Search (225 results, page 1 of 12)

0.052796576 = product of:
  0.10559315 = sum of:
    0.07167925 = weight(_text_:data in 954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07167925 = score(doc=954,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.48408815 = fieldWeight in 954, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=954)
    0.033913903 = product of:
      0.067827806 = sum of:
        0.067827806 = weight(_text_:processing in 954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067827806 = score(doc=954,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 954, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=954)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) is a significant document database on mainland China, which has been built up by the Documentation and Information Centre of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Briefly introduces the background to CSCD, and discusses in detail its development and application, source journals and citation data, data processing methods, subject scope, compilation regulations, stylistic rules and layout, and usage directions for both the printed and CD-ROM editions of CSCD which have been published from the data

0.04658822 = product of:
  0.09317644 = sum of:
    0.051210128 = weight(_text_:data in 793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051210128 = score(doc=793,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.34584928 = fieldWeight in 793, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=793)
    0.041966315 = product of:
      0.08393263 = sum of:
        0.08393263 = weight(_text_:processing in 793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08393263 = score(doc=793,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.4427661 = fieldWeight in 793, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=793)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

LCSH

Document delivery / Data processing

Subject

Document delivery / Data processing

0.026219916 = product of:
  0.05243983 = sum of:
    0.03657866 = weight(_text_:data in 6543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03657866 = score(doc=6543,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.24703519 = fieldWeight in 6543, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6543)
    0.01586117 = product of:
      0.03172234 = sum of:
        0.03172234 = weight(_text_:22 in 6543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03172234 = score(doc=6543,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6543, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6543)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

All types of information can be referenced to a geographic place. Maps, aerial photographs, and remote sensing images are spatially georeferenced. Other forms of information such as books, articles, research papers, pieces of music, and art are often linked to a geographic location through place names (geographic names). A gazetteer (a dictionary of geographic names) that is spatially referenced itself provides the bridge between these two types of georeferencing. With a georeferenced gazetteer translation service, a user can start with a geographic name and find information that is described with either geographic names or with geospatial coordinates. Use of this powerful indirect geospatially referencing tool can be applied as a common approach to libraries, bibliographic files, data centers, web resources, and museum and specimen collections and can be particular useful across language barriers since latitude and longitude coordinates are universally understood. The Alexandria Digital Library has implemented a gazetteer component for its georeferenced digital library. This experience resulted in the creation of a Gazetteer Content Standard, a Feature Type Thesaurus, and an operational interactive gazetteer service. This paper describes the development of these components and illustrates the use of this tool in a georeferenced digital library. It also relates progress in working with Federal agencies and others toward developing shareable gazetteer data through Digital Gazetteer Information Exchange programs

Date

29. 9.2001 20:22:45

0.025605064 = product of:
  0.102420256 = sum of:
    0.102420256 = weight(_text_:data in 4405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.102420256 = score(doc=4405,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.69169855 = fieldWeight in 4405, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4405)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Object

Biblio-Data

0.025605064 = product of:
  0.102420256 = sum of:
    0.102420256 = weight(_text_:data in 5240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.102420256 = score(doc=5240,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.69169855 = fieldWeight in 5240, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5240)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Imprint

Düsseldorf : Data Becker

Object

Große Data Becker Lexikon

0.025035713 = product of:
  0.050071426 = sum of:
    0.031038022 = weight(_text_:data in 3296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031038022 = score(doc=3296,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 3296, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3296)
    0.019033402 = product of:
      0.038066804 = sum of:
        0.038066804 = weight(_text_:22 in 3296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038066804 = score(doc=3296,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3296, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3296)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The large number and variety of online databases in the field of environment sciences and chemistry underlies the need for a cooperative evaluation approach. Presents 2 evaluation criteria, divided into 4 headings; general criteria (size of data source, cost of 1 hour searching, updating of database, availability on other media); chemical relevant criteria (number of chemicals, identification parameters of chemicals, test set chemicals, development of chemicals), environmental relevant criteria (information parameters for chemicals, parameter development); and criteria describing environmental chemicals (use of chemicals, quality of database). A 6 number scoring system is applied to these criteria and the Hasse diagram technique is presented for 19 bibliographic online databases using these criteria. Using this technique, 'good' and 'bad' databases are identified and changes in the database content from 1995 to 1998 can be visualized

Source

Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.4, S.247-262

0.025035713 = product of:
  0.050071426 = sum of:
    0.031038022 = weight(_text_:data in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031038022 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
    0.019033402 = product of:
      0.038066804 = sum of:
        0.038066804 = weight(_text_:22 in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038066804 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Project SSG-FI at SUB Göttingen provides special subject gateways to international high quality Internet resources for scientific users. Internet sites are selected by subject specialists and described using an extension of qualified Dublin Core metadata. A basic evaluation is added. These descriptions are freely available and can be searched and browsed. These are now subject gateways for 3 subject ares: earth sciences (GeoGuide); mathematics (MathGuide); and Anglo-American culture (split into HistoryGuide and AnglistikGuide). Together they receive about 3.300 'hard' requests per day, thus reaching over 1 million requests per year. The project SSG-FI behind these guides is open to collaboration. Institutions and private persons wishing to contribute can notify the SSG-FI team or send full data sets. Regular contributors can request registration with the project to access the database via the Internet and create and edit records

Date

22. 6.2002 19:40:42

0.022399765 = product of:
  0.08959906 = sum of:
    0.08959906 = weight(_text_:data in 5368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08959906 = score(doc=5368,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.60511017 = fieldWeight in 5368, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5368)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Imprint

Düsseldorf : Data Becker

Object

Große Data Becker Lexikon

0.020863095 = product of:
  0.04172619 = sum of:
    0.02586502 = weight(_text_:data in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02586502 = score(doc=228,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
    0.01586117 = product of:
      0.03172234 = sum of:
        0.03172234 = weight(_text_:22 in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03172234 = score(doc=228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Presents a brief, critical review of LISA PLaus: the CD-ROM database version of LISA and which includes the database of Current Research in Library and Information Science (CRLIS). The review covers the DOS version only, as it appeared in the Summer 1996 CD-ROM, noting that the Windows version was planned for the future. Points to the way LISA has found its mark, if not its fortune, in LISA Plus and notes its strengths, including: ideal suitability for current awareness in library and information science (LIS); massive and convenient consolidation of the published LIS literature; and massive increase in coverage from 7.900 abstracts in 1993 to over 12.000 currently. Criticizes certain features of LISA Plus, notably: the OPTI-Ware search interface; the combination of 2 databases (LISA and CRLIS) in a single, searchable database; and certain unexpected effects caused by the building of the Subject and Free Text indexes. Points particularly to great lack of consistency in the indexes and the indexing (faults that were fully rectified by a complete overhaul of the data in Summer 1996). Notes that LISA Plus is the first port of call for both information researchers and information science students. The Windows version of LISA Plus was launched in Spring 1997

Date

9. 2.1997 18:44:22

0.020863095 = product of:
  0.04172619 = sum of:
    0.02586502 = weight(_text_:data in 5674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02586502 = score(doc=5674,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 5674, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5674)
    0.01586117 = product of:
      0.03172234 = sum of:
        0.03172234 = weight(_text_:22 in 5674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03172234 = score(doc=5674,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5674, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5674)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

In zunehmendem Maße finden sich medizinische Informationen ausschließlich im Internet und auf Multimediaprodukten. Dies erhöht die Notwendigkeit einer inhaltlichen Erschließung dieser Medien, die über die Möglichkeiten der Suchmaschinen hinausgeht. Momentan erschließen medizinische Bibliotheken die Neuen Medien mit den traditionellen Mitteln der klassischen Inhaltserschließung konventioneller Medien: systematische Erschließung mit Klassifikationen (NLM-Klassifikation), im Internet meist in der Form strukturierter Listen, und verbale Sacherschließung mit Fachthesaurl (meist MESH oder RSWK), im Internet ergänzt um standardisierte Metadaten (wie Dublin Core DC, Learning Object Data LOD, Platform for Internet Content Selection PICS). Dies geschieht mit großem Aufwand auch deshalb, um eine Kompatibilität der Erschließung und Suchbarkeit von konventionellen und Neuen Medien sicherzustellen, obwohl die Neuen Medien eher wenig und nur in einem bestimmten Kontext genutzt werden. Hängt die geringe Nutzung der Neuen Medien möglicherweise mit einer inadäquaten Evaluierung und Systematisierung zusammen? Vor- und Nachteile der Erschließung der Neuen Medien durch systematische und verbale Klassifikation werden dargestellt. Daraus werden Empfehlungen entwickelt, welchen Anforderungen Erschließungsinstrumente für Neue Medien genügen sollten und welche Konsequenzen sich daraus für die zukünftige Inhaltserschließung Neuer Medien im Sinne einer höheren Nutzbarkeit und Nutzung ergeben (kooperative Erschließung, Bildung von Kompetenzzentren, Entwicklung neuer Erschließungsinstrumente)

Date

22. 3.2001 13:19:39

0.020863095 = product of:
  0.04172619 = sum of:
    0.02586502 = weight(_text_:data in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02586502 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
    0.01586117 = product of:
      0.03172234 = sum of:
        0.03172234 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03172234 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.

