Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"McGarry, D."
  1. McGarry, D.: Conference on 'actual problems of subject indexing and subject access systems' (1998) 0.03
    0.034032986 = product of:
      0.06806597 = sum of:
        0.06806597 = product of:
          0.13613194 = sum of:
            0.13613194 = weight(_text_:subject in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13613194 = score(doc=3739,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550679 = queryNorm
                0.83639985 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Summary of papers contributed to the conference on actual problems of subject indexing and subject access systems held in the National Library of Russia, St. Petersburg 27-29 April, 1998, in celebration of the 30th anniversary of the Research Group on Subject Analysis and Subject Cataloguing. Papers covered theoretical and practical aspects of subject indexing, ans speakers emphasise national and international cooperation in authority control
  2. Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993) 0.03
    0.029778862 = product of:
      0.059557725 = sum of:
        0.059557725 = product of:
          0.11911545 = sum of:
            0.11911545 = weight(_text_:subject in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11911545 = score(doc=5612,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550679 = queryNorm
                0.73184985 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis
  3. McGarry, D.: International cooperation in subject analysis (1994) 0.03
    0.025726518 = product of:
      0.051453035 = sum of:
        0.051453035 = product of:
          0.10290607 = sum of:
            0.10290607 = weight(_text_:subject in 5996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10290607 = score(doc=5996,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550679 = queryNorm
                0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 5996, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5996)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. McGarry, D.: Guidelines for subject authority and reference entries (1996) 0.02
    0.022739245 = product of:
      0.04547849 = sum of:
        0.04547849 = product of:
          0.09095698 = sum of:
            0.09095698 = weight(_text_:subject in 6578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09095698 = score(doc=6578,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550679 = queryNorm
                0.55884314 = fieldWeight in 6578, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6578)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Provides a background to the development of the Guidelines for Subject Authority Reference Entries, prepared by a working group of the section on classification and indexing of the IFLA. Discusses authority entries, specific reference entries; and general reference entries
  5. McGarry, D.: Magda Heiner-Freiling and her work in the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing : ein Erfahrungsbericht (2008) 0.02
    0.022510704 = product of:
      0.045021407 = sum of:
        0.045021407 = product of:
          0.090042815 = sum of:
            0.090042815 = weight(_text_:subject in 2201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.090042815 = score(doc=2201,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550679 = queryNorm
                0.5532265 = fieldWeight in 2201, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Magda Heiner-Freiling was an exceptional person, and her participation with the Section on Classification and Indexing helped to produce valuable publications as well as contributing to a very pleasant working environment. She participated in and contributed to a satellite meeting on subject indexing, in a Working Group on Principles Underlying Subject Heading Languages, and in surveying national libraries and national bibliographies on subject heading languages and classification systems used. She brought many excellent qualities to her work.
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
  6. McGarry, D.; Svenonius, E.: More on improved browsable displays for online subject access (1991) 0.02
    0.019494843 = product of:
      0.038989685 = sum of:
        0.038989685 = product of:
          0.07797937 = sum of:
            0.07797937 = weight(_text_:subject in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07797937 = score(doc=1066,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550679 = queryNorm
                0.4791082 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Key problems of subject searches in online public access catalogs are that too much may be retrieved and that the display may be arranged in what appears to be an unintuitive and unhelpful manner. A study was undertaken on one large database to determine how often the display of a subject and its modifications and subdivisions extended over more than two screens and what the results on display would be of compressing geographic subdivisions and other modifications. The study then addressed the question of how often the display of a term and its subdivisions was interrupted by the appearance in the display of inverted headings, phrase headings, and headings with parenthetical qualifiers
  7. McGarry, D.: Section on classification and indexing (1994) 0.02
    0.019294888 = product of:
      0.038589776 = sum of:
        0.038589776 = product of:
          0.07717955 = sum of:
            0.07717955 = weight(_text_:subject in 8165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07717955 = score(doc=8165,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550679 = queryNorm
                0.4741941 = fieldWeight in 8165, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8165)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Bericht über das satellite meeting 'Subject indexing: principles and practices in the '90s' in Lissabon 1993 und die IFLA-Tagung 1993 in Barcelona
  8. McGarry, D.; Svenonius, E.: ¬An interview with Elaine Svenonius (2000) 0.02
    0.018191395 = product of:
      0.03638279 = sum of:
        0.03638279 = product of:
          0.07276558 = sum of:
            0.07276558 = weight(_text_:subject in 5356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07276558 = score(doc=5356,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550679 = queryNorm
                0.4470745 = fieldWeight in 5356, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5356)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In an interview with Dorothy McGarry, Elaine Svenonius discusses her many-faceted career. Topics include her research interests in subject and descriptive cataloging (Svenonius notes that it "takes some untangling of vocabulary and semantics to see that the traditional bifurcation separating subject and descriptive cataloging is artificial"); her teaching experience, especially her use of Andrew Osborn's "active learning" seminar method; and her views about the development of information science and its relationship to librarianship.