-
Sauperl, A.; Rozman, D.: Subject cataloguing at the crossroads : with or without subject heading strings? (2007)
0.06
0.056272756 = product of:
0.08440913 = sum of:
0.06461004 = weight(_text_:development in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06461004 = score(doc=245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.40352166 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
0.019799087 = product of:
0.059397258 = sum of:
0.059397258 = weight(_text_:22 in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059397258 = score(doc=245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Knjiznice za prihodnost : napredek in sodelovanje : zbornik referatov [ Libraries for the future : development and collaboration: proceedings / Professional conference of Union of associations of Slovene Librarians], Portoroz, October 22-23, 2007; ed. M. Ambrozic
-
Sauperl, A.; Saye, J.D.: Pebbles for the mosais of cataloging expertise : what do problems in expert systems for cataloging reveal about cataloging expertise? (1999)
0.03
0.03376365 = product of:
0.050645474 = sum of:
0.038766023 = weight(_text_:development in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038766023 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.242113 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
0.011879452 = product of:
0.035638355 = sum of:
0.035638355 = weight(_text_:22 in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035638355 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Twenty-five years of research in expert systems for descriptive cataloging and related areas are reviewed. Researchers who developed prototype expert cataloging systems in the 1980s found that cataloging rules are extremely comprehensive and complicated, but still insufficient to permit these systems accurate cataloging results. Those researchers also identified smaller areas that need to be pursued for successful implementation of expert cataloging systems. Subsequent research has focused on narrower areas. Cataloging rules were studied and more was learned about problems with their logic structure and organization. Another focus was optical reading of bibliographic elements in documents. Categories of responsibility and graphic design continue to pose problems. The visual characteristics of documents were studied to understand more about the automatic recognition of bibliographic elements necessary for the bibliographic description of documents. The systematic study of the cataloging process, necessary for development of expert systems, may result in improvement of manual working procedures and enrich the education of new catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Sauperl, A.: Precoordination or not? : a new view of the old question (2009)
0.03
0.028136378 = product of:
0.042204566 = sum of:
0.03230502 = weight(_text_:development in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03230502 = score(doc=3611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.20176083 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
0.009899544 = product of:
0.029698629 = sum of:
0.029698629 = weight(_text_:22 in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029698629 = score(doc=3611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper aims to discuss some long-standing issues of the development of a subject heading language as pre- or postcoordinated. Design/methodology/approach - In a review of literature on pre- and postcoordination and user behaviour, 20 criteria originally discussed by Svenonius are considered. Findings - The advantages and disadvantages of pre- and postcoordinated systems are on a very similar level. Most subject heading languages developed recently are precoordinated. They all require investments in highly skilled intellectual work, and are therefore expensive and difficult to maintain. Postcoordinated systems seem to have more advantages for information providers, but less for users. However, most of these disadvantages could be overcome by known information retrieval models and techniques. Research limitations/implications - The criteria originally discussed by Svenonius are difficult to evaluate in an exact manner. Some of them are also irrelevant because of changes in information retrieval systems. Practical implications - It was found that the decision on whether to use a pre- or postcoordinated system cannot be taken independent of consideration of the subject authority file and the functions of an information retrieval system, which should support users on one hand and information providers and indexers on the other. Originality/value - This literature review brings together some findings that have not been considered together previously.
- Date
- 20. 6.2010 14:22:43
-
Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002)
0.02
0.016881825 = product of:
0.025322737 = sum of:
0.019383011 = weight(_text_:development in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019383011 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.1210565 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
0.005939726 = product of:
0.017819177 = sum of:
0.017819177 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017819177 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1535205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 27. 9.2005 14:22:19
-
Sauperl, A.; Saye, J.D.: Have we made any progress? : catalogues of the future revisited (2009)
0.02
0.0152287325 = product of:
0.045686197 = sum of:
0.045686197 = weight(_text_:development in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045686197 = score(doc=2843,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16011542 = queryWeight, product of:
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.2853329 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.652261 = idf(docFreq=3116, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Library online public access catalogues (OPACs) are considered to be unattractive in comparison with popular internet sites. In 2000, the authors presented some suggestions on how library catalogues should change. Have librarians actually made their OPACs more user-friendly by adopting techniques and technologies already present in other information resources? This paper aims to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The characteristics of four OPACs, one online bookstore and two internet search engines are analyzed. The paper reviews some of the changes and directions suggested by researchers and adds some of authors own. All this is in the hope that library catalogues will survive "Google attack." Findings - Changes are identified in the information services studied over a seven-year period. Least development is found in library catalogues. Suggestions are made for library catalogues of the future. Research limitations/implications - A library catalogue, a web search engine and an internet bookstore cannot be compared directly because of differences in scope. But features from each could be fruitfully used in others. Practical implications - OPACs must be both attractive and useful. They should be at least as easy to use as their competitors. With the results of research as well as the knowledge librarians have many years, the profession should be able to develop better OPACs than we have today and regain lost ground in the "competition" for those with information needs. Originality/value - A comparison of OPAC features in 2000 and 2007, even if subjective, can provide a panoramic view of the development of the field.
-
Sauperl, A.; Fidler, M.L.; Rozman, D.; Rozman Salobir, M.: Conclusions from the 2007 "Conference on the use of Universal Decimal Classification" in Slovenia (2007)
0.01
0.007991524 = product of:
0.023974571 = sum of:
0.023974571 = product of:
0.07192371 = sum of:
0.07192371 = weight(_text_:29 in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07192371 = score(doc=674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 29(2007), S.21-23
-
Saye, J.; Sauperl, A.: Cataloging education on the sunny side of the alps (Slovenia) (2005)
0.01
0.0053276825 = product of:
0.015983047 = sum of:
0.015983047 = product of:
0.04794914 = sum of:
0.04794914 = weight(_text_:29 in 530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04794914 = score(doc=530,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 530, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=530)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 9.2008 18:53:35
-
Sauperl, A.: Four views of a novel : characteristics of novels as described by publishers, librarians, literary theorists, and readers (2013)
0.00
0.0046617216 = product of:
0.013985164 = sum of:
0.013985164 = product of:
0.041955493 = sum of:
0.041955493 = weight(_text_:29 in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041955493 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1542157 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.04384008 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 19:07:21
