Search (61 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Dillon, M.: Enhanced bibliographic record retrieval experiments (1989) 0.03
    0.030406015 = product of:
      0.06081203 = sum of:
        0.06081203 = product of:
          0.12162406 = sum of:
            0.12162406 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12162406 = score(doc=1406,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Wolfram, D.; Dimitroff, A.: Preliminary findings on searcher performance and perceptions of performance in a hypertext bibliographic retrieval system (1997) 0.02
    0.023040833 = product of:
      0.046081666 = sum of:
        0.046081666 = product of:
          0.09216333 = sum of:
            0.09216333 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09216333 = score(doc=1857,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.52149844 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on research examining the relationship of searcher performance and perception of performance, particulary for hypertext-based onformation retrieval systems for bibliographic data. Employs a prototype hypertext bibliographic retrieval system called HyperLynx. Evaluates its use by 83 subjects at the School of Library and Information Science and the Golda Meir Library at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA. Measures of system usgae indicate that there is no significant relationship between confidence and the number of record pages visited, although confident searchers searched for shorter time periods. The reality check measures shows that both novice and experienced searchers were over confident in their performance
  3. Yerbury, H.; Parker, J.: Novice searchers' use of familiar structures in searching bibliographic information retrieval systems (1998) 0.02
    0.02280451 = product of:
      0.04560902 = sum of:
        0.04560902 = product of:
          0.09121804 = sum of:
            0.09121804 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09121804 = score(doc=2874,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study of the use of metaphors as problem solving mechanisms by novice searchers of bibliographic databases. Metaphors provide a framework or 'familiar structure' of credible associations within which relationships in other domains may be considered. 28 students taking an undergraduate course in information retrieval at Sydney University of Technology, were recorded as they 'talked through' a search on a bibliographic retrieval system. The transcripts were analyzed using conventional methods and the NUDIST software package for qualitative research. A range of metaphors was apparent from the language use by students in the search process. Those which predominated were: a journey; human interaction; a building or matching process; a problem solving process, and a search for a quantity. Many of the studentes experiencing the interaction as a problem solving process or a search for quantity perceived the outcomes as successful. Concludes that when memory for operating methods and procedures is incomplete an unconscious approach through the use of a conceptual system which is consonant with the task at hand may also lead to success in bibliographic searching
  4. Wolfram, D.; Dimitroff, A.: Hypertext vs. Boolean-based searching in a bibliographic database environment : a direct comparison of searcher performance (1998) 0.02
    0.02280451 = product of:
      0.04560902 = sum of:
        0.04560902 = product of:
          0.09121804 = sum of:
            0.09121804 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09121804 = score(doc=6436,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 6436, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6436)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.02
    0.021526773 = product of:
      0.043053545 = sum of:
        0.043053545 = product of:
          0.08610709 = sum of:
            0.08610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08610709 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  6. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.02
    0.021526773 = product of:
      0.043053545 = sum of:
        0.043053545 = product of:
          0.08610709 = sum of:
            0.08610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08610709 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  7. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.02
    0.021526773 = product of:
      0.043053545 = sum of:
        0.043053545 = product of:
          0.08610709 = sum of:
            0.08610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08610709 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
  8. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.02
    0.021526773 = product of:
      0.043053545 = sum of:
        0.043053545 = product of:
          0.08610709 = sum of:
            0.08610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08610709 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  9. Shenouda, W.: Online bibliographic searching : how end-users modify their search strategies (1990) 0.02
    0.018812763 = product of:
      0.037625525 = sum of:
        0.037625525 = product of:
          0.07525105 = sum of:
            0.07525105 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07525105 = score(doc=4895,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 4895, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4895)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The study attempted to idendify how end-users modify their initial search strategies in the light of new information presented during their interaction with an online bibliographic information retrieval system in a real environment. This exploratory study was also conducted to determine the effectiveness of the changes, made by users during the online process, in retrieving relevant documents. Analysis of this data shows that all end-users modify their searches during the online process. Results indicate that certain changes were made more frequently than others. Changes affecting relevance and characteristics of end-users' online search behaviour were also identified
  10. Wolfram, D.; Volz, A.; Dimitroff, A.: ¬The effect of linkage structure on retrieval performance in a hypertext-based bibliographic retrieval system (1996) 0.02
    0.018812763 = product of:
      0.037625525 = sum of:
        0.037625525 = product of:
          0.07525105 = sum of:
