-
Polatscheck, K.: Elektronische Versuchung : Test des Sony Data Discman: eine digitale Konkurrenz für Taschenbücher? (1992)
0.08
0.08390373 = product of:
0.16780746 = sum of:
0.11705171 = weight(_text_:data in 6381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11705171 = score(doc=6381,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.7905126 = fieldWeight in 6381, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6381)
0.050755743 = product of:
0.101511486 = sum of:
0.101511486 = weight(_text_:22 in 6381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101511486 = score(doc=6381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6381)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Object
- Data Discman
- Source
- Zeit. Nr.xx vom ???, S.22
-
Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998)
0.07
0.0667619 = product of:
0.1335238 = sum of:
0.08276806 = weight(_text_:data in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08276806 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.5589768 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
0.050755743 = product of:
0.101511486 = sum of:
0.101511486 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101511486 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
-
Dillon, A.: Designing usable electronic text : ergonomic aspects of human information usage (1994)
0.07
0.0665546 = product of:
0.1331092 = sum of:
0.07315732 = weight(_text_:data in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07315732 = score(doc=2884,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.49407038 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
0.059951875 = product of:
0.11990375 = sum of:
0.11990375 = weight(_text_:processing in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11990375 = score(doc=2884,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.632523 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- COMPASS
- Data processing
- Subject
- Data processing
-
Rossiter, B.N.; Sillitoe, T.J.; Heather, M.A.: Database support for very large hypertexts (1990)
0.06
0.06274002 = product of:
0.12548004 = sum of:
0.09580538 = weight(_text_:data in 48) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09580538 = score(doc=48,freq=14.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.64702475 = fieldWeight in 48, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=48)
0.029674664 = product of:
0.05934933 = sum of:
0.05934933 = weight(_text_:processing in 48) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05934933 = score(doc=48,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 48, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=48)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Current hypertext systems have been widely and effectively used on relatively small data volumes. Explores the potential of database technology for aiding the implementation of hypertext systems holding very large amounts of complex data. Databases meet many requirements of the hypermedium: persistent data management, large volumes, data modelling, multi-level architecture with abstractions and views, metadata integrated with operational data, short-term transaction processing and high-level end-user languages for searching and updating data. Describes a system implementing the storage, retrieval and recall of trails through hypertext comprising textual complex objects (to illustrate the potential for the use of data bases). Discusses weaknesses in current database systems for handling the complex modelling required
-
Nicholas, D.; Nicholas, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Watkinson, A.: ¬The information seeking behaviour of the users of digital scholarly journals (2006)
0.04
0.0448143 = product of:
0.0896286 = sum of:
0.06843241 = weight(_text_:data in 990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06843241 = score(doc=990,freq=14.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.46216056 = fieldWeight in 990, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=990)
0.021196188 = product of:
0.042392377 = sum of:
0.042392377 = weight(_text_:processing in 990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042392377 = score(doc=990,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 990, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=990)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The article employs deep log analysis (DLA) techniques, a more sophisticated form of transaction log analysis, to demonstrate what usage data can disclose about information seeking behaviour of virtual scholars - academics, and researchers. DLA works with the raw server log data, not the processed, pre-defined and selective data provided by journal publishers. It can generate types of analysis that are not generally available via proprietary web logging software because the software filters out relevant data and makes unhelpful assumptions about the meaning of the data. DLA also enables usage data to be associated with search/navigational and/or user demographic data, hence the name 'deep'. In this connection the usage of two digital journal libraries, those of EmeraldInsight, and Blackwell Synergy are investigated. The information seeking behaviour of nearly three million users is analyzed in respect to the extent to which they penetrate the site, the number of visits made, as well as the type of items and content they view. The users are broken down by occupation, place of work, type of subscriber ("Big Deal", non-subscriber, etc.), geographical location, type of university (old and new), referrer link used, and number of items viewed in a session.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.5, S.1345-1365
-
Harter, S.P.: Scholarly communication and electronic journals : an impact study (1998)
0.03
0.03338095 = product of:
0.0667619 = sum of:
0.04138403 = weight(_text_:data in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04138403 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
0.025377871 = product of:
0.050755743 = sum of:
