Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Linguistik"
  1. Hays, D.G.: Linguistic foundations of the theory of content analysis (1969) 0.03
    0.032363568 = product of:
      0.12945427 = sum of:
        0.12945427 = weight(_text_:communication in 118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12945427 = score(doc=118,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.66788787 = fieldWeight in 118, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=118)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    The analysis of communication content. Ed.: G. Gerbner et al
  2. Amac, T.: Linguistic context analysis : a new approach to communication evaluation (1997) 0.02
    0.024023717 = product of:
      0.09609487 = sum of:
        0.09609487 = weight(_text_:communication in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09609487 = score(doc=2576,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.49577817 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that the integration of computational psycholinguistics can improve corporate communication, and thus become a new strategic tool. An electronic dictionary was created of basic, neutral and negative connotations for nouns, verbs and adjectives appearing in press releases and other communication media, which can be updated with client specific words. The focus on negative messages has the objective of detecting who, why and how publics are criticized, to learn from the vocabulary of opinion leaders and to improve issues management proactively. Suggests a new form of analysis called 'computational linguistic context analysis' (CLCA) by analyzing nominal groups of negative words, rather than monitoring content analysis in the traditional way. Concludes that CLCA can be used to analyze large quantities of press cuttings about a company and could, theoretically, be used to analyze the structure, language and style of a particular journalist to whom it is planned to send a press release or article
  3. Suominen, V.: Linguistic / semiotic conditions of information retrieval / documentation in the light of a sausurean conception of language : 'organising knowledge' or 'communication concerning documents'? (1998) 0.02
    0.019615283 = product of:
      0.07846113 = sum of:
        0.07846113 = weight(_text_:communication in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07846113 = score(doc=81,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.4048012 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Argumentation consists of representation of the basic structuralist concepts of language/semiotic as a two-level form, as a form of expression and here especially form of content, and of application of these concepts to the phenomena of the representation of the contents of documents. On the basis of argumentation the paper questions the notion of "organizing knowledge", is it, or in what sense it is possible to organize knowledge. The paper bings out some reservations to viewing content representation as organizing knowledge in a strong sense and suggests that instead could be used a notion of (meta)documentation, characterized as communication concerning documents
  4. Pandey, R.C.: Information retrieval systems : a linguistic approach (1997) 0.02
    0.018493466 = product of:
      0.073973864 = sum of:
        0.073973864 = weight(_text_:communication in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073973864 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.3816502 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    International information communication and education. 16(1997) no.1, S.14-30
  5. Harras, G.: Concepts in linguistics : concepts in natural language (2000) 0.02
    0.016181784 = product of:
      0.064727135 = sum of:
        0.064727135 = weight(_text_:communication in 5068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064727135 = score(doc=5068,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.33394393 = fieldWeight in 5068, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5068)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper deals with different views of lexical semantics. The focus is on the relationship between lexical expressions and conceptual components. First the assumptions about lexicalization and decompositionality of concepts shared by the most semanticists are presented, followed by a discussion of the differences between two-level-semants and one-level-semantics. The final part is concentrated on the interpretation of conceptual components in situations of communication
  6. Chomsky, N.: Aspects of the theory of syntax (1965) 0.01
    0.012163746 = product of:
      0.048654985 = sum of:
        0.048654985 = product of:
          0.09730997 = sum of:
            0.09730997 = weight(_text_:22 in 3829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09730997 = score(doc=3829,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3829, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3829)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    6. 1.1999 10:29:22
  7. Warner, A.J.: Quantitative and qualitative assessments of the impact of linguistic theory on information science (1991) 0.01
    0.010643278 = product of:
      0.042573113 = sum of:
        0.042573113 = product of:
          0.085146226 = sum of:
            0.085146226 = weight(_text_:22 in 29) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.085146226 = score(doc=29,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 29, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=29)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    6. 1.1999 10:22:45
  8. Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994) 0.01
    0.005321639 = product of:
      0.021286556 = sum of:
        0.021286556 = product of:
          0.042573113 = sum of:
            0.042573113 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042573113 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:17:40
  9. Chafe, W.L.: Meaning and the structure of language (1980) 0.01
    0.005321639 = product of:
      0.021286556 = sum of:
        0.021286556 = product of:
          0.042573113 = sum of:
            0.042573113 = weight(_text_:22 in 220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042573113 = score(doc=220,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 220, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=220)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2007 12:21:29
  10. O'Donnell, R.; Smeaton, A.F.: ¬A linguistic approach to information retrieval (1996) 0.00
    0.0045614047 = product of:
      0.018245619 = sum of:
        0.018245619 = product of:
          0.036491238 = sum of:
            0.036491238 = weight(_text_:22 in 2575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036491238 = score(doc=2575,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2575, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2575)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon