Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

Broughton, V.: ¬The development of a common auxiliary schedule of property : a preliminary survey and proposal for its development (1998) 0.09

0.08908096 = product of:
  0.13362144 = sum of:
    0.10964687 = weight(_text_:development in 6410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10964687 = score(doc=6410,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.68479896 = fieldWeight in 6410, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6410)
    0.023974571 = product of:
      0.07192371 = sum of:
        0.07192371 = weight(_text_:29 in 6410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07192371 = score(doc=6410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6410)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Source: Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 20(1998), S.27-29

Broughton, V.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification Second Edition (2009) 0.02

0.017229345 = product of:
  0.05168803 = sum of:
    0.05168803 = weight(_text_:development in 3755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05168803 = score(doc=3755,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.32281733 = fieldWeight in 3755, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3755)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract: This entry looks at the origins of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition and the theory on which it is built. The reasons for the decision to revise the classification are examined, as are the influences on classification theory of the mid-twentieth century. The process of revision and construction of schedules using facet analysis is described. The use of BC2 is considered along with some recent development work on thesaural and digital formats.

Broughton, V.: Brian Vickery, September 11, 1918-October 17, 2009 (2011) 0.02

0.017229345 = product of:
  0.05168803 = sum of:
    0.05168803 = weight(_text_:development in 1788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05168803 = score(doc=1788,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.32281733 = fieldWeight in 1788, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1788)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract: The article reviews the life and work of Brian Campbell Vickery, one of the major figures of British classification and information retrieval, and a scholar of international reputation. His career as librarian, researcher, and academic is described, as is the part he played in the development of information science theory in the twentieth century. Some of his most significant publications are listed, with reference to the scale and breadth of his published work overall.

Broughton, V.: ¬A new common auxiliary table for relations, processes and operations (2002) 0.01

0.013185343 = product of:
  0.039556026 = sum of:
    0.039556026 = product of:
      0.11866807 = sum of:
        0.11866807 = weight(_text_:29 in 3784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11866807 = score(doc=3784,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.7694941 = fieldWeight in 3784, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3784)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 11. 8.2005 12:27:29
Source: Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 24(2002), S.29-35

Broughton, V.: Faceted classification in support of diversity : the role of concepts and terms in representing religion (2020) 0.01
```
0.012922008 = product of:
  0.038766023 = sum of:
    0.038766023 = weight(_text_:development in 5992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038766023 = score(doc=5992,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.242113 = fieldWeight in 5992, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5992)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

The paper examines the development of facet analysis as a methodology and the role it plays in building classifications and other knowledge-organization tools. The use of categorical analysis in areas other than library and information science is also considered. The suitability of the faceted approach for humanities documentation is explored through a critical description of the FATKS (Facet Analytical Theory in Managing Knowledge Structure for Humanities) project carried out at University College London. This research focused on building a conceptual model for the subject of religion together with a relational database and search-and-browse interfaces that would support some degree of automatic classification. The paper concludes with a discussion of the differences between the conceptual model and the vocabulary used to populate it, and how, in the case of religion, the choice of terminology can create an apparent bias in the system.
Broughton, V.; Lane, H.: Classification schemes revisited : applications to Web indexing and searching (2000) 0.01
```
0.010768341 = product of:
  0.03230502 = sum of:
    0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 2476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03230502 = score(doc=2476,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 2476, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2476)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

Basic skills of classification and subject indexing have been little taught in British library schools since automation was introduced into libraries. However, development of the Internet as a major medium of publication has stretched the capability of search engines to cope with retrieval. Consequently, there has been interest in applying existing systems of knowledge organization to electronic resources. Unfortunately, the classification systems have been adopted without a full understanding of modern classification principles. Analytico-synthetic schemes have been used crudely, as in the case of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC). The fully faceted Bliss Bibliographical Classification, 2nd edition (BC2) with its potential as a tool for electronic resource retrieval is virtually unknown outside academic libraries
Broughton, V.; Lane, H.: ¬The Bliss Bibliographic Classification in action : moving from a special to a universal faceted classification via a digital platform (2004) 0.01
```
0.010768341 = product of:
  0.03230502 = sum of:
    0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 2633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03230502 = score(doc=2633,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 2633, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2633)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

This paper examines the differences in the functional requirements of a faceted classification system when used in a conventional print-based environment (where the emphasis is on the browse function of the classification) as compared to its application to digital collections (where the retrieval function is paramount). The use of the second edition of Bliss's Bibliographic Classification (BC2) as a general classification for the physical organization of undergraduate collections in the University of Cambridge is described. The development of an online tool for indexing of digital resources using the Bliss terminologies is also described, and the advantages of facet analysis for data structuring and system syntax within the prototype tool are discussed. The move from the print-based environment to the digital makes different demands an both the content and the syntax of the classification, and while the conceptual structure remains similar, manipulation of the scheme and the process of content description can be markedly different.
Broughton, V.: Facet analysis as a tool for modelling subject domains and terminologies (2011) 0.01
```
0.010768341 = product of:
  0.03230502 = sum of:
    0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03230502 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