0.050755743 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050755743 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Studies the effects of e-journals on the scholarly communities they are serving. Considers to what extent scholars and researchers are aware of, influenced by, using, or building their own work on research published in e-journals. Draws a sample of scholarly, peer-reviewed e-journals and conducts several analyzes thorugh citation analysis. The data show that the impact of journals on scholarly communication has been minimal
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 16:56:06
-
Zhao, D.: Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science : a comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals (2005)
0.03
0.032942846 = product of:
0.06588569 = sum of:
0.036211025 = weight(_text_:data in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036211025 = score(doc=1065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
0.029674664 = product of:
0.05934933 = sum of:
0.05934933 = weight(_text_:processing in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05934933 = score(doc=1065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article reveals different patterns of scholarly communication in the XML research field on the Web and in print journals in terms of author visibility, and challenges the common practice of exclusively using the ISI's databases to obtain citation counts as scientific performance indicators. Results from this study demonstrate both the importance and the feasibility of the use of multiple citation data sources in citation analysis studies of scholarly communication, and provide evidence for a developing "two tier" scholarly communication system.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1403-1418
-
Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011)
0.03
0.029208332 = product of:
0.058416665 = sum of:
0.036211025 = weight(_text_:data in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036211025 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.022205638 = product of:
0.044411276 = sum of:
0.044411276 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044411276 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:23:07
-
Schmale, W.: Strategische Optionen für universitäre Repositorien in den Digital Humanities (2018)
0.03
0.029208332 = product of:
0.058416665 = sum of:
0.036211025 = weight(_text_:data in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036211025 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
0.022205638 = product of:
0.044411276 = sum of:
0.044411276 = weight(_text_:22 in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044411276 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Ein ideales Repositorium bedient alle Interessen der unterschiedlichen beteiligten AkteurInnen und ihrer Institution, es entspricht den Erfordernissen konkreter Fächer und Fächergruppen und unterstützt Strategien, die die Wissenschaft insgesamt und langfristig betreffen. Es lässt die für den User unkomplizierte Archivierung sämtlicher digitaler Objekte inklusive Datenbanken zu, spiegelt innovative Forschungsfelder der Universität wider und unterstützt insbesondere auch die Lehre. Es bietet Tools und Rechercheoptionen im Sinne von Big Data an.
- Date
- 20. 9.2018 12:22:39
-
Krüger, N.; Pianos, T.: Lernmaterialien für junge Forschende in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften als Open Educational Resources (OER) (2021)
0.03
0.029208332 = product of:
0.058416665 = sum of:
0.036211025 = weight(_text_:data in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036211025 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
0.022205638 = product of:
0.044411276 = sum of:
0.044411276 = weight(_text_:22 in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044411276 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 5.2021 12:43:05
- Source
- Open Password. 2021, Nr.935 vom 16.06.2021 [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzMwNSwiMjNiZDFkOWY4Nzg5IiwwLDAsMjc1LDFd]
-
Pinfield, S.; Salter, J.; Bath, P.A.: ¬A "Gold-centric" implementation of open access : hybrid journals, the "Total cost of publication," and policy development in the UK and beyond (2017)
0.03
0.028887425 = product of:
0.05777485 = sum of:
0.03657866 = weight(_text_:data in 3797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03657866 = score(doc=3797,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.24703519 = fieldWeight in 3797, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3797)
0.021196188 = product of:
0.042392377 = sum of:
0.042392377 = weight(_text_:processing in 3797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042392377 = score(doc=3797,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 3797, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3797)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper reports analysis of data from higher education institutions in the UK on their experience of the open-access (OA) publishing market working within a policy environment favoring "Gold" OA (OA publishing in journals). It models the "total cost of publication"-comprising costs of journal subscriptions, OA article-processing charges (APCs), and new administrative costs-for a sample of 24 institutions. APCs are shown to constitute 12% of the "total cost of publication," APC administration, 1%, and subscriptions, 87% (for a sample of seven publishers). APC expenditure in institutions rose between 2012 and 2014 at the same time as rising subscription costs. There was disproportionately high take up of Gold options for Health and Life Sciences articles. APC prices paid varied widely, with a mean APC of £1,586 in 2014. "Hybrid" options (subscription journals also offering OA for individual articles on payment of an APC) were considerably more expensive than fully OA titles, but the data indicate a correlation between APC price and journal quality (as reflected in the citation rates of journals). The policy implications of these developments are explored, particularly in relation to hybrid OA and potential of offsetting subscription and APC costs.
-
Morrison, H.; Borges, L.; Zhao, X.; Kakou, T.L.; Shanbhoug, A.N.: Change and growth in open access journal publishing and charging trends 2011-2021 (2022)
0.03
0.028887425 = product of:
0.05777485 = sum of:
0.03657866 = weight(_text_:data in 741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03657866 = score(doc=741,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.24703519 = fieldWeight in 741, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=741)
0.021196188 = product of:
0.042392377 = sum of:
0.042392377 = weight(_text_:processing in 741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042392377 = score(doc=741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=741)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This study examines trends in open access article processing charges (APCs) from 2011 to 2021, building on a 2011 study by Solomon and Björk. Two methods are employed, a modified replica and a status update of the 2011 journals. Data are drawn from multiple sources and datasets are available as open data. Most journals do not charge APCs; this has not changed. The global average per-journal APC increased slightly, from 906 to 958 USD, while the per-article average increased from 904 to 1,626 USD, indicating that authors choose to publish in more expensive journals. Publisher size, type, impact metrics and subject affect charging tendencies, average APC, and pricing trends. Half the journals from the 2011 sample are no longer listed in DOAJ in 2021, due to ceased publication or publisher de-listing. Conclusions include a caution about the potential of the APC model to increase costs beyond inflation. The university sector may be the most promising approach to economically sustainable no-fee OA journals. Universities publish many OA journals, nearly half of OA articles, tend not to charge APCs and when APCs are charged, the prices are very low on average.
-
Adler, S.C.: ¬The "¬ABCs" of DSSSL (1997)
0.03
0.028236724 = product of:
0.05647345 = sum of:
0.031038022 = weight(_text_:data in 387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031038022 = score(doc=387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=387)
0.025435425 = product of:
0.05087085 = sum of:
0.05087085 = weight(_text_:processing in 387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05087085 = score(doc=387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=387)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- DSSSL is ISO/IEC 10179 and international standard for the formatting and other processing of SGML documents. DSSSL was completed in Jan 96 after 8 years of development. From its inception, DSSSL was conceived as a companion standard to SGML, where SGML is a language for standardizing the way documents structures are represented without regard to its form or presentation. It ispossible to use SGML mark-up to represent formatting information, but this is discouraged, since doing so makes a document more difficult to reuse and reprocess. Reuse is generally a significant requirement for SGML data so it is not a good idea to pollute documents with presentational mark-up. Yet formatting of some nature is desirable, and sometimes critical, for all documents, and in some cases users want to interchange this formatting information in a standardized, non-proprietory format, DSSSL is key to enabling this interchange
-
Pinfield, S.; Salter, J.; Bath, P.A.: ¬The "total cost of publication" in a hybrid open-access environment : institutional approaches to funding journal article-processing charges in combination with subscriptions (2016)
0.03
0.027920479 = product of:
0.055840958 = sum of:
0.02586502 = weight(_text_:data in 3016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02586502 = score(doc=3016,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 3016, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3016)
0.029975938 = product of:
0.059951875 = sum of:
0.059951875 = weight(_text_:processing in 3016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059951875 = score(doc=3016,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.3162615 = fieldWeight in 3016, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3016)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- As open-access (OA) publishing funded by article-processing charges (APCs) becomes more widely accepted, academic institutions need to be aware of the "total cost of publication" (TCP), comprising subscription costs plus APCs and additional administration costs. This study analyzes data from 23 UK institutions covering the period 2007-2014 modeling the TCP. It shows a clear rise in centrally managed APC payments from 2012 onward, with payments projected to increase further. As well as evidencing the growing availability and acceptance of OA publishing, these trends reflect particular UK policy developments and funding arrangements intended to accelerate the move toward OA publishing ("Gold" OA). Although the mean value of APCs has been relatively stable, there was considerable variation in APC prices paid by institutions since 2007. In particular, "hybrid" subscription/OA journals were consistently more expensive than fully OA journals. Most APCs were paid to large "traditional" commercial publishers who also received considerable subscription income. New administrative costs reported by institutions varied considerably. The total cost of publication modeling shows that APCs are now a significant part of the TCP for academic institutions, in 2013 already constituting an average of 10% of the TCP (excluding administrative costs).
-
Bonime, A.: Sony's Data Discman : a look at these new portable information machines and what they mean for CD-ROM developers (1992)
0.03
0.025605064 = product of:
0.102420256 = sum of:
0.102420256 = weight(_text_:data in 6380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.102420256 = score(doc=6380,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.69169855 = fieldWeight in 6380, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6380)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Object
- Data Discman
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Wouters, P.: Turning working papers into journal articles : an exercise in microbibliometrics (2009)
0.03
0.025035713 = product of:
0.050071426 = sum of:
0.031038022 = weight(_text_:data in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031038022 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
0.019033402 = product of:
0.038066804 = sum of:
0.038066804 = weight(_text_:22 in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038066804 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article focuses on the process of scientific and scholarly communication. Data on open access publications on the Internet not only provides a supplement to the traditional citation indexes but also enables analysis of the microprocesses and daily practices that constitute scientific communication. This article focuses on a stage in the life cycle of scientific and scholarly information that precedes the publication of formal research articles in the scientific and scholarly literature. Binomial logistic regression models are used to analyse precise mechanisms at work in the transformation of a working paper (WP) into a journal article (JA) in the field of economics. The study unveils a fine-grained process of adapting WPs to their new context as JAs by deleting and adding literature references, which perhaps can be best captured by the term sculpting.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:59:25
-
Abella, A.; Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M.; De-Pablos-Heredero, C.: ¬The process of open data publication and reuse (2019)
0.02
0.024537712 = product of:
0.09815085 = sum of:
0.09815085 = weight(_text_:data in 4989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09815085 = score(doc=4989,freq=20.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.662865 = fieldWeight in 4989, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4989)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Open data movement advocates support to public authorities by making available to society the public information they manage. The data released are identified as open government data and the creation of open data portals supports their commitment through open government policies. The worldwide increase of the open data publication is making more necessary the modelling of its impact on society. This research analyses the process of open data publication starting in the internal systems of the organization and reaching the actual reuse of data in reuser's ecosystem surrounding the open data portals. Different reuser's profiles are identified and described within the reuser's ecosystem. Some key elements of the publication process are presented in order to guarantee sustainability of open data initiatives and to further analyse the social and economic impact.
