-
Junger, U.: Can indexing be automated? : the example of the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (2014)
0.02
0.019494843 = product of:
0.038989685 = sum of:
0.038989685 = product of:
0.07797937 = sum of:
0.07797937 = weight(_text_:subject in 1969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07797937 = score(doc=1969,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.4791082 = fieldWeight in 1969, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1969)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The German Integrated Authority File (Gemeinsame Normdatei, GND), provides a broad controlled vocabulary for indexing documents on all subjects. Traditionally used for intellectual subject cataloging primarily for books, the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB, German National Library) has been working on developing and implementing procedures for automated assignment of subject headings for online publications. This project, its results, and problems are outlined in this article.
- Footnote
- Contribution in a special issue "Beyond libraries: Subject metadata in the digital environment and Semantic Web" - Enthält Beiträge der gleichnamigen IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn.
-
Moulaison-Sandy, H.; Adkins, D.; Bossaller, J.; Cho, H.: ¬An automated approach to describing fiction : a methodology to use book reviews to identify affect (2021)
0.02
0.019494843 = product of:
0.038989685 = sum of:
0.038989685 = product of:
0.07797937 = sum of:
0.07797937 = weight(_text_:subject in 710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07797937 = score(doc=710,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.4791082 = fieldWeight in 710, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=710)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Subject headings and genre terms are notoriously difficult to apply, yet are important for fiction. The current project functions as a proof of concept, using a text-mining methodology to identify affective information (emotion and tone) about fiction titles from professional book reviews as a potential first step in automating the subject analysis process. Findings are presented and discussed, comparing results to the range of aboutness and isness information in library cataloging records. The methodology is likewise presented, and how future work might expand on the current project to enhance catalog records through text-mining is explored.
- Footnote
- Teil eines Themenheftes: Artificial intelligence (AI) and automated processes for subject sccess
-
Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.02
0.018496625 = product of:
0.03699325 = sum of:
0.03699325 = product of:
0.0739865 = sum of:
0.0739865 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0739865 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15935703 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:44
-
Hauer, M.: Automatische Indexierung (2000)
0.02
0.018496625 = product of:
0.03699325 = sum of:
0.03699325 = product of:
0.0739865 = sum of:
0.0739865 = weight(_text_:22 in 5887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0739865 = score(doc=5887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15935703 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5887)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Wissen in Aktion: Wege des Knowledge Managements. 22. Online-Tagung der DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 2.-4.5.2000. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
-
Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.02
0.018496625 = product of:
0.03699325 = sum of:
0.03699325 = product of:
0.0739865 = sum of:
0.0739865 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0739865 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15935703 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:56
-
Hauer, M.: Tiefenindexierung im Bibliothekskatalog : 17 Jahre intelligentCAPTURE (2019)
0.02
0.018496625 = product of:
0.03699325 = sum of:
0.03699325 = product of:
0.0739865 = sum of:
0.0739865 = weight(_text_:22 in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0739865 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15935703 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.2, S.163-166
-
Chung, E.-K.; Miksa, S.; Hastings, S.K.: ¬A framework of automatic subject term assignment for text categorization : an indexing conception-based approach (2010)
0.02
0.018191395 = product of:
0.03638279 = sum of:
0.03638279 = product of:
0.07276558 = sum of:
0.07276558 = weight(_text_:subject in 3434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07276558 = score(doc=3434,freq=16.0), product of:
0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.4470745 = fieldWeight in 3434, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3434)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this study is to examine whether the understandings of subject-indexing processes conducted by human indexers have a positive impact on the effectiveness of automatic subject term assignment through text categorization (TC). More specifically, human indexers' subject-indexing approaches, or conceptions, in conjunction with semantic sources were explored in the context of a typical scientific journal article dataset. Based on the premise that subject indexing approaches or conceptions with semantic sources are important for automatic subject term assignment through TC, this study proposed an indexing conception-based framework. For the purpose of this study, two research questions were explored: To what extent are semantic sources effective? To what extent are indexing conceptions effective? The experiments were conducted using a Support Vector Machine implementation in WEKA (I.H. Witten & E. Frank, [2000]). Using F-measure, the experiment results showed that cited works, source title, and title were as effective as the full text while a keyword was found more effective than the full text. In addition, the findings showed that an indexing conception-based framework was more effective than the full text. The content-oriented and the document-oriented indexing approaches especially were found more effective than the full text. Among three indexing conception-based approaches, the content-oriented approach and the document-oriented approach were more effective than the domain-oriented approach. In other words, in the context of a typical scientific journal article dataset, the objective contents and authors' intentions were more desirable for automatic subject term assignment via TC than the possible users' needs. The findings of this study support that incorporation of human indexers' indexing approaches or conception in conjunction with semantic sources has a positive impact on the effectiveness of automatic subject term assignment.
-
Oliver, C.: Leveraging KOS to extend our reach with automated processes (2021)
0.02
0.018191395 = product of:
0.03638279 = sum of:
0.03638279 = product of:
0.07276558 = sum of:
0.07276558 = weight(_text_:subject in 722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07276558 = score(doc=722,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.4470745 = fieldWeight in 722, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=722)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article provides a conclusion to the special issue on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Automated Processes for Subject Access. The authors who contributed to this special issue have provoked interesting questions as well as bringing attention to important issues. This concluding article looks at common themes and highlights some of the questions raised.
- Footnote
- Teil eines Themenheftes: Artificial intelligence (AI) and automated processes for subject sccess
-
Roberts, D.; Souter, C.: ¬The automation of controlled vocabulary subject indexing of medical journal articles (2000)
0.02
0.016709864 = product of:
0.03341973 = sum of:
0.03341973 = product of:
0.06683946 = sum of:
0.06683946 = weight(_text_:subject in 711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06683946 = score(doc=711,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.41066417 = fieldWeight in 711, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=711)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article discusses the possibility of the automation of sophisticated subject indexing of medical journal articles. Approaches to subject descriptor assignment in information retrieval research are usually either based upon the manual descriptors in the database or generation of search parameters from the text of the article. The principles of the Medline indexing system are described, followed by a summary of a pilot project, based upon the Amed database. The results suggest that a more extended study, based upon Medline, should encompass various components: Extraction of 'concept strings' from titles and abstracts of records, based upon linguistic features characteristic of medical literature. Use of the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) for identification of controlled vocabulary descriptors. Coordination of descriptors, utilising features of the Medline indexing system. The emphasis should be on system manipulation of data, based upon input, available resources and specifically designed rules.
-
Olsgaard, J.N.; Evans, E.J.: Improving keyword indexing (1981)
0.02
0.016079074 = product of:
0.032158148 = sum of:
0.032158148 = product of:
0.064316295 = sum of:
0.064316295 = weight(_text_:subject in 4996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064316295 = score(doc=4996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.39516178 = fieldWeight in 4996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4996)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This communication examines some of the most frequently cited critisms of keyword indexing. These critisms include (1) absence of general subject headings, (2) limited entry points, and (3) irrelevant indexing. Some solutions are suggested to meet these critisms.
-
Yongcheng, W.; Xiaoming, G.; Lixia, W.: Automatic indexing on subject of Chinese text (1998)
0.02
0.016079074 = product of:
0.032158148 = sum of:
0.032158148 = product of:
0.064316295 = sum of:
0.064316295 = weight(_text_:subject in 3241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064316295 = score(doc=3241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.39516178 = fieldWeight in 3241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Milstead, J.L.: Methodologies for subject analysis in bibliographic databases (1992)
0.02
0.01591747 = product of:
0.03183494 = sum of:
0.03183494 = product of:
0.06366988 = sum of:
0.06366988 = weight(_text_:subject in 2311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06366988 = score(doc=2311,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 2311, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2311)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The goal of the study was to determine the state of the art of subject analysis as applied to large bibliographic data bases. The intent was to gather and evaluate information, casting it in a form that could be applied by management. There was no attempt to determine actual costs or trade-offs among costs and possible benefits. Commercial automatic indexing packages were also reviewed. The overall conclusion was that data base producers should begin working seriously on upgrading their thesauri and codifying their indexing policies as a means of moving toward development of machine aids to indexing, but that fully automatic indexing is not yet ready for wholesale implementation
-
Losee, R.M.: ¬A Gray code based ordering for documents on shelves : classification for browsing and retrieval (1992)
0.02
0.01591747 = product of:
0.03183494 = sum of:
0.03183494 = product of:
0.06366988 = sum of:
0.06366988 = weight(_text_:subject in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06366988 = score(doc=2335,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A document classifier places documents together in a linear arrangement for browsing or high-speed access by human or computerised information retrieval systems. Requirements for document classification and browsing systems are developed from similarity measures, distance measures, and the notion of subject aboutness. A requirement that documents be arranged in decreasing order of similarity as the distance from a given document increases can often not be met. Based on these requirements, information-theoretic considerations, and the Gray code, a classification system is proposed that can classifiy documents without human intervention. A measure of classifier performance is developed, and used to evaluate experimental results comparing the distance between subject headings assigned to documents given classifications from the proposed system and the Library of Congress Classification (LCC) system
