Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"s"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989) 0.04
    0.040554725 = product of:
      0.08110945 = sum of:
        0.062076043 = weight(_text_:data in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062076043 = score(doc=3564,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.4192326 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
        0.019033402 = product of:
          0.038066804 = sum of:
            0.038066804 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038066804 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Searches conducted as part of the MEDLINE/Full-Text Research Project revealed that the full-text data bases of clinical medical journal articles (CCML (Comprehensive Core Medical Library) from BRS Information Technologies, and MEDIS from Mead Data Central) did not retrieve all the relevant citations. An analysis of the data indicated that 204 relevant citations were retrieved only by MEDLINE. A comparison of the strategies used on the full-text data bases with the text of the articles of these 204 citations revealed that 2 reasons contributed to these failure. The searcher often constructed a restrictive strategy which resulted in the loss of relevant documents; and as in other kinds of retrieval, the problems of natural language caused the loss of relevant documents.
    Date
    9. 1.1996 10:22:31
  2. Petersen, T.: Information on images : the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (1989) 0.04
    0.040442396 = product of:
      0.08088479 = sum of:
        0.051210128 = weight(_text_:data in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051210128 = score(doc=3565,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.34584928 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
        0.029674664 = product of:
          0.05934933 = sum of:
            0.05934933 = weight(_text_:processing in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05934933 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT) was designed as a comprehensive vocabulary in its domain. Its faceted, hierarchically arranged structure allows for powerful indexing and retrieval capabilities, while its planned network of related term relationships makes it especially amenable to natural language processing. To gauge the AAT's effectiveness as a search tool against natural language queries, an experiment was carried out on DIALOG. There are 3 art data bases on DIALOG and there are also a number of other data bases that contain art related material. The experiment used queries culled from reference librarians at art and architecture libraries.
  3. Ruge, G.; Schwarz, C.: Natural language access to free-text data bases (1989) 0.04
    0.040442396 = product of:
      0.08088479 = sum of:
        0.051210128 = weight(_text_:data in 3567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051210128 = score(doc=3567,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.34584928 = fieldWeight in 3567, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3567)
        0.029674664 = product of:
          0.05934933 = sum of:
            0.05934933 = weight(_text_:processing in 3567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05934933 = score(doc=3567,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 3567, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3567)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Problems of indexing and searching free-text data bases are discussed in detail. The possibilities and limitations of Boolean searching are shown. An experimental system COPSY (Context operator syntax) that was built in order to avoid common errors connected with Boolean search is outlined. This system permits, as input, any natural language search question formulation and yields, as output, documents ranked on the basis of an automatically calculated correspondence between natural language search questions and content-based analysis of documents. COPSY is part of a text processing project at Siemens AG called TINA (Text-Inhalts-Analyse...). Software from TINA is actually being applied and evaluated by the US Department of Commerce for patent searching and indexing.
  4. Advances in intelligent retrieval: Proc. of a conference ... Wadham College, Oxford, 16.-17.4.1985 (1986) 0.04
    0.03993276 = product of:
      0.07986552 = sum of:
        0.043894395 = weight(_text_:data in 1384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043894395 = score(doc=1384,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 1384, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1384)
        0.035971127 = product of:
          0.071942255 = sum of:
            0.071942255 = weight(_text_:processing in 1384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071942255 = score(doc=1384,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.3795138 = fieldWeight in 1384, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1384)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: ADDIS, T.: Extended relational analysis: a design approach to knowledge-based systems; PARKINSON, D.: Supercomputers and non-numeric processing; McGREGOR, D.R. u. J.R. MALONE: An architectural approach to advances in information retrieval; ALLEN, M.J. u. O.S. HARRISON: Word processing and information retrieval: some practical problems; MURTAGH, F.: Clustering and nearest neighborhood searching; ENSER, P.G.B.: Experimenting with the automatic classification of books; TESKEY, N. u. Z. RAZAK: An analysis of ranking for free text retrieval systems; ZARRI, G.P.: Interactive information retrieval: an artificial intelligence approach to deal with biographical data; HANCOX, P. u. F. SMITH: A case system processor for the PRECIS indexing language; ROUAULT, J.: Linguistic methods in information retrieval systems; ARAGON-RAMIREZ, V. u. C.D. PAICE: Design of a system for the online elucidation of natural language search statements; BROOKS, H.M., P.J. DANIELS u. N.J. BELKIN: Problem descriptions and user models: developing an intelligent interface for document retrieval systems; BLACK, W.J., P. HARGREAVES u. P.B. MAYES: HEADS: a cataloguing advisory system; BELL, D.A.: An architecture for integrating data, knowledge, and information bases
