Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Beall, J."
  1. Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: ¬The effectiveness of copy cotaloging at eliminating typographical errors in shared bibliographic records (2004) 0.07
    0.074737296 = product of:
      0.14947459 = sum of:
        0.14947459 = sum of:
          0.10642105 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10642105 = score(doc=4849,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045395818 = queryNorm
              0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
          0.043053545 = weight(_text_:22 in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043053545 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045395818 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Typographical errors in bibliographic records can cause retrieval problems in online catalogs. This study examined one hundred typographical errors in records in the OCLC WorldCat database. The local catalogs of five libraries holding the items described by the bibliographic records with typographical errors were searched to determine whether each library had corrected the errors. The study found that only 35.8 percent of the errors had been corrected. Knowledge of copy cataloging error rates can help underscore the importance of quality data in bibliographic utilities and, further, can serve as an indication to libraries whether they need to pay more attention to correcting types in the copy cataloging process.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Beall, J.: Indexing form and genre terms in a large academic library OPAC : the Harvard experience (1999) 0.02
    0.021500299 = product of:
      0.043000598 = sum of:
        0.043000598 = product of:
          0.086001195 = sum of:
            0.086001195 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086001195 = score(doc=5017,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 5017, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5017)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers at Harvard University have been adding form and genre data to MARC records in HOLLIS, the University's online library catalog, since 1994. The addition of this data in bibliographic records allows library users to more easily access some materials described in the catalog. This paper describes how form and genre data is indexed in the catalog and analyzes the value of adding, indexing, and using this bibliographic data.
  3. Beall, J.: Publishers' errors make catalogers [sic] : an analysis of the error indicators [sic] and [i.e.] in cataloging (2001) 0.02
    0.021500299 = product of:
      0.043000598 = sum of:
        0.043000598 = product of:
          0.086001195 = sum of:
            0.086001195 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086001195 = score(doc=5426,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 5426, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5426)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In bibliographic records, catalogers use the error indicators [sic] or [i.e.] with a correction to indicate that a preexisting error was noted on the item being cataloged that did occur not during the cataloging process. This article analyzes this practice and provides examples of the recent use of the error indicators. The article also suggests how the use of the error indicators in bibliographic records might be improved and describes aspects of their use that merit further study.
  4. Beall, J.: Cataloging World Wide Web sites consisting mainly of links (1997) 0.02
    0.018812763 = product of:
      0.037625525 = sum of:
        0.037625525 = product of:
          0.07525105 = sum of:
            0.07525105 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07525105 = score(doc=3408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 3408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    WWW sites, consisting mainly of links to other Internet resources, have begun to proliferate and these sites are valuable to library users and researchers because they bring together in a single Web site links to a comprehensive array of information resources. Because libraries may elect to include bibliographic records for these sites in their online catalogues, cataloguers should be aware of some of the main aspects of cataloguing this new type of resource. Concludes that cataloguers should be aware of the main types and different characteristics of these Web sites, how to describe them in bibliographic records and how to assign appropriate subject headings for them
  5. Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: Measuring typographical errors' impact on retrieval in bibliographic databases (2007) 0.01
    0.011402255 = product of:
      0.02280451 = sum of:
        0.02280451 = product of:
          0.04560902 = sum of:
            0.04560902 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04560902 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Beall, J.: Representation DDC system in MARC 21 (2008) 0.01
    0.011402255 = product of:
      0.02280451 = sum of:
        0.02280451 = product of:
          0.04560902 = sum of:
            0.04560902 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04560902 = score(doc=2167,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 2167, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2167)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Magda Heiner-Freiling argued for assignment of extra DDC numbers for improved access, including table numbers and other parts of numbers as well as fully built numbers, and for coding to identify component parts of built numbers. Changes to the MARC 21 Bibliographic format that support her approach are found in MARC Proposal No. 2008-01 Representation of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) System in MARC 21 formats. The new 083 Additional Dewey Decimal Classification Number field is used for assignment of extra Dewey numbers for improved access. The new 085 Synthesized Classification Number Components field is used to identify component parts of built Dewey numbers. This paper uses specific examples to show how the new fields can help improve access.
  7. Vizine-Goetz, D.; Beall, J.: Using literary warrant to define a version of the DDC for automated classification services (2004) 0.01
    0.010763386 = product of:
      0.021526773 = sum of:
        0.021526773 = product of:
          0.043053545 = sum of:
            0.043053545 = weight(_text_:22 in 2645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043053545 = score(doc=2645,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2645, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2645)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    DDC-22
  8. Beall, J.: Approaches to expansions : case studies from the German and Vietnamese translations (2003) 0.01
    0.0076881335 = product of:
      0.015376267 = sum of:
        0.015376267 = product of:
          0.030752534 = sum of:
            0.030752534 = weight(_text_:22 in 1748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030752534 = score(doc=1748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1748)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    DDC-22