Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

Holley, R.P.: Is popular culture forgotten? (1993) 0.07

0.06760844 = product of:
  0.13521688 = sum of:
    0.13521688 = sum of:
      0.09216333 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09216333 = score(doc=5054,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.52149844 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
      0.043053545 = weight(_text_:22 in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043053545 = score(doc=5054,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract: The 1991 IFLA programme given by the section on bibliography presented the theme that national bibliography becomes part of national memeory by recording the publications of the nation. Examines whether the widely distributed publications of popular culture are 'forgotten' by national bibliography. Considers the bibliographic control of newspapers, mass market publications and erotica in the US bibliographic control system. For the last 2 categories, searches selected titles in the OCLC database where many publications were found with wide distribution but recorded by few or no libraries. Popular culture materials should be recorded in national bibliographies to provide a more extended and historically accurate national memory
Source: International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.1, S.13-17

Holley, R.P.: IFLA and international standards in the area of bibliographic control (1996) 0.03
```
0.03258466 = product of:
  0.06516932 = sum of:
    0.06516932 = product of:
      0.13033864 = sum of:
        0.13033864 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13033864 = score(doc=5572,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045395818 = queryNorm
            0.73751014 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

The Division of Bibliographic Control of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) has taken an active role in standard setting to foster universal bibliographic control (UBC). UBC is built upon the assumption that a national cataloging agency will catalog national imprints and then share the records nationally and internationally. Standards in support of UBC include the International Standard Bibliographic Descriptions, UNIMARC, authority lists, and miscellaneous guidelines. The IFLA standard setting process requires consensus building and compromise among the various traditions of bibliographic control. The increasing importance of library networks and the internationalization of bibliographic control may reduce the importance of IFLA as a standard setting body.

Holley, R.P.: Results of a 'survey on bibliographic control and national bibliography', IFLA Section an Bibliography (1998) 0.03

0.03225045 = product of:
  0.0645009 = sum of:
    0.0645009 = product of:
      0.1290018 = sum of:
        0.1290018 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1290018 = score(doc=2113,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045395818 = queryNorm
            0.7299458 = fieldWeight in 2113, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2113)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 27(1998) no.1, S.3-7

Holley, R.P.: Report from the section on classification and indexing : 1988-89 (1989) 0.03

0.030406015 = product of:
  0.06081203 = sum of:
    0.06081203 = product of:
      0.12162406 = sum of:
        0.12162406 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12162406 = score(doc=425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045395818 = queryNorm
            0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=425)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 18(1989), S.59

Holley, R.P.; Drabenstott, K.M.: ¬An interview with Karen M. Drabenstott (2001) 0.02

0.0152030075 = product of:
  0.030406015 = sum of:
    0.030406015 = product of:
      0.06081203 = sum of:
        0.06081203 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06081203 = score(doc=5432,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045395818 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 5432, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5432)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract: In an interview with Robert P. Holley, Karen M. Drabenstott provides a history of a professional career that has focused on subject access to information. Since her early work with Pauline Cochrane, she has strongly supported enhanced bibliographic records as a way to improve user access in the online catalog. Her Dewey Decimal Classification Online project showed that the classification offers increased subject retrieval. Her current projects include improved strategies for Web searching and multimedia literacy including subject access.

Holley, R.P.: Classification in the USA (1986) 0.01
```
0.013302632 = product of:
  0.026605263 = sum of:
    0.026605263 = product of:
      0.053210527 = sum of:
        0.053210527 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053210527 = score(doc=1524,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045395818 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

United States libraries use classification to provide subject browsing in open stacks. The DDC used by 85% of American libraries, is a theoretical, universal attempt to organize all knowledge. The LCC lacks intellectual consistency since it was based upon library warrant to organize materials in one collection. Many academic libraries use LCC because the Library of Congress' shared bibliographic records with the LCC call numbers reflect the collecting interests of academic libraries. LCC is more hospitable to change than DDC whoese phoenix schedules have encountered resistance throughout the world. Classification currently receives less attention than subject headings since United States librarians place great hope in the computer to resolve subject heading problems while remaining conservative about classification
Holley, R.P.: ¬The consequences of new technologies in classification and subject cataloguing in third world countries : the technological gap (1985) 0.01
```
0.011402255 = product of:
  0.02280451 = sum of:
    0.02280451 = product of:
      0.04560902 = sum of:
        0.04560902 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04560902 = score(doc=1733,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045395818 = queryNorm
            0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Since many nations rely upon subject headings and classification numbers from cataloguing agencies in developed countries, changes requiring computers would hinder subject access in Thrid World areas which lack high technology. New computer-supported systems such as PRECIS will probably take hold only in languages and countries where a subject analysis system does not already exist. For the traditional card catalogue-based subject access system, computer support may lead to more frequent changes in headings, less pre-coordinated structure, and the assignement of more terms per document. Third world countires may have difficulty in adapting to the developments. Classification, especially since it more easily crosses linguistc boundaries, may become to a greater degree the preferred means of subject access in Third World nations. During the transition, IFLA can serve as a forum for developing nations to make their needs known to the providers of bibliographic data

Holley, R.P.: Subject access tools in English for Canadian topics : Canadian extensions to U.S. subject access tools (2008) 0.01

0.010872662 = product of:
  0.021745324 = sum of:
    0.021745324 = product of:
      0.04349065 = sum of:
        0.04349065 = weight(_text_:22 in 2553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04349065 = score(doc=2553,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045395818 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2553, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2553)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
19. 6.2010 19:22:18

Holley, R.P.: ¬The Répertoire de Vedettes-matière de l'Université Laval Library, 1946-92 : Francophone subject access in North America and Europe (2002) 0.01

0.0076881335 = product of:
  0.015376267 = sum of:
    0.015376267 = product of:
      0.030752534 = sum of:
        0.030752534 = weight(_text_:22 in 159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030752534 = score(doc=159,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045395818 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 159, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=159)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

Years

Themes