  5. Wissensrepräsentation : [Themenheft] (1989) 0.04
    0.03764897 = product of:
      0.07529794 = sum of:
        0.04138403 = weight(_text_:data in 5667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04138403 = score(doc=5667,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 5667, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5667)
        0.033913903 = product of:
          0.067827806 = sum of:
            0.067827806 = weight(_text_:processing in 5667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067827806 = score(doc=5667,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 5667, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5667)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält: LAUBSCH, J.: Towards a theory of knowledge representation; REINFRANK, M.: Formulae and models: knowledge representation in logic; FALTINGS, B.: Knowledge representation for qualitative reasoning; STOYAN, H.: Knowledge representation or programming?; FRESKA, C.: Knowledge representation and cognitive science; HÄRDER, T.: Classical data models and knowledge representation; GÖRZ, G.: Knowledge representation and natural language processing; DECKER, R.: Bibliographie zu: Knowledge representation in artificial intelligence
  6. ¬The impact of CD-ROM on library operations and universal availability of information : 11th International Symposium Essen, 1988. Festschrift in honour of Maurice B. Line (1989) 0.03
    0.027920479 = product of:
      0.055840958 = sum of:
        0.02586502 = weight(_text_:data in 14) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02586502 = score(doc=14,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 14, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=14)
        0.029975938 = product of:
          0.059951875 = sum of:
            0.059951875 = weight(_text_:processing in 14) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059951875 = score(doc=14,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.3162615 = fieldWeight in 14, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=14)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: ABID, A.: CD-ROM and access to information in the south; SEVER, S.: CD-ROM and bridging of cultural and technological gaps in developing countries; MITCHELL, J.: Electronic publishing developments and opportunities from OCLC; TAYLOR, H.: Science Citation Index print and CD: the best of both worlds from ISI; DAHLGREN, A.C.: The forgiving building revisited; KOCH, H.-A.: How will CD-ROM affect the cooperation within library networks? SCHNELLING, H.: Beyond online? Interactive public access to library files via CD-ROM; NEUBAUER, K.W.: Electronic library? The consequences of micros on data processing systems in libraries in the age of CD-ROM; PEARSON, E.M.: The impact of CD-ROM on library operations: to buy or to make - one library's experience producing a catalogue on CD-ROM; BROWN, D.J.: ADONIS - The strategic needs of publishers; BRAID, J.A.: ADONIS - from myth to reality; KORWITZ, U.: The ADONIS project: first experiences in the central library of medicine, Cologne; LINE, M.B.: The future of CD-ROMs for full text of journlas; FEIJEN, J.M.: Dutch reference databases (NRB); NOWAK, K.: The Deutsche Bibliographie and CD-ROM; SMITH, R.L.: CD-ROM for national bibliographies: a european project; CHADWYCK-HEALEY, C.: Two major British catalogues on CD-ROM
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information processing and management 26(199?) no.1, S.189-192 (J. Krikelas)
  7. Online-bibliographieren in allgemeinbibliographischen Datenbanken : Online-Versionen und konventionelle Ausgaben im Vergleich (1986) 0.02
    0.01828933 = product of:
      0.07315732 = sum of:
        0.07315732 = weight(_text_:data in 20) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07315732 = score(doc=20,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.49407038 = fieldWeight in 20, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=20)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält: HOFFMANN, B.: Deutsche Bibliographie und Biblio-Data; HUTHLOFF, C.-R.: Zeitschriftendatenbank, Niedersächsischer Zeitschriftennachweis und Gesamtverzeichnis der Kongress-Schriften
    Object
    Biblio-Data
  8. Lee, W.G.; Ishikawa, Y.; Yamagishi, T.; Nishioka, A.; Hatada, K.; Ohbo, N.; Fujiwara, S.: ¬A dynamic thesaurus for intelligent access to research databases (1989) 0.02
    0.015679834 = product of:
      0.06271934 = sum of:
        0.06271934 = weight(_text_:data in 3556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06271934 = score(doc=3556,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.42357713 = fieldWeight in 3556, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3556)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Although thesauri can be solve some problems posed by computerised data base searching (synonyms, generic representation) their compilation requires extensive time and effort of experts and their maintenance is also difficult. Describes how a thesaurus was compiled and maintained automatically by taking advantage of the specially designed formats to input expertise with ease. The thesaurus was named a dynamic thesaurus because it depends on the set of stored data and is adapted to the necessary and sufficient range of keywords. A data base of polymers is taken as an example.
