Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

Starchan, D.: ¬A chance to make UDC notation more computer-friendly (2000) 0.01

0.011102819 = product of:
  0.044411276 = sum of:
    0.044411276 = product of:
      0.08882255 = sum of:
        0.08882255 = weight(_text_:22 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08882255 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.43-44

Craven, T.C.: Salient node notation (1979) 0.01
```
0.009052756 = product of:
  0.036211025 = sum of:
    0.036211025 = weight(_text_:data in 1608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036211025 = score(doc=1608,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 1608, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1608)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Salient node notation is a technique for decreasing the average length of notation in a classification scheme without sacrficing expressiveness or disturbing the succession of chracteristics of the filing order. Assignment of notation begins at a node of the classification tree other than the root. This salient node may be determined algorithmically, given data on the bias of the collection to be classified, even if only part of the tree has been developed. A dummy value is reserved to indicate upward movement in the tree. The technique is especially applicable to classification schemes for spevialized collections and to facets such as space in which the biases of human existence are especially prominent

Satija, M.P.; Comaroni, J.P.: Beyond classification: book numbers (1992) 0.01

0.006466255 = product of:
  0.02586502 = sum of:
    0.02586502 = weight(_text_:data in 1470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02586502 = score(doc=1470,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046827413 = queryNorm
        0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 1470, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1470)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content: Enthält folgende Kapitel: Book numbers, introduction. - Debate over the usefulness of book numbers. - History of book numbers. - Chronological book numbers. - Biscoe's chronological book numbers. - Brown's extended data table. - Colong book numbers. - Rider's book numbers. - Merrill's book numbers. - Appendices: 1) Chronology of book numbers: 2) Bibliography of 181 references in chronological order

Savic, D.: CUTT-x: an expert system for automatic assignment of Cutter numbers (1996) 0.01

0.006344468 = product of:
  0.025377871 = sum of:
    0.025377871 = product of:
      0.050755743 = sum of:
        0.050755743 = weight(_text_:22 in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050755743 = score(doc=6582,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.71-87

Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999) 0.00

0.0047583506 = product of:
  0.019033402 = sum of:
    0.019033402 = product of:
      0.038066804 = sum of:
        0.038066804 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038066804 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 10. 8.2001 13:22:14

Jansen, U.: ¬Die Herren der Striche sitzen in Köln : Seit 1974 vergibt GS 1 Kodes zur Erleichterung des Warenverkehrs (2005) 0.00

0.003172234 = product of:
  0.012688936 = sum of:
    0.012688936 = product of:
      0.025377871 = sum of:
        0.025377871 = weight(_text_:22 in 3219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025377871 = score(doc=3219,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3219, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3219)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date: 3. 5.1997 8:44:22

Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Classifications