-
Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000)
0.04
0.04242566 = product of:
0.12727697 = sum of:
0.099177554 = weight(_text_:history in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.099177554 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.5139763 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
0.02809942 = product of:
0.05619884 = sum of:
0.05619884 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05619884 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 31. 7.2001 20:22:57
- Footnote
- Thematisierung der Verschiebung des Verständnisses von Wissensmanagement; vgl. auch: Day, R.E.: Totality and representation: a history of knowledge management ... in: JASIS 52(2001) no.9, S.725-735
-
Larivière, V.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Cronin, B.: ¬A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years (2012)
0.03
0.026109848 = product of:
0.07832954 = sum of:
0.049588777 = weight(_text_:history in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049588777 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
0.028740766 = product of:
0.05748153 = sum of:
0.05748153 = weight(_text_:century in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05748153 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.27668494 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper presents a condensed history of Library and Information Science (LIS) over the course of more than a century using a variety of bibliometric measures. It examines in detail the variable rate of knowledge production in the field, shifts in subject coverage, the dominance of particular publication genres at different times, prevailing modes of production, interactions with other disciplines, and, more generally, observes how the field has evolved. It shows that, despite a striking growth in the number of journals, papers, and contributing authors, a decrease was observed in the field's market-share of all social science and humanities research. Collaborative authorship is now the norm, a pattern seen across the social sciences. The idea of boundary crossing was also examined: in 2010, nearly 60% of authors who published in LIS also published in another discipline. This high degree of permeability in LIS was also demonstrated through reference and citation practices: LIS scholars now cite and receive citations from other fields more than from LIS itself. Two major structural shifts are revealed in the data: in 1960, LIS changed from a professional field focused on librarianship to an academic field focused on information and use; and in 1990, LIS began to receive a growing number of citations from outside the field, notably from Computer Science and Management, and saw a dramatic increase in the number of authors contributing to the literature of the field.
-
Cronin, B.: ¬The sociological turn in information science (2009)
0.01
0.013223674 = product of:
0.079342045 = sum of:
0.079342045 = weight(_text_:history in 3655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079342045 = score(doc=3655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 3655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3655)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- This paper explores the history of 'the social' in information science. It traces the influence of social scientific thinking on the development of the field's intellectual base. The continuing appropriation of both theoretical and methodological insights from domains such as social studies of science, science and technology studies, and socio-technical systems is discussed.
-
Lee, C.J.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Zhang, G.; Cronin, B.: Bias in peer review (2013)
0.01
0.009917757 = product of:
0.05950654 = sum of:
0.05950654 = weight(_text_:history in 525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05950654 = score(doc=525,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 525, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=525)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Research on bias in peer review examines scholarly communication and funding processes to assess the epistemic and social legitimacy of the mechanisms by which knowledge communities vet and self-regulate their work. Despite vocal concerns, a closer look at the empirical and methodological limitations of research on bias raises questions about the existence and extent of many hypothesized forms of bias. In addition, the notion of bias is predicated on an implicit ideal that, once articulated, raises questions about the normative implications of research on bias in peer review. This review provides a brief description of the function, history, and scope of peer review; articulates and critiques the conception of bias unifying research on bias in peer review; characterizes and examines the empirical, methodological, and normative claims of bias in peer review research; and assesses possible alternatives to the status quo. We close by identifying ways to expand conceptions and studies of bias to contend with the complexity of social interactions among actors involved directly and indirectly in peer review.
-
Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.; LaBarre, K.: ¬A cast of thousands : Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy (2003)
0.01
0.009483969 = product of:
0.05690381 = sum of:
0.05690381 = product of:
0.11380762 = sum of:
0.11380762 = weight(_text_:century in 1731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11380762 = score(doc=1731,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.54780823 = fieldWeight in 1731, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1731)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- We chronicle the use of acknowledgments in 20th-century scholarship by analyzing and classifying more than 4,500 specimens covering a 100-year period. Our results show that the intensity of acknowledgment varies by discipline, reflecting differences in prevailing sociocognitive structures and work practices. We demonstrate that the acknowledgment has gradually established itself as a constitutive element of academic writing, one that provides a revealing insight into the nature and extent of subauthorship collaboration. Complementary data an rates of coauthorship are also presented to highlight the growing importance of collaboration and the increasing division of labor in contemporary research and scholarship.
-
Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.; LaBarre, K.: Visible, Less Visible, and Invisible Work : Patterns of Collaboration in 20th Century Chemistry (2004)
0.01
0.009483969 = product of:
0.05690381 = sum of:
0.05690381 = product of:
0.11380762 = sum of:
0.11380762 = weight(_text_:century in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11380762 = score(doc=2094,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.54780823 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- We chronicle the use of acknowledgments in 20th century chemistry by analyzing and classifying over 2,000 specimens covering a 100-year period. Our results show that acknowledgment has gradually established itself as a constitutive element of academic writing- one that provides a revealing insight into the structural nature of subauthorship collaboration in science. Complementary data an rates of coauthorship are also presented to highlight the growing importance of teamwork and the increasing division of labor in contemporary chemistry. The results of this study are compared with the findings of a parallel study of collaboration in both the social sciences and the humanities.
-
Cronin, B.: Bowling alone together : academic writing as distributed cognition (2004)
0.01
0.0076642046 = product of:
0.045985226 = sum of:
0.045985226 = product of:
0.09197045 = sum of:
0.09197045 = weight(_text_:century in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09197045 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.44269592 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The twentieth century saw the progressive collectivization of science-dramatic growth in teamwork in general and large-scale collaboration in particular. Cognitive partnering in the conduct of research and scholarship has become commonplace, and this trend is reflected in rates of co-authorship and sub-authorship collaboration. The effects of these developments an academic writing are discussed and theorized in terms of distributed cognition.
-
Cronin, B.: Vernacular and vehicular language (2009)
0.01
0.006556531 = product of:
0.039339185 = sum of:
0.039339185 = product of:
0.07867837 = sum of:
0.07867837 = weight(_text_:22 in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07867837 = score(doc=7192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 11:44:11
-
Cronin, B.: Thinking about data (2013)
0.01
0.006556531 = product of:
0.039339185 = sum of:
0.039339185 = product of:
0.07867837 = sum of:
0.07867837 = weight(_text_:22 in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07867837 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 16:18:36
-
Cronin, B.: ¬The writing on the wall (2015)
0.01
0.0056198835 = product of:
0.0337193 = sum of:
0.0337193 = product of:
0.0674386 = sum of:
0.0674386 = weight(_text_:22 in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0674386 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 26. 4.2015 19:27:22
