Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Zhang, Y."
  1. Zhang, Y.; Salaba, A.: Implementing FRBR in libraries : key issues and future directions (2009) 0.03
    0.026875373 = product of:
      0.053750746 = sum of:
        0.053750746 = product of:
          0.10750149 = sum of:
            0.10750149 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10750149 = score(doc=345,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.6082881 = fieldWeight in 345, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=345)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    RSWK
    Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (BVB)
    Subject
    Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (BVB)
  2. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.01
    0.010872662 = product of:
      0.021745324 = sum of:
        0.021745324 = product of:
          0.04349065 = sum of:
            0.04349065 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04349065 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
  3. Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.: ¬A user-centered functional metadata evaluation of moving image collections (2008) 0.01
    0.00950188 = product of:
      0.01900376 = sum of:
        0.01900376 = product of:
          0.03800752 = sum of:
            0.03800752 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03800752 = score(doc=1884,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 1884, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1884)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, the authors report a series of evaluations of two metadata schemes developed for Moving Image Collections (MIC), an integrated online catalog of moving images. Through two online surveys and one experiment spanning various stages of metadata implementation, the MIC evaluation team explored a user-centered approach in which the four generic user tasks suggested by IFLA FRBR (International Association of Library Associations Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records) were embedded in data collection and analyses. Diverse groups of users rated usefulness of individual metadata fields for finding, identifying, selecting, and obtaining moving images. The results demonstrate a consistency across these evaluations with respect to (a) identification of a set of useful metadata fields highly rated by target users for each of the FRBR generic tasks, and (b) indication of a significant interaction between MIC metadata fields and the FRBR generic tasks. The findings provide timely feedback for the MIC implementation specifically, and valuable suggestions to other similar metadata application settings in general. They also suggest the feasibility of using the four IFLA FRBR generic tasks as a framework for user-centered functional metadata evaluations.
  4. Zhang, Y.: ¬The effect of open access on citation impact : a comparison study based on Web citation analysis (2006) 0.01
    0.00950188 = product of:
      0.01900376 = sum of:
        0.01900376 = product of:
          0.03800752 = sum of:
            0.03800752 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03800752 = score(doc=5071,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 5071, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5071)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The academic impact advantage of Open Access (OA) is a prominent topic of debate in the library and publishing communities. Web citations have been proposed as comparable to, even replacements for, bibliographic citations in assessing the academic impact of journals. In our study, we compare Web citations to articles in an OA journal, the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (JCMC), and a traditional access journal, New Media & Society (NMS), in the communication discipline. Web citation counts for JCMC are significantly higher than those for NMS. Furthermore, JCMC receives significantly higher Web citations from the formal scholarly publications posted on the Web than NMS does. The types of Web citations for journal articles were also examined. In the Web context, the impact of a journal can be assessed using more than one type of source: citations from scholarly articles, teaching materials and non-authoritative documents. The OA journal has higher percentages of citations from the third type, which suggests that, in addition to the research community, the impact advantage of open access is also detectable among ordinary users participating in Web-based academic communication. Moreover, our study also proves that the OA journal has impact advantage in developing countries. Compared with NMS, JCMC has more Web citations from developing countries.
  5. Zhang, Y.: Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation (2010) 0.01
    0.00922576 = product of:
      0.01845152 = sum of:
        0.01845152 = product of:
          0.03690304 = sum of:
            0.03690304 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03690304 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.
  6. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.01
    0.00922576 = product of:
      0.01845152 = sum of:
        0.01845152 = product of:
          0.03690304 = sum of:
            0.03690304 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03690304 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
  7. Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Song, S.: ¬The design and evaluation of a nudge-based interface to facilitate consumers' evaluation of online health information credibility (2023) 0.01
    0.0076881335 = product of:
      0.015376267 = sum of:
        0.015376267 = product of:
          0.030752534 = sum of:
            0.030752534 = weight(_text_:22 in 993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030752534 = score(doc=993,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 993, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=993)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:18:34
  8. Zhang, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhang, G.; Lu, J.: Stepping beyond your comfort zone : diffusion-based network analytics for knowledge trajectory recommendation (2023) 0.01
    0.0076881335 = product of:
      0.015376267 = sum of:
        0.015376267 = product of:
          0.030752534 = sum of:
            0.030752534 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030752534 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:07:12