Search (2241 results, page 1 of 113)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.41
    0.41066927 = product of:
      0.547559 = sum of:
        0.12395725 = product of:
          0.37187174 = sum of:
            0.37187174 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.37187174 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.37187174 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37187174 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.05173004 = weight(_text_:data in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05173004 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.34936053 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Content
    Präsentation anlässlich: European Conference on Data Analysis (ECDA 2014) in Bremen, Germany, July 2nd to 4th 2014, LIS-Workshop.
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.35
    0.35397083 = sum of:
      0.07437435 = product of:
        0.22312303 = sum of:
          0.22312303 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.22312303 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046827413 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.22312303 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22312303 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046827413 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.031038022 = weight(_text_:data in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031038022 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046827413 = queryNorm
          0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.025435425 = product of:
        0.05087085 = sum of:
          0.05087085 = weight(_text_:processing in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05087085 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046827413 = queryNorm
              0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
    Source
    Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing - proceedings of the Thirteenth Workshop (TextGraphs-13): November 4, 2019, Hong Kong : EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019. Ed.: Dmitry Ustalov
  3. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.30
    0.2974974 = product of:
      0.5949948 = sum of:
        0.1487487 = product of:
          0.44624606 = sum of:
            0.44624606 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.44624606 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.44624606 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44624606 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  4. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.29
    0.2874685 = product of:
      0.3832913 = sum of:
        0.08677007 = product of:
          0.2603102 = sum of:
            0.2603102 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2603102 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.2603102 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2603102 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.036211025 = weight(_text_:data in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036211025 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  5. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.21
    0.21336986 = product of:
      0.28449315 = sum of:
        0.061978623 = product of:
          0.18593587 = sum of:
            0.18593587 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18593587 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18593587 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18593587 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.03657866 = weight(_text_:data in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03657866 = score(doc=4997,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.24703519 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    While classifications are heavily used to categorize web content, the evolution of the web foresees a more formal structure - ontology - which can serve this purpose. Ontologies are core artifacts of the Semantic Web which enable machines to use inference rules to conduct automated reasoning on data. Lightweight ontologies bridge the gap between classifications and ontologies. A lightweight ontology (LO) is an ontology representing a backbone taxonomy where the concept of the child node is more specific than the concept of the parent node. Formal lightweight ontologies can be generated from their informal ones. The key applications of formal lightweight ontologies are document classification, semantic search, and data integration. However, these applications suffer from the following problems: the disambiguation accuracy of the state of the art NLP tools used in generating formal lightweight ontologies from their informal ones; the lack of background knowledge needed for the formal lightweight ontologies; and the limitation of ontology reuse. In this dissertation, we propose a novel solution to these problems in formal lightweight ontologies; namely, faceted lightweight ontology (FLO). FLO is a lightweight ontology in which terms, present in each node label, and their concepts, are available in the background knowledge (BK), which is organized as a set of facets. A facet can be defined as a distinctive property of the groups of concepts that can help in differentiating one group from another. Background knowledge can be defined as a subset of a knowledge base, such as WordNet, and often represents a specific domain.
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  6. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.20
    0.20489585 = product of:
      0.27319446 = sum of:
        0.22312303 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22312303 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.031038022 = weight(_text_:data in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031038022 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.019033402 = product of:
          0.038066804 = sum of:
            0.038066804 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038066804 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    In this thesis we propose three new word association measures for multi-word term extraction. We combine these association measures with LocalMaxs algorithm in our extraction model and compare the results of different multi-word term extraction methods. Our approach is language and domain independent and requires no training data. It can be applied to such tasks as text summarization, information retrieval, and document classification. We further explore the potential of using multi-word terms as an effective representation for general web-page summarization. We extract multi-word terms from human written summaries in a large collection of web-pages, and generate the summaries by aligning document words with these multi-word terms. Our system applies machine translation technology to learn the aligning process from a training set and focuses on selecting high quality multi-word terms from human written summaries to generate suitable results for web-page summarization.
