-
Hellsten, I.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The construction of interdisciplinarity : the development of the knowledge base and programmatic focus of the journal Climatic Change, 1977-2013 (2016)
0.04
0.04390232 = product of:
0.06585348 = sum of:
0.055953935 = weight(_text_:development in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055953935 = score(doc=3089,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.34946 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
0.009899544 = product of:
0.029698629 = sum of:
0.029698629 = weight(_text_:22 in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029698629 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Climate change as a complex physical and social issue has gained increasing attention in the natural as well as the social sciences. Climate change research has become more interdisciplinary and even transdisciplinary as a typical Mode-2 science that is also dependent on an application context for its further development. We propose to approach interdisciplinarity as a co-construction of the knowledge base in the reference patterns and the programmatic focus in the editorials in the core journal of the climate-change sciences-Climatic Change-during the period 1977-2013. First, we analyze the knowledge base of the journal and map journal-journal relations on the basis of the references in the articles. Second, we follow the development of the programmatic focus by analyzing the semantics in the editorials. We argue that interdisciplinarity is a result of the co-construction between different agendas: The selection of publications into the knowledge base of the journal, and the adjustment of the programmatic focus to the political context in the editorials. Our results show a widening of the knowledge base from referencing the multidisciplinary journals Nature and Science to citing journals from specialist fields. The programmatic focus follows policy-oriented issues and incorporates public metaphors.
- Date
- 24. 8.2016 17:53:22
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003)
0.03
0.03376365 = product of:
0.050645474 = sum of:
0.038766023 = weight(_text_:development in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038766023 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.242113 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
0.011879452 = product of:
0.035638355 = sum of:
0.035638355 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035638355 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Aggregated journal-journal citations can be used for mapping the intellectual organization of the sciences in terms of specialties because the latter can be considered as interreading communities. Can the journal-journal citations also be used as early indicators of change by comparing the files for two subsequent years? Probabilistic entropy measures enable us to analyze changes in large datasets at different levels of aggregation and in considerable detail. Compares Journal Citation Reports of the Social Science Citation Index for 1999 with similar data for 1998 and analyzes the differences using these measures. Compares the various indicators with similar developments in the Science Citation Index. Specialty formation seems a more important mechanism in the development of the social sciences than in the natural and life sciences, but the developments in the social sciences are volatile. The use of aggregate statistics based on the Science Citation Index is ill-advised in the case of the social sciences because of structural differences in the underlying dynamics.
- Date
- 6.11.2005 19:02:22
-
Lucio-Arias, D.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬An indicator of research front activity : measuring intellectual organization as uncertainty reduction in document sets (2009)
0.03
0.030954782 = product of:
0.04643217 = sum of:
0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 3297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03230502 = score(doc=3297,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 3297, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3297)
0.01412715 = product of:
0.04238145 = sum of:
0.04238145 = weight(_text_:29 in 3297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04238145 = score(doc=3297,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.2748193 = fieldWeight in 3297, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3297)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- When using scientific literature to model scholarly discourse, a research specialty can be operationalized as an evolving set of related documents. Each publication can be expected to contribute to the further development of the specialty at the research front. The specific combinations of title words and cited references in a paper can then be considered as a signature of the knowledge claim in the paper: New words and combinations of words can be expected to represent variation, while each paper is at the same time selectively positioned into the intellectual organization of a field using context-relevant references. Can the mutual information among these three dimensions - title words, cited references, and sequence numbers - be used as an indicator of the extent to which intellectual organization structures the uncertainty prevailing at a research front? The effect of the discovery of nanotubes (1991) on the previously existing field of fullerenes is used as a test case. Thereafter, this method is applied to science studies with a focus on scientometrics using various sample delineations. An emerging research front about citation analysis can be indicated.
