Search (5841 results, page 2 of 293)

  1. Julien, H.: Bibliographic instruction trends in Canadian academic libraries (1997) 0.08 
    0.07726679 = product of:
  0.15453358 = sum of:
    0.15453358 = sum of:
      0.10532953 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10532953 = score(doc=2072,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.5959982 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
      0.04920405 = weight(_text_:22 in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04920405 = score(doc=2072,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Determines how bibliographic instruction in Canadian academic libraries is evolving to meet this need in the current dynamic environment. The survey data revealed that traditional content and delivery continues to be stressed. Technology is reportedly changing bibliographic instruction in positive ways, towards the teaching of critical evaluation and research strategies and incorporating more hand-on user training
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 22(1997) no.2, S.1-15
  2. Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: ¬The effectiveness of copy cotaloging at eliminating typographical errors in shared bibliographic records (2004) 0.07 
    0.074737296 = product of:
  0.14947459 = sum of:
    0.14947459 = sum of:
      0.10642105 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10642105 = score(doc=4849,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
      0.043053545 = weight(_text_:22 in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043053545 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Typographical errors in bibliographic records can cause retrieval problems in online catalogs. This study examined one hundred typographical errors in records in the OCLC WorldCat database. The local catalogs of five libraries holding the items described by the bibliographic records with typographical errors were searched to determine whether each library had corrected the errors. The study found that only 35.8 percent of the errors had been corrected. Knowledge of copy cataloging error rates can help underscore the importance of quality data in bibliographic utilities and, further, can serve as an indication to libraries whether they need to pay more attention to correcting types in the copy cataloging process.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.07 
    0.07252696 = sum of:
  0.054075442 = product of:
    0.21630177 = sum of:
      0.21630177 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21630177 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.38486624 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.01845152 = product of:
    0.03690304 = sum of:
      0.03690304 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03690304 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  4. Riva, P.: Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2004) 0.07 
    0.069443956 = product of:
  0.13888791 = sum of:
    0.13888791 = sum of:
      0.10198487 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10198487 = score(doc=136,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.5770728 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
      0.03690304 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03690304 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Bibliographic relationships have taken on even greater importance in the context of ongoing efforts to integrate concepts from the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) into cataloging codes and database structures. In MARC 21, the linking entry fields are a major mechanism for expressing relationships between bibliographic records. Taxonomies of bibliographic relationships have been proposed by Tillett, with an extension by Smiraglia, and in FRBR itself. The present exercise is to provide a detailed bidirectional mapping of the MARC 21 linking fields to these two schemes. The correspondence of the Tillett taxonomic divisions to the MARC categorization of the linking fields as chronological, horizontal, or vertical is examined as well. Application of the findings to MARC format development and system functionality is discussed.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015) 0.07 
    0.069443956 = product of:
  0.13888791 = sum of:
    0.13888791 = sum of:
      0.10198487 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10198487 = score(doc=2610,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.5770728 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
      0.03690304 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03690304 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Aggregates have been a frequent topic of discussion between library science researchers. This study seeks to better understand aggregates through the analysis of a sample of bibliographic records and review of the cataloging treatment of aggregates. The study focuses on determining how common aggregates are in library collections, what types of aggregates exist, how aggregates are described in bibliographic records, and the criteria for identifying aggregates from the information in bibliographic records. A sample of bibliographic records representing textual resources was taken from OCLC's WorldCat database. More than 20 percent of the sampled records represented aggregates and more works were embodied in aggregates than were embodied in single work manifestations. A variety of issues, including cataloging practices and the varying definitions of aggregates, made it difficult to accurately identify and quantify the presence of aggregates using only the information from bibliographic records.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Analyses of bibliographies (1973) 0.07 
    0.06876005 = product of:
  0.1375201 = sum of:
    0.1375201 = sum of:
      0.07601504 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07601504 = score(doc=3846,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