-
Shafer, K.: Scorpion Project explores using Dewey to organize the Web (1996)
0.02
0.01591747 = product of:
0.03183494 = sum of:
0.03183494 = product of:
0.06366988 = sum of:
0.06366988 = weight(_text_:subject in 6750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06366988 = score(doc=6750,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 6750, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6750)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- As the amount of accessible information on the WWW increases, so will the cost of accessing it, even if search servcies remain free, due to the increasing amount of time users will have to spend to find needed items. Considers what the seemingly unorganized Web and the organized world of libraries can offer each other. The OCLC Scorpion Project is attempting to combine indexing and cataloguing, specifically focusing on building tools for automatic subject recognition using the technqiues of library science and information retrieval. If subject headings or concept domains can be automatically assigned to electronic items, improved filtering tools for searching can be produced
-
Biebricher, N.; Fuhr, N.; Lustig, G.; Schwantner, M.; Knorz, G.: ¬The automatic indexing system AIR/PHYS : from research to application (1988)
0.02
0.015413855 = product of:
0.03082771 = sum of:
0.03082771 = product of:
0.06165542 = sum of:
0.06165542 = weight(_text_:22 in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06165542 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15935703 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16. 8.1998 12:51:22
-
Kutschekmanesch, S.; Lutes, B.; Moelle, K.; Thiel, U.; Tzeras, K.: Automated multilingual indexing : a synthesis of rule-based and thesaurus-based methods (1998)
0.02
0.015413855 = product of:
0.03082771 = sum of:
0.03082771 = product of:
0.06165542 = sum of:
0.06165542 = weight(_text_:22 in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06165542 = score(doc=4157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15935703 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
-
Tsareva, P.V.: Algoritmy dlya raspoznavaniya pozitivnykh i negativnykh vkhozdenii deskriptorov v tekst i protsedura avtomaticheskoi klassifikatsii tekstov (1999)
0.02
0.015413855 = product of:
0.03082771 = sum of:
0.03082771 = product of:
0.06165542 = sum of:
0.06165542 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06165542 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15935703 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 4.2002 10:22:41
-
Stankovic, R. et al.: Indexing of textual databases based on lexical resources : a case study for Serbian (2016)
0.02
0.015413855 = product of:
0.03082771 = sum of:
0.03082771 = product of:
0.06165542 = sum of:
0.06165542 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06165542 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15935703 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
-
Suominen, O.; Koskenniemi, I.: Annif Analyzer Shootout : comparing text lemmatization methods for automated subject indexing (2022)
0.01
0.0139248865 = product of:
0.027849773 = sum of:
0.027849773 = product of:
0.055699546 = sum of:
0.055699546 = weight(_text_:subject in 658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055699546 = score(doc=658,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.34222013 = fieldWeight in 658, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=658)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Automated text classification is an important function for many AI systems relevant to libraries, including automated subject indexing and classification. When implemented using the traditional natural language processing (NLP) paradigm, one key part of the process is the normalization of words using stemming or lemmatization, which reduces the amount of linguistic variation and often improves the quality of classification. In this paper, we compare the output of seven different text lemmatization algorithms as well as two baseline methods. We measure how the choice of method affects the quality of text classification using example corpora in three languages. The experiments have been performed using the open source Annif toolkit for automated subject indexing and classification, but should generalize also to other NLP toolkits and similar text classification tasks. The results show that lemmatization methods in most cases outperform baseline methods in text classification particularly for Finnish and Swedish text, but not English, where baseline methods are most effective. The differences between lemmatization methods are quite small. The systematic comparison will help optimize text classification pipelines and inform the further development of the Annif toolkit to incorporate a wider choice of normalization methods.
-
Schuegraf, E.J.; Bommel, M.F.van: ¬An automatic document indexing system based on cooperating expert systems : design and development (1993)
0.01
0.012863259 = product of:
0.025726518 = sum of:
0.025726518 = product of:
0.051453035 = sum of:
0.051453035 = weight(_text_:subject in 6504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051453035 = score(doc=6504,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550679 = queryNorm
0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 6504, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6504)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discusses the design of an automatic indexing system based on two cooperating expert systems and the investigation related to its development. The design combines statistical and artificial intelligence techniques. Examines choice of content indicators, the effect of stemming and the identification of characteristic vocabularies for given subject areas. Presents experimental results. Discusses the application of machine learning algorithms to the identification of vocabularies
