-
Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011)
0.29
0.28518412 = product of:
0.57036823 = sum of:
0.14259206 = product of:
0.42777616 = sum of:
0.42777616 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.42777616 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.42777616 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.42777616 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
-
Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014)
0.24
0.23765342 = product of:
0.47530684 = sum of:
0.11882671 = product of:
0.35648012 = sum of:
0.35648012 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.35648012 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.35648012 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.35648012 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
-
Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010)
0.21
0.21291532 = product of:
0.2838871 = sum of:
0.059413355 = product of:
0.17824006 = sum of:
0.17824006 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17824006 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.046233665 = weight(_text_:communication in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046233665 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.23853138 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.17824006 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17824006 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Content
- PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
-
Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019)
0.19
0.18688972 = product of:
0.37377945 = sum of:
0.07129603 = product of:
0.21388808 = sum of:
0.21388808 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21388808 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.3024834 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3024834 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
-
Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019)
0.17
0.1663574 = product of:
0.3327148 = sum of:
0.0831787 = product of:
0.2495361 = sum of:
0.2495361 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2495361 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2495361 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2495361 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.14
0.14259206 = product of:
0.28518412 = sum of:
0.07129603 = product of:
0.21388808 = sum of:
0.21388808 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21388808 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.21388808 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21388808 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016)
0.12
0.12459315 = product of:
0.2491863 = sum of:
0.04753069 = product of:
0.14259206 = sum of:
0.14259206 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14259206 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.20165561 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20165561 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
-
Costas, R.; Zahedi, Z.; Wouters, P.: ¬The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media : large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations (2015)
0.12
0.122440256 = product of:
0.24488051 = sum of:
0.046233665 = weight(_text_:communication in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046233665 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.23853138 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
0.19864684 = sum of:
0.16823748 = weight(_text_:blogs in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16823748 = score(doc=2598,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31091204 = queryWeight, product of:
6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.54110956 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
0.030409368 = weight(_text_:22 in 2598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030409368 = score(doc=2598,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2598, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2598)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze the disciplinary orientation of scientific publications that were mentioned on different social media platforms, focussing on their differences and similarities with citation counts. Design/methodology/approach - Social media metrics and readership counts, associated with 500,216 publications and their citation data from the Web of Science database, were collected from Altmetric.com and Mendeley. Results are presented through descriptive statistical analyses together with science maps generated with VOSviewer. Findings - The results confirm Mendeley as the most prevalent social media source with similar characteristics to citations in their distribution across fields and their density in average values per publication. The humanities, natural sciences, and engineering disciplines have a much lower presence of social media metrics. Twitter has a stronger focus on general medicine and social sciences. Other sources (blog, Facebook, Google+, and news media mentions) are more prominent in regards to multidisciplinary journals. Originality/value - This paper reinforces the relevance of Mendeley as a social media source for analytical purposes from a disciplinary perspective, being particularly relevant for the social sciences (together with Twitter). Key implications for the use of social media metrics on the evaluation of research performance (e.g. the concentration of some social media metrics, such as blogs, news items, etc., around multidisciplinary journals) are identified.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Footnote
- Teil eines Special Issue: Social Media Metrics in Scholarly Communication: exploring tweets, blogs, likes and other altmetrics.
-
Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014)
0.12
0.11882671 = product of:
0.23765342 = sum of:
0.059413355 = product of:
0.17824006 = sum of:
0.17824006 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17824006 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.17824006 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17824006 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
-
Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018)
0.12
0.11882671 = product of:
0.23765342 = sum of:
0.059413355 = product of:
0.17824006 = sum of:
0.17824006 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17824006 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.17824006 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17824006 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
-
Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012)
0.12
0.11606685 = product of:
0.2321337 = sum of:
0.21388808 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21388808 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.018245619 = product of:
0.036491238 = sum of:
0.036491238 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036491238 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
- Date
- 10. 1.2013 19:22:47
-
Fullwood, C.; Melrose, K.; Morris, N.; Floyd, S.: Sex, blogs, and baring your soul : factors influencing UK blogging strategies (2013)
0.11
0.1057146 = product of:
0.2114292 = sum of:
0.09246733 = weight(_text_:communication in 614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09246733 = score(doc=614,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.47706276 = fieldWeight in 614, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=614)
0.11896186 = product of:
0.23792373 = sum of:
0.23792373 = weight(_text_:blogs in 614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23792373 = score(doc=614,freq=8.0), product of:
0.31091204 = queryWeight, product of:
6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.7652445 = fieldWeight in 614, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=614)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- There is an abundance of evidence to suggest that online behavior differs from behaviors in the offline world, and that there are a number of important factors which may affect the communication strategies of people within an online space. This article examines some of these, namely, whether the sex, age, and identifiability of blog authors, as well as the genre of communication, affect communication strategies. Findings suggest that the level of identifiability of the blog author has a limited effect upon their communication strategies. However, sex appeared to influence online behavior in so far as men were more likely to swear and attack others in their blogs. Genre had an important influence on disclosure with more self-disclosure taking place in the diary genre (i.e., blogs in which people talk about their own lives) comparative to the filter genre (i.e., blogs in which people talk about events external to their lives). Age affected both self-disclosure and language use. For example, younger bloggers tended to use more swearing, express more negative emotions and disclose more personal information about others. These findings suggest that age, sex, genre, and identifiability form a cluster of variables that influence the language style and self-disclosure patterns of bloggers; however, the level of identifiability of the blogger may be less important in this respect. Implications of these findings are discussed.
-
Haustein, S.; Sugimoto, C.; Larivière, V.: Social media in scholarly communication : Guest editorial (2015)
0.10
0.09882462 = product of:
0.19764924 = sum of:
0.07846113 = weight(_text_:communication in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07846113 = score(doc=3809,freq=16.0), product of:
0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.4048012 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.119188115 = sum of:
0.10094249 = weight(_text_:blogs in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10094249 = score(doc=3809,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31091204 = queryWeight, product of:
6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.32466576 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.018245619 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018245619 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This year marks 350 years since the inaugural publications of both the Journal des Sçavans and the Philosophical Transactions, first published in 1665 and considered the birth of the peer-reviewed journal article. This form of scholarly communication has not only remained the dominant model for disseminating new knowledge (particularly for science and medicine), but has also increased substantially in volume. Derek de Solla Price - the "father of scientometrics" (Merton and Garfield, 1986, p. vii) - was the first to document the exponential increase in scientific journals and showed that "scientists have always felt themselves to be awash in a sea of the scientific literature" (Price, 1963, p. 15), as, for example, expressed at the 1948 Royal Society's Scientific Information Conference: Not for the first time in history, but more acutely than ever before, there was a fear that scientists would be overwhelmed, that they would be no longer able to control the vast amounts of potentially relevant material that were pouring forth from the world's presses, that science itself was under threat (Bawden and Robinson, 2008, p. 183).
Furthermore, the rise of the web, and subsequently, the social web, has challenged the quasi-monopolistic status of the journal as the main form of scholarly communication and citation indices as the primary assessment mechanisms. Scientific communication is becoming more open, transparent, and diverse: publications are increasingly open access; manuscripts, presentations, code, and data are shared online; research ideas and results are discussed and criticized openly on blogs; and new peer review experiments, with open post publication assessment by anonymous or non-anonymous referees, are underway. The diversification of scholarly production and assessment, paired with the increasing speed of the communication process, leads to an increased information overload (Bawden and Robinson, 2008), demanding new filters. The concept of altmetrics, short for alternative (to citation) metrics, was created out of an attempt to provide a filter (Priem et al., 2010) and to steer against the oversimplification of the measurement of scientific success solely on the basis of number of journal articles published and citations received, by considering a wider range of research outputs and metrics (Piwowar, 2013). Although the term altmetrics was introduced in a tweet in 2010 (Priem, 2010), the idea of capturing traces - "polymorphous mentioning" (Cronin et al., 1998, p. 1320) - of scholars and their documents on the web to measure "impact" of science in a broader manner than citations was introduced years before, largely in the context of webometrics (Almind and Ingwersen, 1997; Thelwall et al., 2005):
There will soon be a critical mass of web-based digital objects and usage statistics on which to model scholars' communication behaviors - publishing, posting, blogging, scanning, reading, downloading, glossing, linking, citing, recommending, acknowledging - and with which to track their scholarly influence and impact, broadly conceived and broadly felt (Cronin, 2005, p. 196). A decade after Cronin's prediction and five years after the coining of altmetrics, the time seems ripe to reflect upon the role of social media in scholarly communication. This Special Issue does so by providing an overview of current research on the indicators and metrics grouped under the umbrella term of altmetrics, on their relationships with traditional indicators of scientific activity, and on the uses that are made of the various social media platforms - on which these indicators are based - by scientists of various disciplines.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Footnote
- Teil eines Special Issue: Social Media Metrics in Scholarly Communication: exploring tweets, blogs, likes and other altmetrics. Der Beitrag ist frei verfügbar.
