electronic publishing and electronic information communication
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.181-247
  2. Spezi, V.; Wakeling, S.; Pinfield, S.; Creaser, C.; Fry, J.; Willett, P.: Open-access mega-journals : the future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? a review (2017) 0.07 
    0.06977999 = product of:
  0.13955998 = sum of:
    0.08007906 = weight(_text_:communication in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08007906 = score(doc=3548,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.41314846 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
    0.05948093 = product of:
      0.11896186 = sum of:
        0.11896186 = weight(_text_:blogs in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11896186 = score(doc=3548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31091204 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.38262224 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose Open-access mega-journals (OAMJs) represent an increasingly important part of the scholarly communication landscape. OAMJs, such as PLOS ONE, are large scale, broad scope journals that operate an open access business model (normally based on article-processing charges), and which employ a novel form of peer review, focussing on scientific "soundness" and eschewing judgement of novelty or importance. The purpose of this paper is to examine the discourses relating to OAMJs, and their place within scholarly publishing, and considers attitudes towards mega-journals within the academic community. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents a review of the literature of OAMJs structured around four defining characteristics: scale, disciplinary scope, peer review policy, and economic model. The existing scholarly literature was augmented by searches of more informal outputs, such as blogs and e-mail discussion lists, to capture the debate in its entirety. Findings While the academic literature relating specifically to OAMJs is relatively sparse, discussion in other fora is detailed and animated, with debates ranging from the sustainability and ethics of the mega-journal model, to the impact of soundness-only peer review on article quality and discoverability, and the potential for OAMJs to represent a paradigm-shifting development in scholarly publishing. Originality/value This paper represents the first comprehensive review of the mega-journal phenomenon, drawing not only on the published academic literature, but also grey, professional and informal sources. The paper advances a number of ways in which the role of OAMJs in the scholarly communication environment can be conceptualised.
  3. Harter, S.P.: Scholarly communication and electronic journals : an impact study (1998) 0.06 
    0.06447117 = product of:
  0.12894234 = sum of:
    0.10461485 = weight(_text_:communication in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10461485 = score(doc=3035,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.5397349 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
    0.024327492 = product of:
      0.048654985 = sum of:
        0.048654985 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048654985 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Studies the effects of e-journals on the scholarly communities they are serving. Considers to what extent scholars and researchers are aware of, influenced by, using, or building their own work on research published in e-journals. Draws a sample of scholarly, peer-reviewed e-journals and conducts several analyzes thorugh citation analysis. The data show that the impact of journals on scholarly communication has been minimal
    Date
    22. 2.1999 16:56:06
  4. Speier, C.; Palmer, J.; Wren, D.; Hahn, S.: Faculty perceptions of electronic journals as scholarly communication : a question of prestige and legitimacy (1999) 0.06 
    0.06447117 = product of:
  0.12894234 = sum of:
    0.10461485 = weight(_text_:communication in 3674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10461485 = score(doc=3674,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.5397349 = fieldWeight in 3674, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3674)
    0.024327492 = product of:
      0.048654985 = sum of:
        0.048654985 = weight(_text_:22 in 3674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048654985 = score(doc=3674,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3674, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3674)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Recent years have seen a proliferation of electronic journals across academic disciplines. Electronic journals offer many advantages to multiple constituencies, however, their acceptance by faculty and university promotion and tenure committees is unclear. This research examines perceptions of faculty and promotion and tenure committee members regarding the perceived prestige and legitimacy of electronic journals as an outlet for scholarly communication
    Date
    22. 5.1999 14:43:47
  5. Brown, D.J.: Repositories and journals: are they in conflict? : a literature review of relevant literature (2010) 0.05 
    0.0528573 = product of:
  0.1057146 = sum of:
    0.046233665 = weight(_text_:communication in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046233665 = score(doc=3954,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.23853138 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
    0.05948093 = product of:
      0.11896186 = sum of:
        0.11896186 = weight(_text_:blogs in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11896186 = score(doc=3954,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31091204 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.38262224 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to bring together information on whether any evidence exists of a commercial conflict between the creation of digital archives at research institutions and by key subject centres of excellence, and the business of journal publishing. Design/methodology/approach - Relevant publications, including articles published in refereed books and journals, as well as informal commentaries on listservs, blogs and wikis, were analysed to determine whether there is any evidence of a commercial relationship. Findings - Most of the published comments are highly subjective and anecdotal - there is a significant emotional overtone to many of the views expressed. There is precious little hard evidence currently available to support or debunk the idea that a commercial conflict exists between repositories and journal subscriptions. The situation is made more difficult by the many technological, sociological and administrative changes that are taking place in parallel to the establishment of repositories. Practical implications - Separating the key drivers and their impact is a major strategic challenge facing all stakeholders in the scholarly communication industry in future. Research limitations/implications - This is an important area which requires close monitoring - the possible threat that the established journal publishing system could be eroded away by a new "free" scholarly information system needs attention. One significant study in this area is being undertaken by the PEER group, funded by the European Commission with hard evidence being collected by UCL's CIBER research group. The results from this impartial investigation will be very welcome. Originality/value - The paper shows that relationship between repositories and journal subscriptions is vague.