Facet analysis is proposed as a general theory of knowledge organization, with an associated methodology that may be applied to the development of terminology tools in a variety of contexts and formats. Faceted classifications originated as a means of representing complexity in semantic content that facilitates logical organization and effective retrieval in a physical environment. This is achieved through meticulous analysis of concepts, their structural and functional status (based on fundamental categories), and their inter-relationships. These features provide an excellent basis for the general conceptual modelling of domains, and for the generation of KOS other than systematic classifications. This is demonstrated by the adoption of a faceted approach to many web search and visualization tools, and by the emergence of a facet based methodology for the construction of thesauri. Current work on the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (Second Edition) is investigating the ways in which the full complexity of faceted structures may be represented through encoded data, capable of generating intellectually and mechanically compatible forms of indexing tools from a single source. It is suggested that a number of research questions relating to the Semantic Web could be tackled through the medium of facet analysis.
Broughton, V.: ¬The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval (2006) 0.01
```
0.010768341 = product of:
  0.03230502 = sum of:
    0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03230502 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

Purpose - The aim of this article is to estimate the impact of faceted classification and the faceted analytical method on the development of various information retrieval tools over the latter part of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Design/methodology/approach - The article presents an examination of various subject access tools intended for retrieval of both print and digital materials to determine whether they exhibit features of faceted systems. Some attention is paid to use of the faceted approach as a means of structuring information on commercial web sites. The secondary and research literature is also surveyed for commentary on and evaluation of facet analysis as a basis for the building of vocabulary and conceptual tools. Findings - The study finds that faceted systems are now very common, with a major increase in their use over the last 15 years. Most LIS subject indexing tools (classifications, subject heading lists and thesauri) now demonstrate features of facet analysis to a greater or lesser degree. A faceted approach is frequently taken to the presentation of product information on commercial web sites, and there is an independent strand of theory and documentation related to this application. There is some significant research on semi-automatic indexing and retrieval (query expansion and query formulation) using facet analytical techniques. Originality/value - This article provides an overview of an important conceptual approach to information retrieval, and compares different understandings and applications of this methodology.
Broughton, V.: ¬The respective roles of intellectual creativity and automation in representing diversity : human and machine generated bias (2019) 0.01
```
0.010768341 = product of:
  0.03230502 = sum of:
    0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 5728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03230502 = score(doc=5728,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 5728, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5728)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

