-
Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009)
0.06
0.05795009 = product of:
0.11590018 = sum of:
0.11590018 = sum of:
0.07899714 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07899714 = score(doc=3601,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.44699866 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.03690304 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03690304 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Some members of the library community, including the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, have suggested that libraries should open up their catalogs to allow users to add descriptive tags to the bibliographic data in catalog records. The web site LibraryThing currently permits its members to add such user tags to its records for books and therefore provides a useful resource to contrast with library bibliographic records. A comparison between the LibraryThing tags for a group of books and the library-supplied subject headings for the same books shows that users and catalogers approach these descriptors very differently. Because of these differences, user tags can enhance subject access to library materials, but they cannot entirely replace controlled vocabularies such as the Library of Congress subject headings.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009)
0.04
0.04125603 = product of:
0.08251206 = sum of:
0.08251206 = sum of:
0.04560902 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04560902 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
0.03690304 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03690304 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study is an examination of the overlap between author-assigned keywords and cataloger-assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) for a set of electronic theses and dissertations in Ohio State University's online catalog. The project is intended to contribute to the literature on the issue of keywords versus controlled vocabularies in the use of online catalogs and databases. Findings support previous studies' conclusions that both keywords and controlled vocabularies complement one another. Further, even in the presence of bibliographic record enhancements, such as abstracts or summaries, keywords and subject headings provided a significant number of unique terms that could affect the success of keyword searches. Implications for the maintenance of controlled vocabularies such as LCSH also are discussed in light of the patterns of matches and nonmatches found between the keywords and their corresponding subject headings.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016)
0.03
0.034380026 = product of:
0.06876005 = sum of:
0.06876005 = sum of:
0.03800752 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03800752 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
0.030752534 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030752534 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this study was to examine user tags that describe digitized archival collections in the field of humanities. A collection of 8,310 tags from a digital portal (Nineteenth-Century Electronic Scholarship, NINES) was analyzed to find out what attributes of primary historical resources users described with tags. Tags were categorized to identify which tags describe the content of the resource, the resource itself, and subjective aspects (e.g., usage or emotion). The study's findings revealed that over half were content-related; tags representing opinion, usage context, or self-reference, however, reflected only a small percentage. The study further found that terms related to genre or physical format of a resource were frequently used in describing primary archival resources. It was also learned that nontextual resources had lower numbers of content-related tags and higher numbers of document-related tags than textual resources and bibliographic materials; moreover, textual resources tended to have more user-context-related tags than other resources. These findings help explain users' tagging behavior and resource interpretation in primary resources in the humanities. Such information provided through tags helps information professionals decide to what extent indexing archival and cultural resources should be done for resource description and discovery, and understand users' terminology.
- Date
- 21. 4.2016 11:23:22
-
Choi, Y.: ¬A Practical application of FRBR for organizing information in digital environments (2012)
0.02
0.01900376 = product of:
0.03800752 = sum of:
0.03800752 = product of:
0.07601504 = sum of:
0.07601504 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07601504 = score(doc=319,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 319, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=319)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study employs the FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) conceptual model to provide in-depth investigation on the characteristics of social tags by analyzing the bibliographic attributes of tags that are not limited to subject properties. FRBR describes four different levels of entities (i.e., Work, Expression, Manifestation, and Item), which provide a distinguishing understanding of each entity in the bibliographic universe. In this research, since the scope of data analysis focuses on tags assigned to web documents, consideration on Manifestation and Item has been excluded. Accordingly, only the attributes of Work and Expression entity were investigated in order to map the attributes of tags to attributes defined in those entities. The content analysis on tag attributes was conducted on a total of 113 web documents regarding 11 attribute categories defined by FRBR. The findings identified essential bibliographic attributes of tags and tagging behaviors by subject. The findings showed that concerning specific subject areas, taggers exhibited different tagging behaviors representing distinctive features and tendencies. These results have led to the conclusion that there should be an increased awareness of diverse user needs by subject in terms of the practical implications of metadata generation.
-
Chan, L.M.: Social bookmarking and subject indexing (2011)
0.02
0.01900376 = product of:
0.03800752 = sum of:
0.03800752 = product of:
0.07601504 = sum of:
0.07601504 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07601504 = score(doc=1806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- IFLA series on bibliographic control; vol. 42
-
Aagaard, H.: Social indexing at the Stockholm Public Library (2011)
0.02
0.01900376 = product of:
0.03800752 = sum of:
0.03800752 = product of:
0.07601504 = sum of:
0.07601504 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07601504 = score(doc=1807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 1807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1807)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- IFLA series on bibliographic control; vol. 42
-
Evedove Tartarotti, R. Dal'; Lopes Fujita, M.: ¬The perspective of social indexing in online bibliographic catalogs : between the individual and the collaborative (2016)
0.02
0.0152030075 = product of:
0.030406015 = sum of:
0.030406015 = product of:
0.06081203 = sum of:
0.06081203 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06081203 = score(doc=4917,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 4917, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4917)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Abreu, A.: "Every bit informs another" : framework analysis for descriptive practice and linked information (2008)
0.01
0.013302632 = product of:
0.026605263 = sum of:
0.026605263 = product of:
0.053210527 = sum of:
0.053210527 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053210527 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- The independent traditions of description in bibliographic and archival environments are rich and continually evolving. Recognizing this, how can Libraries, Archives and Museums seek convergence in describing materials on the web? In order to seek better description for materials and cross-institutional alignment, we can first reconceptualize where description may fit into work practices. I examine subject cataloging and archival practice alongside social tagging as a means of drawing conclusions for possible new paths in integration.
-
Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008)
0.01
0.012301013 = product of:
0.024602026 = sum of:
0.024602026 = product of:
0.04920405 = sum of:
0.04920405 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04920405 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.15-22
-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.01
0.010872662 = product of:
0.021745324 = sum of:
0.021745324 = product of:
0.04349065 = sum of:
0.04349065 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04349065 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008)
0.01
0.010763386 = product of:
0.021526773 = sum of:
0.021526773 = product of:
0.043053545 = sum of:
0.043053545 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043053545 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21. 6.2009 12:22:44
-
Huang, H.; Jörgensen, C.: Characterizing user tagging and Co-occurring metadata in general and specialized metadata collections (2013)
0.01
0.00950188 = product of:
0.01900376 = sum of:
0.01900376 = product of:
0.03800752 = sum of:
0.03800752 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03800752 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study aims to identify the categorical characteristics and usage patterns of the most popular image tags in Flickr. The "metadata usage ratio" is introduced as a means of assessing the usage of a popular tag as metadata. We also compare how popular tags are used as image tags or metadata in the Flickr general collection and the Library of Congress's photostream (LCP), also in Flickr. The Flickr popular tags in the list overall are categorically stable, and the changes that do appear reflect Flickr users' evolving technology-driven cultural experience. The popular tags in Flickr had a high number of generic objects and specific locations-related tags and were rarely at the abstract level. Conversely, the popular tags in the LCP describe more in the specific objects and time categories. Flickr users copied the Library of Congress-supplied metadata that related to specific objects or events and standard bibliographic information (e.g., author, format, time references) as popular tags in the LCP. Those popular tags related to generic objects and events showed a high metadata usage ratio, while those related to specific locations and objects showed a low image metadata usage ratio. Popular tags in Flickr appeared less frequently as image metadata when describing specific objects than specific times and locations for historical images in Flickr LCP collections. Understanding how people contribute image tags or image metadata in Flickr helps determine what users need to describe and query images, and could help improve image browsing and retrieval.
-
Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009)
0.01
0.00922576 = product of:
0.01845152 = sum of:
0.01845152 = product of:
0.03690304 = sum of:
0.03690304 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03690304 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.2010 12:35:22
-
Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011)
0.01
0.00922576 = product of:
0.01845152 = sum of:
0.01845152 = product of:
0.03690304 = sum of:
0.03690304 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03690304 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
-
Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007)
0.01
0.0076881335 = product of:
0.015376267 = sum of:
0.015376267 = product of:
0.030752534 = sum of:
0.030752534 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030752534 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008)
0.01
0.0076881335 = product of:
0.015376267 = sum of:
0.015376267 = product of:
0.030752534 = sum of:
0.030752534 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030752534 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008)
0.01
0.0076881335 = product of:
0.015376267 = sum of:
0.015376267 = product of:
0.030752534 = sum of:
0.030752534 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030752534 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012)
0.01
0.0076881335 = product of:
0.015376267 = sum of:
0.015376267 = product of:
0.030752534 = sum of:
0.030752534 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030752534 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25.12.2012 15:22:37
-
Qin, C.; Liu, Y.; Mou, J.; Chen, J.: User adoption of a hybrid social tagging approach in an online knowledge community (2019)
0.01
0.0076881335 = product of:
0.015376267 = sum of:
0.015376267 = product of:
0.030752534 = sum of:
0.030752534 = weight(_text_:22 in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030752534 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Bentley, C.M.; Labelle, P.R.: ¬A comparison of social tagging designs and user participation (2008)
0.01
0.0061505064 = product of:
0.012301013 = sum of:
0.012301013 = product of:
0.024602026 = sum of:
0.024602026 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024602026 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