  6. Frandsen, T.F.; Wouters, P.: Turning working papers into journal articles : an exercise in microbibliometrics (2009) 0.05 
    0.048353374 = product of:
  0.09670675 = sum of:
    0.07846113 = weight(_text_:communication in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07846113 = score(doc=2757,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.4048012 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
    0.018245619 = product of:
      0.036491238 = sum of:
        0.036491238 = weight(_text_:22 in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036491238 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This article focuses on the process of scientific and scholarly communication. Data on open access publications on the Internet not only provides a supplement to the traditional citation indexes but also enables analysis of the microprocesses and daily practices that constitute scientific communication. This article focuses on a stage in the life cycle of scientific and scholarly information that precedes the publication of formal research articles in the scientific and scholarly literature. Binomial logistic regression models are used to analyse precise mechanisms at work in the transformation of a working paper (WP) into a journal article (JA) in the field of economics. The study unveils a fine-grained process of adapting WPs to their new context as JAs by deleting and adding literature references, which perhaps can be best captured by the term sculpting.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:59:25
  7. Brown, D.J.: Access to scientific research : challenges facing communications in STM (2016) 0.04 
    0.043068804 = product of:
  0.08613761 = sum of:
    0.073973864 = weight(_text_:communication in 3769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073973864 = score(doc=3769,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.3816502 = fieldWeight in 3769, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3769)
    0.012163746 = product of:
      0.024327492 = sum of:
        0.024327492 = weight(_text_:22 in 3769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024327492 = score(doc=3769,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3769, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3769)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The debate about access to scientific research raises questions about the current effectiveness of scholarly communication processes. This book explores, from an independent point of view, the current state of the STM publishing market, new publishing technologies and business models as well as the information habit of researchers, the politics of research funders, and the demand for scientific research as a public good. The book also investigates the democratisation of science including how the information needs of knowledge workers outside academia can be embraced in future.
    Content
    Inhalt: Chapter 1. Background -- Chapter 2. Definitions -- Chapter 3. Aims, Objectives, and Methodology -- Chapter 4. Setting the Scene -- Chapter 5. Information Society -- Chapter 6. Drivers for Change -- Chapter 7 A Dysfunctional STM Scene? -- Chapter 8. Comments on the Dysfunctionality of STM Publishing -- Chapter 9. The Main Stakeholders -- Chapter 10. Search and Discovery -- Chapter 11. Impact of Google -- Chapter 12. Psychological Issues -- Chapter 13. Users of Research Output -- Chapter 14. Underlying Sociological Developments -- Chapter 15. Social Media and Social Networking -- Chapter 16. Forms of Article Delivery -- Chapter 17. Future Communication Trends -- Chapter 18. Academic Knowledge Workers -- Chapter 19. Unaffiliated Knowledge Workers -- Chapter 20. The Professions -- Chapter 21. Small and Medium Enterprises -- Chapter 22. Citizen Scientists -- Chapter 23. Learned Societies -- Chapter 24. Business Models -- Chapter 25. Open Access -- Chapter 26. Political Initiatives -- Chapter 27. Summary and Conclusions -- Chapter 28. Research Questions Addressed
    LCSH
    Communication in science
    Subject
    Communication in science
  8. Hartley, J.: Designing electronic text : the role of print-based research (1987) 0.04 
    0.036986932 = product of:
  0.14794773 = sum of:
    0.14794773 = weight(_text_:communication in 7756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14794773 = score(doc=7756,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.7633004 = fieldWeight in 7756, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7756)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Educational communication and technology. 35(1987), S.3-17
  9. Kasperek, G.: Recherchieren - auch mal mit dem Mut zur Lücke : Literaturbezogene Arbeitsweisen bei Naturwissenschaftlern am Beispiel der Biologie (2009) 0.04 
    0.036863007 = product of:
  0.07372601 = sum of:
    0.0554804 = weight(_text_:communication in 3020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0554804 = score(doc=3020,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.28623766 = fieldWeight in 3020, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3020)
    0.018245619 = product of:
      0.036491238 = sum of:
        0.036491238 = weight(_text_:22 in 3020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036491238 = score(doc=3020,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3020, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3020)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Im Gesamtrahmen wissenschaftlicher Kommunikationsprozesse nimmt die Literatur eine besondere Stellung ein - was die Kommunikation zwischen Wissenschaftlern angeht, aber auch, was die Nutzbarmachung wissenschaftlicher Ergebnisse für die Gesellschaft angeht. Das Arbeiten mit Literatur (einschließlich Suchen, Beschaffen, Lesen, Auswerten und Schreiben) ist für den Wissenschaftler alltäglich, und es beansprucht einen wesentlichen Teil seiner Arbeitszeit. Genauere Kenntnisse dieser Tätigkeiten können eine wichtige Grundlage für die Gestaltung des Angebots von Bibliotheken und anderen Informationseinrichtungen darstellen. Aber: »The actual process of utilizing scientific literature is one of the less well understood phases of scientific communication.« - Diese Feststellung bezog Krishna Subramanyam in seinem enzyklopädischen Beitrag über die naturwissenschaftliche Literatur auf die vielfältigen Tätigkeiten des Naturwissenschaftlers im Hinblick auf Suche, Beschaffung und Verwendung der fachlich relevanten Literatur. Seitdem ist manches intensiver untersucht worden, gerade was die Rolle von Bibliotheken angeht. Aber unsere Kenntnisse des Gesamtprozesses sind nach wie vor lückenhaft, wie im vorliegenden Beitrag am Beispiel der Biologie gezeigt werden soll.
    Date
    22. 7.2009 13:41:12
  10. Robinson, P.: ¬The digitization of primary textual resources (1994) 0.03 
    0.032692138 = product of:
  0.13076855 = sum of:
    0.13076855 = weight(_text_:communication in 7089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13076855 = score(doc=7089,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.6746686 = fieldWeight in 7089, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7089)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Imprint
    Oxford : Office for Humanities Communication
    Series
    Office for Humanities Communication Publications; no.6
  11. Matheson, N.: Scholarly communication in the sciences : publishing trends and the role for libraries: conference report (1993) 0.03 
    0.032031626 = product of:
  0.1281265 = sum of:
    0.1281265 = weight(_text_:communication in 8027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1281265 = score(doc=8027,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.66103756 = fieldWeight in 8027, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8027)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The keynote address focused on the crisis in scholarly communication arising from innovations in publishing: Sessions were devoted to: trends in scientific book publishing; journal publishing; the electronic future; document delivery and alternative access; and the use and effects of electronic media for communication and database searching at Imperial College, London
  12. Rao, M.K.: Scholarly communication and electronic journals : issues and prospects for academic and research libraries (2001) 0.03 
    0.031014485 = product of:
  0.12405794 = sum of:
    0.12405794 = weight(_text_:communication in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12405794 = score(doc=753,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.64004683 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper is to summarize the developments taking place in the scholarly communication system by reviewing the published literature on journal subscriptions, electronic publishing, electronic journals, Internet and changing information needs of researchers. It examines the role of different players in the scholarly communication process such as authors, commercial publishers, libraries, universities, and learned societies, their problems and efforts in meeting the new challenges brought in by the Internet. The study also explores the need for adopting electronic media for scholarly communication in place of printed journals considering the advantages such as accessibility, speed, cost and acceptance by the academic and research community. At the end it provides general guidance to authors, publishers and libraries to develop mechanisms for mutual benefit and foster the scholarly communication process in the new environment.