      0.061505068 = weight(_text_:22 in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061505068 = score(doc=3846,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    SIMON, H.R.: Introduction: why analyze bibliographies?; MARTYN, J.: Secondary services and the rising tide of paper; BROOKES, B.C.: Numerical methods of bibliographic analysis; THOMPSON, L.S.: The humanities: a state of the art report; BOTTLE, R.T.: Information obtainable from analyses of scientific bibliographies; SIMON, H.R.: Outlook: the analyses of bibliographies in the future
    Source
    Library trends. 22(1973), no.1
  7. Hogan, S.A.: Educating users about catalogues and cataloguing : the impossible dream (1993) 0.07 
    0.06876005 = product of:
  0.1375201 = sum of:
    0.1375201 = sum of:
      0.07601504 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07601504 = score(doc=6437,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
      0.061505068 = weight(_text_:22 in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061505068 = score(doc=6437,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.2, S.23-26
  8. Olson, N.B.: Cataloging computer files (1992) 0.07 
    0.06876005 = product of:
  0.1375201 = sum of:
    0.1375201 = sum of:
      0.07601504 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07601504 = score(doc=7631,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 7631, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7631)
      0.061505068 = weight(_text_:22 in 7631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061505068 = score(doc=7631,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7631, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7631)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.4, S.72 (R. Templeton); Technical services quarterly 11(1994) no.3, S.91-92 (P. Holzenberg)
  9. Saffady, W.: ¬The bibliographic utilities in 1993 : a survey of cataloging support and other services; OCLC (1993) 0.07 
    0.06876005 = product of:
  0.1375201 = sum of:
    0.1375201 = sum of:
      0.07601504 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07601504 = score(doc=3090,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
      0.061505068 = weight(_text_:22 in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061505068 = score(doc=3090,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  10. Saffady, W.: ¬The bibliographic utilities in 1993 : a survey of cataloging support and other services; AGILE 3 (1993) 0.07 
    0.06876005 = product of:
  0.1375201 = sum of:
    0.1375201 = sum of:
      0.07601504 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07601504 = score(doc=3091,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 3091, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3091)
      0.061505068 = weight(_text_:22 in 3091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061505068 = score(doc=3091,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3091, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3091)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  11. Saffady, W.: ¬The bibliographic utilities in 1993 : a survey of cataloging support and other services; Interactive Access System (1993) 0.07 
    0.06876005 = product of:
  0.1375201 = sum of:
    0.1375201 = sum of:
      0.07601504 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07601504 = score(doc=3092,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 3092, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3092)
      0.061505068 = weight(_text_:22 in 3092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061505068 = score(doc=3092,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3092, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3092)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  12. Saffady, W.: ¬The bibliographic utilities in 1993 : a survey of cataloging support and other services; Open DRANET (1993) 0.07 
    0.06876005 = product of:
  0.1375201 = sum of:
    0.1375201 = sum of:
      0.07601504 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07601504 = score(doc=3093,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 3093, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3093)
      0.061505068 = weight(_text_:22 in 3093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061505068 = score(doc=3093,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3093, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3093)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  13. Saffady, W.: ¬The bibliographic utilities in 1993 : a survey of cataloging support and other services; RLIN (1993) 0.07 
    0.06876005 = product of:
  0.1375201 = sum of:
    0.1375201 = sum of:
      0.07601504 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07601504 = score(doc=3094,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 3094, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3094)
      0.061505068 = weight(_text_:22 in 3094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061505068 = score(doc=3094,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3094, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3094)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  14. Saffady, W.: ¬The bibliographic utilities in 1993 : a survey of cataloging support and other services; UTLAS (1993) 0.07 
    0.06876005 = product of:
  0.1375201 = sum of:
    0.1375201 = sum of:
      0.07601504 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07601504 = score(doc=3095,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 3095, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3095)
      0.061505068 = weight(_text_:22 in 3095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061505068 = score(doc=3095,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3095, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3095)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  15. Saffady, W.: ¬The bibliographic utilities in 1993 : a survey of cataloging support and other services; Western Library Network (1993) 0.07 
    0.06876005 = product of:
  0.1375201 = sum of:
    0.1375201 = sum of:
      0.07601504 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07601504 = score(doc=3096,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 3096, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3096)
      0.061505068 = weight(_text_:22 in 3096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061505068 = score(doc=3096,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3096, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3096)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  16. Boeuf, P. le: ¬The Impact of the FRBR model an the future revisions of the ISBDs : a challenge for the IFLA Section an Cataloging (2002) 0.07 
    0.06876005 = product of:
  0.1375201 = sum of:
    0.1375201 = sum of:
      0.07601504 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07601504 = score(doc=3954,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
      0.061505068 = weight(_text_:22 in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061505068 = score(doc=3954,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30. 8.2005 9:12:22
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 31(2002) no.1, S.3-6
  17. Holley, R.P.: Is popular culture forgotten? (1993) 0.07 
    0.06760844 = product of:
  0.13521688 = sum of:
    0.13521688 = sum of:
      0.09216333 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09216333 = score(doc=5054,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.52149844 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
      0.043053545 = weight(_text_:22 in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043053545 = score(doc=5054,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The 1991 IFLA programme given by the section on bibliography presented the theme that national bibliography becomes part of national memeory by recording the publications of the nation. Examines whether the widely distributed publications of popular culture are 'forgotten' by national bibliography. Considers the bibliographic control of newspapers, mass market publications and erotica in the US bibliographic control system. For the last 2 categories, searches selected titles in the OCLC database where many publications were found with wide distribution but recorded by few or no libraries. Popular culture materials should be recorded in national bibliographies to provide a more extended and historically accurate national memory
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.1, S.13-17
  18. Snow, M.: Visual depictions and the use of MARC : a view from the trenches of slide librarianship (1989) 0.07 
    0.06760844 = product of:
  0.13521688 = sum of:
    0.13521688 = sum of:
      0.09216333 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09216333 = score(doc=2862,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.52149844 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
      0.043053545 = weight(_text_:22 in 2862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043053545 = score(doc=2862,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2862, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2862)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. The only way to get bibliographic records on to campus on-line library catalogues, and slide records on the national bibliographic utilities, is through the use of MARC. Discusses the importance of having individual slide and photograph records on the national bibliographic utilities, and considers the obstacles which currently make this difficult. Discusses mapping to MARC from data base management systems.
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:51:36
  19. Parka, A.L.; Panchyshyn, R.S.: ¬The path to an RDA hybridized catalog : lessons from the Kent State University Libraries' RDA enrichment project (2016) 0.07 
    0.06760844 = product of:
  0.13521688 = sum of:
    0.13521688 = sum of:
      0.09216333 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09216333 = score(doc=2632,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.52149844 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
      0.043053545 = weight(_text_:22 in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043053545 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article describes in detail the library implementation of a Resource Description and Access (RDA) Enrichment project. The library "hybridized," or enriched legacy data from Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules bibliographic records by the addition of specific RDA elements. The project also cleaned up various other elements in the bibliographic data that were not directly RDA-related. There were over 28 million changes and edits made to these records, changes that would never have been made otherwise because the library lacked the resources to do them independently. The enrichment project made the bibliographic data consistent, and helped prepared the data for its eventual transition to a linked data environment.
    Date
    21. 1.2016 19:08:22
  20. Gresham, J.L.: ¬The place of religion in the universe of knowledge according to various systems of bibliographic classification (1994) 0.07 
    0.06760262 = product of:
  0.13520524 = sum of:
    0.13520524 = sum of:
      0.086001195 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.086001195 = score(doc=905,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17672792 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
      0.04920405 = weight(_text_:22 in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04920405 = score(doc=905,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15896842 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045395818 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Considers ways in which bibliographic classification schemes have attempted to map the subject of religion into their treatment of the universe of knowledge and attemps to understand the different conceptions of religion reflected by these various classification schemes. Specific schemes considered include: DDC, LoC, BC, Ernest Cushing Richardson Classification; Julia Pettee's Union Classification; CC
    Date
    20.10.2000 14:22:53

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 4925
  • m 487
  • el 291
  • s 219
  • b 44
  • x 42
  • r 41
  • i 29
  • p 27
  • ? 11
  • n 11
  • d 4
  • l 2
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications