Search (91 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Busch, J.A.: Building and accessing vocabulary resources for networked resource discovery and navigation (1998) 0.07
    0.069985814 = product of:
      0.13997163 = sum of:
        0.036211025 = weight(_text_:data in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036211025 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
        0.1037606 = sum of:
          0.05934933 = weight(_text_:processing in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05934933 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046827413 = queryNorm
              0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
          0.044411276 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044411276 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046827413 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
  2. Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998) 0.05
    0.049989868 = product of:
      0.099979736 = sum of:
        0.02586502 = weight(_text_:data in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02586502 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
        0.07411472 = sum of:
          0.042392377 = weight(_text_:processing in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042392377 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046827413 = queryNorm
              0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
          0.03172234 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03172234 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046827413 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
  3. Park, Y.C.; Choi, K.-S.: Automatic thesaurus construction using Bayesian networks (1996) 0.05
    0.046219878 = product of:
      0.092439756 = sum of:
        0.058525857 = weight(_text_:data in 6581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058525857 = score(doc=6581,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.3952563 = fieldWeight in 6581, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6581)
        0.033913903 = product of:
          0.067827806 = sum of:
            0.067827806 = weight(_text_:processing in 6581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067827806 = score(doc=6581,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 6581, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6581)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Automatic thesaurus construction is accomplished by extracting term relations mechanically. A popular method uses statistical analysis to discover the term relations. For low frequency terms the statistical information of the terms cannot be reliably used for deciding the relationship of terms. This problem is referred to as the data sparseness problem. Many studies have shown that low frequency terms are of most use in thesaurus construction. Characterizes the statistical behaviour of terms by using an inference network. Develops a formal approach using a Baysian network for the data sparseness problem
    Source
    Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.5, S.543-553
  4. Petersen, T.: Information on images : the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (1989) 0.04
    0.040442396 = product of:
      0.08088479 = sum of:
        0.051210128 = weight(_text_:data in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051210128 = score(doc=3565,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.34584928 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
        0.029674664 = product of:
          0.05934933 = sum of:
            0.05934933 = weight(_text_:processing in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05934933 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT) was designed as a comprehensive vocabulary in its domain. Its faceted, hierarchically arranged structure allows for powerful indexing and retrieval capabilities, while its planned network of related term relationships makes it especially amenable to natural language processing. To gauge the AAT's effectiveness as a search tool against natural language queries, an experiment was carried out on DIALOG. There are 3 art data bases on DIALOG and there are also a number of other data bases that contain art related material. The experiment used queries culled from reference librarians at art and architecture libraries.
  5. Greenberg, J.: User comprehension and application of information retrieval thesauri (2004) 0.04
    0.03754674 = product of:
      0.07509348 = sum of:
        0.031038022 = weight(_text_:data in 5008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031038022 = score(doc=5008,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 5008, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5008)
        0.044055454 = product of:
          0.08811091 = sum of:
            0.08811091 = weight(_text_:processing in 5008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08811091 = score(doc=5008,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.4648076 = fieldWeight in 5008, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5008)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    While information retrieval thesauri may improve search results, there is little research documenting whether general information system users employ these vocabulary tools. This article explores user comprehension and searching with thesauri. Data was gathered as part of a larger empirical query-expansion study involving the ProQuest Controlled Vocabulary. The results suggest that users' knowledge of thesauri is extremely limited. After receiving a basic thesaurus introduction, however, users indicate a desire to employ these tools. The most significant result was that users expressed a preference for thesauri employment through interactive processing or a combination of automatic and interactive processing, compared to exclusively automatic processing. This article defines information retrieval thesauri, summarizes research results, considers circumstances underlying users' knowledge and searching with thesauri, and highlights future research needs.
  6. Rahmstorf, G.: Information retrieval using conceptual representations of phrases (1994) 0.03
    0.03466491 = product of:
      0.06932982 = sum of:
        0.043894395 = weight(_text_:data in 7862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043894395 = score(doc=7862,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 7862, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7862)
        0.025435425 = product of:
          0.05087085 = sum of:
            0.05087085 = weight(_text_:processing in 7862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05087085 = score(doc=7862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 7862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7862)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The information retrieval problem is described starting from an analysis of the concepts 'user's information request' and 'information offerings of texts'. It is shown that natural language phrases are a more adequate medium for expressing information requests and information offerings than character string based query and indexing languages complemented by Boolean oprators. The phrases must be represented as concepts to reach a language invariant level for rule based relevance analysis. The special type of representation called advanced thesaurus is used for the semantic representation of natural language phrases and for relevance processing. The analysis of the retrieval problem leads to a symmetric system structure
    Series
    Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization
    Source
    Information systems and data analysis: prospects - foundations - applications. Proc. of the 17th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Kaiserslautern, March 3-5, 1993. Ed.: H.-H. Bock et al
  7. Lacasta, J.; Falquet, G.; Nogueras Iso, J.N.; Zarazaga-Soria, J.: ¬A software processing chain for evaluating thesaurus quality (2017) 0.03
    0.033504575 = product of:
      0.06700915 = sum of:
        0.031038022 = weight(_text_:data in 3485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031038022 = score(doc=3485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 3485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3485)
        0.035971127 = product of:
          0.071942255 = sum of:
            0.071942255 = weight(_text_:processing in 3485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071942255 = score(doc=3485,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.3795138 = fieldWeight in 3485, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3485)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Thesauri are knowledge models commonly used for information classication and retrieval whose structure is dened by standards that describe the main features the concepts and relations must have. However, following these standards requires a deep knowledge of the field the thesaurus is going to cover and experience in their creation. To help in this task, this paper describes a software processing chain that provides dierent validation components that evaluates the quality of the main thesaurus features.
