-
Minter, C.: Systematic or mechanical arrangement? : Revisiting a debate in German library science, 1790-1914 (2017)
0.03
0.033123083 = product of:
0.09936924 = sum of:
0.049588777 = weight(_text_:history in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049588777 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
0.049780466 = product of:
0.09956093 = sum of:
0.09956093 = weight(_text_:century in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09956093 = score(doc=5066,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.4792324 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This article examines changing views on "systematic" or classified shelf-arrangement in German library science from Kayser's 1790 work Ueber die Manipulation bey der Einrichtung einer Bibliothek to the 1914 Versammlung deutscher Bibliothekare in Leipzig, at which Georg Leyh delivered the seminal paper, "Systematische oder mechanische Aufstellung?" Systematic arrangement was, with few exceptions, held up as an ideal throughout the nineteenth century; but by 1914 it could be agreed to belong to a past era in which, in the words of Leyh, libraries ran as a "Kleinbetrieb" [small business] (Leyh 1913, 100, "Das Dogma von der systematischen Aufstellung II-IV." Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen 30:97-135). In particular, this article seeks to explore how changing views on the ideal of systematic shelf-arrangement in German library science during this period reflected evolving conceptions of librarianship. For nineteenth-century writers such as Ebert, Molbech, and Petzholdt, systematic classification and arrangement had meaning against the backdrop of an encyclopedic tradition within which libraries and librarians played an important role in organizing and presenting a rational overview of the universe of knowledge - an overview that was to be both physical and intellectual. The waning of the ideal of systematic arrangement at the turn of the twentieth century was associated with a sense of loss, as an intellectual or "scholarly" tradition of librarianship was seen to give way to more utilitarian and "bureaucratic" expectations. The changing fortunes of the ideal of systematic arrangement in German library science between 1790 and 1914 may be seen to illustrate how progress and loss are often inextricably linked in the history of libraries and librarianship
-
Manzi, S.: Classifying philosophy at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore (Pisa, Italy) : Part B: evaluation and experience (2009)
0.03
0.025455397 = product of:
0.076366186 = sum of:
0.05950654 = weight(_text_:history in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05950654 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.01685965 = product of:
0.0337193 = sum of:
0.0337193 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0337193 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The verification of the functionality of the Philosophy classification schema adopted at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore needs to take into account the context: the Library is both a special and a multidisciplinary library; its collections reflect the history of the SNS. The philosophy collection has a specialized and selective nature, as do others within the same Library; the Library is open shelves, and classification is used as a shelving and location device. Bearing in mind the above conditions, the second part of this paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of the schema in order to highlight its suitability to match a coherent classification of documents with the effective fruition by the users.
- Date
- 9. 1.2010 14:22:20
-
Silva, C.M.A. da; Ortega, C.D.: Proposals that preceded the call number : shelf arrangement in the Francofone manuals of librarianship from the mid-nineteenth century to 1930 (2017)
0.01
0.008296745 = product of:
0.049780466 = sum of:
0.049780466 = product of:
0.09956093 = sum of:
0.09956093 = weight(_text_:century in 4138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09956093 = score(doc=4138,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.4792324 = fieldWeight in 4138, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4138)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Shelf arrangement, from a bibliographic perspective, constitutes a reading proposal of the collection to the users as well as a resource for management and access to the documents. However, the centrality of the call number testifies the near forgetfulness of the different proposals that came before it and the role of the collection of documents and the target audience in the elaboration of the organization, in addition to the overlapping of the bibliographic classification to shelf arrangement. This work is justified by the need to restore shelf arrangement, seeking to understand its fundamental aspects from the literature in which the activity was systematized. Thus, this paper aims at contributing to reorient the shelf arrangement as an activity of information organization, exploring its conformation in the Francophone literature, from the midnineteenth century up to the 1930s. As for the methodology, this is an exploratory research made possible through the historical-conceptual investigation of shelf arrangement found in the Francophone manuals of librarianship of that period. This study concludes that the activity was placed by that line since the nineteenth century, when its own terminology was developed under the consideration of the intervention of the contexts, using methods and guided by the diversity of proposals.
-
Frigerio, L.: From disorder to order : a challenge for the philosopher and the librarian (Milan, Italy) (2009)
0.01
0.008264797 = product of:
0.049588777 = sum of:
0.049588777 = weight(_text_:history in 3270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049588777 = score(doc=3270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 3270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3270)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The Philosophy Library at the University of Milan was born in the fifties by the merger of the two Institutes of Philosophy and the History of Philosophy. Once the restoration had been completed, it was necessary to devise a suitable classification system in order to arrange the books and to meet the new research needs of the Institutes. The project was untrusted to Prof. Corrado Mangione and Prof. Maria Assunta del Torre, with the theoretical contribution of Giuliana Sapori, chief Director of Central Library of the Faculty of Laws and Humanities. The model had been conceived as completely anew, without any reference toother existing classification systems. The inspiring principles were from one hand the choice for an open shelving system, from the other one the idea that the orientation criteria and the book search had to be user-friendly for everyone. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the making-up of the call number as applied to each section of the collection, and how the scheme has been developed over the past fifty years. Points of strenght and weakness of the scheme are also discussed at the light of the technological innovations which have gradually affected the whole of the library activities, notably with the introduction of the electronic catalogue. The original classification scheme has maintened its coherence and functionality over time, in spite of the expansion of the collection and the automation of all stages of the classification process. This is the main reason to keep using it in the future.
-
Martínez-Ávila, D.; San Segundo, R.: Reader-Interest Classification : concept and terminology historical overview (2013)
0.01
0.0057481537 = product of:
0.03448892 = sum of:
0.03448892 = product of:
0.06897784 = sum of:
0.06897784 = weight(_text_:century in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06897784 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.33202195 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- During the last century, the concept of reader-interest classifications and its related terminology have shown a well-established presence and commonly-agreed characteristics in the literature and other classification discourses. During the period 1952-1995, it was not unusual to find works, projects, and discourses using a common core of characteristics and terms to refer to a recognizable type of projects involving alternative classifications to the DDC and other traditional practices in libraries. However, although similar projects and characteristics are being used until the present day, such as those of implementation of BISAC in public libraries, the use of reader-interest classification-related terms and references have drastically declined since 1995. The present work attempts to overview the concept and terminology of reader-interest classifications in a historical perspective emphasizing the transformation of the concept and its remaining characteristics in time.
-
Martínez-Ávila, D.: Reader interest classifications : an alternative arrangement for libraries (2017)
0.01
0.0057481537 = product of:
0.03448892 = sum of:
0.03448892 = product of:
0.06897784 = sum of:
0.06897784 = weight(_text_:century in 3626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06897784 = score(doc=3626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.33202195 = fieldWeight in 3626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3626)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The concept of reader-interest classifications and its related terminology have shown a well-established presence and common characteristics in the knowledge organization literature for more than half a century. During the period 1952-1995, it was not unusual to find works, projects and discourses using a common core of characteristics and terms to refer to a recognizable type of projects involving alternative classifications to the DDC and other traditional practices in libraries. The use of reader-interest classification related terms and references drastically declined since 1995, although similar projects and characteristics are being used until the present day such as those of implementation of BISAC in American public libraries. The present paper attempts to overview the concept and terminology of reader-interest classifications in a historical perspective emphasizing the transformation of the concept and its remaining characteristics in time.
-
Saarti, J.: Experiments with categorising fiction in Lohtajy Library (1992)
0.00
0.0037465894 = product of:
0.022479536 = sum of:
0.022479536 = product of:
0.044959072 = sum of:
0.044959072 = weight(_text_:22 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044959072 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.4, S.22-24,29
-
Whelan, J.A.: Public access compact shelving in an academic branch library (1996)
0.00
0.0037465894 = product of:
0.022479536 = sum of:
0.022479536 = product of:
0.044959072 = sum of:
0.044959072 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044959072 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.29-32
-
Tiggelen, N. van: ¬Een landelijk systeem zou ideaal zijn : bibliotheken van Leerdam en Weert experimenteren met alternatieve plaatsing (1998)
0.00
0.0037465894 = product of:
0.022479536 = sum of:
0.022479536 = product of:
0.044959072 = sum of:
0.044959072 = weight(_text_:22 in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044959072 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- BibliotheekBlad. 2(1998) no.10/11, S.22-24
-
Rotten, C. v.d.: oderzoek naar alternatieve plaatsing : Bijna net zoveel systemen als bibliotheken (1995)
0.00
0.0032782655 = product of:
0.019669592 = sum of:
0.019669592 = product of:
0.039339185 = sum of:
0.039339185 = weight(_text_:22 in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039339185 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Bibliotheek en samenleving. 23(1995) no.11, S.20-22
-
Schössow, T.; Christoffersen, A.; Norlem, E.; Christensen, S.: Art in the children's library (1992)
0.00
0.0032782655 = product of:
0.019669592 = sum of:
0.019669592 = product of:
0.039339185 = sum of:
0.039339185 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039339185 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.1, S.20-22
-
Stokmans, M.; Oomens, A.: Meer grasduinen door genreplaatsing? : genre- of alfabetische plaatsing: onderzoek naar verschillen in gebruikersgedrag (1997)
0.00
0.0032782655 = product of:
0.019669592 = sum of:
0.019669592 = product of:
0.039339185 = sum of:
0.039339185 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039339185 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- BibliotheekBlad. 1(1997) no.21, S.22-23
-
Lowisch, M.: Gesamthochschulbibliotheken und Klassifikationsentwicklung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Kooperation und lokalen Bedürfnissen (2017)
0.00
0.0032782655 = product of:
0.019669592 = sum of:
0.019669592 = product of:
0.039339185 = sum of:
0.039339185 = weight(_text_:22 in 5116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039339185 = score(doc=5116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5116)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 17. 3.2019 16:22:59
-
Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005)
0.00
0.0028099418 = product of:
0.01685965 = sum of:
0.01685965 = product of:
0.0337193 = sum of:
0.0337193 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0337193 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Müller-Dreier, A.: Einheitsklassifikation : die Geschichte einer fortwirkenden Idee (1994)
0.00
0.0023416183 = product of:
0.01404971 = sum of:
0.01404971 = product of:
0.02809942 = sum of:
0.02809942 = weight(_text_:22 in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02809942 = score(doc=2052,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Mitteilungsblatt VdB NW N.F. 45(1995) H.3, S.332-333 (H. Lohse) [Auch wenn H. Lohse meint, das Buch bzw. die zugrundeliegende Assessorarbeit hätte nicht geschrieben werden müssen, so liefert doch gerade seine Rezension den Beweis, wie notwendig diese Arbeit war]; BuB 47(1995) H.10, S.955-959 (I. Nöther) ["Diese von einem Berufsanfänger vorgelegte Arbeit ist eine Spitzenleistung, ein Meisterwerk, auf das der Autor, seine Ausbildungsstätte sowie der Verlag und der Herausgeber der Reihe sotz sein können. Für jeden, der sich heute und in Zukunft mit Fragen der Klassifikation befaßt, ist die Lektüre dieses Buches Pflicht"]; Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 20(1996) H.1, S.134-135 (W. Gödert); Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.178 (B. Lorenz); Journal of documentation 51(1995) no.4, S.434-437 (J.S. Andrews)
-
Bonse, C.; Fischer, N.: So wird die Sucheffizienz gesteigert : Stadtbibliothek Siegburg stellt nach Kundenbefragung den Bestand fast komplett um (2008)
0.00
0.0016391327 = product of:
0.009834796 = sum of:
0.009834796 = product of:
0.019669592 = sum of:
0.019669592 = weight(_text_:22 in 1827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019669592 = score(doc=1827,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041479383 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1827, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1827)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 11. 5.2008 15:11:22