- Date
- 2. 2.2010 19:29:29
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Goldstone, R.L.: Interdisciplinarity at the journal and specialty level : the changing knowledge bases of the journal cognitive science (2014)
0.03
0.025844015 = product of:
0.077532046 = sum of:
0.077532046 = weight(_text_:development in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.077532046 = score(doc=1187,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.484226 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Using the referencing patterns in articles in Cognitive Science over three decades, we analyze the knowledge base of this literature in terms of its changing disciplinary composition. Three periods are distinguished: (A) construction of the interdisciplinary space in the 1980s, (B) development of an interdisciplinary orientation in the 1990s, and (C) reintegration into "cognitive psychology" in the 2000s. The fluidity and fuzziness of the interdisciplinary delineations in the different visualizations can be reduced and clarified using factor analysis. We also explore newly available routines ("CorText") to analyze this development in terms of "tubes" using an alluvial map and compare the results with an animation (using "Visone"). The historical specificity of this development can be compared with the development of "artificial intelligence" into an integrated specialty during this same period. Interdisciplinarity should be defined differently at the level of journals and of specialties.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Probst, C.: ¬The delineation of an interdisciplinary specialty in terms of a journal set : the case of communication studies (2009)
0.02
0.018274479 = product of:
0.054823436 = sum of:
0.054823436 = weight(_text_:development in 2952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054823436 = score(doc=2952,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.34239948 = fieldWeight in 2952, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2952)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A journal set in an interdisciplinary or newly developing area can be determined by including the journals classified under the most relevant ISI Subject Categories into a journal-journal citation matrix. Despite the fuzzy character of borders, factor analysis of the citation patterns enables us to delineate the specific set by discarding the noise. This methodology is illustrated using communication studies as a hybrid development between political science and social psychology. The development can be visualized using animations which support the claim that a specific journal set in communication studies is increasingly developing, notably in the being cited patterns. The resulting set of 28 journals in communication studies is smaller and more focused than the 45 journals classified by the ISI Subject Categories as Communication. The proposed method is tested for its robustness by extending the relevant environments to sets including many more journals.
-
Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.; Leydesdorff, L.: BRICS countries and scientific excellence : a bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers (2015)
0.02
0.0152287325 = product of:
0.045686197 = sum of:
0.045686197 = weight(_text_:development in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045686197 = score(doc=2047,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.2853329 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) are notable for their increasing participation in science and technology. The governments of these countries have been boosting their investments in research and development to become part of the group of nations doing research at a world-class level. This study investigates the development of the BRICS countries in the domain of top-cited papers (top 10% and 1% most frequently cited papers) between 1990 and 2010. To assess the extent to which these countries have become important players at the top level, we compare the BRICS countries with the top-performing countries worldwide. As the analyses of the (annual) growth rates show, with the exception of Russia, the BRICS countries have increased their output in terms of most frequently cited papers at a higher rate than the top-cited countries worldwide. By way of additional analysis, we generate coauthorship networks among authors of highly cited papers for 4 time points to view changes in BRICS participation (1995, 2000, 2005, and 2010). Here, the results show that all BRICS countries succeeded in becoming part of this network, whereby the Chinese collaboration activities focus on the US.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Johnson, M.W.; Ivanova, I.: Toward a calculus of redundancy : signification, codification, and anticipation in cultural evolution (2018)
0.01
0.013259299 = product of:
0.039777897 = sum of:
0.039777897 = product of:
0.059666842 = sum of:
0.029968213 = weight(_text_:29 in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029968213 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
0.029698629 = weight(_text_:22 in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029698629 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 9.2018 11:22:09
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Why words and co-word cannot map the development of the science (1997)
0.01
0.012922008 = product of:
0.038766023 = sum of:
0.038766023 = weight(_text_:development in 147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038766023 = score(doc=147,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.242113 = fieldWeight in 147, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=147)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Schank, T.: Dynamic animations of journal maps : indicators of structural changes and interdisciplinary developments (2008)
0.01
0.012922008 = product of:
0.038766023 = sum of:
0.038766023 = weight(_text_:development in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038766023 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.242113 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The dynamic analysis of structural change in the organization of the sciences requires, methodologically, the integration of multivariate and time-series analysis. Structural change - for instance, interdisciplinary development - is often an objective of government interventions. Recent developments in multidimensional scaling (MDS) enable us to distinguish the stress originating in each time-slice from the stress originating from the sequencing of time-slices, and thus to locally optimize the trade-offs between these two sources of variance in the animation. Furthermore, visualization programs like Pajek and Visone allow us to show not only the positions of the nodes, but also their relational attributes such as betweenness centrality. Betweenness centrality in the vector space can be considered as an indicator of interdisciplinarity. Using this indicator, the dynamics of the citation-impact environments of the journals Cognitive Science, Social Networks, and Nanotechnology are animated and assessed in terms of interdisciplinarity among the disciplines involved.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Mapping (USPTO) patent data using overlays to Google Maps (2012)
0.01
0.012922008 = product of:
0.038766023 = sum of:
0.038766023 = weight(_text_:development in 288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038766023 = score(doc=288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.242113 = fieldWeight in 288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=288)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A technique is developed using patent information available online (at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office) for the generation of Google Maps. The overlays indicate both the quantity and the quality of patents at the city level. This information is relevant for research questions in technology analysis, innovation studies, and evolutionary economics, as well as economic geography. The resulting maps can also be relevant for technological innovation policies and research and development management, because the U.S. market can be considered the leading market for patenting and patent competition. In addition to the maps, the routines provide quantitative data about the patents for statistical analysis. The cities on the map are colored according to the results of significance tests. The overlays are explored for the Netherlands as a "national system of innovations" and further elaborated in two cases of emerging technologies: ribonucleic acid interference (RNAi) and nanotechnology.