    Source
    Semantic keyword-based search on structured data sources: COST Action IC1302. Second International KEYSTONE Conference, IKC 2016, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, September 8-9, 2016, Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: A. Calì, A. et al
  8. Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995) 0.03
    0.03338095 = product of:
      0.0667619 = sum of:
        0.04138403 = weight(_text_:data in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04138403 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
        0.025377871 = product of:
          0.050755743 = sum of:
            0.050755743 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050755743 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Most indexed databases now include their thesauri and/or coding in their bibliographic files, searchable at the databases' online connect rates. Assesses the searchability of these on the different hosts. Thesauri and classifications are also available as diskette or CD-ROM products. Describes a number of these, highlighting the diskette thesaurus from IFI/Plenum Data for its flexible databases, the CLAIMS Uniterm and Comprehensive indexes to US chemical patents
    Source
    Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
  9. Crouch, C.J.: ¬An approach to the automatic construction of global thesauri (1990) 0.03
    0.02594015 = product of:
      0.1037606 = sum of:
        0.1037606 = sum of:
          0.05934933 = weight(_text_:processing in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05934933 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046827413 = queryNorm
              0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
          0.044411276 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044411276 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046827413 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1996 3:39:53
    Source
    Information processing and management. 26(1990), no.5, S.629-640
  10. Cheti, A.; Viti, E.: Functionality and merits of a faceted thesaurus : the case of the Nuovo soggettario (2023) 0.03
    0.025035713 = product of:
      0.050071426 = sum of:
        0.031038022 = weight(_text_:data in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031038022 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
        0.019033402 = product of:
          0.038066804 = sum of:
            0.038066804 = weight(_text_:22 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038066804 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Nuovo soggettario, the official Italian subject indexing system edited by the National Central Library of Florence, is made up of interactive components, the core of which is a general thesaurus and some rules of a conventional syntax for subject string construction. The Nuovo soggettario Thesaurus is in compliance with ISO 25964: 2011-2013, IFLA LRM, and FAIR principle (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability). Its open data are available in the Zthes, MARC21, and in SKOS formats and allow for interoperability with l library, archive, and museum databases. The Thesaurus's macrostructure is organized into four fundamental macro-categories, thirteen categories, and facets. The facets allow for the orderly development of hierarchies, thereby limiting polyhierarchies and promoting the grouping of homogenous concepts. This paper addresses the main features and peculiarities which have characterized the consistent development of this categorical structure and its effects on the syntactic sphere in a predominantly pre-coordinated usage context.
    Date
    26.11.2023 18:59:22
  11. Dextre Clarke, S.G.; Will, L.D.; Cochard, N.: ¬The BS8723 thesaurus data model and exchange format, and its relationship to SKOS (2008) 0.02
    0.018105512 = product of:
      0.07242205 = sum of:
        0.07242205 = weight(_text_:data in 6051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07242205 = score(doc=6051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.48910472 = fieldWeight in 6051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6051)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  12. Jarvelin, K.: ¬A deductive data model for thesaurus navigation and query expansion (1996) 0.02
    0.017919812 = product of:
      0.07167925 = sum of:
        0.07167925 = weight(_text_:data in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07167925 = score(doc=5625,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.48408815 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a deductive data model based on 3 abstraction levels for representing vocabularies for information retrieval: conceptual level; expression level; and occurrence level. The proposed data model can be used for the representation and navigation of indexing and retrieval thesauri and as a vocabulary source for concept based query expansion in heterogeneous retrieval environments
  13. Lee, W.G.; Ishikawa, Y.; Yamagishi, T.; Nishioka, A.; Hatada, K.; Ohbo, N.; Fujiwara, S.: ¬A dynamic thesaurus for intelligent access to research databases (1989) 0.02
    0.015679834 = product of:
      0.06271934 = sum of:
        0.06271934 = weight(_text_:data in 3556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06271934 = score(doc=3556,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.42357713 = fieldWeight in 3556, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3556)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Although thesauri can be solve some problems posed by computerised data base searching (synonyms, generic representation) their compilation requires extensive time and effort of experts and their maintenance is also difficult. Describes how a thesaurus was compiled and maintained automatically by taking advantage of the specially designed formats to input expertise with ease. The thesaurus was named a dynamic thesaurus because it depends on the set of stored data and is adapted to the necessary and sufficient range of keywords. A data base of polymers is taken as an example.