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  7. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.19
    0.19495897 = product of:
      0.38991794 = sum of:
        0.07437435 = product of:
          0.22312303 = sum of:
            0.22312303 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22312303 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.3155436 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3155436 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  8. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.13
    0.12997265 = product of:
      0.2599453 = sum of:
        0.0495829 = product of:
          0.1487487 = sum of:
            0.1487487 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1487487 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.2103624 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2103624 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  9. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.12
    0.12395725 = product of:
      0.2479145 = sum of:
        0.061978623 = product of:
          0.18593587 = sum of:
            0.18593587 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18593587 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18593587 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18593587 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  10. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.12
    0.12395725 = product of:
      0.2479145 = sum of:
        0.061978623 = product of:
          0.18593587 = sum of:
            0.18593587 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18593587 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18593587 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18593587 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  11. Calì, A. et al.: Processing keyword queries under access limitations (2016) 0.10
    0.099979736 = product of:
      0.19995947 = sum of:
        0.05173004 = weight(_text_:data in 4233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05173004 = score(doc=4233,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.34936053 = fieldWeight in 4233, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4233)
        0.14822944 = sum of:
          0.08478475 = weight(_text_:processing in 4233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08478475 = score(doc=4233,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046827413 = queryNorm
              0.4472613 = fieldWeight in 4233, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4233)
          0.06344468 = weight(_text_:22 in 4233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06344468 = score(doc=4233,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046827413 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4233, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4233)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Source
    Semantic keyword-based search on structured data sources: First COST Action IC1302 International KEYSTONE Conference, IKC 2015, Coimbra, Portugal, September 8-9, 2015. Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: J. Cardoso et al
  12. Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015) 0.08
    0.084835626 = product of:
      0.16967125 = sum of:
        0.043894395 = weight(_text_:data in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043894395 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
        0.12577686 = sum of:
          0.071942255 = weight(_text_:processing in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.071942255 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046827413 = queryNorm
              0.3795138 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
          0.0538346 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0538346 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046827413 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:54:03
    22. 1.2017 17:10:56
    LCSH
    Communication in science / Data processing
    Subject
    Communication in science / Data processing
  13. Vaughan, L.; Chen, Y.: Data mining from web search queries : a comparison of Google trends and Baidu index (2015) 0.08
    0.08185689 = product of:
      0.16371378 = sum of:
        0.08959906 = weight(_text_:data in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08959906 = score(doc=1605,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.60511017 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
        0.07411472 = sum of:
          0.042392377 = weight(_text_:processing in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042392377 = score(doc=1605,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046827413 = queryNorm
              0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
          0.03172234 = weight(_text_:22 in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03172234 = score(doc=1605,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046827413 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Numerous studies have explored the possibility of uncovering information from web search queries but few have examined the factors that affect web query data sources. We conducted a study that investigated this issue by comparing Google Trends and Baidu Index. Data from these two services are based on queries entered by users into Google and Baidu, two of the largest search engines in the world. We first compared the features and functions of the two services based on documents and extensive testing. We then carried out an empirical study that collected query volume data from the two sources. We found that data from both sources could be used to predict the quality of Chinese universities and companies. Despite the differences between the two services in terms of technology, such as differing methods of language processing, the search volume data from the two were highly correlated and combining the two data sources did not improve the predictive power of the data. However, there was a major difference between the two in terms of data availability. Baidu Index was able to provide more search volume data than Google Trends did. Our analysis showed that the disadvantage of Google Trends in this regard was due to Google's smaller user base in China. The implication of this finding goes beyond China. Google's user bases in many countries are smaller than that in China, so the search volume data related to those countries could result in the same issue as that related to China.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.1, S.13-22
    Theme
    Data Mining
  14. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.07
    0.07437435 = product of:
      0.2974974 = sum of:
        0.2974974 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2974974 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39700332 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  15. Saggi, M.K.; Jain, S.: ¬A survey towards an integration of big data analytics to big insights for value-creation (2018) 0.07
    0.07135947 = product of:
      0.14271894 = sum of:
        0.112743005 = weight(_text_:data in 5053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.112743005 = score(doc=5053,freq=38.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.7614136 = fieldWeight in 5053, product of:
              6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
                38.0 = termFreq=38.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5053)