0.02024258 = product of:
  0.08097032 = sum of:
    0.08097032 = weight(_text_:data in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08097032 = score(doc=3589,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.5468357 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Contribution to an issue devoted to the weeding and maintenance of reference collections. Little has been published about weeding reference collections until the past few years and little of that has been empirical research. Reviews the literature on the subject with emphasis on use of the material as a condition for deselection. The University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire Library has collected data for 5 years; Uses this data to show that even in well weeded collections, which previously depended upon subjective methods, empirical data will prove beneficial. Proper reference collection management requires more than subjective judgments. Empirical data may provide a number of surprises. Data collection is being made easier by automation.

0.018105512 = product of:
  0.07242205 = sum of:
    0.07242205 = weight(_text_:data in 5389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07242205 = score(doc=5389,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.48910472 = fieldWeight in 5389, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5389)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Object

Große Lexikon 2001 (Data Becker)

0.017919812 = product of:
  0.07167925 = sum of:
    0.07167925 = weight(_text_:data in 3637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07167925 = score(doc=3637,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.48408815 = fieldWeight in 3637, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3637)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reviews the multimedia CD-ROM data base: McGraw-Hill Science and Technical Reference Set, rel.2.0. Includes 7.700 signed science articles by 3.000 authorities (including 19 Nobel laureates), 117.500 scientific terms and definitions and over 1.700 VGA-quality digitised photographs. drawings, formulae and chemical structures. The data base integrates the current, unabridged editions of the McGraw-Hill Concise Encyclopedia of Science and Technology, 2nd edition; and the McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, 4th edition. The data base is obtainable from McGraw-Hill at $495 (US) with special pricing for upgrades

0.015701758 = product of:
  0.06280703 = sum of:
    0.06280703 = product of:
      0.12561406 = sum of:
        0.12561406 = weight(_text_:22 in 502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12561406 = score(doc=502,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 502, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=502)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

3. 5.1997 8:44:22
22. 9.2003 10:02:00

0.015519011 = product of:
  0.062076043 = sum of:
    0.062076043 = weight(_text_:data in 6108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062076043 = score(doc=6108,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.4192326 = fieldWeight in 6108, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6108)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Object

Große Data Becker Lexikon

0.015519011 = product of:
  0.062076043 = sum of:
    0.062076043 = weight(_text_:data in 4254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062076043 = score(doc=4254,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.4192326 = fieldWeight in 4254, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4254)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Object

Große Lexikon 2000 (Data Becker)

0.015494656 = product of:
  0.061978623 = sum of:
    0.061978623 = product of:
      0.18593587 = sum of:
        0.18593587 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18593587 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

"Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."

0.014631464 = product of:
  0.058525857 = sum of:
    0.058525857 = weight(_text_:data in 3641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058525857 = score(doc=3641,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.3952563 = fieldWeight in 3641, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3641)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Presents a review of the literature review of books, articles and conference proceedings, on all aspects of CD-ROMs, published in 1991, plus a comprehensive bibliography. Lists the 81 periodicals cited in the article and includes keyword index to broad subjects. The review includes specific sections on: market statistics; products; awards and prizes; conferences; government data bases; portable data bases; users; student users; academic libraries; school libraries; hardware; networking; pricing; software; multimedia; standards; product development; the international scene (reporting on Canada, Central America, Africa, Europe, UK); and future possibilities

0.014631464 = product of:
  0.058525857 = sum of:
    0.058525857 = weight(_text_:data in 968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058525857 = score(doc=968,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.3952563 = fieldWeight in 968, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=968)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Describes the eidtorial thinking and planning behind the preparation of the New Dictionary of National Biography (DNB) for publication in print and electronic form. Focuses on issues arising from the attempt to capture 'clean' information from literary prose. Details the characters of the DNB, access through indexes, core data, clean data, indexing the subject, indexing the text, and editorial tracking