-
Schmidt, J.: Full-text searching : as seen from a non-bibliographic searcher's point of view (1989)
0.02
0.018812763 = product of:
0.037625525 = sum of:
0.037625525 = product of:
0.07525105 = sum of:
0.07525105 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07525105 = score(doc=2876,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 2876, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2876)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Examines searching capabilities and search results relating to the same full text data base made available by: a host that offers a command language designed for searching bibliographic data bases and a host that provides search facilities that have been specially designed for full text retrieval. Moreover, the CD-ROM format of an encyclopedia is compared with the equivalent on-line version of the same work, Academic American Encyclopedia. Results reveal that it is easier to search on those systems that offer searching facilities which have been specially designed for full text retrieval.
-
Quint, B.: Flipping for full-text (1991)
0.02
0.0152030075 = product of:
0.030406015 = sum of:
0.030406015 = product of:
0.06081203 = sum of:
0.06081203 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06081203 = score(doc=4893,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 4893, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4893)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Provides tips for searchers of full text online databases and examines the coverage policies of full text database producers which may change without notification to users. Most full text newspaper files do not carry even bibliographic listings for syndicated columns not created by their own staff. Looks at the development of full-text CD-ROM databases and claims that full-text, though expensive, is the wave of the future
-
Tenopir, C.: Full-text retrieval : systems and files (1994)
0.02
0.0152030075 = product of:
0.030406015 = sum of:
0.030406015 = product of:
0.06081203 = sum of:
0.06081203 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06081203 = score(doc=2424,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 2424, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2424)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- State of the art review of the development of full text databases, encompassing: types of commercially available full text databases; online systems for full text databases; CD-ROM databases for full text databases; full text databases on magnetic discs or tapes; creation of full text databases; searching and display requirements for full text searching and software. Concludes that bibliographic information services without full text support solve only half of the retrieval problems
-
Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2017)
0.01
0.0134376865 = product of:
0.026875373 = sum of:
0.026875373 = product of:
0.053750746 = sum of:
0.053750746 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053750746 = score(doc=3868,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.30414405 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This paper reports on an analysis of the loss levels that would result if a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI), were missing the subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by its professional indexers, employing the methodology developed by Gross and Taylor (2005), and later by Gross et al. (2015). The results indicate that AEI users would lose a similar proportion of hits per query to that experienced by library catalog users: on average, 27% of the resources found by a sample of keyword queries on the AEI database would not have been found without the subject indexing, based on the Australian Thesaurus of Education Descriptors (ATED). The paper also discusses the methodological limitations of these studies, pointing out that real-life users might still find some of the resources missed by a particular query through follow-up searches, while additional resources might also be found through iterative searching on the subject vocabulary. The paper goes on to describe a new research design, based on a before - and - after experiment, which addresses some of these limitations. It is argued that this alternative design will provide a more realistic picture of the value that professionally assigned subject indexing and controlled subject vocabularies can add to literature searching of a more scholarly and thorough kind.
-
Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2018)
0.01
0.0134376865 = product of:
0.026875373 = sum of:
0.026875373 = product of:
0.053750746 = sum of:
0.053750746 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053750746 = score(doc=4300,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.30414405 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This article reports on an investigation of the search value that subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by professional indexers add to a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI). First, a similar methodology to that developed by Gross et al. (2015) was applied, with keyword searches representing a range of educational topics run on the AEI database with and without its subject indexing. The results indicated that AEI users would also lose, on average, about a quarter of hits per query. Second, an alternative research design was applied in which an experienced literature searcher was asked to find resources on a set of educational topics on an AEI database stripped of its subject indexing and then asked to search for additional resources on the same topics after the subject indexing had been reinserted. In this study, the proportion of additional resources that would have been lost had it not been for the subject indexing was again found to be about a quarter of the total resources found for each topic, on average.
-
Couvreur, T.R.; Benzel, R.N.; Miller, S.F.; Zeitler, D.N.; Lee, D.L.; Singhal, M.; Shivaratri, N.; Wong, W.Y.P.: ¬An analysis of performance and cost factors in searching large text databases using parallel search systems (1994)
0.01
0.013302632 = product of:
0.026605263 = sum of:
0.026605263 = product of:
0.053210527 = sum of:
0.053210527 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053210527 = score(doc=7657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 7657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The results of modelling the performance of searching large text databases (>10 GBytes) via various parallel hardware architectures and search algorithms are discussed. The performance under load and the cost of each configuration are compared. Strengths, weaknesses, performance sensitivities, and search features supported for each configuration are also addressed. In addition, a common search workload used in the modelling is described. The search workload is derived from a set of searches run against the Chemical Abstracts file of bibliographic and abstract text available on STN International. This common workload is applied to all configurations modelled to provide a common basis of comparison
-
Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993)
0.01
0.012301013 = product of:
0.024602026 = sum of:
0.024602026 = product of:
0.04920405 = sum of:
0.04920405 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04920405 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 23. 1.1999 19:22:09
-
Reinisch, F.: Wer suchet - der findet? : oder Die Überwindung der sprachlichen Grenzen bei der Suche in Volltextdatenbanken (2000)
0.01
0.012301013 = product of:
0.024602026 = sum of:
0.024602026 = product of:
0.04920405 = sum of:
0.04920405 = weight(_text_:22 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04920405 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2000 17:48:06
-
Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS und eLib : Information Retrieval und Search Engines in Full-text Databases (2001)
0.01
0.012301013 = product of:
0.024602026 = sum of:
0.024602026 = product of:
0.04920405 = sum of:
0.04920405 = weight(_text_:22 in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04920405 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2001 12:22:31
-
Dambeck, H.; Engler, T.: Gesucht und gefunden : Neun Volltext-Suchprogramme für den Desktop (2002)
0.01
0.012301013 = product of:
0.024602026 = sum of:
0.024602026 = product of:
0.04920405 = sum of:
0.04920405 = weight(_text_:22 in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04920405 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- c't. 2002, H.22, S.190-197
-
Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989)
0.01
0.00922576 = product of:
0.01845152 = sum of:
0.01845152 = product of:
0.03690304 = sum of:
0.03690304 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03690304 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 1.1996 10:22:31