        0.029975938 = product of:
          0.059951875 = sum of:
            0.059951875 = weight(_text_:processing in 5053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059951875 = score(doc=5053,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.3162615 = fieldWeight in 5053, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5053)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Big Data Analytics (BDA) is increasingly becoming a trending practice that generates an enormous amount of data and provides a new opportunity that is helpful in relevant decision-making. The developments in Big Data Analytics provide a new paradigm and solutions for big data sources, storage, and advanced analytics. The BDA provide a nuanced view of big data development, and insights on how it can truly create value for firm and customer. This article presents a comprehensive, well-informed examination, and realistic analysis of deploying big data analytics successfully in companies. It provides an overview of the architecture of BDA including six components, namely: (i) data generation, (ii) data acquisition, (iii) data storage, (iv) advanced data analytics, (v) data visualization, and (vi) decision-making for value-creation. In this paper, seven V's characteristics of BDA namely Volume, Velocity, Variety, Valence, Veracity, Variability, and Value are explored. The various big data analytics tools, techniques and technologies have been described. Furthermore, it presents a methodical analysis for the usage of Big Data Analytics in various applications such as agriculture, healthcare, cyber security, and smart city. This paper also highlights the previous research, challenges, current status, and future directions of big data analytics for various application platforms. This overview highlights three issues, namely (i) concepts, characteristics and processing paradigms of Big Data Analytics; (ii) the state-of-the-art framework for decision-making in BDA for companies to insight value-creation; and (iii) the current challenges of Big Data Analytics as well as possible future directions.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'In (Big) Data we trust: Value creation in knowledge organizations'.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 54(2018) no.5, S.758-790
    Theme
    Data Mining
  16. Semantic keyword-based search on structured data sources : First COST Action IC1302 International KEYSTONE Conference, IKC 2015, Coimbra, Portugal, September 8-9, 2015. Revised Selected Papers (2016) 0.07
    0.070449546 = product of:
      0.14089909 = sum of:
        0.046268754 = weight(_text_:data in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046268754 = score(doc=2753,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.31247756 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
        0.09463033 = sum of:
          0.058740605 = weight(_text_:processing in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058740605 = score(doc=2753,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046827413 = queryNorm
              0.30987173 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
          0.03588973 = weight(_text_:22 in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03588973 = score(doc=2753,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046827413 = queryNorm
              0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the thoroughly refereed post-conference proceedings of the First COST Action IC1302 International KEYSTONE Conference on semantic Keyword-based Search on Structured Data Sources, IKC 2015, held in Coimbra, Portugal, in September 2015. The 13 revised full papers, 3 revised short papers, and 2 invited papers were carefully reviewed and selected from 22 initial submissions. The paper topics cover techniques for keyword search, semantic data management, social Web and social media, information retrieval, benchmarking for search on big data.
    Content
    Inhalt: Professional Collaborative Information Seeking: On Traceability and Creative Sensemaking / Nürnberger, Andreas (et al.) - Recommending Web Pages Using Item-Based Collaborative Filtering Approaches / Cadegnani, Sara (et al.) - Processing Keyword Queries Under Access Limitations / Calì, Andrea (et al.) - Balanced Large Scale Knowledge Matching Using LSH Forest / Cochez, Michael (et al.) - Improving css-KNN Classification Performance by Shifts in Training Data / Draszawka, Karol (et al.) - Classification Using Various Machine Learning Methods and Combinations of Key-Phrases and Visual Features / HaCohen-Kerner, Yaakov (et al.) - Mining Workflow Repositories for Improving Fragments Reuse / Harmassi, Mariem (et al.) - AgileDBLP: A Search-Based Mobile Application for Structured Digital Libraries / Ifrim, Claudia (et al.) - Support of Part-Whole Relations in Query Answering / Kozikowski, Piotr (et al.) - Key-Phrases as Means to Estimate Birth and Death Years of Jewish Text Authors / Mughaz, Dror (et al.) - Visualization of Uncertainty in Tag Clouds / Platis, Nikos (et al.) - Multimodal Image Retrieval Based on Keywords and Low-Level Image Features / Pobar, Miran (et al.) - Toward Optimized Multimodal Concept Indexing / Rekabsaz, Navid (et al.) - Semantic URL Analytics to Support Efficient Annotation of Large Scale Web Archives / Souza, Tarcisio (et al.) - Indexing of Textual Databases Based on Lexical Resources: A Case Study for Serbian / Stankovic, Ranka (et al.) - Domain-Specific Modeling: Towards a Food and Drink Gazetteer / Tagarev, Andrey (et al.) - Analysing Entity Context in Multilingual Wikipedia to Support Entity-Centric Retrieval Applications / Zhou, Yiwei (et al.)
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    LCSH
    Text processing (Computer science)
    Subject
    Text processing (Computer science)
  17. Dow, K.E.; Hackbarth, G.; Wong, J.: Data architectures for an organizational memory information system (2013) 0.07
    0.06888585 = product of:
      0.1377717 = sum of:
        0.09580538 = weight(_text_:data in 963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09580538 = score(doc=963,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.64702475 = fieldWeight in 963, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=963)
        0.041966315 = product of:
          0.08393263 = sum of:
            0.08393263 = weight(_text_:processing in 963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08393263 = score(doc=963,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.4427661 = fieldWeight in 963, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=963)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    A framework is developed that supports the theoretical design of an organizational memory information system (OMIS). The framework provides guidance for managing the processing capabilities of an organization by matching knowledge location, flexibility, and processing requirements with data architecture. This framework is tested using three different sets of data attributes and data architectures from 147 business professionals that have experience in IS development. We find that trade-offs exist between the amount of knowledge embedded in the data architecture and the flexibility of data architectures. This trade-off is contingent on the characteristics of the set of tasks that the data architecture is being designed to support. Further, the match is important to consider in the design of OMIS database architecture.
