Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  1. Koltay, T.: Abstracting: information literacy on a professional level (2009) 0.03
    0.032363568 = product of:
      0.12945427 = sum of:
        0.12945427 = weight(_text_:communication in 3610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12945427 = score(doc=3610,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.66788787 = fieldWeight in 3610, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3610)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to argue for a conception of information literacy (IL) that goes beyond the abilities of finding information as it includes communication skills. An important issue in this is that abstractors exercise IL on a professional level. Design/methodology/approach - By stressing the importance of the fact that information literacy extends towards verbal communication the paper takes an interdisciplinary approach, the main component of which is linguistics. Findings - It is found that verbal communication and especially analytic-synthetic writing activities play an important role in information literacy at the level of everyday language use, semi-professional and professional summarising of information. The latter level characterises abstracting. Originality/value - The paper adds to the body of knowledge about information literacy in general and in connection with communication and abstracting.
  2. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Summarising text for intelligent communication : results of the Dagstuhl seminar (1994) 0.02
    0.019615283 = product of:
      0.07846113 = sum of:
        0.07846113 = weight(_text_:communication in 8867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07846113 = score(doc=8867,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.4048012 = fieldWeight in 8867, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8867)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    As a result of the transition to full-text storage, multimedia and networking, information systems are becoming more efficient but at the same time more difficult to use, in particular because users are confronted with information volumes that increasingly exceed individual processing capacities. Consequently, there is an increase in the demand for user aids such as summarising techniques. Against this background, the interdisciplinary Dagstuhl Seminar 'Summarising Text for Intelligent Communication' (Dec. 1993) outlined the academic state of the art with regard to summarising (abstracting) and proposed future directions for research and system development. Research is currently shifting its attention from text summarising to summarising states of affairs. Recycling solutions are put forward in order to satisfy short-term needs for summarisation products. In the medium and long term, it is necessary to devise concepts and methods of intelligent summarising which have a better formal and empirical grounding and a more modular organisation
  3. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Summarizing information (1998) 0.01
    0.0138701 = product of:
      0.0554804 = sum of:
        0.0554804 = weight(_text_:communication in 688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0554804 = score(doc=688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.28623766 = fieldWeight in 688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=688)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Summarizing is the process of reducing the large information size of something like a novel or a scientific paper to a short summary or abstract comprising only the most essential points. Summarizing is frequent in everyday communication, but it is also a professional skill for journalists and others. Automated summarizing functions are urgently needed by Internet users who wish to avoid being overwhelmed by information. This book presents the state of the art and surveys related research; it deals with everyday and professional summarizing as well as computerized approaches. The author focuses in detail on the cognitive pro-cess involved in summarizing and supports this with a multimedia simulation systems on the accompanying CD-ROM
  4. Spina, D.; Trippas, J.R.; Cavedon, L.; Sanderson, M.: Extracting audio summaries to support effective spoken document search (2017) 0.01
    0.0138701 = product of:
      0.0554804 = sum of:
        0.0554804 = weight(_text_:communication in 3788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0554804 = score(doc=3788,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.28623766 = fieldWeight in 3788, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3788)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    We address the challenge of extracting query biased audio summaries from podcasts to support users in making relevance decisions in spoken document search via an audio-only communication channel. We performed a crowdsourced experiment that demonstrates that transcripts of spoken documents created using Automated Speech Recognition (ASR), even with significant errors, are effective sources of document summaries or "snippets" for supporting users in making relevance judgments against a query. In particular, the results show that summaries generated from ASR transcripts are comparable, in utility and user-judged preference, to spoken summaries generated from error-free manual transcripts of the same collection. We also observed that content-based audio summaries are at least as preferred as synthesized summaries obtained from manually curated metadata, such as title and description. We describe a methodology for constructing a new test collection, which we have made publicly available.
  5. Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.01
    0.007602342 = product of:
      0.030409368 = sum of:
        0.030409368 = product of:
          0.060818736 = sum of:
            0.060818736 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060818736 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27. 1.1996 18:22:06
  6. Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988) 0.01
    0.006081873 = product of:
      0.024327492 = sum of:
        0.024327492 = product of:
          0.048654985 = sum of:
            0.048654985 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048654985 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
  7. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.00
    0.0045614047 = product of:
      0.018245619 = sum of:
        0.018245619 = product of:
          0.036491238 = sum of:
            0.036491238 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036491238 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  8. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.00
    0.0045614047 = product of:
      0.018245619 = sum of:
        0.018245619 = product of:
          0.036491238 = sum of:
            0.036491238 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036491238 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  9. Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006) 0.00
    0.0045614047 = product of:
      0.018245619 = sum of:
        0.018245619 = product of:
          0.036491238 = sum of:
            0.036491238 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036491238 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  10. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.00
    0.003801171 = product of:
      0.015204684 = sum of:
        0.015204684 = product of:
          0.030409368 = sum of:
            0.030409368 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030409368 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356