Search (159 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.14
    0.14259206 = product of:
      0.28518412 = sum of:
        0.07129603 = product of:
          0.21388808 = sum of:
            0.21388808 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21388808 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21388808 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21388808 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  2. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.12
    0.11882671 = product of:
      0.23765342 = sum of:
        0.059413355 = product of:
          0.17824006 = sum of:
            0.17824006 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17824006 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.17824006 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17824006 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38057154 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  3. Fugmann, R.: What is information? : an information veteran looks back (2022) 0.06
    0.06143835 = product of:
      0.1228767 = sum of:
        0.09246733 = weight(_text_:communication in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09246733 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.47706276 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
        0.030409368 = product of:
          0.060818736 = sum of:
            0.060818736 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060818736 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    18. 8.2022 19:22:57
    Series
    Short communication
  4. Shahbazi, M.; Bunker, D.; Sorrell, T.C.: Communicating shared situational awareness in times of chaos : social media and the COVID-19 pandemic (2023) 0.05
    0.053836007 = product of:
      0.10767201 = sum of:
        0.09246733 = weight(_text_:communication in 1054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09246733 = score(doc=1054,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.47706276 = fieldWeight in 1054, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1054)
        0.015204684 = product of:
          0.030409368 = sum of:
            0.030409368 = weight(_text_:22 in 1054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030409368 = score(doc=1054,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1054, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1054)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    To effectively manage a crisis, most decisions made by governments, organizations, communities, and individuals are based on "shared situational awareness" (SSA) derived from multiple information sources. Developing SSA depends on the alignment of mental models, which "represent our shared version of truth and reality on which we can act." Social media has facilitated public sensemaking during a crisis; however, it has also encouraged mental model dissonance, resulting in the digital destruction of mental models and undermining adequate SSA. The study is concerned with the challenges of creating SSA during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. This paper documents a netnography of Australian public health agencies' Facebook communication, exploring the initial impact of COVID-19 on SSA creation. Chaos theory is used as a theoretical lens to examine information perception, meaning, and assumptions relating to SSA from pre to post-pandemic periods. Our study highlights how the initial COVID-19 "butterfly effect" swamped the public health communication channel, leaving little space for other important health issues. This research contributes to information systems, information science, and communications by illustrating how the emergence of a crisis impacts social media communication, the creation of SSA, and what this means for social media adoption for crisis communication purposes.
    Date
    22. 9.2023 16:02:26
  5. Wu, P.F.: Veni, vidi, vici? : On the rise of scrape-and-report scholarship in online reviews research (2023) 0.04
    0.043006845 = product of:
      0.08601369 = sum of:
        0.064727135 = weight(_text_:communication in 896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064727135 = score(doc=896,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.33394393 = fieldWeight in 896, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=896)
        0.021286556 = product of:
          0.042573113 = sum of:
            0.042573113 = weight(_text_:22 in 896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042573113 = score(doc=896,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 896, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=896)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:33:53
    Series
    Brief communication
  6. Hertzum, M.: Information seeking by experimentation : trying something out to discover what happens (2023) 0.04
    0.036863007 = product of:
      0.07372601 = sum of:
        0.0554804 = weight(_text_:communication in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0554804 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.28623766 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
        0.018245619 = product of:
          0.036491238 = sum of:
            0.036491238 = weight(_text_:22 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036491238 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:29
    Series
    Brief communication
  7. Hartel, J.: ¬The red thread of information (2020) 0.03
    0.030719174 = product of:
      0.06143835 = sum of:
        0.046233665 = weight(_text_:communication in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046233665 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.23853138 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
        0.015204684 = product of:
          0.030409368 = sum of:
            0.030409368 = weight(_text_:22 in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030409368 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose In The Invisible Substrate of Information Science, a landmark article about the discipline of information science, Marcia J. Bates wrote that ".we are always looking for the red thread of information in the social texture of people's lives" (1999a, p. 1048). To sharpen our understanding of information science and to elaborate Bates' idea, the work at hand answers the question: Just what does the red thread of information entail? Design/methodology/approach Through a close reading of Bates' oeuvre and by applying concepts from the reference literature of information science, nine composite entities that qualify as the red thread of information are identified, elaborated, and related to existing concepts in the information science literature. In the spirit of a scientist-poet (White, 1999), several playful metaphors related to the color red are employed. Findings Bates' red thread of information entails: terms, genres, literatures, classification systems, scholarly communication, information retrieval, information experience, information institutions, and information policy. This same constellation of phenomena can be found in resonant visions of information science, namely, domain analysis (Hjørland, 2002), ethnography of infrastructure (Star, 1999), and social epistemology (Shera, 1968). Research limitations/implications With the vital vermilion filament in clear view, newcomers can more easily engage the material, conceptual, and social machinery of information science, and specialists are reminded of what constitutes information science as a whole. Future researchers and scientist-poets may wish to supplement the nine composite entities with additional, emergent information phenomena. Originality/value Though the explication of information science that follows is relatively orthodox and time-bound, the paper offers an imaginative, accessible, yet technically precise way of understanding the field.
    Date
    30. 4.2020 21:03:22
  8. Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023) 0.03
    0.030719174 = product of:
      0.06143835 = sum of:
        0.046233665 = weight(_text_:communication in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046233665 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.23853138 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
        0.015204684 = product of:
          0.030409368 = sum of:
            0.030409368 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030409368 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:02
  9. Aspray, W.; Aspray, P.: Does technology really outpace policy, and does it matter? : a primer for technical experts and others (2023) 0.03
    0.030719174 = product of:
      0.06143835 = sum of:
        0.046233665 = weight(_text_:communication in 1017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046233665 = score(doc=1017,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.23853138 = fieldWeight in 1017, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1017)
        0.015204684 = product of:
          0.030409368 = sum of:
            0.030409368 = weight(_text_:22 in 1017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030409368 = score(doc=1017,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1017, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1017)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reconsiders the outpacing argument, the belief that changes in law and other means of regulation cannot keep pace with recent changes in technology. We focus on information and communication technologies (ICTs) in and of themselves as well as applied in computer science, telecommunications, health, finance, and other applications, but our argument applies also in rapidly developing technological fields such as environmental science, materials science, and genetic engineering. First, we discuss why the outpacing argument is so closely associated with information and computing technologies. We then outline 12 arguments that support the outpacing argument, by pointing to some particular weaknesses of policy making, using the United States as the primary example. Then arguing in the opposite direction, we present 4 brief and 3 more extended criticisms of the outpacing thesis. The paper's final section responds to calls within the technical community for greater engagement of policy and ethical concerns and reviews the paper's major arguments. While the paper focuses on ICTs and policy making in the United States, our critique of the outpacing argument and our exploration of its complex character are of utility to actors in other political contexts and in other technical fields.
    Date
    22. 7.2023 13:28:28
  10. Lai, S.; Fan, N.: Understanding the attenuation of the accommodation recommendation spillover effect in view of spatial distance (2021) 0.03
    0.028027672 = product of:
      0.11211069 = sum of:
        0.11211069 = weight(_text_:communication in 383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11211069 = score(doc=383,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.5784079 = fieldWeight in 383, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=383)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This brief communication aims to reveal whether the recommendation information's spillover effect decays with geographical distance. A unique dataset of Airbnb listings in Beijing is collected to perform an empirical analysis and a model simulation. The results of this study demonstrate that the spillover of listings' recommendation information decays with spatial distance and this decay follows a certain attenuation mode (i.e., has a certain attenuation rate and attenuation point). As one of the first to investigate the attenuation mechanism of information spillover, this communication enriches the current research on information transmission and brings a novel topic to the attention of the community.
    Series
    Brief communication
  11. Joyce, M.C.; Long, K.S.: Controlled vocabulary as communication : the process of negotiating meaning in an indigenous knowledge organization system (2022) 0.03
    0.028027672 = product of:
      0.11211069 = sum of:
        0.11211069 = weight(_text_:communication in 1142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11211069 = score(doc=1142,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.5784079 = fieldWeight in 1142, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1142)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article outlines the early process and reflects on the experiences of the authors as members of a team creating a Hawaiian knowledge organization system. The authors put forward shared understanding as a process, not a goal, and a way to reimagine and elucidate the process of knowledge organization work. As the project has progressed, team members have embraced their work as not solely knowledge creation and organization, but also communication. The group has identified a metaphorical frame, community agreements, knowledge graphs, and authority record templates as communication tools that are critical to creating a shared space to discuss meaning.
  12. Bosancic, B.: Information, data, and knowledge in the cognitive system of the observer (2020) 0.03
    0.025845407 = product of:
      0.10338163 = sum of:
        0.10338163 = weight(_text_:communication in 5972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10338163 = score(doc=5972,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.5333724 = fieldWeight in 5972, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5972)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose In line with the cognitive viewpoint on the phenomenon of information, the constructivist tradition based on Maturana and Varela's theory of knowing, and some aspects of Shannon's theory of communication, the purpose of this paper is to shed more light on the role of information, data, and knowledge in the cognitive system (domain) of the observer. Design/methodology/approach In addition to the literature review, a proposed description of the communication and knowledge acquisition processes within the observer's cognitive system/domain is elaborated. Findings The paper recognizes communication and knowledge acquisition as separate processes based on two roles of information within the observer's cognitive system, which are emphasized. The first role is connected with the appropriate communication aspects of Shannon's theory related to encoding cognitive entities in the cognitive domain as data representations for calculating their informativeness. The second role involves establishing relations between cognitive entities encoded as data representations through the knowledge acquisition process in the observer's cognitive domain. Originality/value In this way, according to the cognitive viewpoint, communication and knowledge acquisition processes are recognized as important aspects of the cognitive process as a whole. In line with such a theoretical approach, the paper seeks to provide an extension of Shannon's original idea, intending to involve the observer's knowledge structure as an important framework for the deepening of information theory.