-
Lucio-Arias, D.; Leydesdorff, L.: Main-path analysis and path-dependent transitions in HistCite(TM)-based historiograms (2008)
0.01
0.010768341 = product of:
0.03230502 = sum of:
0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 2373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03230502 = score(doc=2373,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 2373, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2373)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- With the program HistCite(TM) it is possible to generate and visualize the most relevant papers in a set of documents retrieved from the Science Citation Index. Historical reconstructions of scientific developments can be represented chronologically as developments in networks of citation relations extracted from scientific literature. This study aims to go beyond the historical reconstruction of scientific knowledge, enriching the output of HistCiteTM with algorithms from social-network analysis and information theory. Using main-path analysis, it is possible to highlight the structural backbone in the development of a scientific field. The expected information value of the message can be used to indicate whether change in the distribution (of citations) has occurred to such an extent that a path-dependency is generated. This provides us with a measure of evolutionary change between subsequent documents. The forgetting and rewriting of historically prior events at the research front can thus be indicated. These three methods - HistCite, main path and path dependent transitions - are applied to a set of documents related to fullerenes and the fullerene-like structures known as nanotubes.
-
Shelton, R.D.; Leydesdorff, L.: Publish or patent : bibliometric evidence for empirical trade-offs in national funding strategies (2012)
0.01
0.010768341 = product of:
0.03230502 = sum of:
0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 70) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03230502 = score(doc=70,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 70, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=70)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Multivariate linear regression models suggest a trade-off in allocations of national research and development (R&D). Government funding and spending in the higher education sector encourage publications as a long-term research benefit. Conversely, other components such as industrial funding and spending in the business sector encourage patenting. Our results help explain why the United States trails the European Union in publications: The focus in the United States is on industrial funding-some 70% of its total R&D investment. Likewise, our results also help explain why the European Union trails the United States in patenting, since its focus on government funding is less effective than industrial funding in predicting triadic patenting. Government funding contributes negatively to patenting in a multiple regression, and this relationship is significant in the case of triadic patenting. We provide new forecasts about the relationships of the United States, the European Union, and China for publishing; these results suggest much later dates for changes than previous forecasts because Chinese growth has been slowing down since 2003. Models for individual countries might be more successful than regression models whose parameters are averaged over a set of countries because nations can be expected to differ historically in terms of the institutional arrangements and funding schemes.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Zhou, P.: Co-word analysis using the Chinese character set (2008)
0.00
0.0046617216 = product of:
0.013985164 = sum of:
0.013985164 = product of:
0.041955493 = sum of:
0.041955493 = weight(_text_:29 in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041955493 = score(doc=1970,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 12. 7.2008 18:46:29
-
Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The construction and globalization of the knowledge base in inter-human communication systems (2003)
0.00
0.0039598173 = product of:
0.011879452 = sum of:
0.011879452 = product of:
0.035638355 = sum of:
0.035638355 = weight(_text_:22 in 1621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035638355 = score(doc=1621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1621)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 5.2003 19:48:04
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009)
0.00
0.0039598173 = product of:
0.011879452 = sum of:
0.011879452 = product of:
0.035638355 = sum of:
0.035638355 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035638355 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:07:20
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.00
0.0039598173 = product of:
0.011879452 = sum of:
0.011879452 = product of:
0.035638355 = sum of:
0.035638355 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035638355 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
-
Chen, C.; Leydesdorff, L.: Patterns of connections and movements in dual-map overlays : a new method of publication portfolio analysis (2014)
0.00
0.0033298018 = product of:
0.009989405 = sum of:
0.009989405 = product of:
0.029968213 = sum of:
0.029968213 = weight(_text_:29 in 1200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029968213 = score(doc=1200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1200)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 1.2014 16:38:28
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Ivanova, I.A.: Mutual redundancies in interhuman communication systems : steps toward a calculus of processing meaning (2014)
0.00
0.0033298018 = product of:
0.009989405 = sum of:
0.009989405 = product of:
0.029968213 = sum of:
0.029968213 = weight(_text_:29 in 1211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029968213 = score(doc=1211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1211)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 1.2014 16:44:54
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.00
0.003299848 = product of:
0.009899544 = sum of:
0.009899544 = product of:
0.029698629 = sum of:
0.029698629 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029698629 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