  9. Proceedings of the 13. Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., Univ. of Augsburg, April 10-12, 1989 : Conceptual and numerical analysis of data (1989) 0.02
    0.015519011 = product of:
      0.062076043 = sum of:
        0.062076043 = weight(_text_:data in 8991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062076043 = score(doc=8991,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.4192326 = fieldWeight in 8991, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8991)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  10. Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.; Slough, M.: ¬A comparison of indexing and full-text for the retrieval of clinical medical literature (1988) 0.02
    0.015519011 = product of:
      0.062076043 = sum of:
        0.062076043 = weight(_text_:data in 3563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062076043 = score(doc=3563,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.4192326 = fieldWeight in 3563, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3563)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The availability of two full text data bases in the clinical medical journal literature, MEDIS from Mead Data Central and CCML from BRS Information Technologies, provided an opportunity to compare the efficacy of the full text to the traditional, indexed system, MEDLINE for retrieval effectiveness. 100 searches were solicited from an academic health sciences library and the request were searched on all 3 data bases. The results were compared and preliminary analysis suggests that the full text data bases retrieve a greater number of relevant citations and MEDLINE achieves higher precision.
  11. Gehirn und Nervensystem : woraus sie bestehen - wie sie funktionieren - was sie leisten (1988) 0.01
    0.01345865 = product of:
      0.0538346 = sum of:
        0.0538346 = product of:
          0.1076692 = sum of:
            0.1076692 = weight(_text_:22 in 670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1076692 = score(doc=670,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 670, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=670)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 18:22:27
  12. Information brokers and reference services (1989) 0.01
    0.012688936 = product of:
      0.050755743 = sum of:
        0.050755743 = product of:
          0.101511486 = sum of:
            0.101511486 = weight(_text_:22 in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.101511486 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Series
    Reference librarian; no.22
  13. Sullivan, M.V.; Borgman, C.L.: Bibliographic searching by end-users and intermediaries : front-end software vs native DIALOG commands (1988) 0.01
    0.010973599 = product of:
      0.043894395 = sum of:
        0.043894395 = weight(_text_:data in 3560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043894395 = score(doc=3560,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 3560, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3560)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    40 doctoral student were trained to search INSPEC or ERIC on DIALOG using either the Sci-Mate Menu or native commands. In comparison with 20 control subjects for whom a free search was performed by an intermediary, the experiment subjects were no less satisfied with their retrievals, which were fewer in number but higher in precision than the retrievals produced by the intermediaries. Use of the menu interface did not affect quality of retrieval or user satisfaction, although subjects instructed to use native commands required less training time and interacted more with the data bases than did subjects trained on the Sci-Mate Menu. INSPEC subjects placed a higher monetary value on their searches than did ERIC subjects, indicated that they would make more frequent use of ddata bases in the future, and interacted more with the data base.
  14. Lunin, L.F.: Image databases : frontierland (1989) 0.01
    0.0103460075 = product of:
      0.04138403 = sum of:
        0.04138403 = weight(_text_:data in 3561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04138403 = score(doc=3561,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 3561, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3561)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Symbolic indexing and retrieval for effective searches of digitised images still seem to be frontier areas. Explains some criteria and concepts for searches of digitised images, refers to commercial software currently available for handling image data bases with alphanumeric indexing, and lists areas for research.
  15. Pao, M.L.: Retrieval differences between term and citation indexing (1989) 0.01
    0.0103460075 = product of:
      0.04138403 = sum of:
        0.04138403 = weight(_text_:data in 3566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04138403 = score(doc=3566,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 3566, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3566)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A retrieval experiment was conducted to compare on-line searching using terms opposed to citations. This is the first study in which a single data base was used to retrieve two equivalent sets for each query, one using terms found in the bibliographic record to achieve higher recall, and the other using documents. Reports on the use of a second citation searching strategy. Overall, by using both types of search keys, the total recall is increased.