  18. Petric, K.; Petric, T.; Krisper, M.; Rajkovic, V.: User profiling on a pilot digital library with the final result of a new adaptive knowledge management solution (2011) 0.07
    0.066416025 = product of:
      0.13283205 = sum of:
        0.043894395 = weight(_text_:data in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043894395 = score(doc=4560,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.29644224 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
        0.088937655 = sum of:
          0.05087085 = weight(_text_:processing in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05087085 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046827413 = queryNorm
              0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
          0.038066804 = weight(_text_:22 in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038066804 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046827413 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, several procedures (e.g., measurements, information retrieval analyses, power law, association rules, hierarchical clustering) are introduced which were made on a pilot digital library. Information retrievals of web users from 01/01/2003 to 01/01/2006 on the internal search engine of the pilot digital library have been analyzed. With the power law method of data processing, a constant information retrieval pattern has been established, stable over a longer period of time. After this, the data have been analyzed. On the basis of the accomplished measurements and analyses, a series of mental models of web users for global (educational) purposes have been developed (e.g., the metamodel of thought hierarchy of web users, the segmentation model of web users), and the users were profiled in four different groups (adventurers, observers, applicable, and know-alls). The article concludes with the construction of a new knowledge management solution called multidimensional rank thesaurus.
    Date
    13. 7.2011 14:47:22
  19. Borgman, C.L.: Big data, little data, no data : scholarship in the networked world (2015) 0.07
    0.06574981 = product of:
      0.13149962 = sum of:
        0.10751887 = weight(_text_:data in 2785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10751887 = score(doc=2785,freq=54.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.7261322 = fieldWeight in 2785, product of:
              7.3484693 = tf(freq=54.0), with freq of:
                54.0 = termFreq=54.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2785)
        0.02398075 = product of:
          0.0479615 = sum of:
            0.0479615 = weight(_text_:processing in 2785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0479615 = score(doc=2785,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18956426 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.2530092 = fieldWeight in 2785, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2785)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    "Big Data" is on the covers of Science, Nature, the Economist, and Wired magazines, on the front pages of the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times. But despite the media hyperbole, as Christine Borgman points out in this examination of data and scholarly research, having the right data is usually better than having more data; little data can be just as valuable as big data. In many cases, there are no data -- because relevant data don't exist, cannot be found, or are not available. Moreover, data sharing is difficult, incentives to do so are minimal, and data practices vary widely across disciplines. Borgman, an often-cited authority on scholarly communication, argues that data have no value or meaning in isolation; they exist within a knowledge infrastructure -- an ecology of people, practices, technologies, institutions, material objects, and relationships. After laying out the premises of her investigation -- six "provocations" meant to inspire discussion about the uses of data in scholarship -- Borgman offers case studies of data practices in the sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities, and then considers the implications of her findings for scholarly practice and research policy. To manage and exploit data over the long term, Borgman argues, requires massive investment in knowledge infrastructures; at stake is the future of scholarship.
    Content
    Provocations -- What are data? -- Data scholarship -- Data diversity -- Data scholarship in the sciences -- Data scholarship in the social sciences -- Data scholarship in the humanities -- Sharing, releasing, and reusing data -- Credit, attribution, and discovery of data -- What to keep and why to keep them.
    LCSH
    Research / Data processing
    Subject
    Research / Data processing
  20. Shaw, R.; Golden, P.; Buckland, M.: Using linked library data in working research notes (2015) 0.06
    0.0629278 = product of:
      0.1258556 = sum of:
        0.08778879 = weight(_text_:data in 2555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08778879 = score(doc=2555,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14807065 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046827413 = queryNorm
            0.5928845 = fieldWeight in 2555, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2555)
        0.038066804 = product of:
          0.07613361 = sum of:
            0.07613361 = weight(_text_:22 in 2555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07613361 = score(doc=2555,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16398162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046827413 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2555, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2555)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    15. 1.2016 19:22:28
    Source
    Linked data and user interaction: the road ahead. Eds.: Cervone, H.F. u. L.G. Svensson

Languages

  • e 1909
  • d 308
  • f 2
  • a 1
  • hu 1
  • i 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 1948
  • el 238
  • m 165
  • s 65
  • x 29
  • r 14
  • b 5
  • i 2
  • p 2
  • n 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications