Search (46 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme"
  1. Barat, A.H.: Hungarians in the history of the UDC (2014) 0.15
    0.14819767 = product of:
      0.29639533 = sum of:
        0.10306835 = weight(_text_:history in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10306835 = score(doc=1429,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.5341399 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
        0.09062983 = weight(_text_:21st in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09062983 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2381352 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.3805814 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
        0.10269714 = sum of:
          0.06897784 = weight(_text_:century in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06897784 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041479383 = queryNorm
              0.33202195 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
          0.0337193 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0337193 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041479383 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    I outline a major segment of the history of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) in Hungary and all related important events and activities. Significant and committed specialists who played prominent role on a national and international level are also mentioned. It's not an overstatement, that the usage and publications of the UDC in Hungary are significant milestones in the international history of UDC. The usage of UDC has been very widespread and it is found in different types of libraries. People who were responsible for the developing of information retrieval systems and quality of these methods were very engaged and participated in international activities. There were several huge libraries such as special, academic, municipal and national library where UDC has been employed since quite early on and the leaders of these pioneer libraries travelled widely and were active in international researches and practices.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  2. Zedelmaier, H.: Bibliotheca universalis und bibliotheca selecta : das Problem der Ordnung des gelehrten Wissens in der frühen Neuzeit (1992) 0.04
    0.03728617 = product of:
      0.11185851 = sum of:
        0.079342045 = weight(_text_:history in 3932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079342045 = score(doc=3932,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 3932, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3932)
        0.032516465 = product of:
          0.06503293 = sum of:
            0.06503293 = weight(_text_:century in 3932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06503293 = score(doc=3932,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041479383 = queryNorm
                0.31303328 = fieldWeight in 3932, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3932)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    LCSH
    Libraries / History / 1400 / 1600
    Classification / Books / History
    Early printed books / 16th century
    Subject
    Libraries / History / 1400 / 1600
    Classification / Books / History
    Early printed books / 16th century
  3. McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification : some factors concerning its origins, development, and influence (1997) 0.03
    0.03295663 = product of:
      0.09886988 = sum of:
        0.07012912 = weight(_text_:history in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07012912 = score(doc=141,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.3634361 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
        0.028740766 = product of:
          0.05748153 = sum of:
            0.05748153 = weight(_text_:century in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05748153 = score(doc=141,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041479383 = queryNorm
                0.27668494 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines the bibliographic enterprise envisaged by Otlet and LaFontaine, which resulted in the UDC being developed in 1895, and the subsequent history of the scheme. Relationship with DDC from which it was derived deteriorated in the early 20th century and changes in funding, location, and editorship of Duyvis from 1929-59 had a profound effect on the scheme's development and management. Lloyd, Duyvis successor, reformed the revision structure, and further management changes from 1975 to the present day, culminated in the formation of the UDC Consortium in 1992. Notes the subsequent creation of a machine-readable Master Reference File and speedier revision procedures. Examines the scheme's structure, development, and influence on classification theory, problems caused by longevity and lack of standrad procedures, and highlights proposals for their reform to improve the scheme's suitability for an automated world. Explores research projects in 1960s which foreshadowed possibilities today, such as a complementary thesaurus and individualisation of single concepts notationally. Emphasizes the value of classification in a multilingual environment and outlines the future developments
    Footnote
    Contribution to part 1 of a 2 part series on the history of documentation and information science
  4. Lorenz, B.: ¬Die DDC im Umfeld der Entwicklung dezimaler Klassifikationen (2008) 0.03
    0.030078119 = product of:
      0.090234354 = sum of:
        0.049588777 = weight(_text_:history in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049588777 = score(doc=2152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
        0.04064558 = product of:
          0.08129116 = sum of:
            0.08129116 = weight(_text_:century in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08129116 = score(doc=2152,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041479383 = queryNorm
                0.39129162 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The decimal system is one system of a number of possible systems of ordering - and a very symbolic also. The ordering in ten chapters, themes, numbers, etc. you can find often in history. Indeed Dewey is not the genius-founder of decimal classification (against a number of authors)! For ordering and structuring separate schemes within a classification DDC creates a number of important negative solutions, e.g. in the main classes the 'lost' of physics and of medicine as special schemes: Nearly a catastrophe in the times of STM! And against an enormous tradition like Leibniz 1646 - 1716) et alii! Compare Bliss: The Bliss-Classification gives space for 6 numbers »sciences« in a context of 26 classes. Therefore the result in short: DDC (and UDC of course!) are »flowers« of the past, of the first decades of century 20! As a fact the Decimal Classification within the tradition of Melvil Dewey is not a final work: See the increasing number of newly constructed decimal classifications during the years 80 and 90 of the 20th century! Nevertheless DDC is a very great (problem and) solution in its development, internationality, reception - and edge-stone for many thinkers and librarians throughout the world - and an important example for modern translational work! Magda Heiner-Freiling has given to us a great stone for the edifice of Modern DDC: Requiescat in pace!
  5. Rayward, W.B.: ¬The origins of information science and the International Institute of Bibliography / International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID) (1997) 0.03
    0.029697962 = product of:
      0.08909389 = sum of:
        0.069424294 = weight(_text_:history in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069424294 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
        0.019669592 = product of:
          0.039339185 = sum of:
            0.039339185 = weight(_text_:22 in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039339185 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041479383 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the history and origins of the International Institute of Bibliography, founded in 1895 and which later became the FID. Outlines the work of Paul Otlet and his colleagues in developing the idea of universal bibliographic control through the Répertoire Bibliographique Universel and the emergence of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) as the means of its classifies arrangement. Stresses the key role played by this work in developing the main concepts of information science and documentation
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.2, S.3-15
  6. Vickery, B.C.: ¬The significance of John Wilkins in the history of bibliographical classification (1953) 0.03
    0.026447348 = product of:
      0.15868409 = sum of:
        0.15868409 = weight(_text_:history in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15868409 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.82236207 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  7. Lehnus, D.J.: Book numbers : history, principles and applications (1980) 0.03
    0.026447348 = product of:
      0.15868409 = sum of:
        0.15868409 = weight(_text_:history in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15868409 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.82236207 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  8. Schulte-Albert, H.G.: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and library classification (1971) 0.02
    0.023141433 = product of:
      0.13884859 = sum of:
        0.13884859 = weight(_text_:history in 979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13884859 = score(doc=979,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.7195668 = fieldWeight in 979, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=979)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of library history; philosophy and comparative librarianship. 6(1971), S.133-152
  9. Lorenz, B.: Systematische Aufstellung in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart (2002) 0.02
    0.022645455 = product of:
      0.06793636 = sum of:
        0.05950654 = weight(_text_:history in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05950654 = score(doc=1786,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.3083858 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
        0.008429825 = product of:
          0.01685965 = sum of:
            0.01685965 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01685965 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041479383 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 17:56:19
    LCSH
    Classification / Books / History
    Catalogs, Classified / History
    Subject
    Classification / Books / History
    Catalogs, Classified / History
  10. ¬The structure of knowledge : classifications of science and learning since the Renaissance ; International Summer School in History of Science <1998, Uppsala> (2001) 0.02
    0.021866597 = product of:
      0.13119958 = sum of:
        0.13119958 = weight(_text_:history in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13119958 = score(doc=86,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.67992675 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Imprint
    Berkeley : Office for History of Science and Technology, University of California
    LCSH
    Science / History
    Series
    Bologna studies in history of science ; 28) (Berkeley papers in history of science ; 19) (Uppsala studies in history of science ; 28
    Subject
    Science / History
  11. Kaiser, J.O.: Systematic indexing (1985) 0.02
    0.02088788 = product of:
      0.06266364 = sum of:
        0.039671022 = weight(_text_:history in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039671022 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.20559052 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
        0.022992613 = product of:
          0.045985226 = sum of:
            0.045985226 = weight(_text_:century in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045985226 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041479383 = queryNorm
                0.22134796 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    A native of Germany and a former teacher of languages and music, Julius Otto Kaiser (1868-1927) came to the Philadelphia Commercial Museum to be its librarian in 1896. Faced with the problem of making "information" accessible, he developed a method of indexing he called systematic indexing. The first draft of his scheme, published in 1896-97, was an important landmark in the history of subject analysis. R. K. Olding credits Kaiser with making the greatest single advance in indexing theory since Charles A. Cutter and John Metcalfe eulogizes him by observing that "in sheer capacity for really scientific and logical thinking, Kaiser's was probably the best mind that has ever applied itself to subject indexing." Kaiser was an admirer of "system." By systematic indexing he meant indicating information not with natural language expressions as, for instance, Cutter had advocated, but with artificial expressions constructed according to formulas. Kaiser grudged natural language its approximateness, its vagaries, and its ambiguities. The formulas he introduced were to provide a "machinery for regularising or standardising language" (paragraph 67). Kaiser recognized three categories or "facets" of index terms: (1) terms of concretes, representing things, real or imaginary (e.g., money, machines); (2) terms of processes, representing either conditions attaching to things or their actions (e.g., trade, manufacture); and (3) terms of localities, representing, for the most part, countries (e.g., France, South Africa). Expressions in Kaiser's index language were called statements. Statements consisted of sequences of terms, the syntax of which was prescribed by formula. These formulas specified sequences of terms by reference to category types. Only three citation orders were permitted: a term in the concrete category followed by one in the process category (e.g., Wool-Scouring); (2) a country term followed by a process term (e.g., Brazil - Education); and (3) a concrete term followed by a country term, followed by a process term (e.g., Nitrate-Chile-Trade). Kaiser's system was a precursor of two of the most significant developments in twentieth-century approaches to subject access-the special purpose use of language for indexing, thus the concept of index language, which was to emerge as a generative idea at the time of the second Cranfield experiment (1966) and the use of facets to categorize subject indicators, which was to become the characterizing feature of analytico-synthetic indexing methods such as the Colon classification. In addition to its visionary quality, Kaiser's work is notable for its meticulousness and honesty, as can be seen, for instance, in his observations about the difficulties in facet definition.
  12. Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008) 0.02
    0.01996889 = product of:
      0.11981333 = sum of:
        0.11981333 = sum of:
          0.080474146 = weight(_text_:century in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.080474146 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041479383 = queryNorm
              0.38735893 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
          0.039339185 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039339185 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14525373 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041479383 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The paper takes a retrospective look at the work of Henry Evelyn Bliss, classificationist theorist and author of the Bibliographic Classification. Major features of his writings and philosophy are examined and evaluated for the originality of their contribution to the corpus of knowledge in the discipline. Reactions to Bliss's work are analysed, as is his influence on classification theory of the 20th century. Contemporary work on knowledge organization is seen to continue a number of strands from Bliss's original writings. His standing as a classificationist is compared with that of Ranganathan, with the conclusion that he is not given the credit he deserves.
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  13. Barber, E.E.; Tripaldi, N.M.; Pisano, S.L.: Facts, approaches, and reflections on classification in the history of Argentine librarianship (2003) 0.02
    0.016529594 = product of:
      0.099177554 = sum of:
        0.099177554 = weight(_text_:history in 4062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099177554 = score(doc=4062,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.5139763 = fieldWeight in 4062, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4062)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  14. Satija, M.P.: History of book numbers (1987) 0.02
    0.016363464 = product of:
      0.09818078 = sum of:
        0.09818078 = weight(_text_:history in 1243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09818078 = score(doc=1243,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.5088106 = fieldWeight in 1243, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1243)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The history of book numbers starts only with Melvil Dewey, as before hom books were shelved in fixed location systems. The article traces the early attempts by Dewey himself to combine class numbers with author numbers and shows the development in the individualization of book numbers by a great number of classificationists and classifiers, among which J. Schwartz, W.S. Biscoe, Ch.A. Cutter, K.E. Sanborn, J.D. Brown, A.F. Rider and finally S.R. Ranganathan whose faceted structure and ease of application of book numbers seems still to be the optimal solution. Two rival systems of book numbers are alphabetical by author and chronological by the year of publication of a books. The concluding chapter is devoted to the existing literatur on book numbers and laments its vanishing quality. The study of book numbers is not getting due attention.
  15. Jacobs, E.H.: Buying into classes : the practice of book selection in eighteenth-Century Britain (1999) 0.02
    0.016258232 = product of:
      0.097549394 = sum of:
        0.097549394 = product of:
          0.19509879 = sum of:
            0.19509879 = weight(_text_:century in 6154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19509879 = score(doc=6154,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041479383 = queryNorm
                0.93909985 = fieldWeight in 6154, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6154)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Eighteenth-century studies. 33(1999) no.1, S.43-64
  16. Whitrow, M.: ¬An eighteenth-century faceted classification scheme (1983) 0.02
    0.015328409 = product of:
      0.09197045 = sum of:
        0.09197045 = product of:
          0.1839409 = sum of:
            0.1839409 = weight(_text_:century in 3901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1839409 = score(doc=3901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20775084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041479383 = queryNorm
                0.88539183 = fieldWeight in 3901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.0085325 = idf(docFreq=802, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3901)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  17. Studwell, W.E.; Wang, R.; Wu, H.: Ideological influences on book classification schemes in the People's Republic of China (1994) 0.01
    0.013223674 = product of:
      0.079342045 = sum of:
        0.079342045 = weight(_text_:history in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079342045 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the history of classification in China and discusses the application of 4 major classification schemes in the Chinese People's Republic, to show how the thread of ideology and ideological considerations have influenced their structure and contents and have also influenced the historical development of classification in China from earliest times. Presented recommendations are for prossible future revision of classification schemes
  18. Miksa, F.L.: ¬The DDC, the universe of knowledge, and the post-modern library (1998) 0.01
    0.013223674 = product of:
      0.079342045 = sum of:
        0.079342045 = weight(_text_:history in 6220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079342045 = score(doc=6220,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 6220, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6220)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    History of DDC and of classification theory. Implications for post-modern library
  19. LaBarre, K.: ¬The heritage of early FC in document reference retrieval systems : 1920-1969 (2007) 0.01
    0.013223674 = product of:
      0.079342045 = sum of:
        0.079342045 = weight(_text_:history in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079342045 = score(doc=689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.41118103 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Library history. 23(2007) no.2, S.129-149
  20. Santoro, M.: Ripensare la CDU (1995) 0.01
    0.011570716 = product of:
      0.069424294 = sum of:
        0.069424294 = weight(_text_:history in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069424294 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19296135 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041479383 = queryNorm
            0.3597834 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    A detailed examination of the UDC's history, function and future prospects. Among topics discussed are: the early pioneering work of P. Otlet and H. LaFontaine; the development of Colon Classification; the 'UDC versus switching language' debate in the 1970s; the FID standard reference code project; and the recent scheme by Williamson and McIlwaine to restructure UDC completely, converting it into a Colon Classification and also creating a thesaurus drawn from the same classification. Comments that UDC, far from being a 'prehistoric monster', is becoming a sort of test laboratory for developing new and interesting documentation structures

Languages

  • e 38
  • d 6
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 41
  • m 4
  • el 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…