  16. Universal classification I : subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, 6th Annual Conf. of Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982 (1982) 0.01
    0.009052756 = product of:
      0.036211025 = sum of:
        0.036211025 = weight(_text_:data in 18) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036211025 = score(doc=18,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 18, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=18)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: GROLIER, E. de: Classifications as a cultural artefacts; FOSKETT, D.J., S. BURY: Concept organisation and universal classification systems; ROLLAND-THOMAS, P.: Towards the establishment of the validity of encyclopedic library classification systems; KASHYAP, C.M.M.: General theory of measurement and theory of subjects; WELLISCH, H.H.: A new classification of the world's language; MILLS, J.: Practice and theory in a general classification: the new BLISS Classification (BC2); GOPINATH, M.A.: Application of general systems theory to the classification theory of Ranganathan; AUSTIN, D.: Basic concept classes and primitive relations; FELBER; H., W. NEDOBITY: The basis of Wüster's classification research; EISENWORT, W.: Remarks on certain foundational problems of a general theory of terminology; GÖDERT, W.: Library subject analysis in tension between universality and subject specialty; WAHLIN, E.: Analysis of different ordering principles in the area 'technology' (T), 'industry' (I) and 'material culture' (M) - the TIM project; SVENONIUS, E.: Indexical contents; BHATTACHARYYA, G.: Classaurus: its fundamentals, design and use; RICHMOND, P.A.: Classification in syndetic structures; CRAVEN, T.C.: The representation of facets in a general concept network for index display generation; CIGANIK, M.: Fuzzy faceted thesaurus construction; DEVADASON, F.J., M. KOTHANDA RAMANUJAM: Computer-aided construction of an 'alphabetic' classaurus; SECHSER, O.: Theoretical generalizations in retrieval system research, their objectivity and relevance; KUMAR, K.: Theoretical bases for universal classification systems; GLICKERT, P.: Gradational classification: a topic-tagging scheme for computerized production of a scannable list; PEJTERSEN, A.M.: A new approach to the classification of fiction; AUSTIN, J.: The AMP classification system for fiction: trial applications and retrieval tests; BONNER, R.: Community information classification research prject: user oriented empirical methods of classification construction; BORKO, H.: The role of classification in online retrieval systems and automated libraries; KELM, B., B. MAASSEN: Weiterentwicklung der Sacherschließungsarbeit an der Deutschen Bibliothek; JOITA, E., P. ATANASIU, V. TEODORU: The use of ordering systems by different user groups; COCHRANE, P.A.: Classification as a users's tool in online public access catalogs; TRAVIS, I.L.: Faceted classification in an online environment; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Videotex information retrieval systems: the logical development and optimization of tree structures in a general online interactive system; SCHABAS, A.H.: Videotex information systems: complements to the tree structure; WERSIG, G., M. BURKART-SABSOUB: Empirical classification research as a basis of informaton policy; MALANGA, G.: Classifying and screening journal literature with citation data; RIGBY, M.: The use of the UDC in automated terminology data banks; SWAYDAN, N.: The universal classification and the needs of libraries in developing countries; MEDER, N.: Family resemblance and empirical classification, cluster analysis: its philosophy of science and strategy of research; KRAUTH, J.: Models of the measurement of similarity; LÖFFLER, G.: Cluster-Strukturvergleiche - Ein Ansatz zur Zusammenhangsanalyse multivariat definierter Raumstrukturen; KRISHNAMURTHY, E.V., VENKATASEKHAR, H.S.: A relational data-base system and query language for storage, manipulation and retrieval of virus data. -
  17. Subject and information analysis (1985) 0.01
    0.008992782 = product of:
      0.035971127 = sum of:
        0.035971127 = product of:
          0.071942255 = sum of:
