Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"chi"
  1. Lu, S.-j.: Bibliographic control in a national bibliographic centre (1996) 0.05
    0.046081666 = product of:
      0.09216333 = sum of:
        0.09216333 = product of:
          0.18432666 = sum of:
            0.18432666 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18432666 = score(doc=88,freq=24.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                1.0429969 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
                  4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                    24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the theory and practice of bibliographic control, provides a definition for a bibliographic centre and for bibliographic control in a national bibliographic centre, and discusses the current situation and future development in bibliographic control in the national bibliographic centre (of China). Makes some suggestions for planning effective bibliographic control in the national bibliographic centre as follows: to collect materials; to recruit advisers; to set up a mission, goals and objectives; to make and implement action plans; to put in place the organizational structure of the bibliographic database; and to make plans for cooperating with other area or national bibliographic centres
  2. Cheng, L.-y.: On bibliographic(al) control (1998) 0.03
    0.030406015 = product of:
      0.06081203 = sum of:
        0.06081203 = product of:
          0.12162406 = sum of:
            0.12162406 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12162406 = score(doc=3376,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic(al) control is important for retrieving documents in the library. Reviews previous studies in order to understand bibliographic(al) control from its very beginnings up to the present information age. The history, meaning, scope and functions of bibliographic(al) control are included. Finally, various catalogues are reviewed and discussed
  3. Chen, H.-c.: Concerning core bibliographic record (1997) 0.02
    0.021500299 = product of:
      0.043000598 = sum of:
        0.043000598 = product of:
          0.086001195 = sum of:
            0.086001195 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086001195 = score(doc=1427,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The incresing ned to make library materials more speedily available to impatient readers is causing libraries in Taiwan to become interested in copy cataloguing and outsourcing (contracting out). Reviews the concept of the Core Bibliographic Record in the USA as an important part of cooperative cataloguing systems and studies the Program for Cooperative Cataloguing (PCC) Core
  4. Huang, M.-h.: Error analysis of end users in online searching (1995) 0.01
    0.013302632 = product of:
      0.026605263 = sum of:
        0.026605263 = product of:
          0.053210527 = sum of:
            0.053210527 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053210527 = score(doc=153,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 153, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=153)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Uses an information processing approach to analyse the behaviour of end users in searching online bibliographic databases, with particular emphasis on errors made. Following instruction in online searching, 41 students and 3 faculty end users conducted 79 subject searches. Analysis of search transcripts identified 119 reasons for errors. Errors occured most frequently in connection with functions, moves, and elements of 'create and develop sets' and 'display and print records'. Surprisingly, the results do not indicate that end users make errors less frequently as they gain more experience and practice, although syntax-related errors do decrease with time
  5. Lee, Y.-R.: ¬A study on the conditions of using OPAC access points and subject searching by users (1997) 0.01
    0.012301013 = product of:
      0.024602026 = sum of:
        0.024602026 = product of:
          0.04920405 = sum of:
            0.04920405 = weight(_text_:22 in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04920405 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1997, no.22, S.39-55
  6. Yi, H.; Shubai, L.: Application of classification in information organization under the networking environment (1998) 0.01
    0.012301013 = product of:
      0.024602026 = sum of:
        0.024602026 = product of:
          0.04920405 = sum of:
            0.04920405 = weight(_text_:22 in 3236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04920405 = score(doc=3236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3236)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.1, S.19-22
  7. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.01
    0.012301013 = product of:
      0.024602026 = sum of:
        0.024602026 = product of:
          0.04920405 = sum of:
            0.04920405 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04920405 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  8. Pu, H.-T.: Exploration of personalized information service for OPAC (1997) 0.01
    0.010763386 = product of:
      0.021526773 = sum of:
        0.021526773 = product of:
          0.043053545 = sum of:
            0.043053545 = weight(_text_:22 in 1772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043053545 = score(doc=1772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1772)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4. 8.1998 19:36:22
  9. Tseng, Y.-H.: Solving vocabulary problems with interactive query expansion (1998) 0.01
    0.00950188 = product of:
      0.01900376 = sum of:
        0.01900376 = product of:
          0.03800752 = sum of:
            0.03800752 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03800752 = score(doc=5159,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 5159, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5159)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    One of the major causes of search failures in information retrieval systems is vocabulary mismatch. Presents a solution to the vocabulary problem through 2 strategies known as term suggestion (TS) and term relevance feedback (TRF). In TS, collection specific terms are extracted from the text collection. These terms and their frequencies constitute the keyword database for suggesting terms in response to users' queries. One effect of this term suggestion is that it functions as a dynamic directory if the query is a general term that contains broad meaning. In term relevance feedback, terms extracted from the top ranked documents retrieved from the previous query are shown to users for relevance feedback. In the experiment, interactive TS provides very high precision rates while achieving similar recall rates as n-gram matching. Local TRF achieves improvement in both precision and recall rate in a full text news database and degrades slightly in recall rate in bibliographic databases due to the very limited source of information for feedback. In terms of Rijsbergen's combined measure of recall and precision, both TS and TRF achieve better performance than n-gram matching, which implies that the greater improvement in precision rate compensates the slight degradation in recall rate for TS and TRF