  14. Quick Guide to Publishing a Thesaurus on the Semantic Web (2008) 0.02
    0.015679834 = product of:
      0.06271934 = sum of:
        0.06271934 = weight(_text_:data in 4656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06271934 = score(doc=4656,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.42357713 = fieldWeight in 4656, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4656)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This document describes in brief how to express the content and structure of a thesaurus, and metadata about a thesaurus, in RDF. Using RDF allows data to be linked to and/or merged with other RDF data by semantic web applications. The Semantic Web, which is based on the Resource Description Framework (RDF), provides a common framework that allows data to be shared and reused across application, enterprise, and community boundaries.
  15. Soergel, D.: Data structure and software support for for integrated thesauri (1996) 0.02
    0.015519011 = product of:
      0.062076043 = sum of:
        0.062076043 = weight(_text_:data in 6052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062076043 = score(doc=6052,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.4192326 = fieldWeight in 6052, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6052)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  16. Kempf, A.O.; Baum, K.: Thesaurus-based indexing of research data in the social sciences : opportunities and difficulties of internationalization efforts (2013) 0.02
    0.015519011 = product of:
      0.062076043 = sum of:
        0.062076043 = weight(_text_:data in 1656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062076043 = score(doc=1656,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.4192326 = fieldWeight in 1656, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1656)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Efforts towards internationalization have become increasingly important in scientific environments. As for content-based indexing of scientific research data, however, standards leading to internationally coherent indexing which is vital for retrieval purposes are not yet sufficiently developed. Even concerning the concrete use of indexing instruments, launched by initiatives on an international scale, there are still no binding policies and guidelines. Against this backdrop, essential criteria which internationally applicable indexing systems should meet will be outlined. These will be illustrated through the multilingual European Language Social Science Thesaurus (ELSST), originally based on the UK Data Archive's (UKDA) Humanities and Social Science Electronic Thesaurus (HASSET) and ultimately developed by the Council of European Social Science Data Archives (CESSDA). Additionally, the general pros and cons of using international versus national indexing languages will be weighed using the ELSST and the Thesaurus for the Social Sciences (TSS) developed by GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences. In this light, the benefit of vocabulary crosswalks for supporting a combined use of international and national indexing systems will be discussed.
  17. Pollard, A.: ¬A hypertext-based thesaurus as subject browsing aid for bibliographic databases (1993) 0.01
    0.014837332 = product of:
      0.05934933 = sum of:
        0.05934933 = product of:
          0.11869866 = sum of:
            0.11869866 = weight(_text_:processing in 4713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11869866 = score(doc=4713,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.6261658 = fieldWeight in 4713, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4713)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.3, S.345-358
  18. Nielsen, M.L.: ¬A framework for work task based thesaurus design (2001) 0.01
    0.013439858 = product of:
      0.053759433 = sum of:
        0.053759433 = weight(_text_:data in 4477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053759433 = score(doc=4477,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.3630661 = fieldWeight in 4477, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4477)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Design and construction of indexing languages require thorough knowledge and understanding of the information environment. This empirical study investigated a mixed set of methods (group interviews, recollection of information needs and word association tests to collect data; content analysis and discourse analysis to analyse data) to evaluate whether these methods collected the data needed for work domain oriented thesaurus design. The findings showed that the study methods together provided the domain knowledge needed to define the role of the thesaurus and design its content and structure. The study was carried out from a person-insituation perspective. The findings reflected the information environment and made it possible to develop a thesaurus according to the characteristics of the work domain. It seemed more difficult to capture the needs of the individual user and adapt the thesaurus to individual characteristics.
  19. Cochard, N.: ¬A data model and XML schema for BS 8723-5 (2007) 0.01
    0.01293251 = product of:
      0.05173004 = sum of:
        0.05173004 = weight(_text_:data in 532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05173004 = score(doc=532,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.34936053 = fieldWeight in 532, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=532)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  20. Liang, A.C.; Sini, M.: Mapping AGROVOC and the Chinese Agricultural Thesaurus : definitions, tools, procedures (2006) 0.01
    0.012802532 = product of:
      0.051210128 = sum of:
        0.051210128 = weight(_text_:data in 5707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051210128 = score(doc=5707,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.34584928 = fieldWeight in 5707, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5707)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes the procedures for a concept-based mapping of two agricultural thesauri, the multilingual AGROVOC, created and maintained by the Food and Agricultural Organization, and the bilingual Chinese Agricultural Thesaurus, created and maintained by the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science. Conducted under the auspices of FAO's Agricultural Ontology Service, the mapping project aims to extend AGROVOC with an additional set of perspectives on the agricultural domains, enrich its domain and language coverage, and make use of AGROVOC as a common data model for data exchange among a wide range of multilingual repositories within agriculture.

Years

Languages

  • e 73
  • d 11
  • f 4
  • sp 2
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 76
  • el 9
  • s 4
  • m 3
  • n 2
  • x 2
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…