The paper traces the development of the discussion around ethical issues in artificial intelligence, and considers the way in which humans have affected the knowledge bases used in machine learning. The phenomenon of bias or discrimination in machine ethics is seen as inherited from humans, either through the use of biased data or through the semantics inherent in intellectually- built tools sourced by intelligent agents. The kind of biases observed in AI are compared with those identified in the field of knowledge organization, using religious adherents as an example of a community potentially marginalized by bias. A practical demonstration is given of apparent religious prejudice inherited from source material in a large database deployed widely in computational linguistics and automatic indexing. Methods to address the problem of bias are discussed, including the modelling of the moral process on neuroscientific understanding of brain function. The question is posed whether it is possible to model religious belief in a similar way, so that robots of the future may have both an ethical and a religious sense and themselves address the problem of prejudice.
Broughton, V.: Science and knowledge organization : an editorial (2021) 0.01
```
0.010768341 = product of:
  0.03230502 = sum of:
    0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03230502 = score(doc=593,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 593, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=593)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

The purpose of this article is to identify the most important factors and features in the evolution of thesauri and ontologies through a dialectic model. This model relies on a dialectic process or idea which could be discovered via a dialectic method. This method has focused on identifying the logical relationship between a beginning proposition, or an idea called a thesis, a negation of that idea called the antithesis, and the result of the conflict between the two ideas, called a synthesis. During the creation of knowledge organization systems (KOSs), the identification of logical relations between different ideas has been made possible through the consideration and use of the most influential methods and tools such as dictionaries, Roget's Thesaurus, thesaurus, micro-, macro- and metathesauri, ontology, lower, middle and upper level ontologies. The analysis process has adapted a historical methodology, more specifically a dialectic method and documentary method as the reasoning process. This supports our arguments and synthesizes a method for the analysis of research results. Confirmed by the research results, the principle of unity has shown to be the most important factor in the development and evolution of the structure of knowledge organization systems and their types. There are various types of unity when considering the analysis of logical relations. These include the principle of unity of alphabetical order, unity of science, semantic unity, structural unity and conceptual unity. The results have clearly demonstrated a movement from plurality to unity in the assembling of the complex structure of knowledge organization systems to increase information and knowledge storage and retrieval performance.

Broughton, V.: ¬A new classification for the literature of religion (2000) 0.01

0.009323443 = product of:
  0.027970329 = sum of:
    0.027970329 = product of:
      0.08391099 = sum of:
        0.08391099 = weight(_text_:29 in 353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08391099 = score(doc=353,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 353, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=353)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source: International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.4, S.59-61

Broughton, V.; Slavic, A.: Building a faceted classification for the humanities : principles and procedures (2007) 0.01
```
0.008614672 = product of:
  0.025844015 = sum of:
    0.025844015 = weight(_text_:development in 2875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025844015 = score(doc=2875,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04384008 = queryNorm
        0.16140866 = fieldWeight in 2875, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2875)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to provide an overview of principles and procedures involved in creating a faceted classification scheme for use in resource discovery in an online environment. Design/methodology/approach - Facet analysis provides an established rigorous methodology for the conceptual organization of a subject field, and the structuring of an associated classification or controlled vocabulary. This paper explains how that methodology was applied to the humanities in the FATKS project, where the objective was to explore the potential of facet analytical theory for creating a controlled vocabulary for the humanities, and to establish the requirements of a faceted classification appropriate to an online environment. A detailed faceted vocabulary was developed for two areas of the humanities within a broader facet framework for the whole of knowledge. Research issues included how to create a data model which made the faceted structure explicit and machine-readable and provided for its further development and use. Findings - In order to support easy facet combination in indexing, and facet searching and browsing on the interface, faceted classification requires a formalized data structure and an appropriate tool for its management. The conceptual framework of a faceted system proper can be applied satisfactorily to humanities, and fully integrated within a vocabulary management system. Research limitations/implications - The procedures described in this paper are concerned only with the structuring of the classification, and do not extend to indexing, retrieval and application issues. Practical implications - Many stakeholders in the domain of resource discovery consider developing their own classification system and supporting tools. The methods described in this paper may clarify the process of building a faceted classification and may provide some useful ideas with respect to the vocabulary maintenance tool. Originality/value - As far as the authors are aware there is no comparable research in this area.

Broughton, V.: Organizing a national humanities portal : a model for the classification and subject management of digital resources (2002) 0.01

0.007991524 = product of:
  0.023974571 = sum of:
    0.023974571 = product of:
      0.07192371 = sum of:
        0.07192371 = weight(_text_:29 in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07192371 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 29. 8.2004 9:14:57

Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.01

0.007919635 = product of:
  0.023758903 = sum of:
    0.023758903 = product of:
      0.07127671 = sum of:
        0.07127671 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07127671 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 22. 9.2007 15:41:14

Broughton, V.: Facet analysis as a fundamental theory for structuring subject organization tools (2007) 0.01

0.0053276825 = product of:
  0.015983047 = sum of:
    0.015983047 = product of:
      0.04794914 = sum of:
        0.04794914 = weight(_text_:29 in 537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04794914 = score(doc=537,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 537, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=537)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 26.12.2011 13:21:29

Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008) 0.00

0.004619787 = product of:
  0.0138593605 = sum of:
    0.0138593605 = product of:
      0.04157808 = sum of:
        0.04157808 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04157808 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 9. 2.1997 18:44:22

Broughton, V.: ¬A faceted classification as the basis of a faceted terminology : conversion of a classified structure to thesaurus format in the Bliss Bibliographic Classification, 2nd Edition (2008) 0.00

0.003995762 = product of:
  0.011987286 = sum of:
    0.011987286 = product of:
      0.035961855 = sum of:
        0.035961855 = weight(_text_:29 in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035961855 = score(doc=1857,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 31. 5.2008 19:11:29

Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999) 0.00

0.0039598173 = product of:
  0.011879452 = sum of:
    0.011879452 = product of:
      0.035638355 = sum of:
        0.035638355 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035638355 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 10. 8.2001 13:22:14

Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001) 0.00

0.0033298018 = product of:
  0.009989405 = sum of:
    0.009989405 = product of:
      0.029968213 = sum of:
        0.029968213 = weight(_text_:29 in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029968213 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04384008 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 29. 6.2014 17:31:49

Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Types

Themes