  13. Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015) 0.03 
    0.030719174 = product of:
  0.06143835 = sum of:
    0.046233665 = weight(_text_:communication in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046233665 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.23853138 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
    0.015204684 = product of:
      0.030409368 = sum of:
        0.030409368 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030409368 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  14. Jenda, C.A.: Electronic journal publishing and the scientific scholarly communication system (1994) 0.03 
    0.028027672 = product of:
  0.11211069 = sum of:
    0.11211069 = weight(_text_:communication in 8643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11211069 = score(doc=8643,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.5784079 = fieldWeight in 8643, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8643)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Promotes a future vision of the electronic journal and its role in scholarly communication. Aims to stimulate further a through discussion that will ensure a continued successful evolution of the electronic journal. Examines the tradition, evolving and future scientific scholarly communication system, considering limitations of traditional and existing systems. Considers what publishers, librarians and scholars should be aware of to make the system function smoothly. Examines the need for a scientific electronic system and the challenges that it poses. Suggests planning considerations for such a system
  15. Zhao, D.: Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science : a comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals (2005) 0.03 
    0.028027672 = product of:
  0.11211069 = sum of:
    0.11211069 = weight(_text_:communication in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11211069 = score(doc=1065,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.5784079 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This article reveals different patterns of scholarly communication in the XML research field on the Web and in print journals in terms of author visibility, and challenges the common practice of exclusively using the ISI's databases to obtain citation counts as scientific performance indicators. Results from this study demonstrate both the importance and the feasibility of the use of multiple citation data sources in citation analysis studies of scholarly communication, and provide evidence for a developing "two tier" scholarly communication system.
  16. Schaffner, A.C.: ¬The future of scientific journals : lessons from the past (1994) 0.03 
    0.0277402 = product of:
  0.1109608 = sum of:
    0.1109608 = weight(_text_:communication in 1018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1109608 = score(doc=1018,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.5724753 = fieldWeight in 1018, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1018)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Examines the history of scientific communication and the complex roles traditionally played by scientific periodicals in an attempt to understand how and when these periodicals are likely to incorporate new technologies and forms of information communication. Concludes that: enabling technologies may not be sufficient to bring about major changes in communication form; new forms of information communication are slow to develop and to take full advantage of new capabilities; periodicals and books took years to develop and the same shoul be expected of electronic periodicals; authors must have confidence in the ability of electronic periodicals to serve as public knowledge; the central function of periodicals is fully embedded in the scientific process; the information content carried in the structure of the current system must not be lost (at least until technology can provide alternatives); and electronic periodicals must be able to serve the social needs of subdisciplines of scholars
  17. Kliegl, R.: ¬A vision of scientific communication (2016) 0.03 
    0.0277402 = product of:
  0.1109608 = sum of:
    0.1109608 = weight(_text_:communication in 3249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1109608 = score(doc=3249,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.5724753 = fieldWeight in 3249, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3249)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  18. Grötschel, M.: Best current practices : Recommendations on electronic information communication (2002). Endorsed by the IMU Executive Committee on April 13, 2002 in its 69th session in Paris, France (2002) 0.03 
    0.026153712 = product of:
  0.10461485 = sum of:
    0.10461485 = weight(_text_:communication in 1413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10461485 = score(doc=1413,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.5397349 = fieldWeight in 1413, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1413)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Communication of mathematical research and scholarship is undergoing profound change as new technology creates new ways to disseminate and access the literature. More than technology is changing, however; the culture and practices of those who create, disseminate, and archive the mathematical literature are changing as well. For the sake of present and future mathematicians, we should shape those changes to make them suit the needs of the discipline.
  19. Wilson, T.: 'In the beginning was the word' : social and economic factors in scholarly communication (1995) 0.03 
    0.025845407 = product of:
  0.10338163 = sum of:
    0.10338163 = weight(_text_:communication in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10338163 = score(doc=4399,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.5333724 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Discusses the social and economic factors involved in the implementation of the electronic library. Discusses the ways in which the library metaphor may be restricitng thinking and the development of systems that may approach more closely the ideals of scholarly communication. Such a system not only necessitates new models for the concepts of periodical, library and publishing, but also new interpersonal and institutional practices, and a new basis for the economic conditions associated with communication. Electronic communication systems offer the possibility not only of disseminating information over networks but of interpersonal communication among collaborating authors or producers and, perhaps more important, between author, reader, user or consumer of the information. For example, electronic mail forms included in electronic periodicals along data discussed in the articles could lead to the evolution of electronic periodicals into electronic seminars or electronic common rooms. Poses the question of whether commercial publishers will be able to find a role to play in this process and fails to suggest an answer
  20. Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018) 0.02 
    0.02457534 = product of:
  0.04915068 = sum of:
    0.036986932 = weight(_text_:communication in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036986932 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04488925 = queryNorm
        0.1908251 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
    0.012163746 = product of:
      0.024327492 = sum of:
        0.024327492 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024327492 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 66
  • d 49
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 107
  • el 8
  • m 8
  • s 4
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications