Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.013223674 = product of:
  0.079342045 = sum of:
    0.079342045 = weight(_text_:history in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.079342045 = score(doc=689,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041479383 = queryNorm
        0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source

Library history. 23(2007) no.2, S.129-149

0.009917757 = product of:
  0.05950654 = sum of:
    0.05950654 = weight(_text_:history in 14) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05950654 = score(doc=14,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041479383 = queryNorm
        0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 14, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=14)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Research during the 1950s in library and information science reflected the intense intellectual foment and fervor of the time. As a master's student of library science at Western Reserve University (WRU) in 1952, Phyllis Allen Richmond found herself at the epicenter of some of the most exciting work being pursued in the field. Her academic career crosscuts diverse areas. She was a champion of library automation, of facet analytical theory, and of the history of science. She always kept the future of classification firmly at the center of her work. This retrospective of the pioneering accomplishments and contributions of a distinguished forty-year career will draw upon recollections, materials at the Case Western Reserve University Archive, and Richmond's own writings.

0.009483969 = product of:
  0.05690381 = sum of:
    0.05690381 = product of:
      0.11380762 = sum of:
        0.11380762 = weight(_text_:century in 1731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11380762 = score(doc=1731,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.54780823 = fieldWeight in 1731, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1731)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

We chronicle the use of acknowledgments in 20th-century scholarship by analyzing and classifying more than 4,500 specimens covering a 100-year period. Our results show that the intensity of acknowledgment varies by discipline, reflecting differences in prevailing sociocognitive structures and work practices. We demonstrate that the acknowledgment has gradually established itself as a constitutive element of academic writing, one that provides a revealing insight into the nature and extent of subauthorship collaboration. Complementary data an rates of coauthorship are also presented to highlight the growing importance of collaboration and the increasing division of labor in contemporary research and scholarship.

0.009483969 = product of:
  0.05690381 = sum of:
    0.05690381 = product of:
      0.11380762 = sum of:
        0.11380762 = weight(_text_:century in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11380762 = score(doc=2094,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.54780823 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

We chronicle the use of acknowledgments in 20th century chemistry by analyzing and classifying over 2,000 specimens covering a 100-year period. Our results show that acknowledgment has gradually established itself as a constitutive element of academic writing- one that provides a revealing insight into the structural nature of subauthorship collaboration in science. Complementary data an rates of coauthorship are also presented to highlight the growing importance of teamwork and the increasing division of labor in contemporary chemistry. The results of this study are compared with the findings of a parallel study of collaboration in both the social sciences and the humanities.

0.0057481537 = product of:
  0.03448892 = sum of:
    0.03448892 = product of:
      0.06897784 = sum of:
        0.06897784 = weight(_text_:century in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06897784 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.33202195 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

The concerns of the past century follow us into the next. Despite continuing technological advancement we find ourselves overwhelmed by a virtual tidal wave of information. Instead of reinventing seemingly novel solutions, it is appropriate to reexamine the successes and failures of the past. In light of the increasing focus on faceted classification as a potential approach to the problems of organizing conceptual space, it is appropriate to direct critical attention to the convoluted nature of the interaction between Henry Evelyn Bliss and S. R. Ranganathan. Drawing upon the methods of historiography, this is a review of original documents and an analysis of primary examples drawn from the correspondence between Ranganathan and Bliss currently in possession of the Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Columbia University and Archives and Special Collections at the Morris Raphael Cohen Library, City College of New York. This analysis will serve as a springboard to further exploration of the synthetic nature of faceted classification

0.0032782655 = product of:
  0.019669592 = sum of:
    0.019669592 = product of:
      0.039339185 = sum of:
        0.039339185 = weight(_text_:22 in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039339185 = score(doc=2247,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date

27.12.2008 9:50:22