-
Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018)
0.02
0.02426428 = product of:
0.04852856 = sum of:
0.035839625 = weight(_text_:data in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035839625 = score(doc=4631,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.24204408 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.012688936 = product of:
0.025377871 = sum of:
0.025377871 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025377871 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in terms of shares of scholarly book publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in five European countries, i.e. Flanders (Belgium), Finland, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. In addition to aggregate results for the whole of the social sciences and the humanities, the authors focus on two well-established fields, namely, economics & business and history. Design/methodology/approach Comprehensive coverage databases of SSH scholarly output have been set up in Flanders (VABB-SHW), Finland (VIRTA), Norway (NSI), Poland (PBN) and Slovenia (COBISS). These systems allow to trace the shares of monographs and book chapters among the total volume of scholarly publications in each of these countries. Findings As expected, the shares of scholarly monographs and book chapters in the humanities and in the social sciences differ considerably between fields of science and between the five countries studied. In economics & business and in history, the results show similar field-based variations as well as country variations. Most year-to-year and overall variation is rather limited. The data presented illustrate that book publishing is not disappearing from an SSH. Research limitations/implications The results presented in this paper illustrate that the polish scholarly evaluation system has influenced scholarly publication patterns considerably, while in the other countries the variations are manifested only slightly. The authors conclude that generalizations like "performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) are bad for book publishing" are flawed. Research evaluation systems need to take book publishing fully into account because of the crucial epistemic and social roles it serves in an SSH. Originality/value The authors present data on monographs and book chapters from five comprehensive coverage databases in Europe and analyze the data in view of the debates regarding the perceived detrimental effects of research evaluation systems on scholarly book publishing. The authors show that there is little reason to suspect a dramatic decline of scholarly book publishing in an SSH.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Ferro, N.; Silvello, G.: NESTOR: a formal model for digital archives (2013)
0.02
0.023530604 = product of:
0.04706121 = sum of:
0.02586502 = weight(_text_:data in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02586502 = score(doc=2707,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
0.021196188 = product of:
0.042392377 = sum of:
0.042392377 = weight(_text_:processing in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042392377 = score(doc=2707,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Archives are an extremely valuable part of our cultural heritage since they represent the trace of the activities of a physical or juridical person in the course of their business. Despite their importance, the models and technologies that have been developed over the past two decades in the Digital Library (DL) field have not been specifically tailored to archives. This is especially true when it comes to formal and foundational frameworks, as the Streams, Structures, Spaces, Scenarios, Societies (5S) model is. Therefore, we propose an innovative formal model, called NEsted SeTs for Object hieRarchies (NESTOR), for archives, explicitly built around the concepts of context and hierarchy which play a central role in the archival realm. NESTOR is composed of two set-based data models: the Nested Sets Model (NS-M) and the Inverse Nested Sets Model (INS-M) that express the hierarchical relationships between objects through the inclusion property between sets. We formally study the properties of these models and prove their equivalence with the notion of hierarchy entailed by archives. We then use NESTOR to extend the 5S model in order to take into account the specific features of archives and to tailor the notion of digital library accordingly. This offers the possibility of opening up the full wealth of DL methods and technologies to archives. We demonstrate the impact of NESTOR on this problem through three example use cases.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 49(2013) no.6, S.1206-1240
-
Brock, L.: Electronic publishing : baseline data 1993 (1993)
0.02
0.020692015 = product of:
0.08276806 = sum of:
0.08276806 = weight(_text_:data in 6406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08276806 = score(doc=6406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046827413 = queryNorm
0.5589768 = fieldWeight in 6406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6406)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