            0.071942255 = weight(_text_:processing in 793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071942255 = score(doc=793,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.3795138 = fieldWeight in 793, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=793)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: OVERVIEW: Automatic analysis (M.E. STEVENS); Analysis of Information (B.C. VICKERY) / DESCRIPTIVE CATALOGING: Descriptive cataloging (J.E. DAILY) / NATURAL LANGUAGE TEXT PROCESSING: Content analysis (C.E. HICKS, J.E. RUSH, S.M. STRONG); Machine translation (W. LEHMANN); Machine translation (W.N. LOCKE); Natural language analysis and processing (N. SAGER); Automatic analysis (M.E. STEVENS) / INDEXING: Coordinate indexing (A. ARTANDI); Subject indexes (C.L. BERNIER); Automatic indexing: progress and prospects (B.C. LANDRY, J.E. RUSH); Automatic analysis (M.E. STEVENS) / TERMINOLOGY CONTROL: Authority files (J.E. DAILY); Subject headings (J.E. Daily); Thesaurus (D.J. FOSKETT); Subject headings (M.L. MANNHEIMER) / CLASSIFYING: Abstract classification (J.E. Daily); Classification and categorization (J.E. DAILY); Clumps, theory of (K. SPARCK JONES); Dewey Decimal Classification (M.L. MANNHEIMER); Techniques used in Library of Congress Classification (M.L. MANNHEIMER); Classification, theory of (A. NEELAMEGHAN); Automatic analysis (M.E. STEVENS) / ABSTRACTING: Abstracts and abstracting (C.L. BERNIER); Abstracting (B.A. MATHIS, J.E. RUSH) / EXTRACTING: Relevance predictability in information retrieval systems (A. KENT, J. BELZER, M. KURFEERST, E.D. DYM, D.L. SHIREY, A. BOSE)
  18. Future of online catalogues : Essen symposium, 30.9.-3.10.1985 (1986) 0.01
    0.006466255 = product of:
      0.02586502 = sum of:
        0.02586502 = weight(_text_:data in 2077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02586502 = score(doc=2077,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.17468026 = fieldWeight in 2077, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2077)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a die Beiträge: HILDRETH, Ch.: Online public access catalogues; VOGT, H.: The future of online catalogues in the northern areas of Germany; SEAL, A.: Data structures, MARC and online access; HOLM, L.: Design of databases as good catalogues; RISHOEJ, J.: From database-production to an online catalogue; BUCKLE, D.: OCLC Europe: bibliographic database services for catalogue conversion; FERGUSON, J.: Future of online catalogues. UTLAS in Europe - a personal view; SÜLE, G.: Problems of duplicate records, standards and quality control; HUNSTAD, S.: Problems of duplicate records; SCHOOTS, P.: Browsers in Rotterdam: popular access to the database; KINSELLA, J.: "Prospects for browsing": experimental approaches to the presentation of brief entries and the design of 'browse screens'; MERRIN, G.: Access points and search methods in the SIBIL system with special reference to Boolean and tree search; KOHL, E.: The online union catalogue of parliamentary and government institutions in the Federal Republic of Germany; COSTERS, L. u. J. BUYS: The results of an experiment with an online public access catalogue; NOERR, K.B. u. P. NOERR: A microcomputer system for online catalogues; RAITT, D.: Online catalogues: the facts, the features, the future
  19. Classification theory in the computer age : Conversations across the disciplines. Proceedings from the Conference, Nov. 18.-19, 1988, Albany, New York (1989) 0.01
    0.0063588563 = product of:
      0.025435425 = sum of:
        0.025435425 = product of:
          0.05087085 = sum of:
            0.05087085 = weight(_text_:processing in 2071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05087085 = score(doc=2071,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 2071, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2071)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: D. BATTY: The future of DDC in the perspective of current classification research; I. DAHLBERG: Concept and definiton theory; I.L. TRAVIS: Application of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification; E. SVENONIUS: An ideal classification for an on-line catalog; K. MARKEY u. A.N. DEMEYER: The concept of common subject headings in subject outline searching; N. WILLIAMSON: The Library of Congress Classification in the Computer age; D.S. SCOTT: Subject classification and natural-language processing for retrieval in large databases; F. MIKSA: Shifting directions in LIS classification; C. MANDEL: A computer age classification: implications for library practice; R.S. HALSEY: Implications of classification theory in the computer age for educators of librarians and information science professionals; J. HOLIDAY: Subject access: new technology and philosophical perspectives
  20. Smith, L.C.: "Wholly new forms of encyclopedias" : electronic knowledge in the form of hypertext (1989) 0.01
    0.006344468 = product of:
      0.025377871 = sum of:
        0.025377871 = product of:
          0.050755743 = sum of:
            0.050755743 = weight(_text_:22 in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050755743 = score(doc=3558,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    7. 1.1996 22:47:52