-
Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011)
0.06
0.06406054 = product of:
0.12812108 = sum of:
0.12812108 = sum of:
0.09121804 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09121804 = score(doc=302,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.03690304 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03690304 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) is currently the most broadly used bibliographic standard for encoding and exchanging bibliographic data. However, MARC may not fully support representation of the dynamic nature and semantics of digital resources because of its rigid and single-layered linear structure. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model, which is designed to overcome the problems of MARC, does not provide sufficient data elements and adopts a predetermined hierarchy. A flexible structure for bibliographic data with detailed data elements is needed. Integrating MARC format with the hierarchical structure of FRBR is one approach to meet this need. The purpose of this research is to propose an approach that can facilitate interoperability between MARC and FRBR by providing a conceptual structure that can function as a mediator between MARC data elements and FRBR attributes.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Gray, B.: Cataloging the special collections of Allegheny college (2005)
0.06
0.059152298 = product of:
0.118304595 = sum of:
0.118304595 = sum of:
0.07525105 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07525105 = score(doc=127,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.043053545 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043053545 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Scholars have long noted the significance of Allegheny College's special collections to American cultural and educational history. Special collections have value to colleges and universities as publicity devices to draw scholars, students, and funding to the institution. Catalogers have an important role to play in marketing the library and the college through improved bibliographic access to these collections. Rare book and manuscript cataloging presents many challenges to catalogers, especially at smaller institutions. This report traces the evolution of Allegheny College's catalog, from book format in 1823, through card format, and finally to online. It also explores the bibliographic challenges created as the library moved from one format to another.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010)
0.06
0.059152298 = product of:
0.118304595 = sum of:
0.118304595 = sum of:
0.07525105 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07525105 = score(doc=4309,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.043053545 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043053545 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009)
0.06
0.05795009 = product of:
0.11590018 = sum of:
0.11590018 = sum of:
0.07899714 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07899714 = score(doc=3601,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.44699866 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.03690304 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03690304 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Some members of the library community, including the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, have suggested that libraries should open up their catalogs to allow users to add descriptive tags to the bibliographic data in catalog records. The web site LibraryThing currently permits its members to add such user tags to its records for books and therefore provides a useful resource to contrast with library bibliographic records. A comparison between the LibraryThing tags for a group of books and the library-supplied subject headings for the same books shows that users and catalogers approach these descriptors very differently. Because of these differences, user tags can enhance subject access to library materials, but they cannot entirely replace controlled vocabularies such as the Library of Congress subject headings.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005)
0.06
0.05500804 = product of:
0.11001608 = sum of:
0.11001608 = sum of:
0.06081203 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06081203 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.04920405 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04920405 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008)
0.06
0.05500804 = product of:
0.11001608 = sum of:
0.11001608 = sum of:
0.06081203 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06081203 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.04920405 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04920405 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007)
0.06
0.05500804 = product of:
0.11001608 = sum of:
0.11001608 = sum of:
0.06081203 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06081203 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.04920405 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04920405 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews the enormous changes in cataloging and classification reflected in the literature of 2003 and 2004, and discusses major themes and issues. Traditional cataloging and classification tools have been re-vamped and new resources have emerged. Most notable themes are: the continuing influence of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Control (FRBR); the struggle to understand the ever-broadening concept of an "information entity"; steady developments in metadata-encoding standards; and the globalization of information systems, including multilinguistic challenges.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Madison, O.M.A.: Utilizing the FRBR framework in designing user-focused digital content and access systems (2006)
0.06
0.05500804 = product of:
0.11001608 = sum of:
0.11001608 = sum of:
0.06081203 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06081203 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
0.04920405 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04920405 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the rapidly expanding environment of emerging electronic content and the importance of librarians to partner with new research and teaching communities in meeting users' needs to find, identify, select, and obtain the information and resources they need. The methodology and framework of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records could serve as a useful tool in building expanded access and content systems.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014)
0.05
0.05070197 = product of:
0.10140394 = sum of:
0.10140394 = sum of:
0.0645009 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0645009 = score(doc=2608,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.3649729 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.03690304 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03690304 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys the English-language literature on cataloging and classification published during 2011 and 2012, covering both theory and application. A major theme of the literature centered on Resource Description and Access (RDA), as the period covered in this review includes the conclusion of the RDA test, revisions to RDA, and the implementation decision. Explorations in the theory and practical applications of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), upon which RDA is organized, are also heavily represented. Library involvement with linked data through the creation of prototypes and vocabularies are explored further during the period. Other areas covered in the review include: classification, controlled vocabularies and name authority, evaluation and history of cataloging, special formats cataloging, cataloging and discovery services, non-AACR2/RDA metadata, cataloging workflows, and the education and careers of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Banush, D.; Kurth, M:; Pajerek, J.: Rehabilitating killer serials : an automated strategy for maintaining E-journal metadata (2005)
0.04
0.04225164 = product of:
0.08450328 = sum of:
0.08450328 = sum of:
0.053750746 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053750746 = score(doc=124,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.30414405 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.030752534 = weight(_text_:22 in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030752534 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Cornell University Library (CUL) has developed a largely automated method for providing title-level catalog access to electronic journals made available through aggregator packages. CUL's technique for automated e-journal record creation and maintenance relies largely on the conversion of externally supplied metadata into streamlined, abbreviated-level MARC records. Unlike the Cooperative Online Serials Cataloging Program's recently implemented aggregator-neutral approach to e-journal cataloging, CUL's method involves the creation of a separate bibliographic record for each version of an e-journal title in order to facilitate automated record maintenance. An indexed local field indicates the aggregation to which each title belongs and enables machine manipulation of all the records associated with a specific aggregation. Information encoded in another locally defined field facilitates the identification of all of the library's e-journal titles and allows for the automatic generation of a Web-based title list of e-journals. CUL's approach to providing title-level catalog access to its e-journal aggregations involves a number of tradeoffs in which some elements of traditional bibliographic description (such as subject headings and linking fields) are sacrificed in the interest of timeliness and affordability. URLs (Uniform Resource Locators) and holdings information are updated on a regular basis by use of automated methods that save on staff costs.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Bowen, J.: FRBR : coming soon to your library? (2005)
0.04
0.04125603 = product of:
0.08251206 = sum of:
0.08251206 = sum of:
0.04560902 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04560902 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
0.03690304 = weight(_text_:22 in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03690304 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) data model holds great potential for improving access to library resources, but may not affect all libraries in the same way. The Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules), assisted by the work of its Format Variation Working Group, is exploring ways to incorporate FRBR into the next edition of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules to facilitate collocation at the level of the FRBR entity expression. Several library system vendors are also adding FRBR-based functionality to their systems. A combination of these two approaches to FRBR can provide significant benefits to users. Most FRBR entities and attributes are already present in library catalog records, and the influence of FRBR can also be seen in existing library activities. FRBR is thus not something totally foreign, but a fresh, more rigorous way of thinking about what libraries already do that provides a basis for designing new ways to improve users' access to library resources.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Lundy, M.W.: Evidence of application of the DCRB core standard in WorldCat and RLIN (2006)
0.04
0.04125603 = product of:
0.08251206 = sum of:
0.08251206 = sum of:
0.04560902 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04560902 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
0.03690304 = weight(_text_:22 in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03690304 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Core Standard for Rare Books, known as the DCRB Core standard, was approved by the Program for Cooperative Cataloging for use beginning in January 1999. Comparable to the core standards for other types of materials, the DCRB Core standard provides requirements for an intermediate level of bibliographic description for the cataloging of rare books. While the Core Standard for Books seems to have found a place in general cataloging practice, the DCRB Core standard appears to have met with resistance among rare book cataloging practitioners. This study investigates the extent to which such resistance exists by examining all of the DCRB Core records in the OCLC (Online Computer Library Center) Online Union Catalog (WorldCat) and the Research Libraries Croup Union Catalog (RLIN) databases that were created during the standard's first five years. The study analyzes the content of the records for adherence to the standard and investigates the ways in which the flexibility of the standard and cataloger's judgment augmented many records with more than the mandatory elements of description and access.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009)
0.04
0.04125603 = product of:
0.08251206 = sum of:
0.08251206 = sum of:
0.04560902 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04560902 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
0.03690304 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03690304 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study is an examination of the overlap between author-assigned keywords and cataloger-assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) for a set of electronic theses and dissertations in Ohio State University's online catalog. The project is intended to contribute to the literature on the issue of keywords versus controlled vocabularies in the use of online catalogs and databases. Findings support previous studies' conclusions that both keywords and controlled vocabularies complement one another. Further, even in the presence of bibliographic record enhancements, such as abstracts or summaries, keywords and subject headings provided a significant number of unique terms that could affect the success of keyword searches. Implications for the maintenance of controlled vocabularies such as LCSH also are discussed in light of the patterns of matches and nonmatches found between the keywords and their corresponding subject headings.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Filk, C.: Online, Internet und Digitalkultur : eine Bibliographie zur jüngsten Diskussion um die Informationsgesellschaft (1996)
0.03
0.030443456 = product of:
0.060886912 = sum of:
0.060886912 = product of:
0.121773824 = sum of:
0.121773824 = weight(_text_:22 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.121773824 = score(doc=44,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 9.1997 19:22:27
- Source
- Rundfunk und Geschichte. 22(1996) H.2/3, S.184-193
-
Murfin, M.E.; Wynar, L.R.: Reference service : an annotated bibliographic guide (1977)
0.03
0.030406015 = product of:
0.06081203 = sum of:
0.06081203 = product of:
0.12162406 = sum of:
0.12162406 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12162406 = score(doc=4617,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 4617, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4617)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Metz, A.: Community service : a bibliography (1996)
0.02
0.024602026 = product of:
0.04920405 = sum of:
0.04920405 = product of:
0.0984081 = sum of:
0.0984081 = weight(_text_:22 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0984081 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.10.1996 14:22:33
-
Albers, C.: Zeitungen in Bibliotheken : Aufsätze, Monographien und Rezensionen aus den Jahren 2002-2003. Mit Nachträgen für die Jahre 1980-2001 (2004)
0.02
0.021745324 = product of:
0.04349065 = sum of:
0.04349065 = product of:
0.0869813 = sum of:
0.0869813 = weight(_text_:22 in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0869813 = score(doc=4,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 13:32:22
-
Denda, K.: Beyond subject headings : a structured information retrieval tool for interdisciplinary fields (2005)
0.02
0.021526773 = product of:
0.043053545 = sum of:
0.043053545 = product of:
0.08610709 = sum of:
0.08610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08610709 = score(doc=1038,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Jones, E.: ¬The FRBR model as applied to continuing resources (2005)
0.02
0.021526773 = product of:
0.043053545 = sum of:
0.043053545 = product of:
0.08610709 = sum of:
0.08610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08610709 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Global books in print plus : complete English-language bibliographic information from the United States, United Kingdom, continental Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Africa, Asia, Latin America, Canada, and the oceanic states (1994)
0.02
0.01900376 = product of:
0.03800752 = sum of:
0.03800752 = product of:
0.07601504 = sum of:
0.07601504 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07601504 = score(doc=7837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.045395818 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 7837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