            0.07525105 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07525105 = score(doc=6622,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 6622, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Investigates how linkage environments in a hypertext based bibliographic retrieval system affect retrieval performance for novice and experienced searchers, 2 systems, 1 with inter record linkages to authors and descriptors and 1 that also included title and abstract keywords, were tested. No significant differences in retrieval performance and system usage were found for most search tests. The enhanced system did provide better performance where title and abstract keywords provided the most direct access to relevant records. The findings have implications for the design of bilbiographic information retrieval systems using hypertext linkages
  11. Savoy, J.: Bibliographic database access using free-text and controlled vocabulary : an evaluation (2005) 0.02
    0.018812763 = product of:
      0.037625525 = sum of:
        0.037625525 = product of:
          0.07525105 = sum of:
            0.07525105 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07525105 = score(doc=1053,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper evaluates and compares the retrieval effectiveness of various search models, based on either automatic text-word indexing or on manually assigned controlled descriptors. Retrieval is from a relatively large collection of bibliographic material written in French. Moreover, for this French collection we evaluate improvements that result from combining automatic and manual indexing. First, when considering various contexts, this study reveals that the combined indexing strategy always obtains the best retrieval performance. Second, when users wish to conduct exhaustive searches with minimal effort, we demonstrate that manually assigned terms are essential. Third, the evaluations presented in this paper study reveal the comparative retrieval performances that result from manual and automatic indexing in a variety of circumstances.
  12. Tibbo, H.R.: ¬The epic struggle : subject retrieval from large bibliographic databases (1994) 0.02
    0.016125225 = product of:
      0.03225045 = sum of:
        0.03225045 = product of:
          0.0645009 = sum of:
            0.0645009 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0645009 = score(doc=2179,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.3649729 = fieldWeight in 2179, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2179)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses a retrieval study that focused on collection level archival records in the OCLC OLUC, made accessible through the EPIC online search system. Data were also collected from the local OPAC at North Carolina University at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH) in which UNC-CH produced OCLC records are loaded. The chief objective was to explore the retrieval environments in which a random sample of USMARC AMC records produced at UNC-CH were found: specifically to obtain a picture of the density of these databases in regard to each subject heading applied and, more generally, for each records. Key questions were: how many records would be retrieved for each subject heading attached to each of the records; and what was the nature of these subject headings vis a vis the numer of hits associated with them. Results show that large retrieval sets are a potential problem with national bibliographic utilities and that the local and national retrieval environments can vary greatly. The need for specifity in indexing is emphasized
  13. Dimitroff, A.; Wolfram, D.; Volz, A.: Affective response and retrieval performance : analysis of contributing factors (1996) 0.02
    0.016125225 = product of:
      0.03225045 = sum of:
        0.03225045 = product of:
          0.0645009 = sum of:
            0.0645009 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0645009 = score(doc=164,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.3649729 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a study which investigated the affective response of 83 subjects to 2 versions of a hypertext-based bibliographic retrieval system. The objective of the study was to determine if subjects preferred searching a hypertext information retrieval (IR) system via traditional bibliographic links or via an enhanced set of linkages between structured records. The study also examined the utility of using factor analysis to explore subjects' affective responses to searching the 2 hypertext-based IR systems; explored the effect of experience on search outcome; and compared the effect of different types of linkages within the hypertext system. Findings reveal a complex relationship between system and user that is sometimes contradictory. Searchers found the systems to be usable or unusable in different ways indicating that further researchg is needed to isolate to specific features that searchers find frustrating or not in searching structured records via a hypertext-based IR system
  14. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.02
    0.015376267 = product of:
      0.030752534 = sum of:
        0.030752534 = product of:
          0.061505068 = sum of:
            0.061505068 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061505068 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  15. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.02
    0.015376267 = product of:
      0.030752534 = sum of:
        0.030752534 = product of:
          0.061505068 = sum of:
            0.061505068 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061505068 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  16. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.02
    0.015376267 = product of:
      0.030752534 = sum of:
        0.030752534 = product of:
          0.061505068 = sum of:
            0.061505068 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061505068 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-25
  17. Feng, S.: ¬A comparative study of indexing languages in single and multidatabase searching (1989) 0.02
    0.0152030075 = product of:
      0.030406015 = sum of:
        0.030406015 = product of:
          0.06081203 = sum of:
            0.06081203 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06081203 = score(doc=2494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 2494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    An experiment was conducted using 3 data bases in library and information science - Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA), Information Science Abstracts and ERIC - to investigate some of the main factors affecting on-line searching: effectiveness of search vocabularies, combinations of fields searched, and overlaps among databases. Natural language, controlled vocabulary and a mixture of natural language and controlled terms were tested using different fields of bibliographic records. Also discusses a comparative evaluation of single and multi-data base searching, measuring the overlap among data bases and their influence upon on-line searching.
  18. Pao, M.L.: Retrieval differences between term and citation indexing (1989) 0.02
    0.0152030075 = product of:
      0.030406015 = sum of:
        0.030406015 = product of:
          0.06081203 = sum of:
            0.06081203 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06081203 = score(doc=3566,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 3566, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3566)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A retrieval experiment was conducted to compare on-line searching using terms opposed to citations. This is the first study in which a single data base was used to retrieve two equivalent sets for each query, one using terms found in the bibliographic record to achieve higher recall, and the other using documents. Reports on the use of a second citation searching strategy. Overall, by using both types of search keys, the total recall is increased.
  19. Hood, W.W.; Wilson, C.S.: ¬The scatter of documents over databases in different subject domains : how many databases are needed? (2001) 0.01
    0.0134376865 = product of:
      0.026875373 = sum of:
        0.026875373 = product of:
          0.053750746 = sum of:
            0.053750746 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053750746 = score(doc=6936,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.30414405 = fieldWeight in 6936, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6936)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The distribution of bibliographic records in on-line bibliographic databases is examined using 14 different search topics. These topics were searched using the DIALOG database host, and using as many suitable databases as possible. The presence of duplicate records in the searches was taken into consideration in the analysis, and the problem with lexical ambiguity in at least one search topic is discussed. The study answers questions such as how many databases are needed in a multifile search for particular topics, and what coverage will be achieved using a certain number of databases. The distribution of the percentages of records retrieved over a number of databases for 13 of the 14 search topics roughly fell into three groups: (1) high concentration of records in one database with about 80% coverage in five to eight databases; (2) moderate concentration in one database with about 80% coverage in seven to 10 databases; and (3) low concentration in one database with about 80% coverage in 16 to 19 databases. The study does conform with earlier results, but shows that the number of databases needed for searches with varying complexities of search strategies, is much more topic dependent than previous studies would indicate.
  20. Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2017) 0.01
    0.0134376865 = product of:
      0.026875373 = sum of:
        0.026875373 = product of:
          0.053750746 = sum of:
            0.053750746 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053750746 = score(doc=3868,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045395818 = queryNorm
                0.30414405 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This paper reports on an analysis of the loss levels that would result if a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI), were missing the subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by its professional indexers, employing the methodology developed by Gross and Taylor (2005), and later by Gross et al. (2015). The results indicate that AEI users would lose a similar proportion of hits per query to that experienced by library catalog users: on average, 27% of the resources found by a sample of keyword queries on the AEI database would not have been found without the subject indexing, based on the Australian Thesaurus of Education Descriptors (ATED). The paper also discusses the methodological limitations of these studies, pointing out that real-life users might still find some of the resources missed by a particular query through follow-up searches, while additional resources might also be found through iterative searching on the subject vocabulary. The paper goes on to describe a new research design, based on a before - and - after experiment, which addresses some of these limitations. It is argued that this alternative design will provide a more realistic picture of the value that professionally assigned subject indexing and controlled subject vocabularies can add to literature searching of a more scholarly and thorough kind.

Languages

  • e 55
  • d 3
  • chi 1
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 54
  • s 5
  • m 2
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…