  13. Yu, L.; Fan, Z.; Li, A.: ¬A hierarchical typology of scholarly information units : based on a deduction-verification study (2020) 0.02
    0.02457534 = product of:
      0.04915068 = sum of:
        0.036986932 = weight(_text_:communication in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036986932 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.1908251 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
        0.012163746 = product of:
          0.024327492 = sum of:
            0.024327492 = weight(_text_:22 in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024327492 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to lay a theoretical foundation for identifying operational information units for library and information professional activities in the context of scholarly communication. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a deduction-verification approach to formulate a typology of units for scholarly information. It first deduces possible units from an existing conceptualization of information, which defines information as the combined product of data and meaning, and then tests the usefulness of these units via two empirical investigations, one with a group of scholarly papers and the other with a sample of scholarly information users. Findings The results show that, on defining an information unit as a piece of information that is complete in both data and meaning, to such an extent that it remains meaningful to its target audience when retrieved and displayed independently in a database, it is then possible to formulate a hierarchical typology of units for scholarly information. The typology proposed in this study consists of three levels, which in turn, consists of 1, 5 and 44 units, respectively. Research limitations/implications The result of this study has theoretical implications on both the philosophical and conceptual levels: on the philosophical level, it hinges on, and reinforces the objective view of information; on the conceptual level, it challenges the conceptualization of work by IFLA's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and Library Reference Model but endorses that by Library of Congress's BIBFRAME 2.0 model. Practical implications It calls for reconsideration of existing operational units in a variety of library and information activities. Originality/value The study strengthens the conceptual foundation of operational information units and brings to light the primacy of "one work" as an information unit and the possibility for it to be supplemented by smaller units.
    Date
    14. 1.2020 11:15:22
  14. Boczkowski, P.; Mitchelstein, E.: ¬The digital environment : How we live, learn, work, and play now (2021) 0.02
    0.02457534 = product of:
      0.04915068 = sum of:
        0.036986932 = weight(_text_:communication in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036986932 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.1908251 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
        0.012163746 = product of:
          0.024327492 = sum of:
            0.024327492 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024327492 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1571945 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04488925 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Increasingly we live through our personal screens; we work, play, socialize, and learn digitally. The shift to remote everything during the pandemic was another step in a decades-long march toward the digitization of everyday life made possible by innovations in media, information, and communication technology. In The Digital Environment, Pablo Boczkowski and Eugenia Mitchelstein offer a new way to understand the role of the digital in our daily lives, calling on us to turn our attention from our discrete devices and apps to the array of artifacts and practices that make up the digital environment that envelops every aspect of our social experience. Boczkowski and Mitchelstein explore a series of issues raised by the digital takeover of everyday life, drawing on interviews with a variety of experts. They show how existing inequities of gender, race, ethnicity, education, and class are baked into the design and deployment of technology, and describe emancipatory practices that counter this--including the use of Twitter as a platform for activism through such hashtags as #BlackLivesMatter and #MeToo. They discuss the digitization of parenting, schooling, and dating--noting, among other things, that today we can both begin and end relationships online. They describe how digital media shape our consumption of sports, entertainment, and news, and consider the dynamics of political campaigns, disinformation, and social activism. Finally, they report on developments in three areas that will be key to our digital future: data science, virtual reality, and space exploration.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:25:18
  15. Eskens, S.: ¬The personal information sphere : an integral approach to privacy and related information and communication rights (2020) 0.02
    0.020019764 = product of:
      0.08007906 = sum of:
        0.08007906 = weight(_text_:communication in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08007906 = score(doc=5941,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.41314846 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Data protection laws, including the European Union General Data Protection Regulation, regulate aspects of online personalization. However, the data protection lens is too narrow to analyze personalization. To define conditions for personalization, we should understand data protection in its larger fundamental rights context, starting with the closely connected right to privacy. If the right to privacy is considered along with other European fundamental rights that protect information and communication flows, namely, communications confidentiality; the right to receive information; and freedom of expression, opinion, and thought, these rights are observed to enable what I call a "personal information sphere" for each person. This notion highlights how privacy interferences affect other fundamental rights. The personal information sphere is grounded in European case law and is thus not just an academic affair. The essence of the personal information sphere is control, yet with a different meaning than mere control as guaranteed by data protection law. The personal information sphere is about people controlling how they situate themselves in information and communication networks. It follows that, to respect privacy and related rights, online personalization providers should actively involve users in the personalization process and enable them to use personalization for personal goals.
  16. Zheng, H.; Goh, D.H.-L.; Lee, E.W.J.; Lee, C.S.; Theng, Y.-L.: Understanding the effects of message cues on COVID-19 information sharing on Twitter (2022) 0.02
    0.020019764 = product of:
      0.08007906 = sum of:
        0.08007906 = weight(_text_:communication in 564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08007906 = score(doc=564,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.41314846 = fieldWeight in 564, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=564)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Analyzing and documenting human information behaviors in the context of global public health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic are critical to informing crisis management. Drawing on the Elaboration Likelihood Model, this study investigates how three types of peripheral cues-content richness, emotional valence, and communication topic-are associated with COVID-19 information sharing on Twitter. We used computational methods, combining Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic modeling with psycholinguistic indicators obtained from the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count dictionary to measure these concepts and built a research model to assess their effects on information sharing. Results showed that content richness was negatively associated with information sharing. Tweets with negative emotions received more user engagement, whereas tweets with positive emotions were less likely to be disseminated. Further, tweets mentioning advisories tended to receive more retweets than those mentioning support and news updates. More importantly, emotional valence moderated the relationship between communication topics and information sharing-tweets discussing news updates and support conveying positive sentiments led to more information sharing; tweets mentioning the impact of COVID-19 with negative emotions triggered more sharing. Finally, theoretical and practical implications of this study are discussed in the context of global public health communication.
  17. Solc, R.: ¬The use of various models of work distribution in the analysis of the Czech system of evaluation of research (2020) 0.02
    0.018493466 = product of:
      0.073973864 = sum of:
        0.073973864 = weight(_text_:communication in 5897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073973864 = score(doc=5897,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.3816502 = fieldWeight in 5897, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5897)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Series
    Brief communication
  18. Liu, X.; Chen, X.: Authors' noninstitutional emails and their correlation with retraction (2021) 0.02
    0.018493466 = product of:
      0.073973864 = sum of:
        0.073973864 = weight(_text_:communication in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073973864 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.3816502 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Series
    Brief communication
  19. Choemprayong, S.; Siridhara, C.: Work centered classification as communication : representing a central bank's mission with the library classification (2021) 0.02
    0.016346069 = product of:
      0.065384276 = sum of:
        0.065384276 = weight(_text_:communication in 233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065384276 = score(doc=233,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.3373343 = fieldWeight in 233, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=233)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    For a special library serving its parent organization, the design and use of classification schemes primarily need to support work activities. However, when the Prince Vivadhanajaya Library at the Bank of Thailand decided to open its doors to the public in 2018, the redesign of classification that serves both internal staff work and the public interest became a challenging task. We designed a classification scheme by integrating work centered classification design approach, classification as communication framework and the service design approach. The design process included developing empathy, ideation and implementation and evaluation. As a result, the new classification scheme, including seven main classes and thirty-seven level-one subclasses and twenty-two level-two subclasses, was primarily based on the organization's strategic plans, mapping with JEL Classification Codes, Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). The classification scheme also includes geographical code, author cutter number, publication year, volume number and copy number. Follow up interviews with twenty-three participants were conducted two years later to evaluate user experience as well as the staff's opinion of the new classification scheme. The feedback addressed favorable outcomes and challenges to be used for the next iteration of the library service design process.
  20. Rodriguez-Esteban, R.; Vishnyakova, D.; Rinaldi, F.: Revisiting the decay of scientific email addresses (2022) 0.02
    0.016346069 = product of:
      0.065384276 = sum of:
        0.065384276 = weight(_text_:communication in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065384276 = score(doc=449,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19382635 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04488925 = queryNorm
            0.3373343 = fieldWeight in 449, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.317879 = idf(docFreq=1601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=449)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Email is the primary method of communication with authors of scientific publications. This study sought to measure the reliability, over time, of contact email addresses from biomedical publications, particularly depending on email type. Emails were written to randomly selected email addresses from publications in MEDLINE, and email bounce rates were modeled probabilistically. The use of personal email addresses was quantified and compared to the use of other types of email addresses. Eighteen percent of authors' contact email addresses in MEDLINE were estimated to be invalid. A steadily growing share of email addresses was personal: 32% of all new email addresses in MEDLINE in 2018 were of this kind. These email addresses were less likely to be invalid than email addresses from other types of providers. While the percentage of invalid email addresses was significant, it was lower than previously estimated. Personal email addresses are taking an increasingly more important role by supplying more reliable email addresses to scientists. To mitigate the problem of invalid email addresses, institutions should provide email forwarding, scientific directories should offer the possibility of contacting authors, or scientific authors should use more stable email addresses.
    Series
    Brief communication

Languages

  • e 129
  • d 30

Types

  • a 151
  • el 23
  • m 4
  • p 3
  • x 1
  • More… Less…