-
Svenonius, E.: Unanswered questions in the design of controlled vocabularies (1986)
0.04
0.04177576 = product of:
0.12532727 = sum of:
0.079342045 = weight(_text_:history in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079342045 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
0.045985226 = product of:
0.09197045 = sum of:
0.09197045 = weight(_text_:century in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09197045 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.44269592 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The issue of free-text versus controlled vocabulary is examined in this article. The history of the issue, which is seen as beginning with the debate over title term indexing in the last century, is reviewed and the attention is turned to questions which have not been satisfactorily addressed by previous research. The point is made that these questions need to be answered if we are to design retrieval tools, such as thesauri, upon a national basis
-
Svenonius, E.: Unanswered questions in the design of controlled vocabularies (1997)
0.03
0.031331822 = product of:
0.09399546 = sum of:
0.05950654 = weight(_text_:history in 583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05950654 = score(doc=583,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 583, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=583)
0.03448892 = product of:
0.06897784 = sum of:
0.06897784 = weight(_text_:century in 583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06897784 = score(doc=583,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.33202195 = fieldWeight in 583, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=583)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The issue of free-text versus controlled vocabulary is examined in this article. The history of the issue, which is seen as beginning with the debate over title term indexing in the last century, is reviewed and the attention is turned to questions which have not been satisfactorily addressed by previous research. The point is made that these questions need to be answered if we are to design retrieval tools, such as thesauri, upon a national basis
-
Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000)
0.03
0.031331822 = product of:
0.09399546 = sum of:
0.05950654 = weight(_text_:history in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05950654 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
0.03448892 = product of:
0.06897784 = sum of:
0.06897784 = weight(_text_:century in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06897784 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.33202195 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper looks at changes affecting LCSH over its 100-year history. Adopting a linguistic conceptualization, it frames these changes as relating to the semantics, syntax and pragmatics of the LCSH language. While its category semantics has remained stable over time, the LCSH relational semantics underwent a significant upheaval when a thesaural structure was imposed upon its traditional See and See also structure. Over time the LCSH syntax has become increasingly complex as it has moved from being largely enumerative to in large part synthetic. Until fairly recently the LCSH pragmatics consisted of only one rule, viz, the injunction to assign specific headings. This rule, always controversial, has become even more debated and interpreted with the move to the online environment
- Source
- The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone
-
Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000)
0.03
0.031331822 = product of:
0.09399546 = sum of:
0.05950654 = weight(_text_:history in 5602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05950654 = score(doc=5602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 5602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5602)
0.03448892 = product of:
0.06897784 = sum of:
0.06897784 = weight(_text_:century in 5602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06897784 = score(doc=5602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.33202195 = fieldWeight in 5602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5602)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper looks at changes affecting LCSH over its 100-year history. Adopting a linguistic conceptualization, it frames these changes as relating to the semantics, syntax and pragmatics of the LCSH language. While its category semantics has remained stable over time, the LCSH relational semantics underwent a significant upheaval when a thesaural structure was imposed upon its traditional See and See also structure. Over time the LCSH syntax has become increasingly complex as it has moved from being largely enumerative to in large part synthetic. Until fairly recently the LCSH pragmatics consisted of only one rule, viz, the injunction to assign specific headings. This rule, always controversial, has become even more debated and interpreted with the move to the online environment
- Source
- The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone
-
Svenonius, E.: Bibliographic entities and their uses (2018)
0.01
0.0095802555 = product of:
0.05748153 = sum of:
0.05748153 = product of:
0.11496306 = sum of:
0.11496306 = weight(_text_:century in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11496306 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.5533699 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- This article provides an interpretation of the structure of classification theory literature, from the late 19th Century to the present, by dividing it into four orders, and then describes the relationship between that and manuals for classification design.
-
Svenonius, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities (1992)
0.01
0.0076642046 = product of:
0.045985226 = sum of:
0.045985226 = product of:
0.09197045 = sum of:
0.09197045 = weight(_text_:century in 2084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09197045 = score(doc=2084,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.44269592 = fieldWeight in 2084, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2084)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Classification research at any point in time is the resultant product of various philosophical, technological, social, economic, and political forces. This address attemps first to give a partial description of the present state of classification research as determined by one of these forces: philosophy, in particular the 20th century analytic philosophies of logical positivism, linguistic analysis and systems analysis; and, second, assuming the continued influence of these, to speculate upon the future of classification research in terms of its prospects, problems and possibilities
-
Svenonius, E.: ¬The epistemological foundations of knowledge representations (2004)
0.01
0.0076642046 = product of:
0.045985226 = sum of:
0.045985226 = product of:
0.09197045 = sum of:
0.09197045 = weight(_text_:century in 766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09197045 = score(doc=766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.44269592 = fieldWeight in 766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=766)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- This paper looks at the epistemological foundations of knowledge representations embodied in retrieval languages. It considers questions such as the validity of knowledge representations and their effectiveness for the purposes of retrieval and automation. The knowledge representations it considers are derived from three theories of meaning that have dominated twentieth-century philosophy.