-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.; Cai, D.; Kappas, A.: Sentiment strength detection in short informal text (2010)
0.10
0.09780245 = product of:
0.1956049 = sum of:
0.046233665 = weight(_text_:communication in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046233665 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.23853138 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.14937124 = sum of:
0.11896186 = weight(_text_:blogs in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11896186 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31091204 = queryWeight, product of:
6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.38262224 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.030409368 = weight(_text_:22 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030409368 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- A huge number of informal messages are posted every day in social network sites, blogs, and discussion forums. Emotions seem to be frequently important in these texts for expressing friendship, showing social support or as part of online arguments. Algorithms to identify sentiment and sentiment strength are needed to help understand the role of emotion in this informal communication and also to identify inappropriate or anomalous affective utterances, potentially associated with threatening behavior to the self or others. Nevertheless, existing sentiment detection algorithms tend to be commercially oriented, designed to identify opinions about products rather than user behaviors. This article partly fills this gap with a new algorithm, SentiStrength, to extract sentiment strength from informal English text, using new methods to exploit the de facto grammars and spelling styles of cyberspace. Applied to MySpace comments and with a lookup table of term sentiment strengths optimized by machine learning, SentiStrength is able to predict positive emotion with 60.6% accuracy and negative emotion with 72.8% accuracy, both based upon strength scales of 1-5. The former, but not the latter, is better than baseline and a wide range of general machine learning approaches.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:29:23
-
Yablowitz, M.G.; Raban, D.R.: Investment decision paths in the information age : the effect of online journalism (2016)
0.08
0.07821144 = product of:
0.15642288 = sum of:
0.0554804 = weight(_text_:communication in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0554804 = score(doc=2928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.28623766 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
0.10094249 = product of:
0.20188498 = sum of:
0.20188498 = weight(_text_:blogs in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20188498 = score(doc=2928,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31091204 = queryWeight, product of:
6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.6493315 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In the rapidly evolving technology world blogs have become a popular genre of communication. Their potential influence on decision making is the focus of the present research. Based on interplay between Social Judgment Theory and Framing Theory this study investigates whether the information delivered by technology blogs is treated differently during investment decision making than information from traditional financial newspapers in digital form, while containing information cues and text framing. Using an online experiment with a 3?×?2 design, this research compares the influence of this trio of variables on the investment decisions of 236 participants. Results indicate a complex investment decision-making process differing according to the type of medium presented, the text framing, the information cues, and the decision maker's background.
-
Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013)
0.07
0.07129603 = product of:
0.28518412 = sum of:
0.28518412 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28518412 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
-
Spezi, V.; Wakeling, S.; Pinfield, S.; Creaser, C.; Fry, J.; Willett, P.: Open-access mega-journals : the future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? a review (2017)
0.07
0.06977999 = product of:
0.13955998 = sum of:
0.08007906 = weight(_text_:communication in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08007906 = score(doc=3548,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.41314846 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
0.05948093 = product of:
0.11896186 = sum of:
0.11896186 = weight(_text_:blogs in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11896186 = score(doc=3548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31091204 = queryWeight, product of:
6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.38262224 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose Open-access mega-journals (OAMJs) represent an increasingly important part of the scholarly communication landscape. OAMJs, such as PLOS ONE, are large scale, broad scope journals that operate an open access business model (normally based on article-processing charges), and which employ a novel form of peer review, focussing on scientific "soundness" and eschewing judgement of novelty or importance. The purpose of this paper is to examine the discourses relating to OAMJs, and their place within scholarly publishing, and considers attitudes towards mega-journals within the academic community. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents a review of the literature of OAMJs structured around four defining characteristics: scale, disciplinary scope, peer review policy, and economic model. The existing scholarly literature was augmented by searches of more informal outputs, such as blogs and e-mail discussion lists, to capture the debate in its entirety. Findings While the academic literature relating specifically to OAMJs is relatively sparse, discussion in other fora is detailed and animated, with debates ranging from the sustainability and ethics of the mega-journal model, to the impact of soundness-only peer review on article quality and discoverability, and the potential for OAMJs to represent a paradigm-shifting development in scholarly publishing. Originality/value This paper represents the first comprehensive review of the mega-journal phenomenon, drawing not only on the published academic literature, but also grey, professional and informal sources. The paper advances a number of ways in which the role of OAMJs in the scholarly communication environment can be conceptualised.
-
Mathiesen, K.: Human rights as a topic and guide for LIS research and practice (2015)
0.06
0.06460321 = product of:
0.12920642 = sum of:
0.1109608 = weight(_text_:communication in 2119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1109608 = score(doc=2119,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.5724753 = fieldWeight in 2119, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2119)
0.018245619 = product of:
0.036491238 = sum of:
0.036491238 = weight(_text_:22 in 2119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036491238 = score(doc=2119,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2119, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2119)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In this global information age, accessing, disseminating, and controlling information is an increasingly important aspect of human life. Often, these interests are expressed in the language of human rights-for example, rights to expression, privacy, and intellectual property. As the discipline concerned with "facilitating the effective communication of desired information between human generator and human user" (Belkin, 1975, p. 22), library and information science (LIS) has a central role in facilitating communication about human rights and ensuring the respect for human rights in information services and systems. This paper surveys the literature at the intersection of LIS and human rights. To begin, an overview of human rights conventions and an introduction to human rights theory is provided. Then the intersections between LIS and human rights are considered. Three central areas of informational human rights-communication, privacy, and intellectual property-are discussed in detail. It is argued that communication rights in particular serve as a central linchpin in the system of human rights.
-
Ho, S.M.; Hancock, J.T.; Booth, C.: Ethical dilemma : deception dynamics in computer-mediated group communication (2017)
0.06
0.06460321 = product of:
0.12920642 = sum of:
0.1109608 = weight(_text_:communication in 3821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1109608 = score(doc=3821,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.5724753 = fieldWeight in 3821, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3821)
0.018245619 = product of:
0.036491238 = sum of:
0.036491238 = weight(_text_:22 in 3821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036491238 = score(doc=3821,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3821, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3821)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Words symbolically represent communicative and behavioral intent, and can provide clues to a communicator's future actions in online communication. This paper describes a sociotechnical study conducted from 2008 through 2015 to identify deceptive communicative intent within group context as manifested in language-action cues. Specifically, this study used an online team-based game that simulates real-world deceptive insider scenarios to examine several dimensions of group communication. First, we studied how language-action cues differ between groups with and groups without a compromised actor. We also examine how these cues differ within groups in terms of the group members' individual and collective interactions with the compromised actor. Finally, we look at how the cues of compromised actors differ from those of noncompromised actors, and how communication behavior changes after an actor is presented with an ethical dilemma. The results of the study further our understanding of language-action cues as indicators for unmasking a potential deceptive insider.
- Date
- 16.11.2017 13:02:22
-
Hogan, N.M.; Sweeney, K.J.: Social networking and scientific communication : a paradoxical return to Mertonian roots? (2013)
0.06
0.056412272 = product of:
0.112824544 = sum of:
0.09153799 = weight(_text_:communication in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09153799 = score(doc=611,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.47226804 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
0.021286556 = product of:
0.042573113 = sum of:
0.042573113 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042573113 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04488925 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Although modes of interaction between the two continue to evolve, society and science are inextricably linked. Preserving the integrity of science, and by extension society, in the era of Twitter and Facebook represents a significant challenge. The concept of open communication in science is not a new one. Sociologist and scientific historian Robert Merton elegantly chronicled the qualities, or "norms" of science as Communism, Universalism, Disinterestedness, and Organized Scepticism, referred to by the acronym "CUDOS." Is social networking providing us with more efficient ways of upholding deep-rooted principles, or are we at risk of compromising the integrity of science by bypassing traditional gatekeepers?
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:53:52
